or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 2136 comments are related to an article called:

Chelsea FC

Page 18 of 86

posted on 14/10/16

Who would you be interested in?

Embolo + Gomes
=
x + Wanyama

Also would be interested in a permanent move for Laporte as well.

posted on 14/10/16

Would like all 3 for Blind in some sort of deal preferably.

Embolo + Gomes + Laporte
=
x + Witsel + Blind

Enq.

posted on 14/10/16

He covers a lot of positions for me. Plays CB, LB and DM and could play in any of them 3 roles, would be tough to let him go. Laporte covers CB and Gomes covers the midfield but I've got enough good LB's as it is and I want Embolo on RW.

posted on 14/10/16

I have already considered that. I've already thought about Yarmolenko but he is at Birmingham.

I'm still looking for a better LW, Konoplayanka fills the gap better though. Always liked Yarmolenko and Konoplayanka as wide players and always thought.

Still doesn't take away my interest for Gomes or Laporte though.

posted on 14/10/16

Then nadz must have sold him out a little while ago, doubt it was 3 months ago. Still thinking on it.

Still wanting both Gomes and Laporte though.

posted on 14/10/16

No worries, they are the one's I'd want from you.

Gomes + Laporte
=
Witsel + Blind

Enq.

posted on 14/10/16

Blind would be the improvement imo. Covers more positions than Laporte and would be more useful to you as well imo.

posted on 14/10/16

Anything else I can do to swing the deal?

posted on 14/10/16

Yarmolenko got sold out a couple of months ago I think and went to Roma anyway so wouldn't be able to get him I don't think.

posted on 14/10/16

I think you gave Renegade an offer a couple of months ago.

posted on 14/10/16

I will when LSTD answers the other 400 offers I've put on there first.

comment by Welshy (U1348)

posted on 14/10/16

comment by Fan Gillhaus 1903 (U3339)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
Heinrichs & Wilshire
for
Dahoud?
----------------------------------------
Hi, it's a more than reasonable offer bro but I think Dahoud is very valuable to my team and don't really plan on losing him unless it's a real head turner of a deal.

comment by Welshy (U1348)

posted on 14/10/16

I actually hadn't thought of an answer to that

My game is heavily dependant on having a CM who can press hard throughout the whole game and I only have Dahoud and Goretzka for that position so if one is out injured I have cover.

comment by Welshy (U1348)

posted on 14/10/16

Nah don't think so will have a think but not sure if I want to lose or not

comment by Welshy (U1348)

posted on 14/10/16

Ta will give it some thought

Just out of interest would you do Volland + Dahoud for Lemina + Henrichs + Pjaca?

comment by Welshy (U1348)

posted on 14/10/16

I'll think about it bro

comment by $ka (U3522)

posted on 15/10/16

Interested in Wilshere

comment by $ka (U3522)

posted on 15/10/16

Not interested in Butland but I was thinking maybe Sterling + x = Fabinho and Wilshere?

comment by $ka (U3522)

posted on 15/10/16

Would prefer if it was someone else, I've spent 9 months trying to get Jedvaj

comment by $ka (U3522)

posted on 15/10/16

Hmm, I was hoping to put Paredes in a 3 with Kovacic and Wilshere so that would be a tough one.

Anyone else?

comment by $ka (U3522)

posted on 15/10/16

Like, anyone apart from Kos, Marquinhos, Luis and Benzema. Maybe Ribery as well.

comment by $ka (U3522)

posted on 15/10/16

Martin Montoya

comment by $ka (U3522)

posted on 15/10/16

So the whole deal would be


Sterling + Paredes
=
Fabinho + Pjaca + Wilshere?

comment by $ka (U3522)

posted on 15/10/16

Yeah, ok, I'll do that

posted on 15/10/16

Well now that you have Sterling, any business there?

Page 18 of 86

Sign in if you want to comment