Oh, also, hope everyone on here is doing well! Looking forward to the season ahead with Rodgers in charge.
a very unbiased look at the election from the biggest Sanders supporter on twitter
To be fair, everything I stated is actually true. Apart from the Sanders crushing any other democrat. That's just speculation. But I know I'm right so it doesn't matter.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Not looking good for Bernie - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-36466228
I have no love for Hilary but at least she has had some kind of political experience.
A Trump POTUS does not bear thinking about. He is openly devisive, and as corrupt as they come.
Did anyone see his recent interview with the Huffington Post. Nuts
Didn't Hillary just clinch the Democrats nomination off the California vote?
Greatteams, 44% of Bernie Sanders in West Virginia said they'd vote for Trump over Clinton
To a lot of them, Clinton is just as bad as Trump. She's to the right of him on foreign policy and trade, and again, is as corrupt as you can get.
Paddy, that is actually incorrect. Neither Clinton nor Sanders will have enough pledged delegates to clinch the nomination. So it will be a contested convention at the National Convention in July where the Super Delegates will get to vote. If Bernie wins California, along with New Mexico, Montana, North/South Dakota comfortably, and remains competitive in NJ, they will have lots to think about. Especially with the ongoing FBI investigation. Which is a fcking joke she's allowed to run while under investigation anyway.
Juke, California polls haven't even opened yet.
The polling data has them tied, but that's with likely Democratic voters. But with Sanders being ahead in double digits with Non Party Preference voters, he might (hopefully) win quite comfortably.
Only thing I would add is that oil,auto and banking industries have the same clout in Europe. It`s the same scenario here with regards to lobbying, funding etc.
But, if the choice is Trump or Clinton, well anybody voting for an outspoken racist is basically validating his views. He is dangerous to the world, not just the USA.
Sanders might be a good choice, but he probably won`t be part of the choice, although I actually think Clinton will have him as running mate for the elections. Anything else could be calamitous for us all.
Trump will be a laugh.
A disaster, but a laugh nonetheless
If we are all still here to laugh about it Juke. That such an idiot even gets this close to becoming President should be an embarrassment for the USA
Pallaver, I'm in California which has no chance of going to Trump. So if Clinton is the nominee, I can vote for a 3rd party candidate like the Green Party or something. If I was in an important swing state like Ohio, Florida or Pennsylvania or something, I'd vote for Clinton just to make sure Trump can't win it.
Thing is, if Clinton doesn't get smarter she could be her own worst enemy. She's genuinely a horrible candidate.
comment by california_bhoy (U3605)
posted 1 minute ago
Greatteams, 44% of Bernie Sanders in West Virginia said they'd vote for Trump over Clinton
To a lot of them, Clinton is just as bad as Trump. She's to the right of him on foreign policy and trade, and again, is as corrupt as you can get.
Paddy, that is actually incorrect. Neither Clinton nor Sanders will have enough pledged delegates to clinch the nomination. So it will be a contested convention at the National Convention in July where the Super Delegates will get to vote. If Bernie wins California, along with New Mexico, Montana, North/South Dakota comfortably, and remains competitive in NJ, they will have lots to think about. Especially with the ongoing FBI investigation. Which is a fcking joke she's allowed to run while under investigation anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As I mentioned I have no love for Hilary, however her views (in the main) are significantly more tolerant than Trump’s.
Saying that there are third world despots with more liberal opinions that Trump!
Wonder what would happen if both were indicted...?
I guess she’s the lesser of two evils.
Oh it is
He's got a 50% chance of it. Frightening.
Not much difference to a bunch of Eton schoolboys running our country tbh. Our lot are just more discreet about running us into the ground and shady behind closed doors dealings
Wonder what the odds will be on him being assassinated within weeks if he gets the gig. Secret service would probably let it happen too
CB, I think once she gets the party nomination, that is when this stuff about the emails will really come out.
Don`t you think that you should play it safe though and vote for her instead of a 3rd party? Just in case?
