comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 11 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 40 seconds ago
I have never worked in the job centre, you simply made it up. It’s things like this that are the reason you’re pretty much universally mocked on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you don’t work for the council or anything related to benefits?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, as said you’ve made it up because you’re an idiot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Superb rationale as per usual. Perhaps I have mistaken you for someone else but I don’t think I have and it doesn’t really matter either way.
You offer no reasoning, no explanations, no specifics, just your personal tiny opinionated conclusions. You couldn’t make your case to save your life.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cry more. I mean you could have sworn a minute ago, now you’re confused and may be thinking of someone else.
You have zero credibility and that’s why people take the p!ss out of you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not crying, you’re an amusing diversion whilst I’m ill on my sofa.
Still no reasoning, explanations, specifics whatsoever. You’re a clown mate.
Unlike you, I don’t care what anonymous people on an internet forum think, hence why I will set out my opinions clearly and with my reasoning.
You’re either too scared to do that or too inept - my guess is both. Prove me wrong - explain to me why RR criticising Thomas Sowell via no means other than he’s a conservative, has opposed AA, voted for Trump - doesn’t criticise his ideas nor his data, hasn’t read his works, just disregards him because he’s a conservative is different to the analogy I made with me a United fan criticising Klopp outright just because he’s Liverpool manager without looking at his tactics, skill sets not successes. Go on, explain that to me. You won’t for the aforementioned reasons and continue to prove me right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You left out Sowell being hostile to the Civil rights movement. Why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please accept my sincerest apologies Chief.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not accepted. You left it out because it is the red herring that proves that he is a shill and nothing he says can be taken seriously. He is in it for the money and always has been and also works for the Hoover institute which should tell you everything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This reminds me of people citing Candace Owens because of the colour of her skin and support of right wing culture war shiite.
Its the equivalent of saying its not racist because a black person agrees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Satty was a big defender of little Candy. I'm just wondering what he has to say about her defence of Hamas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lol here we go again. A big defender of her or her points? Yeah I think you’ll find it would have been her points.
If she supports Hamas then I think she’s entitled to her opinion much as you are yours but I couldn’t disagree with her more.
If she does support Hamas, then by your logic you like her now, right?
So binary with you guys.
The only person here who actually bothers to engage properly by asking questions is BMCL (a few too many questions perhaps 🤣).
The majority of the rest of you just make supposition upon supposition, stereotyping upon stereotyping, straw man upon straw man. It’s a sign of severe insecurity and lack of empathy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you insinuating I support Hamas? Fvk you.
And what's wrong with working in a job centre, pr!k?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you so old now that you forgot that you said I support Zionism just the other day? Well there you go. So no, fk YOU.
Nothing wrong with it at all, it’s laudable. Prck.
Finished or want some more?
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 16 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 40 seconds ago
I have never worked in the job centre, you simply made it up. It’s things like this that are the reason you’re pretty much universally mocked on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you don’t work for the council or anything related to benefits?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, as said you’ve made it up because you’re an idiot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Superb rationale as per usual. Perhaps I have mistaken you for someone else but I don’t think I have and it doesn’t really matter either way.
You offer no reasoning, no explanations, no specifics, just your personal tiny opinionated conclusions. You couldn’t make your case to save your life.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cry more. I mean you could have sworn a minute ago, now you’re confused and may be thinking of someone else.
You have zero credibility and that’s why people take the p!ss out of you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not crying, you’re an amusing diversion whilst I’m ill on my sofa.
Still no reasoning, explanations, specifics whatsoever. You’re a clown mate.
Unlike you, I don’t care what anonymous people on an internet forum think, hence why I will set out my opinions clearly and with my reasoning.
You’re either too scared to do that or too inept - my guess is both. Prove me wrong - explain to me why RR criticising Thomas Sowell via no means other than he’s a conservative, has opposed AA, voted for Trump - doesn’t criticise his ideas nor his data, hasn’t read his works, just disregards him because he’s a conservative is different to the analogy I made with me a United fan criticising Klopp outright just because he’s Liverpool manager without looking at his tactics, skill sets not successes. Go on, explain that to me. You won’t for the aforementioned reasons and continue to prove me right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You left out Sowell being hostile to the Civil rights movement. Why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please accept my sincerest apologies Chief.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not accepted. You left it out because it is the red herring that proves that he is a shill and nothing he says can be taken seriously. He is in it for the money and always has been and also works for the Hoover institute which should tell you everything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This reminds me of people citing Candace Owens because of the colour of her skin and support of right wing culture war shiite.
Its the equivalent of saying its not racist because a black person agrees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Satty was a big defender of little Candy. I'm just wondering what he has to say about her defence of Hamas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lol here we go again. A big defender of her or her points? Yeah I think you’ll find it would have been her points.
If she supports Hamas then I think she’s entitled to her opinion much as you are yours but I couldn’t disagree with her more.
If she does support Hamas, then by your logic you like her now, right?
So binary with you guys.
The only person here who actually bothers to engage properly by asking questions is BMCL (a few too many questions perhaps 🤣).
The majority of the rest of you just make supposition upon supposition, stereotyping upon stereotyping, straw man upon straw man. It’s a sign of severe insecurity and lack of empathy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shut the fvk up. You are making a fool of yourself.
"the blue haired brigade"
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 16 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 40 seconds ago
I have never worked in the job centre, you simply made it up. It’s things like this that are the reason you’re pretty much universally mocked on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you don’t work for the council or anything related to benefits?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, as said you’ve made it up because you’re an idiot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Superb rationale as per usual. Perhaps I have mistaken you for someone else but I don’t think I have and it doesn’t really matter either way.
