comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 7 minutes ago
Sir Digby
I don’t follow. We were discussing DT’s record of womanising, and you mention HC??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whats the article title?
Look at Clinton's involvement with her husbands sexual assaults
Sir Digby
So you weren’t particularly happy with the direction the debate was going, and decided to ignore previous comments, and change the subject.
You are aware that DT fully supported HC after BC’s infidelity? However when he announced he would stand in the primaries, his (public) position suddenly changed.
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Stretty - mr mourinho (U3123)
posted 2 minutes ago
Since when was being a womaniser a bad thing or related to sexual assault?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, a proven womaniser accused of sexual assault, and being a paedophile is certainly POTUS material
To be clear, I am no supporter of HC. She’s not a particularly great politician, (IMO). But at least has a degree of experience in political office. And despite some of HC’s failings she is a proven mediator, and isn’t likely to throw the toys out of the pram at any given circumstance.
DT has attempted to distance himself from the very mechanisms he wants to become part of. It’s ridiculous to believe DT is anti-establishment when he’s benefited from capitalism his entire life. And will continue to do so whether he becomes POTUS or not.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact she's a proven politician is why a lot don't want her.
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Stretty - mr mourinho (U3123)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 11 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Stretty - mr mourinho (U3123)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 29 minutes ago
Media report said comments, and (surprise surprise) women start to come forward
-----------------
Why not come out any time within the last 30 years?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is there a particular time frame for sexual assault cases to be made?
Ludicrous argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In America there is yes
So no it isn't.
It's a load of nonsense from these women that much is clear
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So a person is essentially time barred (in America) from reporting a potential crime (in this instance sexual harassment/assault?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it's called the statute of limitations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Legal view appears to differ:
http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/could-trump-be-criminally-prosecuted-for-sexual-assault-now-that-more-women-have-come-forward/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.hg.org/article.asp?id=34338
Depends on state and stuff I suppose
I don't think HC can say much in this situation given her husbands track record but that's been glossed over by the press as well.
They are both as bad as each other. That's the truth. Equally terrible for completely different reasons
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 25 seconds ago
They are both as bad as each other. That's the truth. Equally terrible for completely different reasons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yup. He's an idiot and she's a sociopathic liar.
Can't believe the democrats couldn't come up with a better candidate.
Republicans don't suprise me, bush, Romney and trump are all idiots.
They are both as bad as each other. That's the truth.
................
Well, it isn't the truth, just your truth.
Stretty
Agree 100%. I think regardless of DT’s opponent, (republican or democrat) they would have been portrayed as “Washington elite” as DT has based his campaign on anti-establishment rhetoric.
There are millions of disenfranchised American’s willing to take a 'punt' on DT as they feel the government does not represent them, and things cannot get any worse.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
They are both as bad as each other. That's the truth.
................
Well, it isn't the truth, just your truth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If she was a good candidate wouldn't she have been slaughtering trump since this whole thing started?
If she was a good candidate
.............
She isn't a good candidate, she is a terrible one. She just isn't as bad as Trump.
What makes Clinton bad then VC?
It’s only because HC is such a poor candidate that DT’s campaign still has some legs. In any other POTUS election any one of his countless blunders would have buried him long ago.
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 3 hours, 49 minutes ago
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 7 hours, 6 minutes ago
They should have gone to the police instead of the media then. all the women coming out a couple of days after the leaked tape it was obviously all coordinated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Political persuasion aside, it appears you have been duped into this anti establishment paranoia from Trump.
A guy who is a self confessed womaniser, and built a reputation over years, for making amorous advances towards women.
A playboy.
Do you really believe each and every woman that has now come forward with allegations, are lying?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea if they are lying or not but i'm cynical about a lot of it, until anything is proven it's just allegations. Either way their personal life is not a big deal to me but what they do when they're elected. fed up of squeaky clean politically correct clowns who can say all the rights things, but in the end do nothing.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
8bit
Are you aware that DT and BC were lifelong friends, and DT supported both HC and BC throughout the Lewinsky affair. They both were guests at DT’s third wedding, and DT has donated to the Clinton foundation – often attending (golfing etc) fundraising events etc.
It was only when DT defected from the democrats to the republican party he was pressurised by the republican party to distance himself from them.
The biggest illusion of this entire campaign is that DT is in anyway shape or form anti-establishment. It’s easy (and popular) however for a non-politician to criticise a disfunctional government as there is no prior accountability.
