Call it what you want, so long as he gets the same punishment.
comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 1 minute ago
Is it an Abu conspiracy are we out to get you?
Fack off talking rubbish it was a stamp he deserves a 5 game ban end of.
________________
Bite!
comment by redmisty (U7556)
posted 7 minutes ago
It wasn't a stamp. There was not enough force for it to be called that...
Rival fans have been making this distinction since the Mings "non stamp". If Mings didn't stamp then nor did Rojo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And United fans argued that Mings did stamp on Ibrahimovic. If Mings was a stamp then so was Rojo's.
Would you complain if Rojo gets a 5 match ban?
"If Mings was a stamp then so was Rojo's."
They weren't the same.
If you claim they were then you must either be on the wind up or so biased that you're unable to engage common sense.
comment by Plastic Manc (U9526)
posted 1 minute ago
Call it what you want, so long as he gets the same punishment.
________________
no no, you can't call it a stamp. City fans won't allow it. You have to get the word right, never mind the punishment.
I don't care if he gets a ten game ban - just don't call it a stamp! City fans hate it when you get that wrong...
comment by redmisty (U7556)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Plastic Manc (U9526)
posted 1 minute ago
Call it what you want, so long as he gets the same punishment.
________________
no no, you can't call it a stamp. City fans won't allow it. You have to get the word right, never mind the punishment.
I don't care if he gets a ten game ban - just don't call it a stamp! City fans hate it when you get that wrong...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh how stupid do you sound.
Me the city fan that posted how frivolous mings apeal was because the stamp was obvious.
Only a deluded rag could turn a united players stamp into a dig at city.
And you call us obsessed.
Bite haha bitten off more than you can chew misty I would say.
Abus
comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by redmisty (U7556)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Plastic Manc (U9526)
posted 1 minute ago
Call it what you want, so long as he gets the same punishment.
________________
no no, you can't call it a stamp. City fans won't allow it. You have to get the word right, never mind the punishment.
I don't care if he gets a ten game ban - just don't call it a stamp! City fans hate it when you get that wrong...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh how stupid do you sound.
Me the city fan that posted how frivolous mings apeal was because the stamp was obvious.
Only a deluded rag could turn a united players stamp into a dig at city.
And you call us obsessed.
Bite haha bitten off more than you can chew misty I would say.
Abus
_________________
superbite!!
Not getting upset are you LQ?
You seem very, very angry today...
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
"If Mings was a stamp then so was Rojo's."
They weren't the same.
If you claim they were then you must either be on the wind up or so biased that you're unable to engage common sense.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Winston
Rojo did stamp on Hazard last night. The GIF in the link above shows he did. What would you describe it as?
Coutinho's Happy Feet (U18971)
I think he went to do it and pulled out - he sort of stepped on him.
The leg didn't really extend and there wasn't much force at all.
Point is, it's not the same as Mings - no point in making out it is.
Coutinho's Happy Feet (U18971)
I think he went to do it and pulled out - he sort of stepped on him.
The leg didn't really extend and there wasn't much force at all.
Point is, it's not the same as Mings - no point in making out it is.
--------
F off!
Went to stamp on him but stepped on him instead...
Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
Went to stamp on him and pulled out, yes.
Winston
No way he went to pull out of that. He brought his foot down without hesitation.
If the FA ban him for 5 matches will you think it's fair?
Went to stamp on him but stepped on him instead!
Coutinho's Happy Feet (U18971)
I think it's quite clear that he didn't put any force through the challenge, actually.
I think the FA would probably give him three games for that.
Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
That's correct.
If you have eyes, it is fairly clear.
comment by redmisty (U7556)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by redmisty (U7556)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Plastic Manc (U9526)
posted 1 minute ago
Call it what you want, so long as he gets the same punishment.
________________
no no, you can't call it a stamp. City fans won't allow it. You have to get the word right, never mind the punishment.
I don't care if he gets a ten game ban - just don't call it a stamp! City fans hate it when you get that wrong...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh how stupid do you sound.
Me the city fan that posted how frivolous mings apeal was because the stamp was obvious.
Only a deluded rag could turn a united players stamp into a dig at city.
And you call us obsessed.