You offer no reasoning, no explanations, no specifics, just your personal tiny opinionated conclusions. You couldn’t make your case to save your life.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cry more. I mean you could have sworn a minute ago, now you’re confused and may be thinking of someone else.
You have zero credibility and that’s why people take the p!ss out of you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not crying, you’re an amusing diversion whilst I’m ill on my sofa.
Still no reasoning, explanations, specifics whatsoever. You’re a clown mate.
Unlike you, I don’t care what anonymous people on an internet forum think, hence why I will set out my opinions clearly and with my reasoning.
You’re either too scared to do that or too inept - my guess is both. Prove me wrong - explain to me why RR criticising Thomas Sowell via no means other than he’s a conservative, has opposed AA, voted for Trump - doesn’t criticise his ideas nor his data, hasn’t read his works, just disregards him because he’s a conservative is different to the analogy I made with me a United fan criticising Klopp outright just because he’s Liverpool manager without looking at his tactics, skill sets not successes. Go on, explain that to me. You won’t for the aforementioned reasons and continue to prove me right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You left out Sowell being hostile to the Civil rights movement. Why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please accept my sincerest apologies Chief.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not accepted. You left it out because it is the red herring that proves that he is a shill and nothing he says can be taken seriously. He is in it for the money and always has been and also works for the Hoover institute which should tell you everything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This reminds me of people citing Candace Owens because of the colour of her skin and support of right wing culture war shiite.
Its the equivalent of saying its not racist because a black person agrees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Satty was a big defender of little Candy. I'm just wondering what he has to say about her defence of Hamas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lol here we go again. A big defender of her or her points? Yeah I think you’ll find it would have been her points.
If she supports Hamas then I think she’s entitled to her opinion much as you are yours but I couldn’t disagree with her more.
If she does support Hamas, then by your logic you like her now, right?
So binary with you guys.
The only person here who actually bothers to engage properly by asking questions is BMCL (a few too many questions perhaps 🤣).
The majority of the rest of you just make supposition upon supposition, stereotyping upon stereotyping, straw man upon straw man. It’s a sign of severe insecurity and lack of empathy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shut the fvk up.You are making a fool of yourself.
"the blue haired brigade"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Put the spliff down my man. There’s a good lad.
"lol here we go again. A big defender of her or her points? Yeah I think you’ll find it would have been her points."
So we're ignoring the disingenuous nature of the points she makes becuase you happen to agree with her. Whenever you hear/read a high profile person make political argument you always account for what is this persons motive and is their point in good faith or being made for other reasons.
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 16 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 40 seconds ago
I have never worked in the job centre, you simply made it up. It’s things like this that are the reason you’re pretty much universally mocked on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you don’t work for the council or anything related to benefits?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, as said you’ve made it up because you’re an idiot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Superb rationale as per usual. Perhaps I have mistaken you for someone else but I don’t think I have and it doesn’t really matter either way.
You offer no reasoning, no explanations, no specifics, just your personal tiny opinionated conclusions. You couldn’t make your case to save your life.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cry more. I mean you could have sworn a minute ago, now you’re confused and may be thinking of someone else.
You have zero credibility and that’s why people take the p!ss out of you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not crying, you’re an amusing diversion whilst I’m ill on my sofa.
Still no reasoning, explanations, specifics whatsoever. You’re a clown mate.
Unlike you, I don’t care what anonymous people on an internet forum think, hence why I will set out my opinions clearly and with my reasoning.
You’re either too scared to do that or too inept - my guess is both. Prove me wrong - explain to me why RR criticising Thomas Sowell via no means other than he’s a conservative, has opposed AA, voted for Trump - doesn’t criticise his ideas nor his data, hasn’t read his works, just disregards him because he’s a conservative is different to the analogy I made with me a United fan criticising Klopp outright just because he’s Liverpool manager without looking at his tactics, skill sets not successes. Go on, explain that to me. You won’t for the aforementioned reasons and continue to prove me right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You left out Sowell being hostile to the Civil rights movement. Why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please accept my sincerest apologies Chief.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not accepted. You left it out because it is the red herring that proves that he is a shill and nothing he says can be taken seriously. He is in it for the money and always has been and also works for the Hoover institute which should tell you everything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This reminds me of people citing Candace Owens because of the colour of her skin and support of right wing culture war shiite.
Its the equivalent of saying its not racist because a black person agrees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Satty was a big defender of little Candy. I'm just wondering what he has to say about her defence of Hamas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lol here we go again. A big defender of her or her points? Yeah I think you’ll find it would have been her points.
If she supports Hamas then I think she’s entitled to her opinion much as you are yours but I couldn’t disagree with her more.
If she does support Hamas, then by your logic you like her now, right?
So binary with you guys.
The only person here who actually bothers to engage properly by asking questions is BMCL (a few too many questions perhaps 🤣).
The majority of the rest of you just make supposition upon supposition, stereotyping upon stereotyping, straw man upon straw man. It’s a sign of severe insecurity and lack of empathy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shut the fvk up.You are making a fool of yourself.
"the blue haired brigade"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Put the spliff down my man. There’s a good lad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was going to ask you if you were on the rum again already or if it's just the medication. That's a couple of times you've had this.
But you keep up with the weed jokes(?).
And ageist crap?
What a fvkin loser. B'bye.
