Banning him does us no favours - Chelsea would have been one of the games he missed.
Surely it’s cheating against the smaller sides that will be around Watford later in the season not against Arsenal.
If he’d have gotten a ban, you don’t get given a point for drawing the match.
Think Watford will finish in the top 8, tbh. As long as they don't end the season in the same way as last year, they look good enough to be finishing above Everton, Southampton, Leicester and the other top wannabes.
We really shouldnt care. As long as no technical evidence not introduced in the game teams will be betrayed. Unfortunately we were the victims twice.
Arsenal are easily one of the most cheated against teams in the country. The idea that you can just get at us and or players won't protest or that we are too nice makes us prime targets for referees and opposition players. However my point is just on cheating as a whole. If the panel had acted it would have made a serious impact. Instead have shown their pathetic true colors
There is an unhealthy double morale at the FA for sure, Godfather.
The panel is not going to punish dives where there is body-to-body contact as there was with Bellerin and Richarlison. It would simply create too much of a grey area and undermine the consistency of their decisions. I suspect the panel will only rule on dives where a player outirhgt feigns contact with an outstretched leg and was nowhere near the defender (think Rooney vs Campbell all those years back).
Not a nice decision to be on the end of but you can understand it from their point of view.
Correct decision from the panel.
https://twitter.com/GrooverBlog/status/919930556686757888
Nothing to add.
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 18 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/GrooverBlog/status/919930556686757888
Nothing to add.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
dont see anything wrong with this gutterbug
Making me think anout watching more rugby nistead of football. Getting fed up with all the decisions that go against us and the so called clamp down on divers is n absolute joke. They have dont nothing to any divers so far. The FA are a joke and are laughing at the fans who thought they would take action against divers.
Don't worry about that lil cheat Richarlison, he'll wash up on shore eventually, thats how divers clean themselves.
comment by Mr Chelsea - Flustrated (U3579)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 18 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/GrooverBlog/status/919930556686757888
Nothing to add.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
dont see anything wrong with this gutterbug
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well in your case I didnt expect otherwise supporting a club full of cheats.
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Mr Chelsea - Flustrated (U3579)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 18 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/GrooverBlog/status/919930556686757888
Nothing to add.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
dont see anything wrong with this gutterbug
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well in your case I didnt expect otherwise supporting a club full of cheats.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Worst than cheats, they're damaging the ozone layer. Once in the atmosphere, CFCs drift slowly upward to the stratosphere, where they are broken up by ultraviolet radiation, releasing the chlorine that catalytically destroys ozone.
comment by renoog (U4449)
posted 55 minutes ago
The panel is not going to punish dives where there is body-to-body contact as there was with Bellerin and Richarlison. It would simply create too much of a grey area and undermine the consistency of their decisions. I suspect the panel will only rule on dives where a player outirhgt feigns contact with an outstretched leg and was nowhere near the defender (think Rooney vs Campbell all those years back).
Not a nice decision to be on the end of but you can understand it from their point of view.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual
I remember reading article after article and sky sports news up in arms when the ref in the wba game didn't give that clear pen to the WB player yet they are keeping ultra quiet about this clear cut dive.
Anything that benefits Arsenal is always magnified yet when something goes against us we hear nothing. We had clear pens denied against Leicester, Stoke and WBA off tg top of my head yet nothing is said. Makes me sick.
Arsenal should start a new league and soon everyone would join too.
comment by renoog (U4449)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
The panel is not going to punish dives where there is body-to-body contact as there was with Bellerin and Richarlison. It would simply create too much of a grey area and undermine the consistency of their decisions. I suspect the panel will only rule on dives where a player outirhgt feigns contact with an outstretched leg and was nowhere near the defender (think Rooney vs Campbell all those years back).
Not a nice decision to be on the end of but you can understand it from their point of view.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spot on
When Arsenal supporters begin to understand FA decisions you know there is something seriously going on.
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 22 minutes ago
When Arsenal supporters begin to understand FA decisions you know there is something seriously going on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 1 hour, 56 minutes ago
We really shouldnt care. As long as no technical evidence not introduced in the game teams will be betrayed. Unfortunately we were the victims twice.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought it was a dive what was the other incident?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I believe the atmosphere at the club encourages the cheating agaisnt the club. Because no matter how the result came about, if we lose the fans and pundits go into meltdown slaying arsenal, it creates an environment where comments like "it shouldn't have been a penalty but arsenal still deserved to lose."
I have a feeling if that decision was agaisnt mourinho, Pochetinno or pep then richarlison is definitely getting a ban
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 3 minutes ago
Why are Arsenal fans such bloody cry babies?
The refs cheat us
The fixture computer cheats us
The FA hate us
The media hate us
Get a grip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really pal, hence why you are getting some very well measured posters agreeing. It's a simple fact arsenal get far fewer decisions than any of their top 6 rivals. Just drop the childishness and see what's happening. Do you think it was a dive? Do you think we should have had at least one pen in the stoke game? The obvious answer is yes. These decisions have directly caused the loss of points. It's time to wake up
Sign in if you want to comment
Panel decides: no dive
Page 1 of 3
posted on 16/10/17
Banning him does us no favours - Chelsea would have been one of the games he missed.
posted on 16/10/17
Surely it’s cheating against the smaller sides that will be around Watford later in the season not against Arsenal.
