Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Where's Tomkins he said he saw a few but 200 is a tad more than a few.
Head in the sand it was more serious than they let in.
What has to happen before action is taken against West Ham?
Love how you pin this on west ham and not chelsea. Their fans turned nasty at 2-0. A group of them charged at our fans on the bridge. Are we not allowed to defend ourselves?
Still this is why the media spin it, it works on gullible dumb people like you.
Oh and chronic said there would be 200 arrests.
200 ARRESTS
Trying to blame big bad chelsea
Well there's 200 banning orders if you believe Karen Brady.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/oct/27/west-ham-ban-200-supporters-trouble-chelsea-london-stadium
Ah the guardian that well known biased against West Ham media bstard.
Check out green streets biggest man trying to spin the media and it's conspiracy against londons most violent set of fans.
Chelsea have said they Will ban fans found to have caused trouble.
When West Ham fans have been fighting themselves was that Chelsea Middlesbrough watfords fans fault too?
so I say that there is a media spin, and you say in return that mine is a spin on the media? how creative of you.
Why would I accept your biased views on it when i have seen it all with my own eyes and you simply do not have a clue what you are talking about. Your views are drip fed down to you and you know it
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 6 minutes ago
so I say that there is a media spin, and you say in return that mine is a spin on the media? how creative of you.
Why would I accept your biased views on it when i have seen it all with my own eyes and you simply do not have a clue what you are talking about. Your views are drip fed down to you and you know it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm so we have every newspaper and major news outlet "sky BBC channel 4" credible newspaper all reporting the same thing as the tabloids.
And one West Ham regular saying it's all rubbish and we are all brainwashed it's a lie and it never happens.
ππππππ
You realise how incredibly stupid you sound right?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Nothing to see here laaa laaa laaa
Ffs there's a time to speak up and a time to admit the overwhelming evidence of this latest violent incident with West Ham fans.
comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
Love how you pin this on west ham and not chelsea. Their fans turned nasty at 2-0. A group of them charged at our fans on the bridge. Are we not allowed to defend ourselves?
Still this is why the media spin it, it works on gullible dumb people like you.
Oh and chronic said there would be 200 arrests.
200 ARRESTS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what?
Not sure Tomkins and reality are close friends
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
so I say that there is a media spin, and you say in return that mine is a spin on the media? how creative of you.
Why would I accept your biased views on it when i have seen it all with my own eyes and you simply do not have a clue what you are talking about. Your views are drip fed down to you and you know it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See that attitude, right there is a major part of the problem. Stop fuΡking denying, get your head out of the sand.
If you cannot see a problem with what is happening then YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM. Jeez some people. Stop being part of the problem and be part of the solution.
Didn't you say yesterday that a man shouldn't be taking his daughter to a London derby because there is a history of trouble?
Why is it just West Ham? There are families at EVERY match in the country, every week so what makes WH so special?
Their hooligan 'fanbase' that's what. I really hope there is trouble this weekend and that WH have to play all their remaining home fixtures behind closed doors and that their fans are banned from travelling to away matches.
comment by Cal Neva (U11544)
posted 34 minutes ago
There is only one reason LQ is posting about this and that one reason is Maf. All this caring about crowd control is balls.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't talk sheyite! I care that families should be able to go to football in safety and the way the world sees English football fans.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Tompkins serious question, do you think West Ham as a club have done enough to try tackle the issues in the new ground?
I understand your point that the Chelsea fans had their part to play but plenty of home fans were charging tghe stewards line too.
I've seen some ridiculous stuff on Twitter (of course not the best place to find rational thoughts) however plenty of fans claim it's nothing to do with the club, and IMO that is completley wrong and it says that the club don't care about home or away fan safety.
you can try claim a media spin and they do sensetionalize things however we've all seen images of issues in the ground at plenty of games this season, it's not a few isolated incidents anymore.
You could be facing playing behind closed doors, your whle fan base will suffer due to the actions of a few, it's up to the club to do something and to be fair banning 200 people is a great start.
I hope for your sake, and the vast majority of proper West Ham fans that they figure it out.
What's your thoughts on the fact that you moved into a new ground that hasn't got adequate PA systems in place to allow the police have a proper rpesence in the ground?
comment by Cal Neva (U11544)
posted 37 minutes ago
comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Cal Neva (U11544)
posted 34 minutes ago
There is only one reason LQ is posting about this and that one reason is Maf. All this caring about crowd control is balls.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't talk sheyite! I care that families should be able to go to football in safety and the way the world sees English football fans.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that why 6 of your last 15 articles have been about West Ham? BS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A, what's it to you and b, counting my articles well someone's a little obsessed
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Fine and I'm calling you out on being a weirdo
An Arsenal fan I bet.
Did you have a good look through my profile you voyeur
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Weirdo voyuer with low grade narcolepsy and a pension for buggery
Sign in if you want to comment
More than every club in the premier league
Page 1 of 3
posted on 28/10/16
posted on 28/10/16
Animals
posted on 28/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/10/16
Where's Tomkins he said he saw a few but 200 is a tad more than a few.
Head in the sand it was more serious than they let in.