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 16 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 40 seconds ago
I have never worked in the job centre, you simply made it up. It’s things like this that are the reason you’re pretty much universally mocked on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you don’t work for the council or anything related to benefits?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, as said you’ve made it up because you’re an idiot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Superb rationale as per usual. Perhaps I have mistaken you for someone else but I don’t think I have and it doesn’t really matter either way.
You offer no reasoning, no explanations, no specifics, just your personal tiny opinionated conclusions. You couldn’t make your case to save your life.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cry more. I mean you could have sworn a minute ago, now you’re confused and may be thinking of someone else.
You have zero credibility and that’s why people take the p!ss out of you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not crying, you’re an amusing diversion whilst I’m ill on my sofa.
Still no reasoning, explanations, specifics whatsoever. You’re a clown mate.
Unlike you, I don’t care what anonymous people on an internet forum think, hence why I will set out my opinions clearly and with my reasoning.
You’re either too scared to do that or too inept - my guess is both. Prove me wrong - explain to me why RR criticising Thomas Sowell via no means other than he’s a conservative, has opposed AA, voted for Trump - doesn’t criticise his ideas nor his data, hasn’t read his works, just disregards him because he’s a conservative is different to the analogy I made with me a United fan criticising Klopp outright just because he’s Liverpool manager without looking at his tactics, skill sets not successes. Go on, explain that to me. You won’t for the aforementioned reasons and continue to prove me right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You left out Sowell being hostile to the Civil rights movement. Why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please accept my sincerest apologies Chief.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not accepted. You left it out because it is the red herring that proves that he is a shill and nothing he says can be taken seriously. He is in it for the money and always has been and also works for the Hoover institute which should tell you everything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This reminds me of people citing Candace Owens because of the colour of her skin and support of right wing culture war shiite.
Its the equivalent of saying its not racist because a black person agrees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Satty was a big defender of little Candy. I'm just wondering what he has to say about her defence of Hamas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lol here we go again. A big defender of her or her points? Yeah I think you’ll find it would have been her points.
If she supports Hamas then I think she’s entitled to her opinion much as you are yours but I couldn’t disagree with her more.
If she does support Hamas, then by your logic you like her now, right?
So binary with you guys.
The only person here who actually bothers to engage properly by asking questions is BMCL (a few too many questions perhaps 🤣).
The majority of the rest of you just make supposition upon supposition, stereotyping upon stereotyping, straw man upon straw man. It’s a sign of severe insecurity and lack of empathy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shut the fvk up.You are making a fool of yourself.
"the blue haired brigade"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Put the spliff down my man. There’s a good lad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was going to ask you if you were on the rum again already or if it's just the medication. That's a couple of times you've had this.
But you keep up with the weed jokes(?).
And ageist crap?
What a fvkin loser. B'bye.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Goodbye
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 24 minutes ago
The lack of awareness is astounding.
====
How do?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well there are sound bites for both sides of the political spectrum. Acting like there aren’t lefty race hustlers also is daft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who is acting like there aren't any lefty race hustlers?
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 24 minutes ago
The lack of awareness is astounding.
====
How do?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well there are sound bites for both sides of the political spectrum. Acting like there aren’t lefty race hustlers also is daft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who is acting like there aren't any lefty race hustlers?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coolio did.
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 24 minutes ago
The lack of awareness is astounding.
====
How do?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well there are sound bites for both sides of the political spectrum. Acting like there aren’t lefty race hustlers also is daft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who is acting like there aren't any lefty race hustlers?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coolio did.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arguing in bad faith.
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 24 minutes ago
The lack of awareness is astounding.
====
How do?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well there are sound bites for both sides of the political spectrum. Acting like there aren’t lefty race hustlers also is daft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who is acting like there aren't any lefty race hustlers?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coolio did.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arguing in bad faith.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m just Rollin With My Homies
comment by Lucious Lyon (U11781)
posted 1 hour, 38 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Every major religion falls foul of point 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I can’t be gay, drink beer, have seeex before marriage or go to a strip club as a practicing Muslamic
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was a lapsed Muslim on Ja606 a few years back that admitted the majority of Muslims he knows are homophobic, can’t remember his name but he was a Utd fan. What’s your view on gayness Arab, would you be mortified if one of your children turned out to be gay?
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Every major religion falls foul of point 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All religions curtail freedoms. If you look at any country that is currently led by religion, they are restrictive. If you look at prominent religious groups, they campaign to restrict freedoms (look at NI and the US with abortion bans etc).
Even the best devout Christian I know (Ned Flanders) burnt books and restricted learning when in charge of a school, restricted his children's access to the world, did things like try to baptise the Simpson kids against their parents will etc. He'd be an extremist under this definition.
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Every major religion falls foul of point 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All religions curtail freedoms. If you look at any country that is currently led by religion, they are restrictive. If you look at prominent religious groups, they campaign to restrict freedoms (look at NI and the US with abortion bans etc).
Even the best devout Christian I know (Ned Flanders) burnt books and restricted learning when in charge of a school, restricted his children's access to the world, did things like try to baptise the Simpson kids against their parents will etc. He'd be an extremist under this definition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I get that but whilst I’m no expert, I can’t see that conflicting with this as it’s voluntary participation; apart from the children but they have less rights than adults. Or will this be an opening to children to emancipate themselves from extremely religious parents?
Ned Flanders was definitely an extremist 🤣
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Lucious Lyon (U11781)
posted 1 hour, 38 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Every major religion falls foul of point 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I can’t be gay, drink beer, have seeex before marriage or go to a strip club as a practicing Muslamic
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was a lapsed Muslim on Ja606 a few years back that admitted the majority of Muslims he knows are homophobic, can’t remember his name but he was a Utd fan. What’s your view on gayness Arab, would you be mortified if one of your children turned out to be gay?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t profess to have much care for Arab lately but I don’t think this is a fair question to put to him. Either he goes against his religion or he’s a homophone.
