The knowledge that anything can happen in football is keeping me optimistic that we can win.Back in the real world though I will be doing cartwheels if we get a point.
I think we're in with a chance if we put a performance in. They've lost the likes of Bellamy, Chopra, Bothroyd etc but have brought in Miller and Earnshaw. Need big games from the two central defenders and Oster and Copps and Hayter needs to take any chances he gets. Think Lalkovic will have a decent game today if he figures which he should. Come on Rovers!
I am out of circulation again today on holiday in Edinburgh Keep the flag flying we need a result today more than ever. The best news is that our first team will be back soon.
Agree that a point today would be a great achievement. For now I'll take everyone coming through a decent game.
Team line ups are in. Rovers lining up as follows:
Woods
Dumbaya
Oconnor
Friend
Naylor
Spurr
Coppinger
Oster
Gillett
Bennett
Hayter
Sully
Wilson
Barnes
Hird
Lalkovic
Wanted Lalkovic to play...looks like SOD is trying to sure up the defence
Fuzzy. Sorrry we failed to get the HTML table support released yesterday.
Do you want the "1 match ban" enabled so you can kick off disruptive members from the thread?
Looks like the same old, same old,plan A. Start at 0-0 and hope to defend 0-0. Lose a goal in the first ten minutes and then either try to play catch up or defend 0-1.
Why all the fuss about getting our "Star" players back off the injured list when they are not in the squad?
I am not being negative, just trying to understand where we are coming from!!!!!
He'll need it on 14th October
C'mon Donny!!!
RTID
Sorry, I missed O'Conner in the starting line up, but surely if Stock and martis are fit, they should have been part of the bench to bring them on slowly. I know we only have five spaces 4 plus keeper on the bench this season, but even so, you would have expected them to be somewhere about.
'1-Match Ban' feature, which means that if a match thread creator deletes a comment on his/her article, the poster of the comment will be blocked from posting again on the thread. Stops the match threads being disrupted.
Totally just got goosebumps during that minute applause. I'd have had Stocky on the bench rather than Wilson but SOD said he wanted to put them through another friendly in the week to get there sharpness up. To be honest i can't see Martis getting into the squad now we only have 5 subs, but that's just my opinion.
In that case a the creator is a censor, anyone who HE/SHE disagrees with they can ban. Does not sound democratic to me, surely having the post deleted is sufficient. You at Admin control bad language.
Yes we are happy with OPs who go to the effort of creating match threads to censor disruptive members. We leave it at the discretion of the OP.
Post seems to be having a good game in defence.
hahaha Becky-Jane Orpe! That's me :D
I had a fiver on the left post to score!!!
Just watched the Leger on TVG over here.
According to Admin, Fuzzy can delete both posts.
Off the post twice in the first minute But we seem to be finding our feet now.
1-Match ban feature? Not sure how much that helps as if a user is banned from posting on a specific OP's threads, he's only going to moan about it (keeping within language protocolls) on other threads. Deletion is something I have used occasionally on 606 (for real prats) but it can make a mess of the thread.
If the one match ban is going to be there, it would need to be used responsibly. There is having your say and there is being disruptive. Users would have to be very responsible in drawing that distinction.
To be honest Fuzzy, we don't have many on here who need to be banned, ionly excepted, Ha, Ha, Joke Mick. Might be useful sometimes when opposition posters get a bit stroppy.
Says a lot when OUR commentator says that after 27 minutes we should be playing for time.
I think he was being ironic about the idiot in the crowd who was keeping the ball to be honest.
Plan A working so far Fuzzy. We must be doing something right if the comments on the crowd are justified.
Sounds now that we have brought on our secret weapon, ( kept a total secret), the games now Messi they said, or have I misheard?