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 29 minutes ago
What makes Clinton bad then VC?
................
Don't you know? I assumed you would having made your earlier comment.
Maybe you should sit this one out.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 29 minutes ago
What makes Clinton bad then VC?
................
Don't you know? I assumed you would having made your earlier comment.
Maybe you should sit this one out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Im asking you
It cant be as bad as saying mean thing though
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 1 minute ago
8bit
Are you aware that DT and BC were lifelong friends, and DT supported both HC and BC throughout the Lewinsky affair. They both were guests at DT’s third wedding, and DT has donated to the Clinton foundation – often attending (golfing etc) fundraising events etc.
It was only when DT defected from the democrats to the republican party he was pressurised by the republican party to distance himself from them.
The biggest illusion of this entire campaign is that DT is in anyway shape or form anti-establishment. It’s easy (and popular) however for a non-politician to criticise a disfunctional government as there is no prior accountability.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trump may be a let down but we already know Hillary will be. we haven't seen a candidate like Trump before saying what he says. He is the anti establishment candidate otherwise the media wouldn't be so disgustingly pro Clinton covering up for her. nothing major about wikileaks, no pick up on this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IuJGHuIkzY
if this kind of thing got out in the mainstream media Clinton would finished.
Maybe you should sit this one out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Im asking you
...............
Why? You are the one who said 'They are both as bad as each other. That's the truth.'
If you don't know why she is bad that kind of makes you look an utter prat for pretending you know wht you are on about.
Of course this is nothing new for you. You have history of it.
the media wouldn't be so disgustingly pro Clinton
..........................
The media wouldn't be pro Clinton if Trump wasn't worse than her.
They are both as bad. One doesn't know when to stop talking the other doesn't know when to stop lying.
Some just feel the need to pretend Clinton never lies though, or that she hasn't said things which could be construed as racist
They are both as bad.
............
No they are not. One is quite clearly worse than the other.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Trump or Clinton
Page 24 of 107
25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29
posted on 18/10/16
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 7 minutes ago
Sir Digby
I don’t follow. We were discussing DT’s record of womanising, and you mention HC??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whats the article title?
Look at Clinton's involvement with her husbands sexual assaults
posted on 18/10/16
Sir Digby
So you weren’t particularly happy with the direction the debate was going, and decided to ignore previous comments, and change the subject.
You are aware that DT fully supported HC after BC’s infidelity? However when he announced he would stand in the primaries, his (public) position suddenly changed.
posted on 18/10/16
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Stretty - mr mourinho (U3123)
posted 2 minutes ago
Since when was being a womaniser a bad thing or related to sexual assault?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, a proven womaniser accused of sexual assault, and being a paedophile is certainly POTUS material
To be clear, I am no supporter of HC. She’s not a particularly great politician, (IMO). But at least has a degree of experience in political office. And despite some of HC’s failings she is a proven mediator, and isn’t likely to throw the toys out of the pram at any given circumstance.
DT has attempted to distance himself from the very mechanisms he wants to become part of. It’s ridiculous to believe DT is anti-establishment when he’s benefited from capitalism his entire life. And will continue to do so whether he becomes POTUS or not.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact she's a proven politician is why a lot don't want her.
posted on 18/10/16
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Stretty - mr mourinho (U3123)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 11 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Stretty - mr mourinho (U3123)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 29 minutes ago
Media report said comments, and (surprise surprise) women start to come forward
-----------------
Why not come out any time within the last 30 years?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is there a particular time frame for sexual assault cases to be made?
Ludicrous argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In America there is yes
So no it isn't.
It's a load of nonsense from these women that much is clear
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So a person is essentially time barred (in America) from reporting a potential crime (in this instance sexual harassment/assault?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it's called the statute of limitations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Legal view appears to differ:
http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/could-trump-be-criminally-prosecuted-for-sexual-assault-now-that-more-women-have-come-forward/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.hg.org/article.asp?id=34338
Depends on state and stuff I suppose
I don't think HC can say much in this situation given her husbands track record but that's been glossed over by the press as well.
posted on 18/10/16
They are both as bad as each other. That's the truth. Equally terrible for completely different reasons
posted on 18/10/16
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 25 seconds ago
They are both as bad as each other. That's the truth. Equally terrible for completely different reasons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yup. He's an idiot and she's a sociopathic liar.
Can't believe the democrats couldn't come up with a better candidate.
Republicans don't suprise me, bush, Romney and trump are all idiots.
posted on 18/10/16
They are both as bad as each other. That's the truth.