Given that I rarely practice my religion except for fasting I couldn’t care less how my daughter would turn out
comment by Lucious Lyon (U11781)
posted 1 minute ago
Given that I rarely practice my religion except for fasting I couldn’t care less how my daughter would turn out
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Random question - does your work let you go home early when fasting finishes at the time it does currently?
No, I’ve deliberately asked them to put me on the earlier/mid shifts
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Every major religion falls foul of point 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All religions curtail freedoms. If you look at any country that is currently led by religion, they are restrictive. If you look at prominent religious groups, they campaign to restrict freedoms (look at NI and the US with abortion bans etc).
Even the best devout Christian I know (Ned Flanders) burnt books and restricted learning when in charge of a school, restricted his children's access to the world, did things like try to baptise the Simpson kids against their parents will etc. He'd be an extremist under this definition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I get that but whilst I’m no expert, I can’t see that conflicting with this as it’s voluntary participation; apart from the children but they have less rights than adults. Or will this be an opening to children to emancipate themselves from extremely religious parents?
Ned Flanders was definitely an extremist 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely terrorist organisations are voluntary participation?
comment by Lucious Lyon (U11781)
posted 5 minutes ago
No, I’ve deliberately asked them to put me on the earlier/mid shifts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah. I let one of my guys go early. His mum asked so I said yes 🤣
He prays 5 times a day too
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Every major religion falls foul of point 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All religions curtail freedoms. If you look at any country that is currently led by religion, they are restrictive. If you look at prominent religious groups, they campaign to restrict freedoms (look at NI and the US with abortion bans etc).
Even the best devout Christian I know (Ned Flanders) burnt books and restricted learning when in charge of a school, restricted his children's access to the world, did things like try to baptise the Simpson kids against their parents will etc. He'd be an extremist under this definition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I get that but whilst I’m no expert, I can’t see that conflicting with this as it’s voluntary participation; apart from the children but they have less rights than adults. Or will this be an opening to children to emancipate themselves from extremely religious parents?
Ned Flanders was definitely an extremist 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely terrorist organisations are voluntary participation?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah but the religion is removing rights from the individual but the individual is choosing to accept that voluntarily.
I dunno, I’d have to read into what Gove has put in place more.
Put it this way, I doubt that this will make all religions extremists.
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Every major religion falls foul of point 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All religions curtail freedoms. If you look at any country that is currently led by religion, they are restrictive. If you look at prominent religious groups, they campaign to restrict freedoms (look at NI and the US with abortion bans etc).
Even the best devout Christian I know (Ned Flanders) burnt books and restricted learning when in charge of a school, restricted his children's access to the world, did things like try to baptise the Simpson kids against their parents will etc. He'd be an extremist under this definition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I get that but whilst I’m no expert, I can’t see that conflicting with this as it’s voluntary participation; apart from the children but they have less rights than adults. Or will this be an opening to children to emancipate themselves from extremely religious parents?
Ned Flanders was definitely an extremist 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely terrorist organisations are voluntary participation?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I get very confused when Christians go on about teachers "grooming" children into LGBTQ+ culture when they indoctrinate children with tales of burning in hellfire if you break any of their rules.
That seems like a more effective way of gaining followers.
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Every major religion falls foul of point 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All religions curtail freedoms. If you look at any country that is currently led by religion, they are restrictive. If you look at prominent religious groups, they campaign to restrict freedoms (look at NI and the US with abortion bans etc).
Even the best devout Christian I know (Ned Flanders) burnt books and restricted learning when in charge of a school, restricted his children's access to the world, did things like try to baptise the Simpson kids against their parents will etc. He'd be an extremist under this definition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I get that but whilst I’m no expert, I can’t see that conflicting with this as it’s voluntary participation; apart from the children but they have less rights than adults. Or will this be an opening to children to emancipate themselves from extremely religious parents?
Ned Flanders was definitely an extremist 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely terrorist organisations are voluntary participation?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I get very confused when Christians go on about teachers "grooming" children into LGBTQ+ culture when they indoctrinate children with tales of burning in hellfire if you break any of their rules.
That seems like a more effective way of gaining followers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My parents are religious, but not the loony type, they go to church on Sunday and that's about it. I had to go to Sunday School, but left as soon as I was deemed old enough to make up my own mind.
I've never seen this type of teaching in the UK, I think Christianity in this country is progressive?
comment by Lucious Lyon (U11781)
posted 34 minutes ago
Given that I rarely practice my religion except for fasting I couldn’t care less how my daughter would turn out
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you lose much weight in those 30 days? I bust my foot so I haven't been able to run or work out, so I've been doing the 18/6 fasting diet. I've lost 12lbs in 2 weeks, I think some of that is muscle tho.
NEW: UK Defence Secretary Grant Shapps has had his plane hacked by Putin’s forces, knocking out its GPS and comms
Oh dear
Sign in if you want to comment
Arguing w/strangers cause I'm lonely thread
Page 4099 of 4878
4100 | 4101 | 4102 | 4103 | 4104
posted on 14/3/24
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 11 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 40 seconds ago
I have never worked in the job centre, you simply made it up. It’s things like this that are the reason you’re pretty much universally mocked on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you don’t work for the council or anything related to benefits?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, as said you’ve made it up because you’re an idiot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Superb rationale as per usual. Perhaps I have mistaken you for someone else but I don’t think I have and it doesn’t really matter either way.