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by california_bhoy (U3605)
posted 1 minute ago
Greatteams, 44% of Bernie Sanders in West Virginia said they'd vote for Trump over Clinton
To a lot of them, Clinton is just as bad as Trump. She's to the right of him on foreign policy and trade, and again, is as corrupt as you can get.
Paddy, that is actually incorrect. Neither Clinton nor Sanders will have enough pledged delegates to clinch the nomination. So it will be a contested convention at the National Convention in July where the Super Delegates will get to vote. If Bernie wins California, along with New Mexico, Montana, North/South Dakota comfortably, and remains competitive in NJ, they will have lots to think about. Especially with the ongoing FBI investigation. Which is a fcking joke she's allowed to run while under investigation anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As I mentioned I have no love for Hilary, however her views (in the main) are significantly more tolerant than Trump’s.
Saying that there are third world despots with more liberal opinions that Trump!
Wonder what would happen if both were indicted...?
I guess she’s the lesser of two evils.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's the thing. I think my generation aren't going to be voting for the lesser of two evils. The two party system is nonsense and more often than not, the two candidates are a joke. People are starting to wake up to how this country is being ran. Thing is, this is probably the worst election to not vote for the lesser of two evils...
Pallaver, her Wall St. speeches, which have been a massive problem for her this year will get leaked to the public I think, and I honestly believe that will be her Romney 47% comment.
Not only that, like I've said before, she's being investigated by the fckn FBI! And it hardly gets even a mention on the news.
Tbh, if he's within like 15 points of her in California come election night, I'll probably play it safe. But I wouldn't be happy voting for someone that represents everything I disagree with. Apart from like 2-3 social issues.
clinton just wants to be president, shes a roaster that wouldnt get a look in it the other candidate wasnt a f...ing mutant.
i can see this being a one term president.
comment by california_bhoy (U3605)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by california_bhoy (U3605)
posted 1 minute ago
Greatteams, 44% of Bernie Sanders in West Virginia said they'd vote for Trump over Clinton
To a lot of them, Clinton is just as bad as Trump. She's to the right of him on foreign policy and trade, and again, is as corrupt as you can get.
Paddy, that is actually incorrect. Neither Clinton nor Sanders will have enough pledged delegates to clinch the nomination. So it will be a contested convention at the National Convention in July where the Super Delegates will get to vote. If Bernie wins California, along with New Mexico, Montana, North/South Dakota comfortably, and remains competitive in NJ, they will have lots to think about. Especially with the ongoing FBI investigation. Which is a fcking joke she's allowed to run while under investigation anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As I mentioned I have no love for Hilary, however her views (in the main) are significantly more tolerant than Trump’s.
Saying that there are third world despots with more liberal opinions that Trump!
Wonder what would happen if both were indicted...?
I guess she’s the lesser of two evils.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's the thing. I think my generation aren't going to be voting for the lesser of two evils. The two party system is nonsense and more often than not, the two candidates are a joke. People are starting to wake up to how this country is being ran. Thing is, this is probably the worst election to not vote for the lesser of two evils...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suppose (ultimately) regardless of political persuasion, voting should be based on which nominee is the more likely to lose their temper and push the ‘bug red button’
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 3 minutes ago
clinton just wants to be president, shes a roaster that wouldnt get a look in it the other candidate wasnt a f...ing mutant.
i can see this being a one term president.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She's been running for President for 30 years. She's just shiiit at it.
Hopefully there will be a genuine 3rd party soon so a Republican won't win the White House in 8 years.
Her whole campaign has been a fear mongering one about defeating Trump. Not on policy or even a message of what she's running on.
She's one of the lizard people
It's got to be Donald, the others are too dodgy
comment by really? (U17250)
posted 22 minutes ago
It's got to be Donald, the others are too dodgy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sign in if you want to comment
Voting day here in California
Page 1 of 2
posted on 7/6/16
Oh, also, hope everyone on here is doing well! Looking forward to the season ahead with Rodgers in charge.
posted on 7/6/16
a very unbiased look at the election from the biggest Sanders supporter on twitter
posted on 7/6/16
To be fair, everything I stated is actually true. Apart from the Sanders crushing any other democrat. That's just speculation. But I know I'm right so it doesn't matter.
posted on 7/6/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/6/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/6/16
Not looking good for Bernie - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-36466228
posted on 7/6/16
I have no love for Hilary but at least she has had some kind of political experience.
