Broquin, you were actually one of the chelsea fans I liked

comment by Wahl DIcht. (U21057)
posted 2 hours, 13 minutes ago
Let me ask you, if you were in Brourinhos shoes would you have joined man utd? Didn't think so. If Brourinhos one of us which he's not, why wool he do something that had even the slightest chance of hurting the Chelsea fans? If I was Brourinho I would have flat out refused to join man utd and said to myself I could go anywhere else.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Turning it around on Mourinho since you know I'm right about Lampard.

So we are right about Mourinho? Whoops.

soccer?lol.

nope. different circumstances

True, one was still in his prime while the other was not. Lampard

soccer?lol.

One stabbed Chelsea in the back (Lampard) the other was stabbed in the back by Chelsea (Mourinho)

Yeah the first dagger only took about 30 seconds... And Matic to Pedro connection at that Then got stabbed another 3 times. Slaughter.

soccer?lol.

Chelsea fans laughing at Mourinho losing. Never thought I'd see the day, how tragic...

Yeh I know it's hard to imagine he'd go manage one of our rivals but alas, he betrayed us.

soccer?lol.

He didn't betray Chelsea, chelsea betrayed him. last season Chelsea had a choice of sticking by Mourinho or choosing the rat players and they chose the rat players. They betrayed Mourinho and I hope he gets his revenge.

comment by Wahl DIcht. (U21057)
posted 2 seconds ago
He didn't betray Chelsea, chelsea betrayed him. last season Chelsea had a choice of sticking by Lampard or choosing crap players and they chose crap players. They betrayed Lampard and he got his revenge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The difference is Mourinho didn't deserve to get sacked, but Lampard's time at Chelsea was up and it was the right time to let him go.

comment by Wahl DIcht. (U21057)
posted 1 minute ago
The difference is Lampard still deserved to play, but Brourinho's time at Chelsea was up and it was the right time to let him go.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

wrong.

Yes, we were wrong to let Lamps leave. Glad we agree.

soccer?lol.

No, we were wrong to let Mourinho go bro

comment by Wahl DIcht. (U21057)
posted 3 minutes ago
We were right to let Brourinho go mou
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Whal dude,
Jose destroyed us last year.
He'll do the same up north if they don't get rid, and they will

Soccer

Lampard proved he was capable of another year at the top, Mourinho appears to be showing that he's finished.

On that basis I'd say Lampard was the one unfairly treated, although he's handled it with far more dignity than someone like Mourinho could dream of

comment by Mr Mourinho (U5874)
posted 12 hours, 21 minutes ago
Whal dude,
Jose destroyed us last year.
He'll do the same up north if they don't get rid, and they will
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ffs just change your name, why are you still called that even though you literally hate Mourinho?

comment by THE bag (U11806)
posted 4 hours, 29 minutes ago
Lampard proved he was capable of another year at the top, Mourinho appears to be showing that he's finished.

On that basis I'd say Lampard was the one unfairly treated, although he's handled it with far more dignity than someone like Mourinho could dream of
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lampard wasn't proving anything when he was at Chelsea. Was mostly out of the team in the second half of 2013-14 and wasn't adding much when he played. It seemed like it was the right time for him to go, similar to how Gerrard left Liverpool in 2015. Lampard, however disagreed and I reckon agreed to join Man City because he wanted to prove a point to Chelsea and Mourinho. He started playing better at Man City because he was super motivated to prove that point, he wasn't playing at that level at Chelsea. Lampard is not a Chelsea legend because he couldn't just accept it was his time to go as many dudes have done both at Chelsea and other clubs (Drogba, Ashley Cole, Gerrard etc.) and then even worse was perfectly fine with screeewing over Chelsea just to prove a point. The only one Lampard cares about is himself, not Chelsea. And that's fine, I just wish Chelsea fans would stop being so naive and thinking that Lampard was forced against his will to join Man City. He knew what he was doing in joining City, he wanted to see if he couldn't prove Mourinho and Chelsea wrong for letting him go. Legends don't do that. Legends know when their time is up, say goodbye to the fans who give them the goodbye they deserve, and then they leave with the best wishes of their fans. Steven Gerrard did it. Didier Drogba did it. John Terry will do it. Why couldn't Frank Lampard just do it?

comment by Wahl Icht. (U21057)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Mr Mourinho (U5874)
posted 12 hours, 21 minutes ago
Whal dude,
Jose destroyed us last year.
He'll do the same up north if they don't get rid, and they will
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ffs just change your name, why are you still called that even though you literally hate Mourinho?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whaldude he doesn't change his name like you change your mind

Makes me laugh how simple u are wahl.

1.)Lampard will go down as maybe chelseas best ever player - you hate him

2.)Mourinho - Chelseas most succesful manager - you love him

1.)One's contract ended - went to man city

2.)One contracts ended - went to man utd

hardly any difference at all between the two.

Your not a chelsea fan, your a mourinho and pogba fan.