You offer no reasoning, no explanations, no specifics, just your personal tiny opinionated conclusions. You couldn’t make your case to save your life.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cry more. I mean you could have sworn a minute ago, now you’re confused and may be thinking of someone else.
You have zero credibility and that’s why people take the p!ss out of you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not crying, you’re an amusing diversion whilst I’m ill on my sofa.
Still no reasoning, explanations, specifics whatsoever. You’re a clown mate.
Unlike you, I don’t care what anonymous people on an internet forum think, hence why I will set out my opinions clearly and with my reasoning.
You’re either too scared to do that or too inept - my guess is both. Prove me wrong - explain to me why RR criticising Thomas Sowell via no means other than he’s a conservative, has opposed AA, voted for Trump - doesn’t criticise his ideas nor his data, hasn’t read his works, just disregards him because he’s a conservative is different to the analogy I made with me a United fan criticising Klopp outright just because he’s Liverpool manager without looking at his tactics, skill sets not successes. Go on, explain that to me. You won’t for the aforementioned reasons and continue to prove me right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You left out Sowell being hostile to the Civil rights movement. Why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please accept my sincerest apologies Chief.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not accepted. You left it out because it is the red herring that proves that he is a shill and nothing he says can be taken seriously. He is in it for the money and always has been and also works for the Hoover institute which should tell you everything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This reminds me of people citing Candace Owens because of the colour of her skin and support of right wing culture war shiite.
Its the equivalent of saying its not racist because a black person agrees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Satty was a big defender of little Candy. I'm just wondering what he has to say about her defence of Hamas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lol here we go again. A big defender of her or her points? Yeah I think you’ll find it would have been her points.
If she supports Hamas then I think she’s entitled to her opinion much as you are yours but I couldn’t disagree with her more.
If she does support Hamas, then by your logic you like her now, right?
So binary with you guys.
The only person here who actually bothers to engage properly by asking questions is BMCL (a few too many questions perhaps 🤣).
The majority of the rest of you just make supposition upon supposition, stereotyping upon stereotyping, straw man upon straw man. It’s a sign of severe insecurity and lack of empathy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you insinuating I support Hamas? Fvk you.
And what's wrong with working in a job centre, pr!k?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you so old now that you forgot that you said I support Zionism just the other day? Well there you go. So no, fk YOU.
Nothing wrong with it at all, it’s laudable. Prck.
Finished or want some more?
posted on 14/3/24
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 16 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 40 seconds ago
I have never worked in the job centre, you simply made it up. It’s things like this that are the reason you’re pretty much universally mocked on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you don’t work for the council or anything related to benefits?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, as said you’ve made it up because you’re an idiot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Superb rationale as per usual. Perhaps I have mistaken you for someone else but I don’t think I have and it doesn’t really matter either way.
You offer no reasoning, no explanations, no specifics, just your personal tiny opinionated conclusions. You couldn’t make your case to save your life.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cry more. I mean you could have sworn a minute ago, now you’re confused and may be thinking of someone else.
You have zero credibility and that’s why people take the p!ss out of you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not crying, you’re an amusing diversion whilst I’m ill on my sofa.
Still no reasoning, explanations, specifics whatsoever. You’re a clown mate.
Unlike you, I don’t care what anonymous people on an internet forum think, hence why I will set out my opinions clearly and with my reasoning.
You’re either too scared to do that or too inept - my guess is both. Prove me wrong - explain to me why RR criticising Thomas Sowell via no means other than he’s a conservative, has opposed AA, voted for Trump - doesn’t criticise his ideas nor his data, hasn’t read his works, just disregards him because he’s a conservative is different to the analogy I made with me a United fan criticising Klopp outright just because he’s Liverpool manager without looking at his tactics, skill sets not successes. Go on, explain that to me. You won’t for the aforementioned reasons and continue to prove me right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You left out Sowell being hostile to the Civil rights movement. Why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please accept my sincerest apologies Chief.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not accepted. You left it out because it is the red herring that proves that he is a shill and nothing he says can be taken seriously. He is in it for the money and always has been and also works for the Hoover institute which should tell you everything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This reminds me of people citing Candace Owens because of the colour of her skin and support of right wing culture war shiite.
Its the equivalent of saying its not racist because a black person agrees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Satty was a big defender of little Candy. I'm just wondering what he has to say about her defence of Hamas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lol here we go again. A big defender of her or her points? Yeah I think you’ll find it would have been her points.
If she supports Hamas then I think she’s entitled to her opinion much as you are yours but I couldn’t disagree with her more.
If she does support Hamas, then by your logic you like her now, right?
So binary with you guys.
The only person here who actually bothers to engage properly by asking questions is BMCL (a few too many questions perhaps 🤣).
The majority of the rest of you just make supposition upon supposition, stereotyping upon stereotyping, straw man upon straw man. It’s a sign of severe insecurity and lack of empathy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shut the fvk up. You are making a fool of yourself.
"the blue haired brigade"
posted on 14/3/24
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 16 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 40 seconds ago
I have never worked in the job centre, you simply made it up. It’s things like this that are the reason you’re pretty much universally mocked on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you don’t work for the council or anything related to benefits?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, as said you’ve made it up because you’re an idiot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Superb rationale as per usual. Perhaps I have mistaken you for someone else but I don’t think I have and it doesn’t really matter either way.
You offer no reasoning, no explanations, no specifics, just your personal tiny opinionated conclusions. You couldn’t make your case to save your life.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cry more. I mean you could have sworn a minute ago, now you’re confused and may be thinking of someone else.
