Maybe walcott but not Gervinho.. no way!

Gervinho is going to be dropped before he has even played 5 games for us?

even though he has looked a great player for us...

gervinho is the most powderpuff player ive seen in ages! (bar rosicky)

once he learns to kick the ball over 3 miles per hour i'll change my mind

Walcott is scoring tho, do you really want to take one of our main goalthreats out of the team?.

gervinho is the most powderpuff player ive seen in ages!

--------------------

I think chamberlain could give the team a lot more than walcott though

Don't get me wrong, the kid looks hot, very pleased with his contribution for england but Walcott is much more of a goal threat imo and should stay in the team.

Dont think Van Persie will be best pleased.

He signed contracts to play with footballers not sprinters

How about dropping Arshavin and play Walcott upfront with RVP. Gervinho and Alex on the wings.

He signed contracts to play with footballers not sprinters
----------------------

Okay i can see why walcott, but by sprinters plural it seems you are refering to some of our other players as well. Please do tell which players you are talking about, as only a plank who doesnt know a thing hes talking about would call gervinho and chamberlain sprinters

Play All 3 of them. Walcott scores goals, Gervinho is the most skillful, creates and can score goals. AOC should be coming in as a sub for now, we don't want another player getting burned out like what happened with Wilshere.

Drop Arshavin play the Ox to the left, Walcott right, Gervino centre with VP ahead of him.
@comment by Grrr (U3815)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
With just a little practice, both Walcot and the Ox could give Usain Bolt a run for his money so the statement about sprinters is right

The point hes making is ox has no footballing ability and is just fast with no other skills. Obviously he likes talking about things he doesnt know about