We all know Woy will put him out there
------
So it would be idiotic to not put him there in a predicted line up
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 39 seconds ago
We all know Woy will put him out there
------
So it would be idiotic to not put him there in a predicted line up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Changing that to favoured line up.
To be fair, a "winger" in a 433 is quite far removed from a winger in a 4 man midfield as Scholes was played in.
If you play someone tucked in on the other side, and as long asVardy can get in alongside the centre forward often. Not far off a diamond to be fair, which it will probably will be
comment by HRH King Ledley (U20095)
posted 2 minutes ago
To be fair, a "winger" in a 433 is quite far removed from a winger in a 4 man midfield as Scholes was played in.
If you play someone tucked in on the other side, and as long asVardy can get in alongside the centre forward often. Not far off a diamond to be fair, which it will probably will be
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Against Turkey, Vardy was hugging the touchline in the first half pretty much, and only came inside once to run behind the defence. Otherwise he was crap out there. Do you think it was a tactical instruction by Woy for him to do that?
I agree, hopefully we play a diamond up front if we are hellbent on playing both Kane and Vardy in the same XI.
Vardy is a waste of time on the wing. This was obvious even against San Marino, for fack sake.
From the players selected it looks as though we may be going for a diamond unfortunately. I think that could be a disaster.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Hart
Clyne
Smalling
Cahill
Bertrand
Dier
Henderson, Wilshere
Alli
Kane, Sturridge
That would be the best team in my option but my predicted lineup is
Hart
Clyne
Smalling
Cahill
Rose
Henderson
Wilshere
Milner
Rooney
Sterling
Kane
I agree if vardy plays he must be a cf.
hart
Walker
Cahill
Smalling
Rose
Dier
Rooney
Alli
Henderson
Vardy
Kane
4-4-2 diamond
Fullbacks for width
England needed Drinky to knock the ball from deep into Vardys runs.
With Horrenderson supplying the passes Vardy may as well go on Honeymoon now and save himself for some decent passes in pre season.
Theresonlyonereds
Dier and Alli will start mate.
comment by Dont cry for me Argentina we have Pochetinno a... (U17539)
posted 10 minutes ago
Theresonlyonereds
Dier and Alli will start mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I hope so.
If Horrenderson starts games then we are going home early
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga... (U1308)
posted 56 seconds ago
If Horrenderson starts games then we are going home early
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What's early?
Won't get out of the group.
Early exit, workmen like midfield with Horrenderson slowing the tempo....
It's gotta be a diamond.
--------------Barkley-----------
--Rooney--------------Sterling
-------------Sturridge-----------
--------Vardy----Kane--------
From your pal, Garth Crooks.
comment by Obers (U3904)
posted 4 minutes ago
It's gotta be a diamond.
--------------Barkley-----------
--Rooney--------------Sterling
-------------Sturridge-----------
--------Vardy----Kane--------
From your pal, Garth Crooks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Sideshow (U11809)
posted 8 hours, 40 minutes ago
Hart
Clyne - Smalling - Stones - Rose
Alli - Dier - Wilshire
Vardy - Rooney - Sterling
Thoughts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Swap that lump up front for Kane and Vardy for an actual winger and then I like this team.
comment by whoskissingcamerasinoz (U1703)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Sideshow (U11809)
posted 8 hours, 40 minutes ago
Hart
Clyne - Smalling - Stones - Rose
Alli - Dier - Wilshire
Vardy - Rooney - Sterling
Thoughts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Swap that lump up front for Kane and Vardy for an actual winger and then I like this team.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But Stones can't be in any squad, he is over rated and makes mistakes
comment by whoskissingcamerasinoz (U1703)
posted 9 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by HRH King Ledley (U20095)
posted 2 minutes ago
To be fair, a "winger" in a 433 is quite far removed from a winger in a 4 man midfield as Scholes was played in.
If you play someone tucked in on the other side, and as long asVardy can get in alongside the centre forward often. Not far off a diamond to be fair, which it will probably will be
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Against Turkey, Vardy was hugging the touchline in the first half pretty much, and only came inside once to run behind the defence. Otherwise he was crap out there. Do you think it was a tactical instruction by Woy for him to do that?
I agree, hopefully we play a diamond up front if we are hellbent on playing both Kane and Vardy in the same XI.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It all depends on who is in the other positions for me.