You have zero credibility and that’s why people take the p!ss out of you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not crying, you’re an amusing diversion whilst I’m ill on my sofa.
Still no reasoning, explanations, specifics whatsoever. You’re a clown mate.
Unlike you, I don’t care what anonymous people on an internet forum think, hence why I will set out my opinions clearly and with my reasoning.
You’re either too scared to do that or too inept - my guess is both. Prove me wrong - explain to me why RR criticising Thomas Sowell via no means other than he’s a conservative, has opposed AA, voted for Trump - doesn’t criticise his ideas nor his data, hasn’t read his works, just disregards him because he’s a conservative is different to the analogy I made with me a United fan criticising Klopp outright just because he’s Liverpool manager without looking at his tactics, skill sets not successes. Go on, explain that to me. You won’t for the aforementioned reasons and continue to prove me right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You left out Sowell being hostile to the Civil rights movement. Why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please accept my sincerest apologies Chief.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not accepted. You left it out because it is the red herring that proves that he is a shill and nothing he says can be taken seriously. He is in it for the money and always has been and also works for the Hoover institute which should tell you everything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This reminds me of people citing Candace Owens because of the colour of her skin and support of right wing culture war shiite.
Its the equivalent of saying its not racist because a black person agrees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Satty was a big defender of little Candy. I'm just wondering what he has to say about her defence of Hamas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lol here we go again. A big defender of her or her points? Yeah I think you’ll find it would have been her points.
If she supports Hamas then I think she’s entitled to her opinion much as you are yours but I couldn’t disagree with her more.
If she does support Hamas, then by your logic you like her now, right?
So binary with you guys.
The only person here who actually bothers to engage properly by asking questions is BMCL (a few too many questions perhaps 🤣).
The majority of the rest of you just make supposition upon supposition, stereotyping upon stereotyping, straw man upon straw man. It’s a sign of severe insecurity and lack of empathy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shut the fvk up.You are making a fool of yourself.
"the blue haired brigade"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Put the spliff down my man. There’s a good lad.
posted on 14/3/24
"lol here we go again. A big defender of her or her points? Yeah I think you’ll find it would have been her points."
So we're ignoring the disingenuous nature of the points she makes becuase you happen to agree with her. Whenever you hear/read a high profile person make political argument you always account for what is this persons motive and is their point in good faith or being made for other reasons.
posted on 14/3/24
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 16 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 40 seconds ago
I have never worked in the job centre, you simply made it up. It’s things like this that are the reason you’re pretty much universally mocked on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you don’t work for the council or anything related to benefits?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, as said you’ve made it up because you’re an idiot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Superb rationale as per usual. Perhaps I have mistaken you for someone else but I don’t think I have and it doesn’t really matter either way.
You offer no reasoning, no explanations, no specifics, just your personal tiny opinionated conclusions. You couldn’t make your case to save your life.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cry more. I mean you could have sworn a minute ago, now you’re confused and may be thinking of someone else.
You have zero credibility and that’s why people take the p!ss out of you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not crying, you’re an amusing diversion whilst I’m ill on my sofa.
Still no reasoning, explanations, specifics whatsoever. You’re a clown mate.
Unlike you, I don’t care what anonymous people on an internet forum think, hence why I will set out my opinions clearly and with my reasoning.
You’re either too scared to do that or too inept - my guess is both. Prove me wrong - explain to me why RR criticising Thomas Sowell via no means other than he’s a conservative, has opposed AA, voted for Trump - doesn’t criticise his ideas nor his data, hasn’t read his works, just disregards him because he’s a conservative is different to the analogy I made with me a United fan criticising Klopp outright just because he’s Liverpool manager without looking at his tactics, skill sets not successes. Go on, explain that to me. You won’t for the aforementioned reasons and continue to prove me right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You left out Sowell being hostile to the Civil rights movement. Why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please accept my sincerest apologies Chief.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not accepted. You left it out because it is the red herring that proves that he is a shill and nothing he says can be taken seriously. He is in it for the money and always has been and also works for the Hoover institute which should tell you everything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This reminds me of people citing Candace Owens because of the colour of her skin and support of right wing culture war shiite.
Its the equivalent of saying its not racist because a black person agrees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Satty was a big defender of little Candy. I'm just wondering what he has to say about her defence of Hamas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lol here we go again. A big defender of her or her points? Yeah I think you’ll find it would have been her points.
If she supports Hamas then I think she’s entitled to her opinion much as you are yours but I couldn’t disagree with her more.
If she does support Hamas, then by your logic you like her now, right?
So binary with you guys.
The only person here who actually bothers to engage properly by asking questions is BMCL (a few too many questions perhaps 🤣).
The majority of the rest of you just make supposition upon supposition, stereotyping upon stereotyping, straw man upon straw man. It’s a sign of severe insecurity and lack of empathy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shut the fvk up.You are making a fool of yourself.
"the blue haired brigade"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Put the spliff down my man. There’s a good lad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was going to ask you if you were on the rum again already or if it's just the medication. That's a couple of times you've had this.
But you keep up with the weed jokes(?).
And ageist crap?
What a fvkin loser. B'bye.
posted on 14/3/24
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 16 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 40 seconds ago
I have never worked in the job centre, you simply made it up. It’s things like this that are the reason you’re pretty much universally mocked on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you don’t work for the council or anything related to benefits?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, as said you’ve made it up because you’re an idiot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Superb rationale as per usual. Perhaps I have mistaken you for someone else but I don’t think I have and it doesn’t really matter either way.
