comment by Wahl Zoro (U21057)
posted 25 minutes ago
Can't you just google that Broeman?
Cammy dude, Mourinho was stabbed in the back because he tried to push the players to try to overcome their own limits and become better players and they didn't want to. Not his fault, its the players for being unambitious and ungrateful.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it would be good to show the people under 25 who the really big clubs are dude
Chelsea 04-05, 09-10 and 14-15 should all feature in the top 5.
04-05: Most points accumulated in a PL season (greatest achievement IMO) + least goals conceded
09-10: Most goals scored in a PL season (103)
14:15: Top of the league from day 1 all the way through. Total dominance.
Invincibles and United 07-08 make up the rest of the top 5.
Chelsea 14-15 in the top five.
Top for the entire season, never went out of second gear.
What proceeded in the following season is irrelevant.
The United teams of 98-99 and 08-09 stand out along with the Chelsea side of 04-05 and the Arsenal 03-04 invincibles.
The Liverpool side of 08-09 was probably the best side to have never won the PL. We were better that season than most PL title winning teams.
Wahl, you should do best runners up
Wahl, you should do best 20th place
or most comical runners up
Yeah I was thinking about doing runners up later. That would be pretty cool.
Yes because the opposition were so poor. That Chelsea side are in a debate for worst champions not best.
comment by The Sniper (U21079)
posted 4 minutes ago
The United teams of 98-99 and 08-09 stand out along with the Chelsea side of 04-05 and the Arsenal 03-04 invincibles.
The Liverpool side of 08-09 was probably the best side to have never won the PL. We were better that season than most PL title winning teams.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Our 09 team was the worst of our title winning teams that won three on the trot.
comment by Zlatan The King Ibrahimovic (U10026)
posted 0 seconds ago
Yes because the opposition were so poor. That Chelsea side are in a debate for worst champions not best.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea's record against the big teams was phenomenal that year. Go check it out. If not for late goals there'd have been wins at United and City too,
I know it was. And all the top sides were average that season. We finished top four for fack sake.
No way is the Chelsea team in the top five title winners.
No you didn't you finished 7th.
At full strength, the City team of 13-14 was quite special. They rarely seemed to hit full stride though and always seemed to have at least one key player out through injury.
Sorry, my bad. 4th you're right
Zlatan The King Ibrahimovic -
Sorry, I meant the 07-08 United and Liverpool teams.
Haha. I keep getting the dates wrong. Liverpool 08-09 was our best team.
Chelsea were runners up in 08. They were arguably the best team not to win the league.
comment by Nickalopodis (U9257)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
comment by Zlatan The King Ibrahimovic (U10026)
posted 2 minutes ago
Nah they get remembered for the team as well. Their football was more rememberable than Chelsea's a year later.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
memorable, and was it? Like i said they only scored a couple more goals, and chelsea only got bad press cause they could defend. The best football i've seen down the bridge was that year, robben,duff,drogba,gudjohsen, cole, lampard...we played some fantastic stuff. But it all gets twisted by what people want to remember.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just because your football that year was underrated (which I actually agree with) and the best you've seen Chelsea play, that doesn't mean it was better than the invincibles.
Think you're letting your club bias get in the way of things mate.
Both very strong teams, would be great if the league had sides like that again.
And as much as it pains me to say it, I do think the united team of 07-08 was the best pl side I've seen.
Our team in 08-09 was the one I remember most fondly and the best Liverpool team of the PL era imo. We had a prime Torres and Gerrard playing together along with the likes of Alonso, Mascherano and Hyypia. I think we only lost 2 games that whole season and almost all the games we drew were games which we created more than enough chances to win. Some of the football we played was incredible. Shame we failed to capitalize on the opportunity.
Chelsea have had quite a few quality teams over the past dozen years that I sometimes forget about the ones that failed to win the title.
Yeah that Liverpool team were very good. Did the double over us. Won 4-1 and won fack all.
It was like the Suarez season. I could accept not winning the title, but to win nothing at all was a hard pill to take. Even a league cup would have been a sweetener.
I suppose you could argue those early exits from the cups helped your title challenge, on the other hand.
We played every match possible to play that season bar the FA Cup final. 66 games in total.
Sign in if you want to comment
Top 10 Best PL Champions ever
Page 4 of 5
posted on 13/10/16
comment by Wahl Zoro (U21057)
posted 25 minutes ago
Can't you just google that Broeman?
