Never should you look down on anyone. But I don't think we need much help beating the likes of Stoke, United, etc.
They're fodder. And if there's one thing Arsenal have become adept at tonking. It's fodder.

Haha

comment by DubbedTheNewWenger90 (U19529)
posted 17 minutes ago
Never should you look down on anyone. But I don't think we need much help beating the likes of Stoke, United, etc.
They're fodder. And if there's one thing Arsenal have become adept at tonking. It's fodder.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Will never get this arrogance of some of our fans before an OT game. Fecking Moyes beat us there and their injury ravaged side outfought us last season. Oh and we haven't won there in the league for 10 years lol. It will be a very tough game no matter what.

comment by DubbedTheNewWenger90 (U19529)
posted 22 minutes ago
Never should you look down on anyone. But I don't think we need much help beating the likes of Stoke, United, etc.
They're fodder. And if there's one thing Arsenal have become adept at tonking. It's fodder.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2 teams you mentioned are literally our 2 toughest away games

Chillax lads. It's not arrogance.
We used to struggle with Chelsea. Look at how we swiped em aside.
Granted football doesn't work that way.

But United are so bad that all we need to do is turn up for the points and stick our hands out expectantly. If they somehow dare to resist we'll just overpower and mount em.

You got mounted by an 18 year old last season

I think Jose's issue with Clattenburg was deeper than the penalty decision.

He basically cost us points vs City with the Bravo penalty/ red card and he sent off Herrera for slipping over.

Then the Luis red card with Atkinson (yes we were 2-0 down).

I think Jose does have reasons to feel hard done to with officials so far this season.

comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 57 minutes ago
You got mounted by an 18 year old last season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You got mounted by one this season iheanacho 👍

comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 57 minutes ago
You got mounted by an 18 year old last season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You got mounted by one this season iheanacho 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's 20.

I bet his birth certificate says he's 30.

actually he was 19 at the time

comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 2 minutes ago
actually he was 19 at the time
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Apology accepted

So you're statement was still incorrect.

I've not read anything about this so only know what MOTD showed. I'm still trying to work out what he's done that warrants all this ridiculous banning talk. My understanding is that he went to MC at H/T and ranted about the decision. Now I have no idea what was said but the way I see it is if he kept his ranting about the decision and didn't starting talking about MC's wife, mum etc. Then there are no grounds for banning him from anything other than speaking to officials. I never saw any on pitch/pitchside footage of him accosting MC with a barrage of anger, this all happened inside and off camera (didn't it?) as far as I know.

Jose's match/on air conduct was nothing major so it's unfair to give him any form of ban from games since they're usually based on "Bringing the game into disrepute." because you've acted up on air. I usually find him getting in trouble entertaining but this seems a bit of a witch hunt really. Far as I'm concerned, what happened went on between him, MC and backroom staff. Not in front of all of us, so it's nothing to do with us and the game has only been brought into disrepute by idiot journalists being allowed to tell the nation what happened behind the scenes.

This is about his private conduct with a ref not bringing the game into disrepute. So I say no match ban for Jose but instead an unprecedented £1,000,000 fine from the FA for being an ass to MC plus 3 months "Anger Mangement & Conflict Resolution" classes to help prevent any further incidents

Poor attempt from LQ

Wow he was one year older than the player you were using as an example

I think Jose does have reasons to feel hard done to with officials so far this season.
-----------------------------------------------
Still not as bad as we've had for years. Now the boots on the other foot the decisions are being seen as harsh. We've had a lot worse that have been turned down and youre fans have accused us of being biased whingers. If that had been an Arsenal penalty claim there would have been a lot of your fans on our board saying it wasnt a penalty.

Comment deleted by Article Creator

comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 1 minute ago
Wow he was one year older than the player you were using as an example
..

So not an 18 year old then.

comment by I am gooner now (U16927)
posted 1 second ago
I'm still trying to work out what he's done that warrants all this ridiculous banning talk.
------------------

It was in the tunnel away from cameras.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/manchester-uniteds-jose-mourinho-completely-9166883
----------------------------------------------------------------------
^Corrected the link/post

comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 1 minute ago
Wow he was one year older than the player you were using as an example
..

So not an 18 year old then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No as stated a 19 year old, not a twenty year old like someone said.

Will you be reminding them of their mistake?

This is about his private conduct with a ref not bringing the game into disrepute.

---------
It was during a match, with a match official, losing it about a decision that the ref got right.

Rightly seen as unsavoury in a match situation and absolutely falls into banning territory.

comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 1 minute ago
Wow he was one year older than the player you were using as an example
..

So not an 18 year old then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No as stated a 19 year old, not a twenty year old like someone said.

Will you be reminding them of their mistake?
...

He's 20 now so easily done.

He was 19 then so it was incorrect

comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 3 minutes ago
This is about his private conduct with a ref not bringing the game into disrepute.

---------
It was during a match, with a match official, losing it about a decision that the ref got right.

Rightly seen as unsavoury in a match situation and absolutely falls into banning territory.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think its more of a grey area whether the ref got it right. I watched it again today and paused it at the moment of contact. It seems fairly clear the defender did come across him and catch his leg. As I had paused it at the point of contact it was clear the contact was outside the box with some grass showing between the point of contact and penalty box line, plus the camera angle being from that side. But he did dive and simulate to make it look worse than it was.

Overall with the dive as well I dont think it should have been given and if it was it should have been a free kick rather than penalty. But there is a case that there was contact with the player and not the ball which is a foul these days.

comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 5 minutes ago
He was 19 then so it was incorrect
...

Busby said 'He's 20'. So actually correct.