or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 34 comments are related to an article called:

Alexis Sanchez

Page 1 of 2

posted on 28/6/17

In my prodessional opinion I don't think Arsenal would accept this

posted on 28/6/17

Pre-rvp, I'd have said no chance.

Now... If it did get accepted, I doubt he'd want to come go us. If he really wanted to leave, his agent would tout him to the top European clubs and he'd be picked up by bayern, or juve, even atheltico. Most likely city.

Great player of course.

comment by Tu Meke (U3732)

posted on 28/6/17

No offence, but if he wants to go to Manchester, it'll be to City. Their attacking philosophy will suit him well.

posted on 28/6/17

No idea whether the club would accept that, or the player want to move.

But I do agree that, if we are (apparently) willing to pay £35m for perisic, or £60m for morata, it would be bizarre if we hadn't at least tested the waters on sanchez...he's certainly been one of the top 5 players in the PL since joining, and united would kill for such a prolific goalscorer.

posted on 28/6/17

comment by Tu Meke Santi (U3732)
posted 1 minute ago
No offence, but if he wants to go to Manchester, it'll be to City. Their attacking philosophy will suit him well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
possibly, though he'd have much less competition for a place at united, city already look quite top heavy in attack

posted on 28/6/17

No offence taken Tu but I don't think many players take that into account. I imagine it goes
1.salary
2.Length of contract
3. Standing of club
4. Manager
5. Chance of winning things
6. Whether the style suits.

posted on 28/6/17

Doubt the club have considered this.

posted on 28/6/17

Maybe the club have enquired about Sanchez and have been quoted £40-50m, and Ed Woodward has decided to look for more expensive targets?

posted on 28/6/17

comment by Cornelius Oofterom (U15867)
posted 47 seconds ago
Maybe the club have enquired about Sanchez and have been quoted £40-50m, and Ed Woodward has decided to look for more expensive targets?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nice.

posted on 28/6/17

Why go after Sachez when we're after Perisic ?

posted on 28/6/17

comment by Cornelius Oofterom (U15867)
posted 2 minutes ago
Maybe the club have enquired about Sanchez and have been quoted £40-50m, and Ed Woodward has decided to look for more expensive targets?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

posted on 28/6/17

Wenger won't be selling anyone of any note to Jose so this is simply not going to happen.

If he stays in the PL then it's Chelsea or City or of course he stays put where he is.

posted on 28/6/17

He should join Bayern, then he can play for them rather than the team that gets violated by them.

Can't see him staying put...

posted on 28/6/17

Sanchez would be amazing in that Bayern team.

posted on 28/6/17

Bayern won't pay the fee it would take to get him

posted on 28/6/17

I think players get put off by Jose's style of play and demands

posted on 28/6/17

Well he picked us over Liverpool because of.

A. Location
B. Manager {Wenger > Rodgers)
C. We were more likely to stay in the CL {proven right the following season)

If he goes to Manchester he'd pick city because Pep's management wouls suit him more than Jose"s and City have qualified for the CL more consistantly than Utd

posted on 28/6/17

City don't need him.

They have KDB, Sterling, Silva x 2, Aguero and Jesus

posted on 28/6/17

I don't think location was as important in Sanchez choosing Arsenal as people say. I think Arsenal were just a more attractive club because of the other stuff.

posted on 28/6/17

Arsenal won't sell us Sanchez anyway. Mourinho and Ed would be all over it if there was any indication they would.

posted on 28/6/17

Abe, it's hard enough to fathom our own reasons for doing something, let alone someone from another continent we've never met.

posted on 28/6/17

comment by Zlatan The King Ibrahimovic (U10026)
posted 5 minutes ago
I don't think location was as important in Sanchez choosing Arsenal as people say. I think Arsenal were just a more attractive club because of the other stuff.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
as far as i can see the only public comments made along those lines were by ian ayre, after he had left liverpool. nothing from the player at all, so i personally wouldn't attach any weight to comments from a guy making an excuse for being unable to sign a player.

posted on 28/6/17

Fabinho to PSG going by Duncan Castles of the Daily Record.

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-transfer-news/manchester-united-lose-out-fabinho-10705513

posted on 28/6/17

comment by Genius_AppleCart_Space_Dude_Featuring_Zorak (..We all got a Chicken-Duck-Woman thing, Waiting for us.) (U19099)
posted 5 minutes ago
Fabinho to PSG going by Duncan Castles of the Daily Record.

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-transfer-news/manchester-united-lose-out-fabinho-10705513
----------------------------------------------------------------------
looks like the player expressing a liking for united, and being reasonably priced, has confused Ed and Jose

posted on 28/6/17

Can't see Monaco selling one of their best to PSG. Not when there will be plenty of takers outside of France. As a last resort and if the player was really unhappy perhaps.

Page 1 of 2

Sign in if you want to comment