What has to happen before action is taken against West Ham?
posted on 28/10/16
Love how you pin this on west ham and not chelsea. Their fans turned nasty at 2-0. A group of them charged at our fans on the bridge. Are we not allowed to defend ourselves?
Still this is why the media spin it, it works on gullible dumb people like you.
Oh and chronic said there would be 200 arrests.
200 ARRESTS
posted on 28/10/16
Trying to blame big bad chelsea
posted on 28/10/16
Well there's 200 banning orders if you believe Karen Brady.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/oct/27/west-ham-ban-200-supporters-trouble-chelsea-london-stadium
Ah the guardian that well known biased against West Ham media bstard.
Check out green streets biggest man trying to spin the media and it's conspiracy against londons most violent set of fans.
posted on 28/10/16
Chelsea have said they Will ban fans found to have caused trouble.
When West Ham fans have been fighting themselves was that Chelsea Middlesbrough watfords fans fault too?
posted on 28/10/16
so I say that there is a media spin, and you say in return that mine is a spin on the media? how creative of you.
Why would I accept your biased views on it when i have seen it all with my own eyes and you simply do not have a clue what you are talking about. Your views are drip fed down to you and you know it
posted on 28/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/10/16
comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 6 minutes ago
so I say that there is a media spin, and you say in return that mine is a spin on the media? how creative of you.
Why would I accept your biased views on it when i have seen it all with my own eyes and you simply do not have a clue what you are talking about. Your views are drip fed down to you and you know it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm so we have every newspaper and major news outlet "sky BBC channel 4" credible newspaper all reporting the same thing as the tabloids.
And one West Ham regular saying it's all rubbish and we are all brainwashed it's a lie and it never happens.
ππππππ
You realise how incredibly stupid you sound right?
posted on 28/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/10/16
Nothing to see here laaa laaa laaa
Ffs there's a time to speak up and a time to admit the overwhelming evidence of this latest violent incident with West Ham fans.
posted on 28/10/16
comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
Love how you pin this on west ham and not chelsea. Their fans turned nasty at 2-0. A group of them charged at our fans on the bridge. Are we not allowed to defend ourselves?
Still this is why the media spin it, it works on gullible dumb people like you.
Oh and chronic said there would be 200 arrests.
200 ARRESTS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what?
posted on 28/10/16
Not sure Tomkins and reality are close friends
posted on 28/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/10/16
comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
so I say that there is a media spin, and you say in return that mine is a spin on the media? how creative of you.
Why would I accept your biased views on it when i have seen it all with my own eyes and you simply do not have a clue what you are talking about. Your views are drip fed down to you and you know it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See that attitude, right there is a major part of the problem. Stop fuΡking denying, get your head out of the sand.
If you cannot see a problem with what is happening then YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM. Jeez some people. Stop being part of the problem and be part of the solution.
Didn't you say yesterday that a man shouldn't be taking his daughter to a London derby because there is a history of trouble?
Why is it just West Ham? There are families at EVERY match in the country, every week so what makes WH so special?
Their hooligan 'fanbase' that's what. I really hope there is trouble this weekend and that WH have to play all their remaining home fixtures behind closed doors and that their fans are banned from travelling to away matches.
posted on 28/10/16
comment by Cal Neva (U11544)
posted 34 minutes ago
There is only one reason LQ is posting about this and that one reason is Maf. All this caring about crowd control is balls.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't talk sheyite! I care that families should be able to go to football in safety and the way the world sees English football fans.
posted on 28/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/10/16
Tompkins serious question, do you think West Ham as a club have done enough to try tackle the issues in the new ground?
I understand your point that the Chelsea fans had their part to play but plenty of home fans were charging tghe stewards line too.
I've seen some ridiculous stuff on Twitter (of course not the best place to find rational thoughts) however plenty of fans claim it's nothing to do with the club, and IMO that is completley wrong and it says that the club don't care about home or away fan safety.
you can try claim a media spin and they do sensetionalize things however we've all seen images of issues in the ground at plenty of games this season, it's not a few isolated incidents anymore.
You could be facing playing behind closed doors, your whle fan base will suffer due to the actions of a few, it's up to the club to do something and to be fair banning 200 people is a great start.
I hope for your sake, and the vast majority of proper West Ham fans that they figure it out.
What's your thoughts on the fact that you moved into a new ground that hasn't got adequate PA systems in place to allow the police have a proper rpesence in the ground?
posted on 28/10/16
comment by Cal Neva (U11544)
posted 37 minutes ago
comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Cal Neva (U11544)
posted 34 minutes ago
There is only one reason LQ is posting about this and that one reason is Maf. All this caring about crowd control is balls.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't talk sheyite! I care that families should be able to go to football in safety and the way the world sees English football fans.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that why 6 of your last 15 articles have been about West Ham? BS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A, what's it to you and b, counting my articles well someone's a little obsessed
posted on 28/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/10/16
Fine and I'm calling you out on being a weirdo
An Arsenal fan I bet.
Did you have a good look through my profile you voyeur
posted on 28/10/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/10/16
Weirdo voyuer with low grade narcolepsy and a pension for buggery
Page 1 of 3