Sky doesn't say that. It says they want to invest in a stake of the club. In the past FSG have said they're open to investment but not to a majority sale.
I wonder if one of the questions during the due diligence will be 'will you provide the funds for a new left back?'
It wouldn't be to take full control, it's on an investment in the club to acquire a certain percentage of the shareholding in partnership with FSG.
Rather torn on this to be honest- are state-owned Chinese conglomerates the "right" type of people that the club wants to get involved with, and is it worth the risk of running into spats between parties in the future?
Obviously would be a massive cash injection and would be very good for the club's profile in Asia and across the world, but-
is it a sign FSG are starting to lose faith we are moving forward?
do we really need the cash injection? i'd argue the club isn't limited so much financially these days, attracting the best players to want to come is the problem.
comment by Fear Me Neo (U9135)
posted 1 minute ago
It wouldn't be to take full control, it's on an investment in the club to acquire a certain percentage of the shareholding in partnership with FSG.
Rather torn on this to be honest- are state-owned Chinese conglomerates the "right" type of people that the club wants to get involved with, and is it worth the risk of running into spats between parties in the future?
Obviously would be a massive cash injection and would be very good for the club's profile in Asia and across the world, but-
is it a sign FSG are starting to lose faith we are moving forward?
do we really need the cash injection? i'd argue the club isn't limited so much financially these days, attracting the best players to want to come is the problem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have the cash to fire £100m and 300k at players like United, then I'm sure attracting players wouldn't be that much of an issue.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
We clearly need the cash injection to compete with the best and to avoid buying relegated players.
Cheeky £100m bid for Pogba?
Actually scrap that, Suarez has just scored his 4th hatrick in 6 games. Let's bring him home
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Fear Me Neo (U9135)
posted 1 minute ago
It wouldn't be to take full control, it's on an investment in the club to acquire a certain percentage of the shareholding in partnership with FSG.
Rather torn on this to be honest- are state-owned Chinese conglomerates the "right" type of people that the club wants to get involved with, and is it worth the risk of running into spats between parties in the future?
Obviously would be a massive cash injection and would be very good for the club's profile in Asia and across the world, but-
is it a sign FSG are starting to lose faith we are moving forward?
do we really need the cash injection? i'd argue the club isn't limited so much financially these days, attracting the best players to want to come is the problem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have the cash to fire £100m and 300k at players like United, then I'm sure attracting players wouldn't be that much of an issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We haven't spent anything in the last two transfer windows. If FSG'S don't think we are moving forward I'm pretty sure they are best placed to turn thst around.
Liverpool need a rich owner if you want to challenge the big boys consistently. Just don't have the revenue of a Manchester United who can challenge Chelsea and city's wealthy owners due to the size of the club.
Be nice to see liverpool at the top again, but then there are cons to having a sugar daddy.
Leicester are a one off, its a money game these days
sad but true
This takeover stuff is rubbish
Somebody in the press has put together the info about the club seeking naming rights and talking to potential companies about this, with this https://www.endole.co.uk/company/10097045/everbright-development-liverpool-ltd
So many people claiming that this relates to everbright and their bid for the club....its nothing of the sort and a few simple searches will tell you the people involved in this would have nothing to do with a club takeover.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Takeover bid
Page 1 of 1
posted on 20/8/16
Sky doesn't say that. It says they want to invest in a stake of the club. In the past FSG have said they're open to investment but not to a majority sale.
posted on 20/8/16
I wonder if one of the questions during the due diligence will be 'will you provide the funds for a new left back?'
posted on 20/8/16
It wouldn't be to take full control, it's on an investment in the club to acquire a certain percentage of the shareholding in partnership with FSG.
Rather torn on this to be honest- are state-owned Chinese conglomerates the "right" type of people that the club wants to get involved with, and is it worth the risk of running into spats between parties in the future?
Obviously would be a massive cash injection and would be very good for the club's profile in Asia and across the world, but-
is it a sign FSG are starting to lose faith we are moving forward?
do we really need the cash injection? i'd argue the club isn't limited so much financially these days, attracting the best players to want to come is the problem.
posted on 20/8/16
comment by Fear Me Neo (U9135)
posted 1 minute ago
It wouldn't be to take full control, it's on an investment in the club to acquire a certain percentage of the shareholding in partnership with FSG.
Rather torn on this to be honest- are state-owned Chinese conglomerates the "right" type of people that the club wants to get involved with, and is it worth the risk of running into spats between parties in the future?
Obviously would be a massive cash injection and would be very good for the club's profile in Asia and across the world, but-
is it a sign FSG are starting to lose faith we are moving forward?
do we really need the cash injection? i'd argue the club isn't limited so much financially these days, attracting the best players to want to come is the problem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have the cash to fire £100m and 300k at players like United, then I'm sure attracting players wouldn't be that much of an issue.
posted on 20/8/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 20/8/16
We clearly need the cash injection to compete with the best and to avoid buying relegated players.
posted on 20/8/16
Stake owned. Right.
posted on 20/8/16
Cheeky £100m bid for Pogba?
posted on 20/8/16
Actually scrap that, Suarez has just scored his 4th hatrick in 6 games. Let's bring him home
posted on 20/8/16
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Fear Me Neo (U9135)
posted 1 minute ago
It wouldn't be to take full control, it's on an investment in the club to acquire a certain percentage of the shareholding in partnership with FSG.
Rather torn on this to be honest- are state-owned Chinese conglomerates the "right" type of people that the club wants to get involved with, and is it worth the risk of running into spats between parties in the future?
Obviously would be a massive cash injection and would be very good for the club's profile in Asia and across the world, but-
is it a sign FSG are starting to lose faith we are moving forward?
do we really need the cash injection? i'd argue the club isn't limited so much financially these days, attracting the best players to want to come is the problem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have the cash to fire £100m and 300k at players like United, then I'm sure attracting players wouldn't be that much of an issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We haven't spent anything in the last two transfer windows. If FSG'S don't think we are moving forward I'm pretty sure they are best placed to turn thst around.
posted on 20/8/16
Liverpool need a rich owner if you want to challenge the big boys consistently. Just don't have the revenue of a Manchester United who can challenge Chelsea and city's wealthy owners due to the size of the club.
Be nice to see liverpool at the top again, but then there are cons to having a sugar daddy.
posted on 21/8/16
Leicester are a one off, its a money game these days
sad but true
posted on 21/8/16
This takeover stuff is rubbish
Somebody in the press has put together the info about the club seeking naming rights and talking to potential companies about this, with this https://www.endole.co.uk/company/10097045/everbright-development-liverpool-ltd
So many people claiming that this relates to everbright and their bid for the club....its nothing of the sort and a few simple searches will tell you the people involved in this would have nothing to do with a club takeover.
Page 1 of 1