If the player on the opposite side is a more a playmaker than a forward (say a Barkley rather than a Sterling for example purposes only) then it would free Vardy up more. But its virtually a diamond then anyway in practice, so it may as well be that to start with.
The trick really is to have players in the side that have more than one string to their bow. Mine would have Dier, Milner, Alli, Kane for this reason. All have at least two positions they are comfortable fulfilling, and then tactically you can adjust on the fly, without having to make a sub. If a player is out of position, you should not get caught out horribly.
My side is nominaly a diamond
.......................Hart
Walker...Cahill...Stones....Rose
.......................Dier
............Wilshere....Milner
........................Alli
...............Kane.......Vardy
But with the versatilty in it, it can easily morph in to.....
4231 (perm virtually any front four)
.......................Hart
Walker...Cahill...Stones....Rose
................Dier....Wilshere
.........Alli.......Kane.....Milner
....................Vardy
433 (perm any 3 from Milner, Wilshere and Alli)
.......................Hart
Walker...Cahill...Stones....Rose
..........Milner..Dier...Wilshere
..........Alli......Vardy....Kane
442 (4411 if Kane drops off)
.......................Hart
Walker...Cahill...Stones....Rose
Milner.........Dier....Alli ....Wilshere
..................Kane....Vardy
352
........................Hart
...........Cahill.....Dier...Stones
Walker...Wilshere...Milner.....Rose
..........................Alli
.................Kane.......Vardy
FFS Ledley, stop talking sense, you'll kill the thread
He isn't. He has Stones in each side he proposes!
Personally I'd use Vardy as an impact sub , if we're chasing a game or seeing a game out he will chase every ball down on the break.
Why the fack is this on the Tottenham board?
Sign in if you want to comment
On Behalf of Arro and Myself
Page 1 of 2
posted on 1/6/16
We all know Woy will put him out there
------
So it would be idiotic to not put him there in a predicted line up
posted on 1/6/16
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 39 seconds ago
We all know Woy will put him out there
------
So it would be idiotic to not put him there in a predicted line up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Changing that to favoured line up.
posted on 1/6/16
To be fair, a "winger" in a 433 is quite far removed from a winger in a 4 man midfield as Scholes was played in.
If you play someone tucked in on the other side, and as long asVardy can get in alongside the centre forward often. Not far off a diamond to be fair, which it will probably will be
posted on 1/6/16
comment by HRH King Ledley (U20095)
posted 2 minutes ago
To be fair, a "winger" in a 433 is quite far removed from a winger in a 4 man midfield as Scholes was played in.
If you play someone tucked in on the other side, and as long asVardy can get in alongside the centre forward often. Not far off a diamond to be fair, which it will probably will be
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Against Turkey, Vardy was hugging the touchline in the first half pretty much, and only came inside once to run behind the defence. Otherwise he was crap out there. Do you think it was a tactical instruction by Woy for him to do that?
I agree, hopefully we play a diamond up front if we are hellbent on playing both Kane and Vardy in the same XI.
posted on 1/6/16
Vardy is a waste of time on the wing. This was obvious even against San Marino, for fack sake.
posted on 1/6/16
From the players selected it looks as though we may be going for a diamond unfortunately. I think that could be a disaster.
posted on 1/6/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 1/6/16
No
posted on 1/6/16
Hart
Clyne
Smalling
Cahill
Bertrand
Dier
Henderson, Wilshere
Alli
Kane, Sturridge
That would be the best team in my option but my predicted lineup is
Hart
Clyne
Smalling
Cahill
Rose
Henderson
Wilshere
Milner
Rooney
Sterling
Kane
posted on 1/6/16
I agree if vardy plays he must be a cf.
hart
Walker
Cahill
Smalling
Rose
Dier
Rooney
Alli
Henderson
Vardy
Kane
4-4-2 diamond
Fullbacks for width
posted on 1/6/16
England needed Drinky to knock the ball from deep into Vardys runs.
