comment by Galv's: Happy New Mike Dean (U10415)
posted 29 seconds ago
It's weird how he could never get fit for Arsenal yet seems to be OK at Bournemouth in that regard
...

Welbeck was never injury prone at United, now he's presumed dead.

Wilshere could (and still might be) a top player, if he can stay injury free.

Whilst not particularly nice as an individual, he is definitely talented and is missed by Arsenal. Why he is playing more often at Bournemouth, who knows? Training regime, different fitness techniques, who knows?

comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by Galv's: Happy New Mike Dean (U10415)
posted 29 seconds ago
It's weird how he could never get fit for Arsenal yet seems to be OK at Bournemouth in that regard
...

Welbeck was never injury prone at United, now he's presumed dead.
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Who remembers Wellback

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by garrybuild (U1148)
posted 31 minutes ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 4 minutes ago
Firstly the stat is wrong. Wilshere has 13 career goals

Luka Modric has 11 goals in 189 games for Real, Wilshere has 12 in 159 for Arsenal. I guess that makes Wilshere a better player than Modric in your eyes?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the clue is in the stat , 7 in 17 days, as apposed to 7 in a CAREER(or even as you say 13 in a career0
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you are correct but 17 days compared to a career is a little different to one goal over a hundred and odd games, but if your way pleases you then fill your boots

Well my point was it was a rather naive way to judge two players, but that seems to have gone above your head.

But, yeah. Comparing over careers of players with similar roles is obviously better than goalscoring midfielder in a purple patch v the career of a midfielder whose game isn't about goals.

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 3 minutes ago
Well my point was it was a rather naive way to judge two players, but that seems to have gone above your head.

But, yeah. Comparing over careers of players with similar roles is obviously better than goalscoring midfielder in a purple patch v the career of a midfielder whose game isn't about goals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
as I said to a comment earlier I am the idiot who is just having a dig at a player I dont like whereas you are coming over as someone carrying on a non article just to prove your point

* article

Oh, I thought I was answering your comments that you put to me.
Sort of how conversations work.

Apologies if you didn't want people to reply, maybe public forums aren't for you...

Genuine question, where the fack has Welbeck been? What injury did he get?

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 3 minutes ago
Oh, I thought I was answering your comments that you put to me.
Sort of how conversations work.

Apologies if you didn't want people to reply, maybe public forums aren't for you...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
nah, got no problem with discussion, just with people who come across as a bit of a p rrick

Don't be too hard on yourself

bye

comment by MAGIC Pockets (U20915)
posted 54 seconds ago
Genuine question, where the fack has Welbeck been? What injury did he get?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cartilage damage in his knee. Has had knee issues throughout his career, tbf.

Stupid comparison really, Alli v Chamberlain would be better.