Just what we need. An injury prone player. He's really not that good either.

Admin, there should be a way of giving 5 one stars to an article.
Complete tripe of a post. Sturridge is rank average and injury prone.

£40m should do it and if any issues occur throw Theo in the deal.





So £40,000,001 then?

40m cash or 45m plus Walcott

Sturridge is a great player, and no you can't have him.

Not sure he's quite the same quality but certainly fits the experienced centre half criterion. Do you think thats it for Warburton's 'spending spree'? I'd still like another keeper and forward.

He is really the only English player with some tekkers.

Would love him at Arsenal but with his injury record and our medical team, i just don't see how he would ever be fit

I'd have him at Arsenal more that Vardy, he suits us to a tee. as always his injury record is poor and with our staff being clowns its could be a disaster.

Liverpool seem to have a hard on for Theo why not offer him plus £10Mil for Sturridge. I really think that has a good chance of being accepted.

Sturridge aint going to play every game for Wengers love child Giroud will still play loads of games.

Theo plus 10 mil for studge

Theo valued around £20-25Mil and i doubt Sturridge is anywhere close to £40Mil due to his injury problems.

Theo valued at 25 mil

Fack me your delusional if you think we'd give you studge for Walcott and 10 mil.

comment by BO$$™ (U6401)
posted 9 minutes ago
Theo valued around £20-25Mil and i doubt Sturridge is anywhere close to £40Mil due to his injury problems.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh and studge isn't valued near 40 due to his injury problems but Theo is valued at 25 even with his which are just as bad as sturridges?

Have a word with yourself

If Watford can turn down £25m for Troy facking Feeney then I agree that Walcott must be worth a similar amount.


Only thing is you could then justify £60m+ for Sturridge!

*Deeney, obviously.

What better way to guarantee Giroud is first choice striker next season than signing Sturridge

So we would have Walcott, Welbeck, Wilshere and Sturridge keeping each other company in the medical room for most of the season.

Sturridge has great talent. Thats why City and Chelsea went for him. But he also takes himself out of the game way too often over minor niggles. Thats why Liverpool are talking of selling him. Imagine that at Arsenal where players actually get very serious injuries.

No thanks to injury prone

So we would have Walcott, Welbeck, Wilshere and Sturridge keeping each other company in the medical room for most of the season.
-------------------------
Good English core that!!

sturridge and his spazzy robot dance.....no thanks

RvP was injury prone and we were all disgusted when he was sold. On form the only PL striker I'd take over Sturridge is Aguero who is also incredibly injury prone. He would be a massive gamble at £30M-£35M but a gamble worth taking.

Not sure what game the OP watched. I found him tremendously average.

In general he is a good player and apart from his injuries he would be a fine Addition for Arsenal.

Don't think that Liverpool would sell him.

comment by batsthegunnerinoz (U18355)
posted 40 minutes ago
RvP was injury prone and we were all disgusted when he was sold. On form the only PL striker I'd take over Sturridge is Aguero who is also incredibly injury prone. He would be a massive gamble at £30M-£35M but a gamble worth taking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not a gamble worth taking with our medical department. We have more than enough funds to buy a more reliable striker.

Also I genuinely wasn't annoyed when we sold RVP but I was furious when we signed Giroud and then Sanago to replace him.