................
Well, it isn't the truth, just your truth.
posted on 18/10/16
Stretty
Agree 100%. I think regardless of DT’s opponent, (republican or democrat) they would have been portrayed as “Washington elite” as DT has based his campaign on anti-establishment rhetoric.
There are millions of disenfranchised American’s willing to take a 'punt' on DT as they feel the government does not represent them, and things cannot get any worse.
posted on 18/10/16
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
They are both as bad as each other. That's the truth.
................
Well, it isn't the truth, just your truth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If she was a good candidate wouldn't she have been slaughtering trump since this whole thing started?
posted on 18/10/16
If she was a good candidate
.............
She isn't a good candidate, she is a terrible one. She just isn't as bad as Trump.
posted on 18/10/16
What makes Clinton bad then VC?
posted on 18/10/16
It’s only because HC is such a poor candidate that DT’s campaign still has some legs. In any other POTUS election any one of his countless blunders would have buried him long ago.
posted on 18/10/16
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 3 hours, 49 minutes ago
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted 7 hours, 6 minutes ago
They should have gone to the police instead of the media then. all the women coming out a couple of days after the leaked tape it was obviously all coordinated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Political persuasion aside, it appears you have been duped into this anti establishment paranoia from Trump.
A guy who is a self confessed womaniser, and built a reputation over years, for making amorous advances towards women.
A playboy.
Do you really believe each and every woman that has now come forward with allegations, are lying?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea if they are lying or not but i'm cynical about a lot of it, until anything is proven it's just allegations. Either way their personal life is not a big deal to me but what they do when they're elected. fed up of squeaky clean politically correct clowns who can say all the rights things, but in the end do nothing.
posted on 18/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 18/10/16
8bit
Are you aware that DT and BC were lifelong friends, and DT supported both HC and BC throughout the Lewinsky affair. They both were guests at DT’s third wedding, and DT has donated to the Clinton foundation – often attending (golfing etc) fundraising events etc.
It was only when DT defected from the democrats to the republican party he was pressurised by the republican party to distance himself from them.
The biggest illusion of this entire campaign is that DT is in anyway shape or form anti-establishment. It’s easy (and popular) however for a non-politician to criticise a disfunctional government as there is no prior accountability.
posted on 18/10/16
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 29 minutes ago
What makes Clinton bad then VC?
................
Don't you know? I assumed you would having made your earlier comment.
Maybe you should sit this one out.
posted on 18/10/16
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 29 minutes ago
What makes Clinton bad then VC?
................
Don't you know? I assumed you would having made your earlier comment.
Maybe you should sit this one out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Im asking you
It cant be as bad as saying mean thing though
posted on 18/10/16
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 1 minute ago
8bit
Are you aware that DT and BC were lifelong friends, and DT supported both HC and BC throughout the Lewinsky affair. They both were guests at DT’s third wedding, and DT has donated to the Clinton foundation – often attending (golfing etc) fundraising events etc.
It was only when DT defected from the democrats to the republican party he was pressurised by the republican party to distance himself from them.
The biggest illusion of this entire campaign is that DT is in anyway shape or form anti-establishment. It’s easy (and popular) however for a non-politician to criticise a disfunctional government as there is no prior accountability.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trump may be a let down but we already know Hillary will be. we haven't seen a candidate like Trump before saying what he says. He is the anti establishment candidate otherwise the media wouldn't be so disgustingly pro Clinton covering up for her. nothing major about wikileaks, no pick up on this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IuJGHuIkzY
if this kind of thing got out in the mainstream media Clinton would finished.
posted on 18/10/16
Maybe you should sit this one out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Im asking you
...............
Why? You are the one who said 'They are both as bad as each other. That's the truth.'
If you don't know why she is bad that kind of makes you look an utter prat for pretending you know wht you are on about.
Of course this is nothing new for you. You have history of it.
posted on 18/10/16
the media wouldn't be so disgustingly pro Clinton
..........................
The media wouldn't be pro Clinton if Trump wasn't worse than her.
posted on 18/10/16
They are both as bad. One doesn't know when to stop talking the other doesn't know when to stop lying.
Some just feel the need to pretend Clinton never lies though, or that she hasn't said things which could be construed as racist
posted on 18/10/16
They are both as bad.
............
No they are not. One is quite clearly worse than the other.
posted on 18/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 18/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 18/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 24 of 107
25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29