Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Sideshow (U11809)
posted 5 minutes ago
Mourinho must be an idiot then for continuing to play the same players who wanted to get rid of him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What options did he have? Drop Matic and play Furrrking Loftus cheek?
Anyone who has played football, even at amateur level, will know how hard it is to perform when so much crap is going on around you.
The 'downing tools' argument is just so simplistic.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
No because Loftus Cheek is garbage and Mourinho wanted Pogba. Wasn't his fault the board couldn't get him the players he needed.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
They've been doing it for years - please don't tell me you've only just noticed
Sidebro, if the player is trash, the player is trash. Loftus Cheek is Championship level, throwing him in in the PL is suicide. Even Matic at 10% is more dependable and less likely to lose you a game, and Matic at 10% is terrible.
comment by Grant (U21057)
Sidebro, if the player is trash, the player is trash. Loftus Cheek is Championship level, throwing him in in the PL is suicide. Even Matic at 10% is more dependable and less likely to lose you a game, and Matic at 10% is terrible.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
FFS RLC has played a handful of minutes and deemed rubbish already!
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
How many minutes did Rashford/Fosu-Mensah/Kane/Alli etc. etc. need to show they were premier league standard? Loftus Cheek is just the next Mceachran and will end up at MK dons or Huddersfield or some other team like that.
Playing Mikel wasn't going to make that much of a difference since he also isn't very good. Mourinho was trying to play Matic back into form as a 100% Matic is a lot better than Mikel even if a 10% Matic isn't.
What good bench options did we have sidebro? Falcao? No. Remy? No.
Wahl
When your fellow Chelsea fans are all saying the same thing that we have you've got to wonder if you're wrong.
However, regardless of their fifa rankings last season based on their real life performances whenever on the pitch RLC was better than Oscar, Oscar apart from the 1st half a dozen games when Ivan was the worst player on the pitch Oscar was continually getting 90 minutes. Ivan as well with suitable options on the bench was staying on the field for 90 minutes at a time. This is unacceptable and down to the manager. Instead Jose was always taking Willian off the field and leaving on a miss firing Pedro, Cesc or Oscar like wtf?
How many minutes did Rashford/Fosu-Mensah/Kane/Alli etc. etc. need to show they were premier league standard? Loftus Cheek is just the next Mceachran and will end up at MK dons or Huddersfield or some other team like that.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you watch the FA youth Cup game last October where Chelsea's youngsters played a Man Utd team including Rashford and Fosu-Mensa, of the park, beating them 5-1 on their own territory?
Rashford and co never had alook in and all of a sudden they're the benchmark for would RLC should be!!
Let's wait until he's played 50 games at the top level before deciding whether he's going to be Carlton Palmer or Paul Gascoigne eh!!
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Moureen and United are coming for you!
FFS this from a supporter of the voyeur club. Jose has beaten Chelsea Once before how many strikes is it now against Wenger....40+
comment by vava1on1 (U4692)
posted 11 minutes ago
Moureen and United are coming for you!
FFS this from a supporter of the voyeur club. Jose has beaten Chelsea Once before how many strikes is it now against Wenger....40+
----------------------------------------------------------------------
100+ but doesn't takeaway the fact jose is coming for u after what u did to him.
We had Traore, Kenedy, Musonda anyone really could have put in a better performance than some of our players did
----------------
Sidebro. Look at that list of players. Do you really think those guys would have helped us start winning games again? They're all untested players who just aren't ready to start playing regularly in the Premier League yet. Mourinho wanted to strengthen the squad in the summer but the board let him down. Blame them if you're going to blame anyone.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Please, hiddink barely played the young players either. That's proof that they just aren't good enough.
comment by Grant (U21057)
posted 1 hour, 25 minutes ago
Please, hiddink barely played the young players either. That's proof that they just aren't good enough.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no its not
cant use an interim to gauge anything
he was there for 6 months to steady the ship and yhat was it
Sign in if you want to comment
Remember a time when
Page 2 of 2
posted on 8/7/16
Hmmm..
posted on 8/7/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 8/7/16
comment by Sideshow (U11809)
posted 5 minutes ago
Mourinho must be an idiot then for continuing to play the same players who wanted to get rid of him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What options did he have? Drop Matic and play Furrrking Loftus cheek?
posted on 8/7/16
Anyone who has played football, even at amateur level, will know how hard it is to perform when so much crap is going on around you.
