Comment deleted by Site Moderator

1. England
2. Quarter finals
3. France
4. Poland, Turkey or Croatia

1. England
2. Not even get out of the group
3. Spain
4. Belgium. In saying that, host nations usually go on good runs.

comment by RS 2000® I'm genetically predisposed to eat chicken. Colonel Sanders you give me chicken. (U9953)
posted 5 minutes ago
1. England
2. Not even get out of the group
3. Spain
4. Belgium. In saying that, host nations usually go on good runs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure I would class the worlds top ranked side as a dark horse

Belgium and France dark horses???

Can we say Croatia as a dark horse?

Dreamy midfield, maybe too good for a dark horse?

I actually prefer them to Belgium, who finished 2nd in their group.

I'm English/Welsh

!st or 2nd knockout round for England.

Less sure on Wales, I'd go for group stage exit but a close run thing.

France.

1. Belmonty
2. $hite
3. Germany
4. Wales

1.Manchester
2.same as last time
3.France
4.wales

Wales
1st ko phase
France
No idea

England
Round after group stage
Germany or Spain
Wales could go on a run if bale hits form. Won't win though.

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 4 hours, 58 minutes ago
Belgium and France dark horses???
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ok, France i'll give you that one . Beer can make any half decent side look shïțe - which is a complete 360 to ugly women.

Belgium on the other hand are shïțè with some fantastic individuals. If they won, that would be on parallel to Greece and Denmark.

1. Ingerland
2. Be surprised if we reach quarters
3. France/ Germany
4. Belgium/ Turkey

I don't know where people get the idea that Belgium are rubbish. They've never really gone to a tournament with this generation of players in form having had such a good season (KDB, Lukaku, Spurs defence etc) so we can't tell if they will under or over achieve. In the last World Cup they made the quarters and only just lost to Argentina which is hardly a disgrace. They went to France last year and put 4 past the hosts so can score goals.

The way people talk, Belgium have been awful with this generation for years and years. Truth is, we've never seen what they can do to really judge them

1) England
2) Quarter finals
3) No idea, I'll say Spain.
4) Austria

1.... Northern Ireland

2.... We'll win it obv, one of the form teams (in reality... Hard group and we'll be home early but sure it's a party for the fans going)

3.... France

4.... Croatia maybe... Iceland to make it out of the group, but then should face france

1. Born and live in NZ but my father is English so always support them at tournaments NZ aren't, which is most coz were sht.

2. I'd say the quarters.

3. Germany

4. Austria. In there squad they have alaba, Fuchs, hinteregger, dragovic, wimmer, arnautovic, harnik and januzovic. Some quality players there, if they get a good draw and a head of steam up they could go deep into the tournament.

1. Northern Ireland
2. Either out in the Group stage or Semi Finals. Hopefully the latter
3. Germany
4. Slovakia

1. Northern Ireland
2. Really tough group so just hoping we can get a result o two and see where it takes us. Either way, we're going to have a party in France
3. France
4. Portugal and Poland

The way people talk, Belgium have been awful with this generation for years and years. Truth is, we've never seen what they can do to really judge them

------

Would you still say the same thing if they don't manage to get out of the group stages?

1. Where are you from?
2. How do you reckon your nation will do?
3. Who do think will win it?
4. Who do you think are dark horses to go a long way?
---------

1. England
2. Quarter finals
3. Germany
4. Italy

1. England
2. QF
3. Germany
4. Austria

comment by RS 2000® I'm genetically predisposed to eat chicken. Colonel Sanders you give me chicken. (U9953)
posted 17 minutes ago
The way people talk, Belgium have been awful with this generation for years and years. Truth is, we've never seen what they can do to really judge them

------

Would you still say the same thing if they don't manage to get out of the group stages?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

No because they'll have shown evidence of being rubbish if that happens. Until then I don't know why people don't rate them.

1)England
2)SF
3)France
4)sheep sha99ers

comment by Robb_Mourinho (U20351)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by RS 2000® I'm genetically predisposed to eat chicken. Colonel Sanders yougive me chicken. (U9953)
posted 17 minutes ago
The way people talk, Belgium have been awful with this generation for years and years. Truth is, we've never seen what they can do to really judge them

------

Would you still say the same thing if they don't manage to get out of the group stages?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

No because they'll have shown evidence of being rubbish if that happens. Until then I don't know why people don't rate them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Maybe these people you talk of have already seen enough to not warrant rating them. Moreover, if Belgium don't live up to the high expectations during the EC then peoples thoughts or opinions will be even more justified. Gonna have to wait and see.

comment by RS 2000® I'm genetically predisposed to eat chicken. Colonel Sanders you give me chicken. (U9953)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Robb_Mourinho (U20351)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by RS 2000® I'm genetically predisposed to eat chicken. Colonel Sanders yougive me chicken. (U9953)
posted 17 minutes ago
The way people talk, Belgium have been awful with this generation for years and years. Truth is, we've never seen what they can do to really judge them

------

Would you still say the same thing if they don't manage to get out of the group stages?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

No because they'll have shown evidence of being rubbish if that happens. Until then I don't know why people don't rate them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Maybe these people you talk of have already seen enough to not warrant rating them. Moreover, if Belgium don't live up to the high expectations during the EC then peoples thoughts or opinions will be even more justified. Gonna have to wait and see.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

That's my point though. Where have they seen Belgium enough to judge them either way?