or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 53 comments are related to an article called:

Anything other than JA606?

Page 2 of 3

posted on 2/9/11

Lol

posted on 2/9/11

Good idea?

-----------

Yes

posted on 2/9/11

NO MORE SNIEJDER ARTICLES EVER PLEASE CAPTAIN

posted on 2/9/11

My point was a serious one,

Alternatively how about electric shock to his nether regions?

That should help the "voices" keep quiet

posted on 2/9/11

comment by Admin1 (U1)


posted 37 minutes ago

That is not really what we want. If a user filters all and sundry such that you can't comment, the best coarse of action is to reciprocate with the filter such that they are erased from your site experience. There is no perfect solution to such problems.
------------------------
but surely the filter should not be abused.

I wanted to comment on an article about tonights game.. Not directly to the author of the article but comment on something that someone has written in the thread.

I was unable to do that because The author has me filtered.

The only way me, and several others could get our points across would be create another article about the same topic

I just don't think it is fair that a certain poster can stop me from addressing a point with someone taking apart in a thread, just because the author is a complete plank.

i could filter him back but I won't. I'm an adult for starters

posted on 2/9/11

comment by the legend that is Paul Scholes ^^ (U8591)


posted 37 minutes ago

Would you just be able to filter the keywords,

Something like.

Wesley
Sneijder
Going
To
United
Captain
Positivity

That would work, me thinks

And everytime its flagged up, a great big fist comes out of the Captains screen to send him back on the right track.

--------------------------
Technically, I would say that would be a rather difficult and costly task involving the re-invention of the computer screen incorporating a complex robotics system

I'll donate 10 grand

posted on 2/9/11

Admin1

This topic, i.e. Captain Positivity and his abuse of the filter is a recurring theme on this board.

Whilst I understand the difficulties involved, I think that his abuse of the filter is making this board a bit of a joke!

As a previous poster has said, he wants to engage with fellow United fans on a particular topic but cannot due to the fact that CP does not like his opinion. Do you really want duplicate articles on this board, i.e. those who have not been filtered and those that have?

As i spend most of my time on this board I have realised that one poster has actually created a division on here, surely non-Wums should be able to engage with their fellow fans and not be subject to censorship by CP!

posted on 2/9/11

Anyone know what the "short names" option does?

posted on 2/9/11

Aye no more Sneijder ! I've already said this plenty of times.

comment by Admin1 (U1)

posted on 2/9/11

BillyBobTaunton (U4886)
As i spend most of my time on this board
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
That is a price to pay but we have more pressing concerns than CP. If he is such a problem, don't comment on his articles create your own articles that are open to all. Good sensible articles that create sensible debate. In that way it is a win win for the site and your own experience.

posted on 2/9/11

Billybob has been filtered by me so don't see why he's bothered he can't even see what I say.

posted on 2/9/11

Can someone who hasnt been filtered by him please expalin to CP what is being said. At the same time, tell him to man up!!

posted on 2/9/11

I know what's said, log out then you can view then log in to comment.

But I don't wish to discuss anything with certain people who seem to get offensive rather than try discuss sensibly.

posted on 2/9/11

I know what's said, log out then you can view then log in to comment.
_________________________________

May I just ask, what exactly was the point in filtering people if you are going to do that?

comment by Admin1 (U1)

posted on 2/9/11

Captain it may be wise to ask us to clear your filter as a compromise between your promise to leave the site and our increasing temptation to facilitate that. This is due to the disharmony that has been instigated by your recent activities.

posted on 2/9/11

I mean just now I did that.

Normally couldn't give a monkey what people say.

Plenty of other less angry people that actually support Utd on here to talk to.

posted on 2/9/11

Admin - can I point out that the deal was changed by him NOT me !! He offered loser to pay fiver over paypal.

So I'm under no obligation to quit.

However if you so wish then you can remove filtered people who will get one more chance.

Any offensive comments will mean filtering as I don't come on here for that. Plenty of chat rooms they can go vent their angers on.

posted on 2/9/11

I'm just as irritated as they are but I don't complain like little girl.

I get on with it.

comment by Admin1 (U1)

posted on 2/9/11

Thanks captain. If unfiltered members chose to insult you then that is a breach of our house rules and you are within you rites not to tolerate that.

posted on 2/9/11

That's why I've filtered each one though.

Admin- i don't filter unless some is offensive.

Tbh why are they bothered ??? I don't wanna talk to them they clearly don't wanna talk to me so what is issue ??

comment by Admin1 (U1)

posted on 2/9/11

The issue may have been the backtrack on a bet on which all members might not have been happy with. But lets draw a line under it and lets not make any more bets.

posted on 2/9/11

"comment by UnitedRedMacca- I taught Rooney and berbatov the overhead kick (U2024)
posted 2 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by Captain_Positivity (U2394)


posted 5 minutes ago

This site is 9.98 out of 10 if you want replica of 606.

Only shame not quite so many but numbers growing.
-------------------------------
Did you really just say that?

You have half of us filtered. That's why it appeas quiet to you.

You have abused a tool that was meant to help this forum for debate, not hinder it"

posted on 2/9/11

Admin - I'm not having that, I've not back tracked at all.

The deal was revised by him not me, plus Eric did a vote and majority want me to stay.

Haven't backtracked at all.

posted on 2/9/11

Obviously the majority wanted you to stay, you filtered anybody who wanted you gone.

posted on 2/9/11

Obviously the majority wanted you to stay, you filtered anybody who wanted you gone.

---

Anyone could vote as I didn't create the article with the vote

Wouldn't matter if I'd filtered someone cos I didn't create the article.

By the way, carry on and you'll be filtered again.

Page 2 of 3