In what world is he the clubs number one striker? If ings was fit there's no guarantee he'd be third choice .
Do you even pay attention to Liverpool?
He's not the club's no.1 striker.
i think u will find he is, its just becasue he is injured so often he never plays now; hence he is rarely used.
I think u guys are confusing the fact that klopp doesnt play him so he is not the no1 striker, which on the face of it appears correct. However, if he was FIT he would be the no 1 striker.
We will swap you Janssen for him
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 1 minute ago
We will swap you Janssen for him
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We're not that desperate.
He's the best finisher at the club, but not the best striker. What we need in a striker goes way beyond what Daniel can provide, actually playing a match for example.
i think u will find he is, its just becasue he is injured so often he never plays now; hence he is rarely used.
I think u guys are confusing the fact that klopp doesnt play him so he is not the no1 striker, which on the face of it appears correct. However, if he was FIT he would be the no 1 striker.
---------------------------------------
Those are not relevant to the fact he's not your no.1 striker as far as the present tense is concerned. It would be like me saying Wilshere or Ramsey is Arsenal's no.1 midfielder.
Sturridge has been injured a lot and when he's come in, he hasn't lit up the team. Has he even scored or assisted a league goal this season? He's clearly slipping behind and has some way to go to rebuild his fitness, confidence and form.
He's our best striker easily
Never fit though and Klopp has other plans regarding formation/system
If he's our best striker why was he sat on the bench for 10 odd games this year, while fit?
All of a sudden, he picks up an injury and people start hammering him again.
comment by Igor Biscan's Missing Goal Celebration (U15416)
posted 3 minutes ago
If he's our best striker why was he sat on the bench for 10 odd games this year, while fit?
All of a sudden, he picks up an injury and people start hammering him again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp has other plans regarding formation/system. And maybe he doesn't like his personality or work rate or something.
Still our best striker though
I remember the days when some people use to say he was nit injury prone
In all fairness he hasn't he injured properly for over s year..
People seem to forget how injury prone Torres and gerrard were, but not much was read into that!
Klopp does fancy Sturridge. When he's fit - he plays. Started against United too
Where would he be the offloaded to?
I would assume the asking price wouldn't be cheap and his wagers are going to be a lot for anyone but the biggest of clubs.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
The Studge WILL be replaced..imo!
Page 1 of 1
posted on 10/12/16
Timo Werner
posted on 10/12/16
In what world is he the clubs number one striker? If ings was fit there's no guarantee he'd be third choice .
Do you even pay attention to Liverpool?
posted on 10/12/16
He's not the club's no.1 striker.
posted on 10/12/16
i think u will find he is, its just becasue he is injured so often he never plays now; hence he is rarely used.
I think u guys are confusing the fact that klopp doesnt play him so he is not the no1 striker, which on the face of it appears correct. However, if he was FIT he would be the no 1 striker.
posted on 10/12/16
We will swap you Janssen for him
posted on 10/12/16
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 1 minute ago
We will swap you Janssen for him
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We're not that desperate.
posted on 10/12/16
He's the best finisher at the club, but not the best striker. What we need in a striker goes way beyond what Daniel can provide, actually playing a match for example.
posted on 10/12/16
i think u will find he is, its just becasue he is injured so often he never plays now; hence he is rarely used.
I think u guys are confusing the fact that klopp doesnt play him so he is not the no1 striker, which on the face of it appears correct. However, if he was FIT he would be the no 1 striker.
---------------------------------------
Those are not relevant to the fact he's not your no.1 striker as far as the present tense is concerned. It would be like me saying Wilshere or Ramsey is Arsenal's no.1 midfielder.
Sturridge has been injured a lot and when he's come in, he hasn't lit up the team. Has he even scored or assisted a league goal this season? He's clearly slipping behind and has some way to go to rebuild his fitness, confidence and form.
posted on 10/12/16
He's our best striker easily
Never fit though and Klopp has other plans regarding formation/system
posted on 10/12/16
If he's our best striker why was he sat on the bench for 10 odd games this year, while fit?
All of a sudden, he picks up an injury and people start hammering him again.
posted on 10/12/16
comment by Igor Biscan's Missing Goal Celebration (U15416)
posted 3 minutes ago
If he's our best striker why was he sat on the bench for 10 odd games this year, while fit?
All of a sudden, he picks up an injury and people start hammering him again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp has other plans regarding formation/system. And maybe he doesn't like his personality or work rate or something.
Still our best striker though
posted on 11/12/16
Hernandez is coming in
posted on 11/12/16
I remember the days when some people use to say he was nit injury prone
posted on 11/12/16
In all fairness he hasn't he injured properly for over s year..
People seem to forget how injury prone Torres and gerrard were, but not much was read into that!
posted on 11/12/16
Klopp does fancy Sturridge. When he's fit - he plays. Started against United too
posted on 11/12/16
Where would he be the offloaded to?
I would assume the asking price wouldn't be cheap and his wagers are going to be a lot for anyone but the biggest of clubs.
Page 1 of 1