The 'downing tools' argument is just so simplistic.
posted on 8/7/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 8/7/16
No because Loftus Cheek is garbage and Mourinho wanted Pogba. Wasn't his fault the board couldn't get him the players he needed.
posted on 8/7/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 8/7/16
They've been doing it for years - please don't tell me you've only just noticed
posted on 9/7/16
Sidebro, if the player is trash, the player is trash. Loftus Cheek is Championship level, throwing him in in the PL is suicide. Even Matic at 10% is more dependable and less likely to lose you a game, and Matic at 10% is terrible.
posted on 9/7/16
comment by Grant (U21057)
Sidebro, if the player is trash, the player is trash. Loftus Cheek is Championship level, throwing him in in the PL is suicide. Even Matic at 10% is more dependable and less likely to lose you a game, and Matic at 10% is terrible.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
FFS RLC has played a handful of minutes and deemed rubbish already!
posted on 9/7/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/7/16
How many minutes did Rashford/Fosu-Mensah/Kane/Alli etc. etc. need to show they were premier league standard? Loftus Cheek is just the next Mceachran and will end up at MK dons or Huddersfield or some other team like that.
Playing Mikel wasn't going to make that much of a difference since he also isn't very good. Mourinho was trying to play Matic back into form as a 100% Matic is a lot better than Mikel even if a 10% Matic isn't.
What good bench options did we have sidebro? Falcao? No. Remy? No.
posted on 9/7/16
Wahl
When your fellow Chelsea fans are all saying the same thing that we have you've got to wonder if you're wrong.
posted on 9/7/16
However, regardless of their fifa rankings last season based on their real life performances whenever on the pitch RLC was better than Oscar, Oscar apart from the 1st half a dozen games when Ivan was the worst player on the pitch Oscar was continually getting 90 minutes. Ivan as well with suitable options on the bench was staying on the field for 90 minutes at a time. This is unacceptable and down to the manager. Instead Jose was always taking Willian off the field and leaving on a miss firing Pedro, Cesc or Oscar like wtf?
posted on 9/7/16
How many minutes did Rashford/Fosu-Mensah/Kane/Alli etc. etc. need to show they were premier league standard? Loftus Cheek is just the next Mceachran and will end up at MK dons or Huddersfield or some other team like that.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you watch the FA youth Cup game last October where Chelsea's youngsters played a Man Utd team including Rashford and Fosu-Mensa, of the park, beating them 5-1 on their own territory?
Rashford and co never had alook in and all of a sudden they're the benchmark for would RLC should be!!
Let's wait until he's played 50 games at the top level before deciding whether he's going to be Carlton Palmer or Paul Gascoigne eh!!
posted on 9/7/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/7/16
Moureen and United are coming for you!
FFS this from a supporter of the voyeur club. Jose has beaten Chelsea Once before how many strikes is it now against Wenger....40+
posted on 9/7/16
comment by vava1on1 (U4692)
posted 11 minutes ago
Moureen and United are coming for you!
FFS this from a supporter of the voyeur club. Jose has beaten Chelsea Once before how many strikes is it now against Wenger....40+
----------------------------------------------------------------------
100+ but doesn't takeaway the fact jose is coming for u after what u did to him.
posted on 9/7/16
We had Traore, Kenedy, Musonda anyone really could have put in a better performance than some of our players did
----------------
Sidebro. Look at that list of players. Do you really think those guys would have helped us start winning games again? They're all untested players who just aren't ready to start playing regularly in the Premier League yet. Mourinho wanted to strengthen the squad in the summer but the board let him down. Blame them if you're going to blame anyone.
posted on 9/7/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/7/16
Please, hiddink barely played the young players either. That's proof that they just aren't good enough.
posted on 10/7/16
comment by Grant (U21057)
posted 1 hour, 25 minutes ago
Please, hiddink barely played the young players either. That's proof that they just aren't good enough.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no its not
cant use an interim to gauge anything
he was there for 6 months to steady the ship and yhat was it
Page 2 of 2