Aaron, forget the "achievement". The important thing you got was the vital 3 points.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

You're the least qualified to pass judgement when it comes to rage and being obsessive

I mean, you are well known for frequently raging and obsessing about people for not going to games

You're known as Ronnie Pickering Raptor in this forum for a reason, you know

comment by Chelsea_since_summer_1969 ✯ (U1561)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
Aaron, forget the "achievement". The important thing you got was the vital 3 points.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see what you're saying Chelsea since summer but LOWLY Burnley beat Palace by a greater margin than we did which is a slight concern for me.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Aaron ManyGuns (U20811)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Chelsea_since_summer_1969 ✯ (U1561)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
Aaron, forget the "achievement". The important thing you got was the vital 3 points.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see what you're saying Chelsea since summer but LOWLY Burnley beat Palace by a greater margin than we did which is a slight concern for me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aaron, I also see where you're coming from mate and obviously I am not in the business of building Spurs's seemingly unshakeable confidence even higher than it is, but for me whatever happens at Selhurst from now on will have no bearing in the title race. It's done there for both of us.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Must be because who were Chelsea before 2003.

D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
----------------------------------------------
Either way, the argument of the article is there should be some way for Spurs to maybe gain somewhat of an advantage on Chelsea.

I think the best solution would be Spurs playing before Chelsea just so if Spurs were to subsequently win their game before Chelsea, they can close the gap before Chelsea play rather than playing after Chelsea because personally, it doesn't test Chelsea's title credentials if they always have a sizeable gap over Spurs. 4 points at this stage is still a big gap, but even if it was 7 points before Spurs were to kick a ball, like I've stated, Spurs are just trying to close the gap that was already there, if that makes sense.

Apologies for muddling up my words whilst trying to explain the scenario there, but this text here gives the general idea of what I mean.

comment by Keyser Söze✡ (U1071)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Conte'nt (U20893)
posted 1 hour, 43 minutes ago
You're the least qualified to pass judgement when it comes to rage and being obsessive

I mean, you are well known for frequently raging and obsessing about people for not going to games

You're known as Ronnie Pickering Raptor in this forum for a reason, you know
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Amongst a small minority of Chelsea and Liverpool fans, all of which have these sad traits of obsessiveness and willingness to spend their days on here trying to wum
I clearly hit some nerves when I targeted you glory hunters, who evidently support their corresponding team on the basis of popularity. You have never set foot in Stamford Bridge in your sad little life you sad obsessive cretin

Maf has more credibility on this forum than you ya facking skid mark
----------------------------------------------------------------------
proper fan

"would anybody agree that the title race is fair?"
******************
Dunno wot fairness has got to do with it!
Spurs have got to win every game.
They really don't have to watch wot the Scuuuuum do.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

there should be some way for Spurs to maybe gain somewhat of an advantage on Chelsea.
----------------------------
Why?

It doesn't matter who plays when, every team plays the same teams and the same amount of games, Chelsea are top as they have taken the most points.

comment by Keyser Söze✡ (U1071)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Conte'nt (U20893)
posted 1 hour, 43 minutes ago
You're the least qualified to pass judgement when it comes to rage and being obsessive

I mean, you are well known for frequently raging and obsessing about people for not going to games

You're known as Ronnie Pickering Raptor in this forum for a reason, you know
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Amongst a small minority of Chelsea and Liverpool fans, all of which have these sad traits of obsessiveness and willingness to spend their days on here trying to wum
I clearly hit some nerves when I targeted you glory hunters, who evidently support their corresponding team on the basis of popularity. You have never set foot in Stamford Bridge in your sad little life you sad obsessive cretin

Maf has more credibility on this forum than you ya facking skid mark
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a load of nonsense. Firstly, It's not my fault Chelsea happened to be local team. Secondly, not my fault you leave yourself open to ridicule and therefore vulnerable to wums. Thirdly, you make things up as you go along, because have no knowledge about me. Fourthly. at least I don't share my season ticket with three other people