Cammy dude, Mourinho was stabbed in the back because he tried to push the players to try to overcome their own limits and become better players and they didn't want to. Not his fault, its the players for being unambitious and ungrateful.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it would be good to show the people under 25 who the really big clubs are dude
posted on 13/10/16
Chelsea 04-05, 09-10 and 14-15 should all feature in the top 5.
04-05: Most points accumulated in a PL season (greatest achievement IMO) + least goals conceded
09-10: Most goals scored in a PL season (103)
14:15: Top of the league from day 1 all the way through. Total dominance.
Invincibles and United 07-08 make up the rest of the top 5.
posted on 13/10/16
Chelsea 14-15 in the top five.
posted on 13/10/16
Top for the entire season, never went out of second gear.
What proceeded in the following season is irrelevant.
posted on 13/10/16
The United teams of 98-99 and 08-09 stand out along with the Chelsea side of 04-05 and the Arsenal 03-04 invincibles.
The Liverpool side of 08-09 was probably the best side to have never won the PL. We were better that season than most PL title winning teams.
posted on 13/10/16
Wahl, you should do best runners up
posted on 13/10/16
Wahl, you should do best 20th place
posted on 13/10/16
or most comical runners up
posted on 13/10/16
Yeah I was thinking about doing runners up later. That would be pretty cool.
posted on 13/10/16
Yes because the opposition were so poor. That Chelsea side are in a debate for worst champions not best.
posted on 13/10/16
comment by The Sniper (U21079)
posted 4 minutes ago
The United teams of 98-99 and 08-09 stand out along with the Chelsea side of 04-05 and the Arsenal 03-04 invincibles.
The Liverpool side of 08-09 was probably the best side to have never won the PL. We were better that season than most PL title winning teams.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Our 09 team was the worst of our title winning teams that won three on the trot.
posted on 13/10/16
comment by Zlatan The King Ibrahimovic (U10026)
posted 0 seconds ago
Yes because the opposition were so poor. That Chelsea side are in a debate for worst champions not best.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea's record against the big teams was phenomenal that year. Go check it out. If not for late goals there'd have been wins at United and City too,
posted on 13/10/16
I know it was. And all the top sides were average that season. We finished top four for fack sake.
No way is the Chelsea team in the top five title winners.
posted on 13/10/16
No you didn't you finished 7th.
posted on 13/10/16
At full strength, the City team of 13-14 was quite special. They rarely seemed to hit full stride though and always seemed to have at least one key player out through injury.
posted on 13/10/16
Sorry, my bad. 4th you're right
posted on 13/10/16
Zlatan The King Ibrahimovic -
Sorry, I meant the 07-08 United and Liverpool teams.
posted on 13/10/16
Haha. I keep getting the dates wrong. Liverpool 08-09 was our best team.
posted on 13/10/16
Chelsea were runners up in 08. They were arguably the best team not to win the league.
posted on 13/10/16
comment by Nickalopodis (U9257)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
comment by Zlatan The King Ibrahimovic (U10026)
posted 2 minutes ago
Nah they get remembered for the team as well. Their football was more rememberable than Chelsea's a year later.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
memorable, and was it? Like i said they only scored a couple more goals, and chelsea only got bad press cause they could defend. The best football i've seen down the bridge was that year, robben,duff,drogba,gudjohsen, cole, lampard...we played some fantastic stuff. But it all gets twisted by what people want to remember.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just because your football that year was underrated (which I actually agree with) and the best you've seen Chelsea play, that doesn't mean it was better than the invincibles.
Think you're letting your club bias get in the way of things mate.
Both very strong teams, would be great if the league had sides like that again.
posted on 13/10/16
And as much as it pains me to say it, I do think the united team of 07-08 was the best pl side I've seen.
posted on 13/10/16
Our team in 08-09 was the one I remember most fondly and the best Liverpool team of the PL era imo. We had a prime Torres and Gerrard playing together along with the likes of Alonso, Mascherano and Hyypia. I think we only lost 2 games that whole season and almost all the games we drew were games which we created more than enough chances to win. Some of the football we played was incredible. Shame we failed to capitalize on the opportunity.
Chelsea have had quite a few quality teams over the past dozen years that I sometimes forget about the ones that failed to win the title.
posted on 13/10/16
Yeah that Liverpool team were very good. Did the double over us. Won 4-1 and won fack all.
posted on 13/10/16
It was like the Suarez season. I could accept not winning the title, but to win nothing at all was a hard pill to take. Even a league cup would have been a sweetener.
posted on 13/10/16
I suppose you could argue those early exits from the cups helped your title challenge, on the other hand.
We played every match possible to play that season bar the FA Cup final. 66 games in total.
Page 4 of 5