A Trump POTUS does not bear thinking about. He is openly devisive, and as corrupt as they come.
Did anyone see his recent interview with the Huffington Post. Nuts
posted on 7/6/16
Didn't Hillary just clinch the Democrats nomination off the California vote?
posted on 7/6/16
Greatteams, 44% of Bernie Sanders in West Virginia said they'd vote for Trump over Clinton
To a lot of them, Clinton is just as bad as Trump. She's to the right of him on foreign policy and trade, and again, is as corrupt as you can get.
Paddy, that is actually incorrect. Neither Clinton nor Sanders will have enough pledged delegates to clinch the nomination. So it will be a contested convention at the National Convention in July where the Super Delegates will get to vote. If Bernie wins California, along with New Mexico, Montana, North/South Dakota comfortably, and remains competitive in NJ, they will have lots to think about. Especially with the ongoing FBI investigation. Which is a fcking joke she's allowed to run while under investigation anyway.
posted on 7/6/16
Juke, California polls haven't even opened yet.
The polling data has them tied, but that's with likely Democratic voters. But with Sanders being ahead in double digits with Non Party Preference voters, he might (hopefully) win quite comfortably.
posted on 7/6/16
Only thing I would add is that oil,auto and banking industries have the same clout in Europe. It`s the same scenario here with regards to lobbying, funding etc.
But, if the choice is Trump or Clinton, well anybody voting for an outspoken racist is basically validating his views. He is dangerous to the world, not just the USA.
Sanders might be a good choice, but he probably won`t be part of the choice, although I actually think Clinton will have him as running mate for the elections. Anything else could be calamitous for us all.
posted on 7/6/16
Trump will be a laugh.
A disaster, but a laugh nonetheless
posted on 7/6/16
If we are all still here to laugh about it Juke. That such an idiot even gets this close to becoming President should be an embarrassment for the USA
posted on 7/6/16
Pallaver, I'm in California which has no chance of going to Trump. So if Clinton is the nominee, I can vote for a 3rd party candidate like the Green Party or something. If I was in an important swing state like Ohio, Florida or Pennsylvania or something, I'd vote for Clinton just to make sure Trump can't win it.
Thing is, if Clinton doesn't get smarter she could be her own worst enemy. She's genuinely a horrible candidate.
posted on 7/6/16
comment by california_bhoy (U3605)
posted 1 minute ago
Greatteams, 44% of Bernie Sanders in West Virginia said they'd vote for Trump over Clinton
To a lot of them, Clinton is just as bad as Trump. She's to the right of him on foreign policy and trade, and again, is as corrupt as you can get.
Paddy, that is actually incorrect. Neither Clinton nor Sanders will have enough pledged delegates to clinch the nomination. So it will be a contested convention at the National Convention in July where the Super Delegates will get to vote. If Bernie wins California, along with New Mexico, Montana, North/South Dakota comfortably, and remains competitive in NJ, they will have lots to think about. Especially with the ongoing FBI investigation. Which is a fcking joke she's allowed to run while under investigation anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As I mentioned I have no love for Hilary, however her views (in the main) are significantly more tolerant than Trump’s.
Saying that there are third world despots with more liberal opinions that Trump!
Wonder what would happen if both were indicted...?
I guess she’s the lesser of two evils.
posted on 7/6/16
Oh it is
He's got a 50% chance of it. Frightening.
posted on 7/6/16
Not much difference to a bunch of Eton schoolboys running our country tbh. Our lot are just more discreet about running us into the ground and shady behind closed doors dealings
Wonder what the odds will be on him being assassinated within weeks if he gets the gig. Secret service would probably let it happen too
posted on 7/6/16
CB, I think once she gets the party nomination, that is when this stuff about the emails will really come out.
