That Arsenal top he was wearing though?
Kane is without doubt world class.
Eriksen is very good in open play but his dead ball delivery is dreadful. Dier, Verts and Toby would be regular scorers from free kicks and corners if they had more to work with.
Who remembers when Arro said Vardy was better than Kane???? he genuinely meant it to
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
i work with someone who is Kane's fiance's cousin. Harry has been a Spurs fan all his life, however played for Arsenal in his youth, hence the Arsenal shirt picture
The girl here has a sister who plays for Arsenal u18 ladies and she is a Spurs fan too, even wears Spurs shin pads under her Arsenal socks apparently
Kane is a fantastic striker, proper top class player.
As part of your "special relationship" with Madrid, I expect him to be playing for them in the not too distant future. otherwise what's the point of that collaboration?
comment by Ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 6 minutes ago
Has to do it in the World Cup, just because hes having an extended purple patch you think hes good
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a strange thing to think?
You don't see football thats anywhere near cl standard to the quarter finals of a wc (at best).
It's been 2 games in the CL that he's really performed. Continue it for the remainder of the campaign and I dont think anyone can doubt that he's world class.
But he's not world class just yet.
He is your best striker, there is no doubt about it now.
Coys
Strange article really. Not really sure what is bitter about those statements, or wrong.
He did have to do it in his second season.
He does have to do it for England at tournaments.
He does have to do it in the CL.
All I see is a lot of statements challenging Kane to keep improving and setting his bar at the very highest level.
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
Who remembers when Arro said Vardy was better than Kane????he genuinely meant it to
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think he said he was better at winning titles than Kane which up to now seems about right
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 1 hour, 11 minutes ago
Who remembers when Arro said Vardy was better than Kane????he genuinely meant it to
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Vardy had to do it in a second season...
better than Suarez at his highest level, fack off.
Excellent player though
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by justanotherTopperSpur (U1409)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
Has to do it in the World Cup, just because hes having an extended purple patch you think hes good
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By that standard,George Best...meh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is one of the reasons Best never really gets mentioned when discussing the G.O.A.T.
9 goals in 8 so far. I think we can start to rule him out as being only a 3 season wonder.
Owes it all to his loan spell at Leicester obviously. He was nothing until then.
Seriously, he's proved me totally and utterly wrong. Didn't impress at all at the King Power when he was about 19 or so and I thought he would drop down the leagues. What do I know?
Gone on to be one of the top strikers in the Premier League and now across Europe and has proved himself season after season. However high people set the bar he exceeds it.
Best English striker since Shearer?
Kane is a very good striker, but i wouldn't put him close to the levels of Henry, V. Nistelrooy, Drogba, Andy Cole. Those players won trophies for their clubs.
121 goals on 250+ appearances. Won tons of trophies. Yeah sure, he didn't dribble around defenses like Henry but was arguably more effective.
121 goals on 250+ appearances *for United
Kane already has 108 in 173, will smash Coles scoring.
United didn't win trophies because of Cole, he never hit 20 Premier League goals in a season for them.
Kane is a better striker and a better player than Cole was.
Kane already has 108 in 173, will smash Coles scoring.
---------------------------------
Pretty irrelevant comparison considering the massive decline of defending in modern football.
United didn't win trophies because of Cole, he never hit 20 Premier League goals in a season for them.
-----------------------------------------
United had a team full of goal scorers so didn't need to relay on Cole. In any case i don't remember me saying United won trophies because of Cole.
Kane is a better striker and a better player than Cole was.
-------------------------------------
Irrelevant personal opinion from you. Doubt you've ever seen Cole play, tbh.
comment by Seebs ~WengerIN (U21648)
posted 13 minutes ago
Kane is a very good striker, but i wouldn't put him close to the levels of Henry, V. Nistelrooy, Drogba, Andy Cole. Those players won trophies for their clubs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only because the clubs they happened to play for were very good as well. People need to stop putting so much gravity in silverware won when rating individuals, as if these individuals did it all themselves.
I mean, as if Tom Cleverley was a huge determining factor in United winning their PL title?
You said Cole was better because he won trophies, what a pathetic argument when comparing individuals in a team sport.
Massive decline? Don't be a fackwit.
Not an irrelevant personal opinion. Amnyone who knows anything about football knows Kane is a better player than Cole was.
Pretty sad that you have taken on a previous posters username to try and get some credibility on a forum. Sadly for you your posts get in the way of anyone taking you seriously.
Sign in if you want to comment
Harry Kane
Page 2 of 3
posted on 27/9/17
That Arsenal top he was wearing though?
posted on 27/9/17
Kane is without doubt world class.