With Horrenderson supplying the passes Vardy may as well go on Honeymoon now and save himself for some decent passes in pre season.
posted on 1/6/16
Theresonlyonereds
Dier and Alli will start mate.
posted on 1/6/16
comment by Dont cry for me Argentina we have Pochetinno a... (U17539)
posted 10 minutes ago
Theresonlyonereds
Dier and Alli will start mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I hope so.
posted on 1/6/16
If Horrenderson starts games then we are going home early
posted on 1/6/16
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga... (U1308)
posted 56 seconds ago
If Horrenderson starts games then we are going home early
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What's early?
posted on 1/6/16
Won't get out of the group.
Early exit, workmen like midfield with Horrenderson slowing the tempo....
posted on 1/6/16
It's gotta be a diamond.
--------------Barkley-----------
--Rooney--------------Sterling
-------------Sturridge-----------
--------Vardy----Kane--------
From your pal, Garth Crooks.
posted on 1/6/16
comment by Obers (U3904)
posted 4 minutes ago
It's gotta be a diamond.
--------------Barkley-----------
--Rooney--------------Sterling
-------------Sturridge-----------
--------Vardy----Kane--------
From your pal, Garth Crooks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 2/6/16
comment by Sideshow (U11809)
posted 8 hours, 40 minutes ago
Hart
Clyne - Smalling - Stones - Rose
Alli - Dier - Wilshire
Vardy - Rooney - Sterling
Thoughts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Swap that lump up front for Kane and Vardy for an actual winger and then I like this team.
posted on 2/6/16
comment by whoskissingcamerasinoz (U1703)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Sideshow (U11809)
posted 8 hours, 40 minutes ago
Hart
Clyne - Smalling - Stones - Rose
Alli - Dier - Wilshire
Vardy - Rooney - Sterling
Thoughts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Swap that lump up front for Kane and Vardy for an actual winger and then I like this team.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But Stones can't be in any squad, he is over rated and makes mistakes
posted on 2/6/16
comment by whoskissingcamerasinoz (U1703)
posted 9 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by HRH King Ledley (U20095)
posted 2 minutes ago
To be fair, a "winger" in a 433 is quite far removed from a winger in a 4 man midfield as Scholes was played in.
If you play someone tucked in on the other side, and as long asVardy can get in alongside the centre forward often. Not far off a diamond to be fair, which it will probably will be
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Against Turkey, Vardy was hugging the touchline in the first half pretty much, and only came inside once to run behind the defence. Otherwise he was crap out there. Do you think it was a tactical instruction by Woy for him to do that?
I agree, hopefully we play a diamond up front if we are hellbent on playing both Kane and Vardy in the same XI.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It all depends on who is in the other positions for me.
If the player on the opposite side is a more a playmaker than a forward (say a Barkley rather than a Sterling for example purposes only) then it would free Vardy up more. But its virtually a diamond then anyway in practice, so it may as well be that to start with.
The trick really is to have players in the side that have more than one string to their bow. Mine would have Dier, Milner, Alli, Kane for this reason. All have at least two positions they are comfortable fulfilling, and then tactically you can adjust on the fly, without having to make a sub. If a player is out of position, you should not get caught out horribly.
My side is nominaly a diamond
.......................Hart
Walker...Cahill...Stones....Rose
.......................Dier
............Wilshere....Milner
........................Alli
...............Kane.......Vardy
But with the versatilty in it, it can easily morph in to.....
4231 (perm virtually any front four)
.......................Hart
Walker...Cahill...Stones....Rose
................Dier....Wilshere
.........Alli.......Kane.....Milner
....................Vardy
433 (perm any 3 from Milner, Wilshere and Alli)
.......................Hart
Walker...Cahill...Stones....Rose
..........Milner..Dier...Wilshere
..........Alli......Vardy....Kane
442 (4411 if Kane drops off)
.......................Hart
Walker...Cahill...Stones....Rose
Milner.........Dier....Alli ....Wilshere
..................Kane....Vardy
352
........................Hart
...........Cahill.....Dier...Stones
Walker...Wilshere...Milner.....Rose
..........................Alli
.................Kane.......Vardy
posted on 2/6/16
FFS Ledley, stop talking sense, you'll kill the thread
posted on 2/6/16
He isn't. He has Stones in each side he proposes!
posted on 2/6/16
Personally I'd use Vardy as an impact sub , if we're chasing a game or seeing a game out he will chase every ball down on the break.
posted on 2/6/16
Why the fack is this on the Tottenham board?
Page 1 of 2