Bite haha bitten off more than you can chew misty I would say.
Abus
_________________
superbite!!
Not getting upset are you LQ?
You seem very, very angry today...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah the Arsenal bite defense to being called stupid.
Meh.
You from London?
Rojo did stamp on Hazard last night. The GIF in the link above shows he did. What would you describe it as?
______________
It was clearly a stamp....but you can't call it that because Hazard was not actually injured in the process. If it was a "real stamp" then he would have been badly hurt.
City fans explained all this last week...Ask them to explain it to you.
Facking hell Winston can see how much force was exerted just by looking..
Bet he saves a fortune in not having tyre pressure monitoring on his car.
Do you think it was a stamp?
Are you an Mancunian?
Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
You can see him pull his foot away, yes.
After he's stepped on him or before?
Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
As he's doing it - you can see from the extension of the leg that he doesn't push through.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
Coutinho's Happy Feet (U18971)
I think it's quite clear that he didn't put any force through the challenge, actually.
I think the FA would probably give him three games for that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He still stamped on him. His right foot came down on Hazards chest when he could've stepped over him. It was clearly intentional. Should be a 5 match ban if the FA are consistent.
Coutinho's Happy Feet (U18971)
Why? Please show me the criteria for a five game ban that you're referring to, which you feel is relevant here.
comment by Coutinho's Happy Feet (U18971)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
Coutinho's Happy Feet (U18971)
I think it's quite clear that he didn't put any force through the challenge, actually.
I think the FA would probably give him three games for that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He still stamped on him. His right foot came down on Hazards chest when he could've stepped over him. It was clearly intentional. Should be a 5 match ban if the FA are consistent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fa are far from consistent let's see if rojo gets the same ban as mings.
Sign in if you want to comment
Was Rojo stamp worse than Tyrone?
Page 2 of 6
6
posted on 14/3/17
Call it what you want, so long as he gets the same punishment.
posted on 14/3/17
comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 1 minute ago
Is it an Abu conspiracy are we out to get you?
Fack off talking rubbish it was a stamp he deserves a 5 game ban end of.
________________
Bite!
posted on 14/3/17
comment by redmisty (U7556)
posted 7 minutes ago
It wasn't a stamp. There was not enough force for it to be called that...
Rival fans have been making this distinction since the Mings "non stamp". If Mings didn't stamp then nor did Rojo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And United fans argued that Mings did stamp on Ibrahimovic. If Mings was a stamp then so was Rojo's.
Would you complain if Rojo gets a 5 match ban?
posted on 14/3/17
"If Mings was a stamp then so was Rojo's."
They weren't the same.
If you claim they were then you must either be on the wind up or so biased that you're unable to engage common sense.
posted on 14/3/17
comment by Plastic Manc (U9526)
posted 1 minute ago
Call it what you want, so long as he gets the same punishment.
________________
no no, you can't call it a stamp. City fans won't allow it. You have to get the word right, never mind the punishment.
I don't care if he gets a ten game ban - just don't call it a stamp! City fans hate it when you get that wrong...
posted on 14/3/17
comment by redmisty (U7556)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Plastic Manc (U9526)
posted 1 minute ago
Call it what you want, so long as he gets the same punishment.
________________
no no, you can't call it a stamp. City fans won't allow it. You have to get the word right, never mind the punishment.
I don't care if he gets a ten game ban - just don't call it a stamp! City fans hate it when you get that wrong...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh how stupid do you sound.
Me the city fan that posted how frivolous mings apeal was because the stamp was obvious.
Only a deluded rag could turn a united players stamp into a dig at city.
And you call us obsessed.
Bite haha bitten off more than you can chew misty I would say.
Abus
posted on 14/3/17
comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by redmisty (U7556)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Plastic Manc (U9526)
posted 1 minute ago
Call it what you want, so long as he gets the same punishment.
________________
no no, you can't call it a stamp. City fans won't allow it. You have to get the word right, never mind the punishment.
I don't care if he gets a ten game ban - just don't call it a stamp! City fans hate it when you get that wrong...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh how stupid do you sound.
Me the city fan that posted how frivolous mings apeal was because the stamp was obvious.
Only a deluded rag could turn a united players stamp into a dig at city.
