Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 4 seconds ago
Sutton has a think about things, takes a view and gives his logic. He's no better or worse than the likes of Adrian Durham other than being a Champ on both sides of the border.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't really mind Sutton much. I don't understand why people expect him to be impartial though.
comment by Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 47 seconds ago
Is 6 greater than 2?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not in golf its not.
++++
Yes it is
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erm
timmy has you there Curly 😂👍
comment by timmy (U14278)
posted 59 seconds ago
comment by Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 47 seconds ago
Is 6 greater than 2?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not in golf its not.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends If you're over par or under par_____________
Laudrup<He can only read his daily record with Sutton in it or mad Phil>
Over the years that applies to posters of Celtic and Rangers.
The only place I've seen the Phil man's name is on here.
Probably mentioned more by Rangers fans.
HNY to all on this wonderful thread I've not spoken to yet.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 43 seconds ago
Erm
timmy has you there Curly 😂👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would love to play a round against him for money then.
Miller.
He loves an argument, much the same as everybody on this forum. He just gets paid for it.
comment by Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 4 minutes ago
Actually, Mags point is correct. Had Rangers taken their first chance, then the whole game would have been different. The assumption made is that every action thereafter would have been the same, which in reality would not have happened. Therefore it's a silly argument.
+++++
Again the whole point is totally missed
Leo said laudrup was wrong and the stats back that up
I said it was the opposite and the stats backed laudrup up as we had six chances. No one is debating whether the chances would have all occurred if the first chance went in, all I am saying is that 6 is greater than 2 - which I am 100% certain is still the case
You then said the same thing as laudrup and Leo agreed with you
That says it all really
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That wasn't the original point though. The point was if Rangers had converted the chances they created, they would have won. It's an irrelevance though, as the whole game would have played out differently and this chances would not have been created. Other chances, perhaps, but not the same ones.
In moving the goalposts, you are correct about Leo. But you're still wrong about the original point as no one knows how Rangers scoring their first chance would have affected the game. Same as you were wrong about the 200th post....
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 30 seconds ago
Erm
timmy has you there Curly 😂👍
++++
No he hasn't, the whole point in golf is to have the lesser amount of shots, not the greater amount
You score a 2 but I have a greater amount of shots and score a 6 - who wins the hole
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye Curly, but if you are +2 and I am -6, who wins?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Miller not many Bears would agree wth you.
It kinda makes sense that he's hated by Bears in general.
He's an outspoken and controversial pundit with a Tic history.
Came on stream at the most disastrous 5 years in Rangers' history.
He's never ignored tho - north or south of the border.
Other career pundits like Keevins and Johnstone are garbage.
comment by Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 43 seconds ago
Erm
timmy has you there Curly 😂👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would love to play a round against him for money then.
+++++
You would lose though
You could be a wonderful player and I would still win as you don't understand the scoring and cannot count
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As long as you keep trying to get more shots than me I will be alright.
Show.
Slainthe.
My Made in Seattle autocorrect had wee event there.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I'd much rather have Sutton talk football than Andy Walker. He's absolutely terrible.
Haha
Good try
timmy meant going down in toe shots with you taking six
Cheat 😂😂😂
comment by Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 11 minutes ago
Aye Curly, but if you are +2 and I am -6, who wins?
++++
Well I would have scored 74 and you would have scored 66 so you would win as the whole point in golf is to score less, not more
I am sure you know that though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong again Curly. You shouldda known it was a Par 71.
Anyway, I'm off home. Have a BÜM and make sure you stay safe in these lawless parts you choose to live in.
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 16 minutes ago
Miller not many Bears would agree wth you.
It kinda makes sense that he's hated by Bears in general.
He's an outspoken and controversial pundit with a Tic history.
Came on stream at the most disastrous 5 years in Rangers' history.
He's never ignored tho - north or south of the border.
Other career pundits like Keevins and Johnstone are garbage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They are garbage but big Chris is magic
He is meant to be impartial but he wants us wiped out he spends his time doing the compliance officers job for him during rangers matches, he chooses who he wants suspended after the match for off the ball incidents and goes on and facking on until the guy is charged, very impartial indeed , I can see why you like him Quinn
Thanks for deciding that I like him & he is magic Laudrup
I said he is not ignored.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sign in if you want to comment
Celtic must finish Rangers for ever.
Page 10 of 15
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
posted on 2/1/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 2/1/17
😂😂😂😂😂😂
posted on 2/1/17
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 4 seconds ago
Sutton has a think about things, takes a view and gives his logic. He's no better or worse than the likes of Adrian Durham other than being a Champ on both sides of the border.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't really mind Sutton much. I don't understand why people expect him to be impartial though.
posted on 2/1/17
comment by Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 47 seconds ago
Is 6 greater than 2?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not in golf its not.
