or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 12 comments are related to an article called:

Faf du Plessis ball tampering

Page 1 of 1

comment by Lefty (U17934)

posted on 18/11/16

Guilty,

and Amla, the dirty little rat lying to cover him

posted on 18/11/16

Faf and SA are cheats. They did same against Pak when Faf tampered with the ball with a zip. Rubbing the ball against the zip which lead to reverse swing and won them the test.

posted on 18/11/16

Don't say that Kashy otherwise Andy will be looking for you mate!

posted on 18/11/16

He is guilty, but there's very little you can do about ball tampering. At the moments, it's sweets, before it was zips, finger nails, foreign objects, sweat, stepping on the ball, biting the ball, bouncing the ball back instead of throwing it back. People will always find new ways of doing it.

Teams that are caught are cheats and teams that are not caught are innocent.

posted on 18/11/16

Well said Just True..

Lefty,

We should follow Admin's advice bro.. We all know about certain folks here so no need to get involved with them. I think filter is the best option and we don't have to see their comments nor respond even when other folks copy their comments..

comment by Lefty (U17934)

posted on 18/11/16

will do

comment by Kav H (U19426)

posted on 18/11/16

Lets be honest Australian batsmen have been shocking throughout the series and I very much doubt this made a massive difference. However there is clearly an attempt there at manipulating the ball - one match ban me thinks.

posted on 19/11/16

This has been going on for years, nothing new here, Du Plessis has just not been sly enough.

He deserves punishment for being so brazen.

posted on 25/11/16

Also, what was up with that declaration in this current test?

Who declares on the 1st day of a test match?

posted on 25/11/16

It was a very clever tactical declaration..just a shame it didn't really work. Warner had been off the field so couldn't come out to bat immediately. du Plessis saw the chance to bowl at the end of the day to two new openers.

posted on 25/11/16

It may have been a positive step and I do like that, but I think this was bordering on taking the pi55. I don't think he would've done if the series was still alive.



posted on 25/11/16

No of course not. Bit cocky after he got let off for the ball shining issue and think he just wanted to take the pi55 a bit.

Page 1 of 1

Sign in if you want to comment