Let's hope not.

Pedro couldnae even appeal a banana

If they were listed on the stock market would they not have had an obligation to shareholders to do so?

did celtic appeal?

Wait, what are they appealing?

Because I see nothing appealing about them whatsoever


Seriously though, what are they going to appeal?

Are you talking about the HMRC case or the game last night (I say game but only one team turned up to play)

Don't see how they can. They guy wasn't banned. He'd taken a banned substance. But nowhere does it say any investigation or decision had been made to ban him. Therefore eligible to play

Bad enough last night nevermind the possibility of getting a proper horsing by the Cypriot football powerhouses if an appeal is upheld.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Might be worth a shout.sirely to fvck we will get better!

comment by atheist (U2783)
posted 2 seconds ago
Might be worth a shout.sirely to fvck we will get better!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Just how sick are we.? 😂

Do you have anyone that could appeal successfully?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Buck Cherry (U21527)
posted 13 seconds ago
Do you have anyone that could appeal successfully?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

O. There is no basis for an appeal. We were deservedly beaten by a pub team

I dont remember celtic ever having to appeal. Surely it would be the recipient of a ban that would appeal?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Legia Warsaw for example......

comment by esctosh - Just don't mention Timothy... (U8215)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Buck Cherry (U21527)
posted 13 seconds ago
Do you have anyone that could appeal successfully?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

O. There is no basis for an appeal. We were deservedly beaten by a pub team

----------------------------------------------------------------------
2nd leg should have been dominoes

I was thinking the same Esc, but what they are saying is he took the banned substance without informing UEFA which he didn't do so therefore if found guilty he would be retrospectively banned.

TBH I don.t want to see this happening we didn't deserve anything for the way they gutless idiots played but it is worth money to the club which IMO is more important.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Buck Cherry (U21527)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by esctosh - Just don't mention Timothy... (U8215)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Buck Cherry (U21527)
posted 13 seconds ago
Do you have anyone that could appeal successfully?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

O. There is no basis for an appeal. We were deservedly beaten by a pub team

----------------------------------------------------------------------
2nd leg should have been dominoes
----------------------------------------------------------------------
.😄

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Gio_Gio (U12790)
posted 5 seconds ago
I was thinking the same Esc, but what they are saying is he took the banned substance without informing UEFA which he didn't do so therefore if found guilty he would be retrospectively banned.

TBH I don.t want to see this happening we didn't deserve anything for the way they gutless idiots played but it is worth money to the club which IMO is more important.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Forgetting the good sportsmanship aspect, surely as a business with investors they would need to?

Curly, It's in here:

http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/371502

You're mixing up appealing with appalling