Don`t you think that you should play it safe though and vote for her instead of a 3rd party? Just in case?
posted on 7/6/16
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by california_bhoy (U3605)
posted 1 minute ago
Greatteams, 44% of Bernie Sanders in West Virginia said they'd vote for Trump over Clinton
To a lot of them, Clinton is just as bad as Trump. She's to the right of him on foreign policy and trade, and again, is as corrupt as you can get.
Paddy, that is actually incorrect. Neither Clinton nor Sanders will have enough pledged delegates to clinch the nomination. So it will be a contested convention at the National Convention in July where the Super Delegates will get to vote. If Bernie wins California, along with New Mexico, Montana, North/South Dakota comfortably, and remains competitive in NJ, they will have lots to think about. Especially with the ongoing FBI investigation. Which is a fcking joke she's allowed to run while under investigation anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As I mentioned I have no love for Hilary, however her views (in the main) are significantly more tolerant than Trump’s.
Saying that there are third world despots with more liberal opinions that Trump!
Wonder what would happen if both were indicted...?
I guess she’s the lesser of two evils.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's the thing. I think my generation aren't going to be voting for the lesser of two evils. The two party system is nonsense and more often than not, the two candidates are a joke. People are starting to wake up to how this country is being ran. Thing is, this is probably the worst election to not vote for the lesser of two evils...
posted on 7/6/16
Pallaver, her Wall St. speeches, which have been a massive problem for her this year will get leaked to the public I think, and I honestly believe that will be her Romney 47% comment.
Not only that, like I've said before, she's being investigated by the fckn FBI! And it hardly gets even a mention on the news.
Tbh, if he's within like 15 points of her in California come election night, I'll probably play it safe. But I wouldn't be happy voting for someone that represents everything I disagree with. Apart from like 2-3 social issues.
posted on 7/6/16
clinton just wants to be president, shes a roaster that wouldnt get a look in it the other candidate wasnt a f...ing mutant.
i can see this being a one term president.
posted on 7/6/16
comment by california_bhoy (U3605)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by california_bhoy (U3605)
posted 1 minute ago
Greatteams, 44% of Bernie Sanders in West Virginia said they'd vote for Trump over Clinton
To a lot of them, Clinton is just as bad as Trump. She's to the right of him on foreign policy and trade, and again, is as corrupt as you can get.
Paddy, that is actually incorrect. Neither Clinton nor Sanders will have enough pledged delegates to clinch the nomination. So it will be a contested convention at the National Convention in July where the Super Delegates will get to vote. If Bernie wins California, along with New Mexico, Montana, North/South Dakota comfortably, and remains competitive in NJ, they will have lots to think about. Especially with the ongoing FBI investigation. Which is a fcking joke she's allowed to run while under investigation anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As I mentioned I have no love for Hilary, however her views (in the main) are significantly more tolerant than Trump’s.
Saying that there are third world despots with more liberal opinions that Trump!
Wonder what would happen if both were indicted...?
I guess she’s the lesser of two evils.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's the thing. I think my generation aren't going to be voting for the lesser of two evils. The two party system is nonsense and more often than not, the two candidates are a joke. People are starting to wake up to how this country is being ran. Thing is, this is probably the worst election to not vote for the lesser of two evils...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suppose (ultimately) regardless of political persuasion, voting should be based on which nominee is the more likely to lose their temper and push the ‘bug red button’
posted on 7/6/16
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 3 minutes ago
clinton just wants to be president, shes a roaster that wouldnt get a look in it the other candidate wasnt a f...ing mutant.
i can see this being a one term president.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She's been running for President for 30 years. She's just shiiit at it.
Hopefully there will be a genuine 3rd party soon so a Republican won't win the White House in 8 years.
Her whole campaign has been a fear mongering one about defeating Trump. Not on policy or even a message of what she's running on.
She's one of the lizard people
posted on 7/6/16
It's got to be Donald, the others are too dodgy
posted on 7/6/16
comment by really? (U17250)
posted 22 minutes ago
It's got to be Donald, the others are too dodgy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 2