++++
Yes it is
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 2/1/17
Erm
timmy has you there Curly 😂👍
posted on 2/1/17
comment by timmy (U14278)
posted 59 seconds ago
comment by Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 47 seconds ago
Is 6 greater than 2?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not in golf its not.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends If you're over par or under par_____________
posted on 2/1/17
Laudrup<He can only read his daily record with Sutton in it or mad Phil>
Over the years that applies to posters of Celtic and Rangers.
The only place I've seen the Phil man's name is on here.
Probably mentioned more by Rangers fans.
HNY to all on this wonderful thread I've not spoken to yet.
posted on 2/1/17
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 43 seconds ago
Erm
timmy has you there Curly 😂👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would love to play a round against him for money then.
posted on 2/1/17
Miller.
He loves an argument, much the same as everybody on this forum. He just gets paid for it.
posted on 2/1/17
comment by Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 4 minutes ago
Actually, Mags point is correct. Had Rangers taken their first chance, then the whole game would have been different. The assumption made is that every action thereafter would have been the same, which in reality would not have happened. Therefore it's a silly argument.
+++++
Again the whole point is totally missed
Leo said laudrup was wrong and the stats back that up
I said it was the opposite and the stats backed laudrup up as we had six chances. No one is debating whether the chances would have all occurred if the first chance went in, all I am saying is that 6 is greater than 2 - which I am 100% certain is still the case
You then said the same thing as laudrup and Leo agreed with you
That says it all really
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That wasn't the original point though. The point was if Rangers had converted the chances they created, they would have won. It's an irrelevance though, as the whole game would have played out differently and this chances would not have been created. Other chances, perhaps, but not the same ones.
In moving the goalposts, you are correct about Leo. But you're still wrong about the original point as no one knows how Rangers scoring their first chance would have affected the game. Same as you were wrong about the 200th post....
posted on 2/1/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 2/1/17
Quinny
BÜM mate.
posted on 2/1/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 2/1/17
comment by Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 30 seconds ago
Erm
timmy has you there Curly 😂👍
++++
No he hasn't, the whole point in golf is to have the lesser amount of shots, not the greater amount
You score a 2 but I have a greater amount of shots and score a 6 - who wins the hole
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye Curly, but if you are +2 and I am -6, who wins?
posted on 2/1/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 2/1/17
Miller not many Bears would agree wth you.
It kinda makes sense that he's hated by Bears in general.
He's an outspoken and controversial pundit with a Tic history.
Came on stream at the most disastrous 5 years in Rangers' history.
He's never ignored tho - north or south of the border.
Other career pundits like Keevins and Johnstone are garbage.
posted on 2/1/17
comment by Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 43 seconds ago
Erm
timmy has you there Curly 😂👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would love to play a round against him for money then.
+++++
You would lose though
You could be a wonderful player and I would still win as you don't understand the scoring and cannot count
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As long as you keep trying to get more shots than me I will be alright.
posted on 2/1/17
Show.
Slainthe.
My Made in Seattle autocorrect had wee event there.
posted on 2/1/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 2/1/17
I'd much rather have Sutton talk football than Andy Walker. He's absolutely terrible.
posted on 2/1/17
Haha
Good try
timmy meant going down in toe shots with you taking six
Cheat 😂😂😂
posted on 2/1/17
comment by Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 11 minutes ago
Aye Curly, but if you are +2 and I am -6, who wins?
++++
Well I would have scored 74 and you would have scored 66 so you would win as the whole point in golf is to score less, not more
I am sure you know that though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong again Curly. You shouldda known it was a Par 71.
Anyway, I'm off home. Have a BÜM and make sure you stay safe in these lawless parts you choose to live in.
posted on 2/1/17
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 16 minutes ago
Miller not many Bears would agree wth you.
It kinda makes sense that he's hated by Bears in general.
He's an outspoken and controversial pundit with a Tic history.
Came on stream at the most disastrous 5 years in Rangers' history.
He's never ignored tho - north or south of the border.
Other career pundits like Keevins and Johnstone are garbage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They are garbage but big Chris is magic
He is meant to be impartial but he wants us wiped out he spends his time doing the compliance officers job for him during rangers matches, he chooses who he wants suspended after the match for off the ball incidents and goes on and facking on until the guy is charged, very impartial indeed , I can see why you like him Quinn
posted on 2/1/17
Thanks for deciding that I like him & he is magic Laudrup
I said he is not ignored.
posted on 2/1/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 10 of 15
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15