You offer no reasoning, no explanations, no specifics, just your personal tiny opinionated conclusions. You couldn’t make your case to save your life.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cry more. I mean you could have sworn a minute ago, now you’re confused and may be thinking of someone else.
You have zero credibility and that’s why people take the p!ss out of you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not crying, you’re an amusing diversion whilst I’m ill on my sofa.
Still no reasoning, explanations, specifics whatsoever. You’re a clown mate.
Unlike you, I don’t care what anonymous people on an internet forum think, hence why I will set out my opinions clearly and with my reasoning.
You’re either too scared to do that or too inept - my guess is both. Prove me wrong - explain to me why RR criticising Thomas Sowell via no means other than he’s a conservative, has opposed AA, voted for Trump - doesn’t criticise his ideas nor his data, hasn’t read his works, just disregards him because he’s a conservative is different to the analogy I made with me a United fan criticising Klopp outright just because he’s Liverpool manager without looking at his tactics, skill sets not successes. Go on, explain that to me. You won’t for the aforementioned reasons and continue to prove me right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You left out Sowell being hostile to the Civil rights movement. Why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please accept my sincerest apologies Chief.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not accepted. You left it out because it is the red herring that proves that he is a shill and nothing he says can be taken seriously. He is in it for the money and always has been and also works for the Hoover institute which should tell you everything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This reminds me of people citing Candace Owens because of the colour of her skin and support of right wing culture war shiite.
Its the equivalent of saying its not racist because a black person agrees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Satty was a big defender of little Candy. I'm just wondering what he has to say about her defence of Hamas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lol here we go again. A big defender of her or her points? Yeah I think you’ll find it would have been her points.
If she supports Hamas then I think she’s entitled to her opinion much as you are yours but I couldn’t disagree with her more.
If she does support Hamas, then by your logic you like her now, right?
So binary with you guys.
The only person here who actually bothers to engage properly by asking questions is BMCL (a few too many questions perhaps 🤣).
The majority of the rest of you just make supposition upon supposition, stereotyping upon stereotyping, straw man upon straw man. It’s a sign of severe insecurity and lack of empathy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shut the fvk up.You are making a fool of yourself.
"the blue haired brigade"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Put the spliff down my man. There’s a good lad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was going to ask you if you were on the rum again already or if it's just the medication. That's a couple of times you've had this.
But you keep up with the weed jokes(?).
And ageist crap?
What a fvkin loser. B'bye.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Goodbye
posted on 14/3/24
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 24 minutes ago
The lack of awareness is astounding.
====
How do?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well there are sound bites for both sides of the political spectrum. Acting like there aren’t lefty race hustlers also is daft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who is acting like there aren't any lefty race hustlers?
posted on 14/3/24
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 24 minutes ago
The lack of awareness is astounding.
====
How do?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well there are sound bites for both sides of the political spectrum. Acting like there aren’t lefty race hustlers also is daft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who is acting like there aren't any lefty race hustlers?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coolio did.
posted on 14/3/24
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 24 minutes ago
The lack of awareness is astounding.
====
How do?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well there are sound bites for both sides of the political spectrum. Acting like there aren’t lefty race hustlers also is daft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who is acting like there aren't any lefty race hustlers?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coolio did.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arguing in bad faith.
posted on 14/3/24
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 24 minutes ago
The lack of awareness is astounding.
====
How do?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well there are sound bites for both sides of the political spectrum. Acting like there aren’t lefty race hustlers also is daft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who is acting like there aren't any lefty race hustlers?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coolio did.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arguing in bad faith.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m just Rollin With My Homies
posted on 14/3/24
comment by Lucious Lyon (U11781)
posted 1 hour, 38 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Every major religion falls foul of point 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I can’t be gay, drink beer, have seeex before marriage or go to a strip club as a practicing Muslamic
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was a lapsed Muslim on Ja606 a few years back that admitted the majority of Muslims he knows are homophobic, can’t remember his name but he was a Utd fan. What’s your view on gayness Arab, would you be mortified if one of your children turned out to be gay?
posted on 14/3/24
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Every major religion falls foul of point 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All religions curtail freedoms. If you look at any country that is currently led by religion, they are restrictive. If you look at prominent religious groups, they campaign to restrict freedoms (look at NI and the US with abortion bans etc).
Even the best devout Christian I know (Ned Flanders) burnt books and restricted learning when in charge of a school, restricted his children's access to the world, did things like try to baptise the Simpson kids against their parents will etc. He'd be an extremist under this definition.
posted on 14/3/24
Stupid Flanders.
posted on 14/3/24
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Every major religion falls foul of point 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All religions curtail freedoms. If you look at any country that is currently led by religion, they are restrictive. If you look at prominent religious groups, they campaign to restrict freedoms (look at NI and the US with abortion bans etc).
Even the best devout Christian I know (Ned Flanders) burnt books and restricted learning when in charge of a school, restricted his children's access to the world, did things like try to baptise the Simpson kids against their parents will etc. He'd be an extremist under this definition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I get that but whilst I’m no expert, I can’t see that conflicting with this as it’s voluntary participation; apart from the children but they have less rights than adults. Or will this be an opening to children to emancipate themselves from extremely religious parents?