And you call us obsessed.
Bite haha bitten off more than you can chew misty I would say.
Abus
_________________
superbite!!
Not getting upset are you LQ?
You seem very, very angry today...
posted on 14/3/17
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
"If Mings was a stamp then so was Rojo's."
They weren't the same.
If you claim they were then you must either be on the wind up or so biased that you're unable to engage common sense.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Winston
Rojo did stamp on Hazard last night. The GIF in the link above shows he did. What would you describe it as?
posted on 14/3/17
Coutinho's Happy Feet (U18971)
I think he went to do it and pulled out - he sort of stepped on him.
The leg didn't really extend and there wasn't much force at all.
Point is, it's not the same as Mings - no point in making out it is.
posted on 14/3/17
Coutinho's Happy Feet (U18971)
I think he went to do it and pulled out - he sort of stepped on him.
The leg didn't really extend and there wasn't much force at all.
Point is, it's not the same as Mings - no point in making out it is.
--------
F off!
Went to stamp on him but stepped on him instead...
posted on 14/3/17
Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
Went to stamp on him and pulled out, yes.
posted on 14/3/17
Winston
No way he went to pull out of that. He brought his foot down without hesitation.
If the FA ban him for 5 matches will you think it's fair?
posted on 14/3/17
Went to stamp on him but stepped on him instead!
posted on 14/3/17
Coutinho's Happy Feet (U18971)
I think it's quite clear that he didn't put any force through the challenge, actually.
I think the FA would probably give him three games for that.
posted on 14/3/17
Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
That's correct.
If you have eyes, it is fairly clear.
posted on 14/3/17
comment by redmisty (U7556)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by redmisty (U7556)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Plastic Manc (U9526)
posted 1 minute ago
Call it what you want, so long as he gets the same punishment.
________________
no no, you can't call it a stamp. City fans won't allow it. You have to get the word right, never mind the punishment.
I don't care if he gets a ten game ban - just don't call it a stamp! City fans hate it when you get that wrong...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh how stupid do you sound.
Me the city fan that posted how frivolous mings apeal was because the stamp was obvious.
Only a deluded rag could turn a united players stamp into a dig at city.
And you call us obsessed.
Bite haha bitten off more than you can chew misty I would say.
Abus
_________________
superbite!!
Not getting upset are you LQ?
You seem very, very angry today...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah the Arsenal bite defense to being called stupid.
Meh.
You from London?
posted on 14/3/17
Rojo did stamp on Hazard last night. The GIF in the link above shows he did. What would you describe it as?
______________
It was clearly a stamp....but you can't call it that because Hazard was not actually injured in the process. If it was a "real stamp" then he would have been badly hurt.
City fans explained all this last week...Ask them to explain it to you.
posted on 14/3/17
Facking hell Winston can see how much force was exerted just by looking..
Bet he saves a fortune in not having tyre pressure monitoring on his car.
posted on 14/3/17
Do you think it was a stamp?
Are you an Mancunian?
posted on 14/3/17
Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
You can see him pull his foot away, yes.
posted on 14/3/17
After he's stepped on him or before?
posted on 14/3/17
Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
As he's doing it - you can see from the extension of the leg that he doesn't push through.
posted on 14/3/17
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
Coutinho's Happy Feet (U18971)
I think it's quite clear that he didn't put any force through the challenge, actually.
I think the FA would probably give him three games for that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He still stamped on him. His right foot came down on Hazards chest when he could've stepped over him. It was clearly intentional. Should be a 5 match ban if the FA are consistent.
posted on 14/3/17
Coutinho's Happy Feet (U18971)
Why? Please show me the criteria for a five game ban that you're referring to, which you feel is relevant here.
posted on 14/3/17
comment by Coutinho's Happy Feet (U18971)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
Coutinho's Happy Feet (U18971)
I think it's quite clear that he didn't put any force through the challenge, actually.
I think the FA would probably give him three games for that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He still stamped on him. His right foot came down on Hazards chest when he could've stepped over him. It was clearly intentional. Should be a 5 match ban if the FA are consistent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fa are far from consistent let's see if rojo gets the same ban as mings.
Page 2 of 6
6