Why get rid of janssen? We will only buy some other dross that'll sit on the bench in reserve. Realistically are we going to sign another quality out and out striker? I'd say we sign someone young and pacey as a versatile forward, keeping janssen as an option he's been good recent months.
If we get rid of players just because they are not as good as the players in a very good first xi, we will just end up leaving a hole in the squad or buying players of similar ilk. I hope to see wimmer, Davies, lamela and janssen stay next season
I think Janssen is going to start scoring goals like he does in Europe.
Lamela may or may not play football again.
Davies is below par.
Comment deleted by Article Creator
comment by Thicken (U1043)
posted 4 hours, 1 minute ago
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Thicken (U1043)
posted 41 minutes ago
Edin, Kane was far more wasteful than Son yet you gave him a higher mark.
Son's all round play was also better than Kane.
Sounds like typical fan favouritism to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol your contribution = 💩
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still don't like being disagreed with I see
It's true. Son had a half chance from edge of the box, and am intercepted shot from an angle, Kane had 2 clear cut non-blocked chances..and hit pea rollers.
Son was better than Kane today no doubt about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all, there has often been people disagreeing with me on these rating threads. Few cry 'fan favouritism' as they hypocritically sob about someone thinking someone didn't play that great.
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 6 hours, 27 minutes ago
comment by Thicken (U1043)
posted 4 hours, 1 minute ago
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Thicken (U1043)
posted 41 minutes ago
Edin, Kane was far more wasteful than Son yet you gave him a higher mark.
Son's all round play was also better than Kane.
Sounds like typical fan favouritism to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol your contribution = 💩
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still don't like being disagreed with I see
It's true. Son had a half chance from edge of the box, and am intercepted shot from an angle, Kane had 2 clear cut non-blocked chances..and hit pea rollers.
Son was better than Kane today no doubt about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all, there has often been people disagreeing with me on these rating threads. Few cry 'fan favouritism' as they hypocritically sob about someone thinking someone didn't play that great.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see what's hypocritical about it. I gave pretty clear reasoning for why you are wrong. Apart from his goal Kane was well off the pace today, Son looked a constant threat & his goal was technically superior to Kane's.
This isn't criticising Kane in any shape or form, but anyone who is 7+ yrs old will have seen he played quite poorly today & was far more wasteful than Son.
Open your eyes .
Not at all, Kane missed a poor chance I agree. Was it any worse than Son selfishly stealing the ball off from Dele when he was in the offside position and skewing it wide?
If you are one for statistics Kane created more chances than any other player in our team. First half he played exceptionally well, but tired second half which is understandable due to being injured again.
Troll away though my good friend, it is rare to see it directed away from Lamela. I do not have time for your contributions though
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sign in if you want to comment
Player Ratings
Page 2 of 2
posted on 15/4/17
Why get rid of janssen? We will only buy some other dross that'll sit on the bench in reserve. Realistically are we going to sign another quality out and out striker? I'd say we sign someone young and pacey as a versatile forward, keeping janssen as an option he's been good recent months.
If we get rid of players just because they are not as good as the players in a very good first xi, we will just end up leaving a hole in the squad or buying players of similar ilk. I hope to see wimmer, Davies, lamela and janssen stay next season
posted on 15/4/17
I think Janssen is going to start scoring goals like he does in Europe.
Lamela may or may not play football again.
Davies is below par.
posted on 15/4/17
Comment deleted by Article Creator
posted on 15/4/17
comment by Thicken (U1043)
posted 4 hours, 1 minute ago
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Thicken (U1043)
posted 41 minutes ago
Edin, Kane was far more wasteful than Son yet you gave him a higher mark.
Son's all round play was also better than Kane.
Sounds like typical fan favouritism to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol your contribution = 💩
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still don't like being disagreed with I see
It's true. Son had a half chance from edge of the box, and am intercepted shot from an angle, Kane had 2 clear cut non-blocked chances..and hit pea rollers.
Son was better than Kane today no doubt about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all, there has often been people disagreeing with me on these rating threads. Few cry 'fan favouritism' as they hypocritically sob about someone thinking someone didn't play that great.
posted on 16/4/17
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 6 hours, 27 minutes ago
comment by Thicken (U1043)
posted 4 hours, 1 minute ago
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Thicken (U1043)
posted 41 minutes ago
Edin, Kane was far more wasteful than Son yet you gave him a higher mark.
Son's all round play was also better than Kane.
Sounds like typical fan favouritism to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol your contribution = 💩
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still don't like being disagreed with I see
It's true. Son had a half chance from edge of the box, and am intercepted shot from an angle, Kane had 2 clear cut non-blocked chances..and hit pea rollers.
Son was better than Kane today no doubt about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all, there has often been people disagreeing with me on these rating threads. Few cry 'fan favouritism' as they hypocritically sob about someone thinking someone didn't play that great.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see what's hypocritical about it. I gave pretty clear reasoning for why you are wrong. Apart from his goal Kane was well off the pace today, Son looked a constant threat & his goal was technically superior to Kane's.
This isn't criticising Kane in any shape or form, but anyone who is 7+ yrs old will have seen he played quite poorly today & was far more wasteful than Son.
Open your eyes .
posted on 16/4/17
Not at all, Kane missed a poor chance I agree. Was it any worse than Son selfishly stealing the ball off from Dele when he was in the offside position and skewing it wide?
If you are one for statistics Kane created more chances than any other player in our team. First half he played exceptionally well, but tired second half which is understandable due to being injured again.
Troll away though my good friend, it is rare to see it directed away from Lamela. I do not have time for your contributions though
posted on 16/4/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 2 of 2