Ned Flanders was definitely an extremist 🤣
posted on 14/3/24
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Lucious Lyon (U11781)
posted 1 hour, 38 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Every major religion falls foul of point 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I can’t be gay, drink beer, have seeex before marriage or go to a strip club as a practicing Muslamic
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was a lapsed Muslim on Ja606 a few years back that admitted the majority of Muslims he knows are homophobic, can’t remember his name but he was a Utd fan. What’s your view on gayness Arab, would you be mortified if one of your children turned out to be gay?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t profess to have much care for Arab lately but I don’t think this is a fair question to put to him. Either he goes against his religion or he’s a homophone.
posted on 14/3/24
Given that I rarely practice my religion except for fasting I couldn’t care less how my daughter would turn out
posted on 14/3/24
comment by Lucious Lyon (U11781)
posted 1 minute ago
Given that I rarely practice my religion except for fasting I couldn’t care less how my daughter would turn out
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Random question - does your work let you go home early when fasting finishes at the time it does currently?
posted on 14/3/24
No, I’ve deliberately asked them to put me on the earlier/mid shifts
posted on 14/3/24
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Every major religion falls foul of point 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All religions curtail freedoms. If you look at any country that is currently led by religion, they are restrictive. If you look at prominent religious groups, they campaign to restrict freedoms (look at NI and the US with abortion bans etc).
Even the best devout Christian I know (Ned Flanders) burnt books and restricted learning when in charge of a school, restricted his children's access to the world, did things like try to baptise the Simpson kids against their parents will etc. He'd be an extremist under this definition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I get that but whilst I’m no expert, I can’t see that conflicting with this as it’s voluntary participation; apart from the children but they have less rights than adults. Or will this be an opening to children to emancipate themselves from extremely religious parents?
Ned Flanders was definitely an extremist 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely terrorist organisations are voluntary participation?
posted on 14/3/24
comment by Lucious Lyon (U11781)
posted 5 minutes ago
No, I’ve deliberately asked them to put me on the earlier/mid shifts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah. I let one of my guys go early. His mum asked so I said yes 🤣
He prays 5 times a day too
posted on 14/3/24
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Every major religion falls foul of point 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All religions curtail freedoms. If you look at any country that is currently led by religion, they are restrictive. If you look at prominent religious groups, they campaign to restrict freedoms (look at NI and the US with abortion bans etc).
Even the best devout Christian I know (Ned Flanders) burnt books and restricted learning when in charge of a school, restricted his children's access to the world, did things like try to baptise the Simpson kids against their parents will etc. He'd be an extremist under this definition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I get that but whilst I’m no expert, I can’t see that conflicting with this as it’s voluntary participation; apart from the children but they have less rights than adults. Or will this be an opening to children to emancipate themselves from extremely religious parents?
Ned Flanders was definitely an extremist 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely terrorist organisations are voluntary participation?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah but the religion is removing rights from the individual but the individual is choosing to accept that voluntarily.
I dunno, I’d have to read into what Gove has put in place more.
Put it this way, I doubt that this will make all religions extremists.
posted on 14/3/24
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Every major religion falls foul of point 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All religions curtail freedoms. If you look at any country that is currently led by religion, they are restrictive. If you look at prominent religious groups, they campaign to restrict freedoms (look at NI and the US with abortion bans etc).
Even the best devout Christian I know (Ned Flanders) burnt books and restricted learning when in charge of a school, restricted his children's access to the world, did things like try to baptise the Simpson kids against their parents will etc. He'd be an extremist under this definition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I get that but whilst I’m no expert, I can’t see that conflicting with this as it’s voluntary participation; apart from the children but they have less rights than adults. Or will this be an opening to children to emancipate themselves from extremely religious parents?
Ned Flanders was definitely an extremist 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely terrorist organisations are voluntary participation?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I get very confused when Christians go on about teachers "grooming" children into LGBTQ+ culture when they indoctrinate children with tales of burning in hellfire if you break any of their rules.
That seems like a more effective way of gaining followers.
posted on 14/3/24
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Every major religion falls foul of point 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All religions curtail freedoms. If you look at any country that is currently led by religion, they are restrictive. If you look at prominent religious groups, they campaign to restrict freedoms (look at NI and the US with abortion bans etc).
Even the best devout Christian I know (Ned Flanders) burnt books and restricted learning when in charge of a school, restricted his children's access to the world, did things like try to baptise the Simpson kids against their parents will etc. He'd be an extremist under this definition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I get that but whilst I’m no expert, I can’t see that conflicting with this as it’s voluntary participation; apart from the children but they have less rights than adults. Or will this be an opening to children to emancipate themselves from extremely religious parents?
Ned Flanders was definitely an extremist 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely terrorist organisations are voluntary participation?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I get very confused when Christians go on about teachers "grooming" children into LGBTQ+ culture when they indoctrinate children with tales of burning in hellfire if you break any of their rules.
That seems like a more effective way of gaining followers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My parents are religious, but not the loony type, they go to church on Sunday and that's about it. I had to go to Sunday School, but left as soon as I was deemed old enough to make up my own mind.
I've never seen this type of teaching in the UK, I think Christianity in this country is progressive?
posted on 14/3/24
comment by Lucious Lyon (U11781)
posted 34 minutes ago
Given that I rarely practice my religion except for fasting I couldn’t care less how my daughter would turn out
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you lose much weight in those 30 days? I bust my foot so I haven't been able to run or work out, so I've been doing the 18/6 fasting diet. I've lost 12lbs in 2 weeks, I think some of that is muscle tho.
posted on 14/3/24
NEW: UK Defence Secretary Grant Shapps has had his plane hacked by Putin’s forces, knocking out its GPS and comms
Oh dear
Page 4099 of 4878
4100 | 4101 | 4102 | 4103 | 4104