Don't deserve to sign him with that attitude. Are you one of those that just watches his team. Pathetic.
He'd be a very typical Liverpool signing. Decent enough player but not shopping at the top table there are you?
Surely you should be competing for better players than that.
watched a 10 minute 2016/17 you tube vid of him...looks like hes better than whoever the best LB in the world is.
Seriously, he looks pretty decent and fast, seems like he is decent player. About time we had some scots playing for us again, if he turns out like the other scots we had, cool by me
comment by Eric_the_king (SE85) (U21241)
posted 3 minutes ago
He'd be a very typical Liverpool signing. Decent enough player but not shopping at the top table there are you?
Surely you should be competing for better players than that.
---------------------------
Same could be said for lindelof!
Is he better than the leftbacks we have at the minute?
Yes!
Will we lose money on him at £8m?
No!
What I've seen, pretty good player. Fast, decent delivery, not a bad player at all. In fact, wouldn't be adverse having him at Utd.
Can't really go wrong at that price but I do question whether he's good enough to make the step up.
From what I've seen his positives attributes are good positional awareness, has a decent cross and is obviously naturally left footed which may help us.
Hull were very poor at the back last season though and you've got to say he's partially at fault for that.
He's a good player and was touted as a future star from a young age. He hasn't yet lived up to that but if we could get him below £10m and that allows us to get our other targets, I'd be more than happy with that.
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 25 minutes ago
watched a 10 minute 2016/17 you tube vid of him...looks like hes better than whoever the best LB in the world is.
Seriously, he looks pretty decent and fast, seems like he is decent player. About time we had some scots playing for us again, if he turns out like the other scots we had, cool by me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charlie Adam?
I'd put along the same level as Davies at Spurs!
Don't see it as an amazing signing but a good one to improve us, he's got to be better than Moreno!
comment by Returning managers (U1762)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 25 minutes ago
watched a 10 minute 2016/17 you tube vid of him...looks like hes better than whoever the best LB in the world is.
Seriously, he looks pretty decent and fast, seems like he is decent player. About time we had some scots playing for us again, if he turns out like the other scots we had, cool by me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charlie Adam?
--------------------------
Fast is probably the last word I'd use to describe Charlie Adam.
comment by Quincey peacock, esq. (U19119)
posted 12 minutes ago
What I've seen, pretty good player. Fast, decent delivery, not a bad player at all. In fact, wouldn't be adverse having him at Utd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Better going forward than defending, allows players to just swan past him with little emphasis on trying to stop them
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Quincey peacock, esq. (U19119)
posted 12 minutes ago
What I've seen, pretty good player. Fast, decent delivery, not a bad player at all. In fact, wouldn't be adverse having him at Utd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Better going forward than defending, allows players to just swan past him with little emphasis on trying to stop them
-----------------
Perfect for us then
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Quincey peacock, esq. (U19119)
posted 12 minutes ago
What I've seen, pretty good player. Fast, decent delivery, not a bad player at all. In fact, wouldn't be adverse having him at Utd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Better going forward than defending, allows players to just swan past him with little emphasis on trying to stop them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As part of an awful hull defence. He's no Shaw defensively, but is better in attack. Shame we can't combine the two.
Definition of average, surely Liverpool strive for better?
comment by Analog (U17200)
posted 1 minute ago
Definition of average, surely Liverpool strive for better?
-----------------------------------
I'm sure people said that about Ben Davies when you signed him.
I thought Robertson was GOOD at defending and positionally very good.
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Analog (U17200)
posted 1 minute ago
Definition of average, surely Liverpool strive for better?
-----------------------------------
I'm sure people said that about Ben Davies when you signed him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Davies joined as back up and I'm sure his reputation was bigger than Robertson's, plus he was younger
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 51 seconds ago
I thought Robertson was GOOD at defending and positionally very good.
----------------------
You thought we should sign Scott Parker!
We've always had a Scottish player in our squad when we've won the league, just saying
He's got pl experience and Klopp clearly still sees Milner as his first choice so this makes sense
So he will be backup instead of Moreno or Flanagan
Actually i will add, as long as he has a decent left foot and is better positionally than moreno then he is in!
LB isnt massive in terms of a major position in the team...just a half decent one will do.
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 10 seconds ago
Actually i will add, as long as he has a decent left foot and is better positionally than moreno then he is in!
LB isnt massive in terms of a major position in the team...just a half decent one will do.
----------------------
God you are clueless!
In most teams formations nowadays the fullbacks are the main source of whith!
I still think Milner will start but from the little I've seen of Robertson he'll be a decent option in certain games and situations whilst also helping the former out with workload in a busy season. He'll stretch teams and change our attacking patterns.
Trippier came from Burnley and now he's playing for England.
If we play Cout or Mane left it doesn't help with Milner also bwing right footed and at £8m (?) then it's relatively risk free in this market.
Sign in if you want to comment
Robertson, any good?
Page 1 of 8
6 | 7 | 8
posted on 15/7/17
Don't deserve to sign him with that attitude. Are you one of those that just watches his team. Pathetic.
posted on 15/7/17
He'd be a very typical Liverpool signing. Decent enough player but not shopping at the top table there are you?