If he’d have gotten a ban, you don’t get given a point for drawing the match.
posted on 16/10/17
Think Watford will finish in the top 8, tbh. As long as they don't end the season in the same way as last year, they look good enough to be finishing above Everton, Southampton, Leicester and the other top wannabes.
posted on 16/10/17
We really shouldnt care. As long as no technical evidence not introduced in the game teams will be betrayed. Unfortunately we were the victims twice.
posted on 16/10/17
Arsenal are easily one of the most cheated against teams in the country. The idea that you can just get at us and or players won't protest or that we are too nice makes us prime targets for referees and opposition players. However my point is just on cheating as a whole. If the panel had acted it would have made a serious impact. Instead have shown their pathetic true colors
posted on 16/10/17
There is an unhealthy double morale at the FA for sure, Godfather.
posted on 16/10/17
The panel is not going to punish dives where there is body-to-body contact as there was with Bellerin and Richarlison. It would simply create too much of a grey area and undermine the consistency of their decisions. I suspect the panel will only rule on dives where a player outirhgt feigns contact with an outstretched leg and was nowhere near the defender (think Rooney vs Campbell all those years back).
Not a nice decision to be on the end of but you can understand it from their point of view.
posted on 16/10/17
Correct decision from the panel.
posted on 16/10/17
https://twitter.com/GrooverBlog/status/919930556686757888
Nothing to add.
posted on 16/10/17
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 18 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/GrooverBlog/status/919930556686757888
Nothing to add.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
dont see anything wrong with this gutterbug
posted on 16/10/17
Making me think anout watching more rugby nistead of football. Getting fed up with all the decisions that go against us and the so called clamp down on divers is n absolute joke. They have dont nothing to any divers so far. The FA are a joke and are laughing at the fans who thought they would take action against divers.
posted on 16/10/17
Don't worry about that lil cheat Richarlison, he'll wash up on shore eventually, thats how divers clean themselves.
posted on 16/10/17
comment by Mr Chelsea - Flustrated (U3579)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 18 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/GrooverBlog/status/919930556686757888
Nothing to add.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
dont see anything wrong with this gutterbug
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well in your case I didnt expect otherwise supporting a club full of cheats.
posted on 16/10/17
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Mr Chelsea - Flustrated (U3579)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 18 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/GrooverBlog/status/919930556686757888
Nothing to add.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
dont see anything wrong with this gutterbug
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well in your case I didnt expect otherwise supporting a club full of cheats.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Worst than cheats, they're damaging the ozone layer. Once in the atmosphere, CFCs drift slowly upward to the stratosphere, where they are broken up by ultraviolet radiation, releasing the chlorine that catalytically destroys ozone.
posted on 16/10/17
comment by renoog (U4449)
posted 55 minutes ago
The panel is not going to punish dives where there is body-to-body contact as there was with Bellerin and Richarlison. It would simply create too much of a grey area and undermine the consistency of their decisions. I suspect the panel will only rule on dives where a player outirhgt feigns contact with an outstretched leg and was nowhere near the defender (think Rooney vs Campbell all those years back).
Not a nice decision to be on the end of but you can understand it from their point of view.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual
posted on 16/10/17
I remember reading article after article and sky sports news up in arms when the ref in the wba game didn't give that clear pen to the WB player yet they are keeping ultra quiet about this clear cut dive.
Anything that benefits Arsenal is always magnified yet when something goes against us we hear nothing. We had clear pens denied against Leicester, Stoke and WBA off tg top of my head yet nothing is said. Makes me sick.
posted on 16/10/17
Arsenal should start a new league and soon everyone would join too.
posted on 16/10/17
comment by renoog (U4449)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
The panel is not going to punish dives where there is body-to-body contact as there was with Bellerin and Richarlison. It would simply create too much of a grey area and undermine the consistency of their decisions. I suspect the panel will only rule on dives where a player outirhgt feigns contact with an outstretched leg and was nowhere near the defender (think Rooney vs Campbell all those years back).
Not a nice decision to be on the end of but you can understand it from their point of view.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spot on
posted on 16/10/17
When Arsenal supporters begin to understand FA decisions you know there is something seriously going on.
posted on 16/10/17
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 22 minutes ago
When Arsenal supporters begin to understand FA decisions you know there is something seriously going on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 16/10/17
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 1 hour, 56 minutes ago
We really shouldnt care. As long as no technical evidence not introduced in the game teams will be betrayed. Unfortunately we were the victims twice.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought it was a dive what was the other incident?
posted on 16/10/17
Easy Gunth m8
posted on 16/10/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 16/10/17
I believe the atmosphere at the club encourages the cheating agaisnt the club. Because no matter how the result came about, if we lose the fans and pundits go into meltdown slaying arsenal, it creates an environment where comments like "it shouldn't have been a penalty but arsenal still deserved to lose."
I have a feeling if that decision was agaisnt mourinho, Pochetinno or pep then richarlison is definitely getting a ban
posted on 16/10/17
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 3 minutes ago
Why are Arsenal fans such bloody cry babies?
The refs cheat us
The fixture computer cheats us
The FA hate us
The media hate us
Get a grip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really pal, hence why you are getting some very well measured posters agreeing. It's a simple fact arsenal get far fewer decisions than any of their top 6 rivals. Just drop the childishness and see what's happening. Do you think it was a dive? Do you think we should have had at least one pen in the stoke game? The obvious answer is yes. These decisions have directly caused the loss of points. It's time to wake up
Page 1 of 3