I think the point he's making is that Spurs can fill a venue that size and he believes that city cannot.
Interesting question as still recall the days of citywith Niall Quinn as striker languishing in mid tables with us 😂
We've both come a long way since 👌
Pochettinos parents hadn't even met last time big club Spurs won the league
Spurs were one of the original big 5 along with Everton at one point believe it or not.
We all know how City got where they are. At least Chelsea were in and around the summit before the Russian. City were with the dead men so traditionally Spurs were the bigger club pre 2008.
comment by bertrand small (U19359)
posted 31 minutes ago
Spurs were one of the original big 5 along with Everton at one point believe it or not.
We all know how City got where they are. At least Chelsea were in and around the summit before the Russian. City were with the dead men so traditionally Spurs were the bigger club pre 2008.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But without your money u and city wouldnt have won any titles or CL's.
I'm happy for you to call us a small club so long as we are the ones actually winning stuff.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 18 seconds ago
City won the lottery when the sheikh bought in. I don't begrudge them that as their fans had been through a lot. Wasn't so long ago they were languishing in the third tier of English footy. Traditionally Spurs have always been a slightly bigger, more glamorous club than City. City are currently wealthier due to the huge cash injection and as a consequence have had recent success, but that doesn't automatically make them a bigger club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So chelsea ain't a bigger club than arsenal then by that logic?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by ♤WengersNearlyMen♤ (U5041)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 18 seconds ago
City won the lottery when the sheikh bought in. I don't begrudge them that as their fans had been through a lot. Wasn't so long ago they were languishing in the third tier of English footy. Traditionally Spurs have always been a slightly bigger, more glamorous club than City. City are currently wealthier due to the huge cash injection and as a consequence have had recent success, but that doesn't automatically make them a bigger club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So chelsea ain't a bigger club than arsenal then by that logic?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, possibly not. Chelsea have won a hell of a lot since RA took over, much more than City have in comparison. They are more successful than Arsenal in the modern era but a bigger club? I always think of Arsenal as the biggest London club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would u say chelsea are a bigger club than Spurs then?
The quote is "The Argentine claims that despite City's wealth, Pep Guardiola has left Barcelona and Bayern Munich for a club HISTORICALLY INFERIOR to the north Londoners".
.
It does NOT say BIGGER - please learn to read your own posts
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by ♤WengersNearlyMen♤ (U5041)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by ♤WengersNearlyMen♤ (U5041)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 18 seconds ago
City won the lottery when the sheikh bought in. I don't begrudge them that as their fans had been through a lot. Wasn't so long ago they were languishing in the third tier of English footy. Traditionally Spurs have always been a slightly bigger, more glamorous club than City. City are currently wealthier due to the huge cash injection and as a consequence have had recent success, but that doesn't automatically make them a bigger club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So chelsea ain't a bigger club than arsenal then by that logic?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, possibly not. Chelsea have won a hell of a lot since RA took over, much more than City have in comparison. They are more successful than Arsenal in the modern era but a bigger club? I always think of Arsenal as the biggest London club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would u say chelsea are a bigger club than Spurs then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Even before RA?
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Spurs bigger than Man City?
Page 1 of 1
posted on 21/1/17
I think the point he's making is that Spurs can fill a venue that size and he believes that city cannot.
posted on 21/1/17
Interesting question as still recall the days of citywith Niall Quinn as striker languishing in mid tables with us 😂
We've both come a long way since 👌
posted on 21/1/17
Pochettinos parents hadn't even met last time big club Spurs won the league
posted on 21/1/17
Spurs were one of the original big 5 along with Everton at one point believe it or not.
We all know how City got where they are. At least Chelsea were in and around the summit before the Russian. City were with the dead men so traditionally Spurs were the bigger club pre 2008.
posted on 21/1/17
comment by bertrand small (U19359)
posted 31 minutes ago
Spurs were one of the original big 5 along with Everton at one point believe it or not.
We all know how City got where they are. At least Chelsea were in and around the summit before the Russian. City were with the dead men so traditionally Spurs were the bigger club pre 2008.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But without your money u and city wouldnt have won any titles or CL's.
posted on 21/1/17
I'm happy for you to call us a small club so long as we are the ones actually winning stuff.
posted on 21/1/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/1/17
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 18 seconds ago
City won the lottery when the sheikh bought in. I don't begrudge them that as their fans had been through a lot. Wasn't so long ago they were languishing in the third tier of English footy. Traditionally Spurs have always been a slightly bigger, more glamorous club than City. City are currently wealthier due to the huge cash injection and as a consequence have had recent success, but that doesn't automatically make them a bigger club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So chelsea ain't a bigger club than arsenal then by that logic?
posted on 21/1/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/1/17
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by ♤WengersNearlyMen♤ (U5041)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 18 seconds ago
City won the lottery when the sheikh bought in. I don't begrudge them that as their fans had been through a lot. Wasn't so long ago they were languishing in the third tier of English footy. Traditionally Spurs have always been a slightly bigger, more glamorous club than City. City are currently wealthier due to the huge cash injection and as a consequence have had recent success, but that doesn't automatically make them a bigger club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So chelsea ain't a bigger club than arsenal then by that logic?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, possibly not. Chelsea have won a hell of a lot since RA took over, much more than City have in comparison. They are more successful than Arsenal in the modern era but a bigger club? I always think of Arsenal as the biggest London club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would u say chelsea are a bigger club than Spurs then?
posted on 21/1/17
The quote is "The Argentine claims that despite City's wealth, Pep Guardiola has left Barcelona and Bayern Munich for a club HISTORICALLY INFERIOR to the north Londoners".
.
It does NOT say BIGGER - please learn to read your own posts
posted on 21/1/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/1/17
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by ♤WengersNearlyMen♤ (U5041)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by ♤WengersNearlyMen♤ (U5041)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 18 seconds ago
City won the lottery when the sheikh bought in. I don't begrudge them that as their fans had been through a lot. Wasn't so long ago they were languishing in the third tier of English footy. Traditionally Spurs have always been a slightly bigger, more glamorous club than City. City are currently wealthier due to the huge cash injection and as a consequence have had recent success, but that doesn't automatically make them a bigger club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So chelsea ain't a bigger club than arsenal then by that logic?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, possibly not. Chelsea have won a hell of a lot since RA took over, much more than City have in comparison. They are more successful than Arsenal in the modern era but a bigger club? I always think of Arsenal as the biggest London club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would u say chelsea are a bigger club than Spurs then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Even before RA?
Page 1 of 1