The board are full of empty threats. Like the threat they made to take AM to court and sue Villa and blah blah blah....then for it to all be sorted.

They are just an embarrisment. I see he has time to talk to the media regarding someone attacking the club, but doesn't have the time to tell the fans what's going on...?

Those pair are a bunch of clowns.

I see where Pannu is coming from. The legions of fans, the pundits, the journalists and the departing players (one of which has been at Birmingham longer then Pannu) don't have a clue. They don't know what they're talking about.

Pannu, however, definitely 100% has everything under control. The player fire sale is obviously part of the plan and was fully intended.

Who does this moron think he is kidding...sick of him.

Its swings and round abouts really, are the board not also entitled to their opinion? freedom of speech and all that?

I must have missed the reports about Jerome calling Pannu in June demanding to be sold but if he did that then isnt there a question mark against his loyalty?

Not particularly defending the board but as I recall their only contribution to our relegation was that they didnt fire McNugget in January like they should have done.

Those are my opinions in the context of my rights to freedom of speech

The difference is Xpat is that you accept that others are entitled to opinions and move on.

Pannu does not accept others are entitled to opinions, not matter how fair an opinion it may be, and threatens legal action in a desperate attempt to claw money back into the club he and his master is turning over.

Add to that Pannu's opinions tend to be rainbows, unicorns and strawberry flavoured gum drops because he doesn't realise Birmingham City fans can form a (realistic) opinion of our frankly dire situation for ourselves.

He thinks we're mugs and throws a wobbly whenever anyone contradicts his blatant rubbish that he spouts time and time again.

And he's fat and bald. Never a good thing.

Freedom of speech is one thing but silence is another.
Pannu has been personally invited to talk on Birminghams BRMB by Tom Ross but has passed on this one so far. Why?
Tbh if he were on the show I would be very careful over the way I asked a question or I'd be in court on Monday morning.

Xpat I agree the board are entitled to an opinion using freedom of speech but they choose not to say anything except who they plan to sue.

One thing that really annoys me about Pannu is his constant need to seek legal advice on anything negative said about the club.

Football is all about opinions, it's what makes football as interesting and passionate as it is.

In the current circumstances, most people have doubts about the current board. Negative opinions and rumours are swirling around Blues at the moment...are you surprised? Until Pannu provides people with evidence on the financial state of BIHL and Blues it will stay this way.

If he is so bothered by people questioning him etc, why doesn't he provide everyone with proof to put an end to it.

The opinions of Jerome and Bowyer don't bother me. I've heard exactly the same from people at work, and my friends...

Thought PP had said a few weeks ago that we where financially secure?,no one would believe him whatever he says. kro..

Thought PP had said a few weeks ago that we where financially secure?
---------------------------------------------------

He must have found my wallet, I've been looking for that everywhere!

Whats happened to Banjo Kid tonight?. kro.

"Freedom of speech is one thing but silence is another."

Sorry but what a contradiction...

Freedom of speech includes the right to remain silent if you wish, or am a I missing something here???

I have to go along with the sentiment that whatever you think of PP he and the rest of the management are entitled to their opinion on things said by LB & CJ.
Both those players, have had their wages paid via the management, but more so by the fans who have been paying their way into the ground week in week out/season in season out and promoting the team elsewhere via merchandise etc.
The players could/should have kept their opinions to themselves unless they felt they were hard done by or did not get a move which has/is been good for their careers.
I do not blame CJ or LB for what they have said, not do i blame PP for saying what he has said.
At the end of the day, he represents/is the owner of the club that these players have been employed by and who, in his opinion are disrespecting [or worse] their former employers.
Ultimately it does not matter much either way but i know that i would be peed off had someone i had employed [and not asked to leave] then turned around and said 'bad' things about their former employers after getting a move which was to their benefit.

"And he's fat and bald. Never a good thing."


Hey i am aswell, and i ant so bad a thing

Panu thinks everything is rosey, cut cloth accordingly well we have spent about £500K on fees (can rise on sucsess) and when you look at the money saved in cuts and players sold, its not a case of cutting cloth accordingly its a case of sell all they can because we are dept ridden and skint.

Come prove us wrong Panu

Why was players sold for cheaper than value again we are desperate for cash to pay off banks, why could the board not cough up cash to keep club afloat untill we got the right offers for players, because the board are skint.

Yeung and Co do not have a pot to pee in.

Jerome tells the truth, something Panu etc have been dodging all along, if we are to progress then the club has to.

1) Invest in our club to get promoted we are not in the Top 4 strongest sqauds this season.

2) When Promoted they need to invest again, and invest enough to keep us up, the kind of spending we would need to move on would be what Stoke have done and thats improve bit by bit, last 2 seasons Stoke have been ambitious.

Granted Yeung and co was on same level of ambition if not more, sadly the targets was too pricey (if Jones was what Stoke paid i think we would have got him and so we was right not to pay £13M).

But come january after the Xmass of all those going bust rumours, and when Yeung had to loan the club money to keep afloat we should have heard alarm bells. We never was in the market in January as we was in the Summer so i wonder if cash was tight.

I think bottom line, Yeung could have backed us more in the Prem, but combination of lossing Prem Income and Yeungs arrest has meant we are in trouble.

Fact! Yeung is not very rich, he seemed the only one backing the club (otherwise why would he have to sell shares, and loan off his assets to keep club afloat).

Fact! He/BIH paid over the odds for the club and seems its not all paid cash but loans and debts from banks and lenders.

So please Panu tell me i am wrong, maybe we can discuss it over a coffee.

Fans are upset, you need to try to get them back on side and be honest, if you told us we are in big financial mess the fans would be fine, we can handle the truth.

Panu your rants are alienating you as much as Sully's did.

The KiD

why is every one going on as he looks the fool ... time will tell if Yeung makes comeback or is convicted..

I think there stake will be sold if he goes down if he doesnt the resentment will force them out.. Yes Yeungs stakes value will increase and we then we can move forward in regaining premier status ... Blues is bigger than any owner and will be here long after Yeung and Co

Pannu is like the Chinese equivalent of Chemical/Comical Ali in Eye-raq.
I can almost see him telling everyone that the Americans were finished,as their tanks rolled into Bagdhad in full view of the cameras,just over his shoulder!

Is it true that Yuengs has been told that he cannot leave HK now?

Somebody at the game told me that he will not be coming over this week, can anybody confirm this?

bcfc83 , a woman at the game told me the same thing.
kro.