Sign in if you want to comment
Pre-Match: Cardiff v Donny
Page 1 of 3
posted on 10/9/11
The knowledge that anything can happen in football is keeping me optimistic that we can win.Back in the real world though I will be doing cartwheels if we get a point.
posted on 10/9/11
I think we're in with a chance if we put a performance in. They've lost the likes of Bellamy, Chopra, Bothroyd etc but have brought in Miller and Earnshaw. Need big games from the two central defenders and Oster and Copps and Hayter needs to take any chances he gets. Think Lalkovic will have a decent game today if he figures which he should. Come on Rovers!
posted on 10/9/11
I am out of circulation again today on holiday in Edinburgh Keep the flag flying we need a result today more than ever. The best news is that our first team will be back soon.
posted on 10/9/11
Agree that a point today would be a great achievement. For now I'll take everyone coming through a decent game.
posted on 10/9/11
Team line ups are in. Rovers lining up as follows:
Woods
Dumbaya
Oconnor
Friend
Naylor
Spurr
Coppinger
Oster
Gillett
Bennett
Hayter
Sully
Wilson
Barnes
Hird
Lalkovic
Wanted Lalkovic to play...looks like SOD is trying to sure up the defence
posted on 10/9/11
Fuzzy. Sorrry we failed to get the HTML table support released yesterday.
Do you want the "1 match ban" enabled so you can kick off disruptive members from the thread?
posted on 10/9/11
Looks like the same old, same old,plan A. Start at 0-0 and hope to defend 0-0. Lose a goal in the first ten minutes and then either try to play catch up or defend 0-1.
Why all the fuss about getting our "Star" players back off the injured list when they are not in the squad?
I am not being negative, just trying to understand where we are coming from!!!!!
posted on 10/9/11
He'll need it on 14th October
C'mon Donny!!!
RTID
posted on 10/9/11
Sorry, I missed O'Conner in the starting line up, but surely if Stock and martis are fit, they should have been part of the bench to bring them on slowly. I know we only have five spaces 4 plus keeper on the bench this season, but even so, you would have expected them to be somewhere about.
posted on 10/9/11
'1-Match Ban' feature, which means that if a match thread creator deletes a comment on his/her article, the poster of the comment will be blocked from posting again on the thread. Stops the match threads being disrupted.
posted on 10/9/11
Totally just got goosebumps during that minute applause. I'd have had Stocky on the bench rather than Wilson but SOD said he wanted to put them through another friendly in the week to get there sharpness up. To be honest i can't see Martis getting into the squad now we only have 5 subs, but that's just my opinion.
posted on 10/9/11
In that case a the creator is a censor, anyone who HE/SHE disagrees with they can ban. Does not sound democratic to me, surely having the post deleted is sufficient. You at Admin control bad language.
posted on 10/9/11
Good start Woods
posted on 10/9/11
Yes we are happy with OPs who go to the effort of creating match threads to censor disruptive members. We leave it at the discretion of the OP.
posted on 10/9/11
Post seems to be having a good game in defence.
posted on 10/9/11
hahaha Becky-Jane Orpe! That's me :D
posted on 10/9/11
I had a fiver on the left post to score!!!
posted on 10/9/11
Just watched the Leger on TVG over here.
According to Admin, Fuzzy can delete both posts.
posted on 10/9/11
Off the post twice in the first minute But we seem to be finding our feet now.
1-Match ban feature? Not sure how much that helps as if a user is banned from posting on a specific OP's threads, he's only going to moan about it (keeping within language protocolls) on other threads. Deletion is something I have used occasionally on 606 (for real prats) but it can make a mess of the thread.
If the one match ban is going to be there, it would need to be used responsibly. There is having your say and there is being disruptive. Users would have to be very responsible in drawing that distinction.
posted on 10/9/11
To be honest Fuzzy, we don't have many on here who need to be banned, ionly excepted, Ha, Ha, Joke Mick. Might be useful sometimes when opposition posters get a bit stroppy.
posted on 10/9/11
Says a lot when OUR commentator says that after 27 minutes we should be playing for time.
posted on 10/9/11
I think he was being ironic about the idiot in the crowd who was keeping the ball to be honest.
posted on 10/9/11
Plan A working so far Fuzzy. We must be doing something right if the comments on the crowd are justified.
posted on 10/9/11
Sounds now that we have brought on our secret weapon, ( kept a total secret), the games now Messi they said, or have I misheard?
posted on 10/9/11
It's his cousin Scrappy.
Page 1 of 3