Eriksen is very good in open play but his dead ball delivery is dreadful. Dier, Verts and Toby would be regular scorers from free kicks and corners if they had more to work with.
posted on 27/9/17
Who remembers when Arro said Vardy was better than Kane???? he genuinely meant it to
posted on 27/9/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 27/9/17
i work with someone who is Kane's fiance's cousin. Harry has been a Spurs fan all his life, however played for Arsenal in his youth, hence the Arsenal shirt picture
The girl here has a sister who plays for Arsenal u18 ladies and she is a Spurs fan too, even wears Spurs shin pads under her Arsenal socks apparently
posted on 27/9/17
Kane is a fantastic striker, proper top class player.
As part of your "special relationship" with Madrid, I expect him to be playing for them in the not too distant future. otherwise what's the point of that collaboration?
posted on 27/9/17
comment by Ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 6 minutes ago
Has to do it in the World Cup, just because hes having an extended purple patch you think hes good
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a strange thing to think?
You don't see football thats anywhere near cl standard to the quarter finals of a wc (at best).
posted on 27/9/17
It's been 2 games in the CL that he's really performed. Continue it for the remainder of the campaign and I dont think anyone can doubt that he's world class.
But he's not world class just yet.
posted on 27/9/17
He is your best striker, there is no doubt about it now.
Coys
posted on 27/9/17
Strange article really. Not really sure what is bitter about those statements, or wrong.
He did have to do it in his second season.
He does have to do it for England at tournaments.
He does have to do it in the CL.
All I see is a lot of statements challenging Kane to keep improving and setting his bar at the very highest level.
posted on 27/9/17
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
Who remembers when Arro said Vardy was better than Kane????he genuinely meant it to
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think he said he was better at winning titles than Kane which up to now seems about right
posted on 27/9/17
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 1 hour, 11 minutes ago
Who remembers when Arro said Vardy was better than Kane????he genuinely meant it to
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Vardy had to do it in a second season...
posted on 27/9/17
better than Suarez at his highest level, fack off.
Excellent player though
posted on 27/9/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 27/9/17
comment by justanotherTopperSpur (U1409)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
Has to do it in the World Cup, just because hes having an extended purple patch you think hes good
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By that standard,George Best...meh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is one of the reasons Best never really gets mentioned when discussing the G.O.A.T.
posted on 27/9/17
9 goals in 8 so far. I think we can start to rule him out as being only a 3 season wonder.
posted on 27/9/17
Owes it all to his loan spell at Leicester obviously. He was nothing until then.
Seriously, he's proved me totally and utterly wrong. Didn't impress at all at the King Power when he was about 19 or so and I thought he would drop down the leagues. What do I know?
Gone on to be one of the top strikers in the Premier League and now across Europe and has proved himself season after season. However high people set the bar he exceeds it.
Best English striker since Shearer?
posted on 27/9/17
Kane is a very good striker, but i wouldn't put him close to the levels of Henry, V. Nistelrooy, Drogba, Andy Cole. Those players won trophies for their clubs.
posted on 27/9/17
Andy Cole
posted on 27/9/17
121 goals on 250+ appearances. Won tons of trophies. Yeah sure, he didn't dribble around defenses like Henry but was arguably more effective.
posted on 27/9/17
121 goals on 250+ appearances *for United
posted on 27/9/17
Kane already has 108 in 173, will smash Coles scoring.
United didn't win trophies because of Cole, he never hit 20 Premier League goals in a season for them.
Kane is a better striker and a better player than Cole was.
posted on 27/9/17
Kane already has 108 in 173, will smash Coles scoring.
---------------------------------
Pretty irrelevant comparison considering the massive decline of defending in modern football.
United didn't win trophies because of Cole, he never hit 20 Premier League goals in a season for them.
-----------------------------------------
United had a team full of goal scorers so didn't need to relay on Cole. In any case i don't remember me saying United won trophies because of Cole.
Kane is a better striker and a better player than Cole was.
-------------------------------------
Irrelevant personal opinion from you. Doubt you've ever seen Cole play, tbh.
posted on 27/9/17
comment by Seebs ~WengerIN (U21648)
posted 13 minutes ago
Kane is a very good striker, but i wouldn't put him close to the levels of Henry, V. Nistelrooy, Drogba, Andy Cole. Those players won trophies for their clubs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only because the clubs they happened to play for were very good as well. People need to stop putting so much gravity in silverware won when rating individuals, as if these individuals did it all themselves.
I mean, as if Tom Cleverley was a huge determining factor in United winning their PL title?
posted on 27/9/17
You said Cole was better because he won trophies, what a pathetic argument when comparing individuals in a team sport.
Massive decline? Don't be a fackwit.
Not an irrelevant personal opinion. Amnyone who knows anything about football knows Kane is a better player than Cole was.
Pretty sad that you have taken on a previous posters username to try and get some credibility on a forum. Sadly for you your posts get in the way of anyone taking you seriously.
Page 2 of 3