Surely you should be competing for better players than that.
posted on 15/7/17
watched a 10 minute 2016/17 you tube vid of him...looks like hes better than whoever the best LB in the world is.
Seriously, he looks pretty decent and fast, seems like he is decent player. About time we had some scots playing for us again, if he turns out like the other scots we had, cool by me
posted on 15/7/17
comment by Eric_the_king (SE85) (U21241)
posted 3 minutes ago
He'd be a very typical Liverpool signing. Decent enough player but not shopping at the top table there are you?
Surely you should be competing for better players than that.
---------------------------
Same could be said for lindelof!
Is he better than the leftbacks we have at the minute?
Yes!
Will we lose money on him at £8m?
No!
posted on 15/7/17
What I've seen, pretty good player. Fast, decent delivery, not a bad player at all. In fact, wouldn't be adverse having him at Utd.
posted on 15/7/17
Can't really go wrong at that price but I do question whether he's good enough to make the step up.
From what I've seen his positives attributes are good positional awareness, has a decent cross and is obviously naturally left footed which may help us.
Hull were very poor at the back last season though and you've got to say he's partially at fault for that.
posted on 15/7/17
He's a good player and was touted as a future star from a young age. He hasn't yet lived up to that but if we could get him below £10m and that allows us to get our other targets, I'd be more than happy with that.
posted on 15/7/17
Good FF buy last year
posted on 15/7/17
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 25 minutes ago
watched a 10 minute 2016/17 you tube vid of him...looks like hes better than whoever the best LB in the world is.
Seriously, he looks pretty decent and fast, seems like he is decent player. About time we had some scots playing for us again, if he turns out like the other scots we had, cool by me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charlie Adam?
posted on 15/7/17
I'd put along the same level as Davies at Spurs!
Don't see it as an amazing signing but a good one to improve us, he's got to be better than Moreno!
posted on 15/7/17
comment by Returning managers (U1762)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 25 minutes ago
watched a 10 minute 2016/17 you tube vid of him...looks like hes better than whoever the best LB in the world is.
Seriously, he looks pretty decent and fast, seems like he is decent player. About time we had some scots playing for us again, if he turns out like the other scots we had, cool by me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charlie Adam?
--------------------------
Fast is probably the last word I'd use to describe Charlie Adam.
posted on 15/7/17
comment by Quincey peacock, esq. (U19119)
posted 12 minutes ago
What I've seen, pretty good player. Fast, decent delivery, not a bad player at all. In fact, wouldn't be adverse having him at Utd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Better going forward than defending, allows players to just swan past him with little emphasis on trying to stop them
posted on 15/7/17
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Quincey peacock, esq. (U19119)
posted 12 minutes ago
What I've seen, pretty good player. Fast, decent delivery, not a bad player at all. In fact, wouldn't be adverse having him at Utd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Better going forward than defending, allows players to just swan past him with little emphasis on trying to stop them
-----------------
Perfect for us then
posted on 15/7/17
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Quincey peacock, esq. (U19119)
posted 12 minutes ago
What I've seen, pretty good player. Fast, decent delivery, not a bad player at all. In fact, wouldn't be adverse having him at Utd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Better going forward than defending, allows players to just swan past him with little emphasis on trying to stop them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As part of an awful hull defence. He's no Shaw defensively, but is better in attack. Shame we can't combine the two.
posted on 15/7/17
Definition of average, surely Liverpool strive for better?
posted on 15/7/17
comment by Analog (U17200)
posted 1 minute ago
Definition of average, surely Liverpool strive for better?
-----------------------------------
I'm sure people said that about Ben Davies when you signed him.
posted on 15/7/17
I thought Robertson was GOOD at defending and positionally very good.
posted on 15/7/17
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Analog (U17200)
posted 1 minute ago
Definition of average, surely Liverpool strive for better?
-----------------------------------
I'm sure people said that about Ben Davies when you signed him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Davies joined as back up and I'm sure his reputation was bigger than Robertson's, plus he was younger
posted on 15/7/17
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 51 seconds ago
I thought Robertson was GOOD at defending and positionally very good.
----------------------
You thought we should sign Scott Parker!
posted on 15/7/17
We've always had a Scottish player in our squad when we've won the league, just saying
posted on 15/7/17
He's got pl experience and Klopp clearly still sees Milner as his first choice so this makes sense
posted on 15/7/17
So he will be backup instead of Moreno or Flanagan
posted on 15/7/17
Actually i will add, as long as he has a decent left foot and is better positionally than moreno then he is in!
LB isnt massive in terms of a major position in the team...just a half decent one will do.
posted on 15/7/17
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 10 seconds ago
Actually i will add, as long as he has a decent left foot and is better positionally than moreno then he is in!
LB isnt massive in terms of a major position in the team...just a half decent one will do.
----------------------
God you are clueless!
In most teams formations nowadays the fullbacks are the main source of whith!
posted on 15/7/17
I still think Milner will start but from the little I've seen of Robertson he'll be a decent option in certain games and situations whilst also helping the former out with workload in a busy season. He'll stretch teams and change our attacking patterns.
Trippier came from Burnley and now he's playing for England.
If we play Cout or Mane left it doesn't help with Milner also bwing right footed and at £8m (?) then it's relatively risk free in this market.
Page 1 of 8
6 | 7 | 8