Finally, I hope you realise, what a stupid tool you are

comment by Chelsea_since_summer_1969 ✯ (U1561)
posted 3 hours, 47 minutes ago
comment by Aaron ManyGuns (U20811)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Chelsea_since_summer_1969 ✯ (U1561)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
Aaron, forget the "achievement". The important thing you got was the vital 3 points.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see what you're saying Chelsea since summer but LOWLY Burnley beat Palace by a greater margin than we did which is a slight concern for me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aaron, I also see where you're coming from mate and obviously I am not in the business of building Spurs's seemingly unshakeable confidence even higher than it is, but for me whatever happens at Selhurst from now on will have no bearing in the title race. It's done there for both of us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes Chelsea but what I'm trying to say is that the Spurs form isn't that good if it didn't win as convincingly as Burnley did. The form will have to improve for the last 5 matches and comparing score lines with other clubs i.e. Palace 0 Spurs 1 and Palace 0 Burnley 2 is a good indicator form.

Of form.

Chelsea spent £500 millions more and have never played youngsters - Spurs on the other hand have some of the best young players:

Chelsea spent 50000 on Ryan Bertrand and he has a champions league winners medal, come back when dele alli has that, He played marking a right side of Phillip Lahm and Arjen Robben.

what if Spurs lose, how would that help.

Chelsea's title credentials and bottle really if anything else. Thoughts?
in reply to this see above comment

comment by Aaron ManyGuns (U20811)
posted 7 hours, 40 minutes ago
comment by Chelsea_since_summer_1969 ✯ (U1561)
posted 3 hours, 47 minutes ago
comment by Aaron ManyGuns (U20811)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Chelsea_since_summer_1969 ✯ (U1561)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
Aaron, forget the "achievement". The important thing you got was the vital 3 points.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see what you're saying Chelsea since summer but LOWLY Burnley beat Palace by a greater margin than we did which is a slight concern for me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aaron, I also see where you're coming from mate and obviously I am not in the business of building Spurs's seemingly unshakeable confidence even higher than it is, but for me whatever happens at Selhurst from now on will have no bearing in the title race. It's done there for both of us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes Chelsea but what I'm trying to say is that the Spurs form isn't that good if it didn't win as convincingly as Burnley did. The form will have to improve for the last 5 matches and comparing score lines with other clubs i.e. Palace 0 Spurs 1 and Palace 0 Burnley 2 is a good indicator form.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
IK am sorry, but you are talking nonsense. Comparing results like that has no bearing, there are so many factors in play for each individual game.

For example Palace were missing 3 of their back 4 for the Burnley game.

Chelsea lost to Palace at home,

I could go on an on with examples to discredit your point.

Each game is a separate, independent event.

comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Aaron ManyGuns (U20811)
posted 7 hours, 40 minutes ago
comment by Chelsea_since_summer_1969 ✯ (U1561)
posted 3 hours, 47 minutes ago
comment by Aaron ManyGuns (U20811)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Chelsea_since_summer_1969 ✯ (U1561)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
Aaron, forget the "achievement". The important thing you got was the vital 3 points.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see what you're saying Chelsea since summer but LOWLY Burnley beat Palace by a greater margin than we did which is a slight concern for me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aaron, I also see where you're coming from mate and obviously I am not in the business of building Spurs's seemingly unshakeable confidence even higher than it is, but for me whatever happens at Selhurst from now on will have no bearing in the title race. It's done there for both of us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes Chelsea but what I'm trying to say is that the Spurs form isn't that good if it didn't win as convincingly as Burnley did. The form will have to improve for the last 5 matches and comparing score lines with other clubs i.e. Palace 0 Spurs 1 and Palace 0 Burnley 2 is a good indicator form.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
IK am sorry, but you are talking nonsense. Comparing results like that has no bearing, there are so many factors in play for each individual game.

For example Palace were missing 3 of their back 4 for the Burnley game.

Chelsea lost to Palace at home,

I could go on an on with examples to discredit your point.

Each game is a separate, independent event.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think I am talking nonsense and I did think of the injury situation after I made my point. Let's just ay that I'm not as confident as I was about the Arsenal match as I was.

But Aaaron, i don't see how can you not see that each game in an independent event?

According to Big Sam yesterday he said Palace were poor............how can you assume with any level of confidence that Palace played as well agst Spurs as they did agst Burnley.

The more tangible evidence that indicates form is this:

Spurs have won their last 8 games
Spurs have conceded just 4 goals in those 8 games
Spurs have won their last 12 PL home games on the bounce

They have the best form of any team in the PL right now and the best defense.

I do but I compare scores.