https://archive.ph/8nNJg

Read it when you have time. Good insight into the situation.

"The Palestinians are Amalek," he was told by Benzi Lieberman, chairman of the Council of Settlements. "We will destroy them,"

“you must remember what Amalek has done to you says our Holy Bible and we do remember and we are fighting our brave troops and combatants who are now in Gaza or around Gaza and in all other regions in Israel are joining this chain of Jewish Heroes a chain that has started 3,000 years ago from Joshua…”

-Netanyahu

comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 14 minutes ago
"The Palestinians are Amalek," he was told by Benzi Lieberman, chairman of the Council of Settlements. "We will destroy them,"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is from 20 years ago, it continues : "“We won’t kill them all. But we will destroy their ability to think as a nation. We will destroy Palestinian nationalism.”

Pretty sh1tty, but let's not stoke things up more than is necessary - and nothing to do with your next quote from Netanyahu from 6 months ago, which was about Hamas. I mean still think the guy is a , but you seem to be conflating the two quotes.

comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 14 minutes ago
"The Palestinians are Amalek," he was told by Benzi Lieberman, chairman of the Council of Settlements. "We will destroy them,"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is from 20 years ago, it continues : "“We won’t kill them all. But we will destroy their ability to think as a nation. We will destroy Palestinian nationalism.”

Pretty sh1tty, but let's not stoke things up more than is necessary - and nothing to do with your next quote from Netanyahu from 6 months ago, which was about Hamas. I mean still think the guy is a, but you seem to be conflating the two quotes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course, the first quite is a quite derived from the link I provided.

The Netanyahu quite was to explain my first comment on what Netanyahu said

*quote not quite.

The gap in time is good to demonstrate the consistency of Israel's view of Palestinians.

The link didn't work, so I had to google the following quotes.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2004/05/31/among-the-settlers

Here's the original link. If you don't have a subscription then use archive.ph

Blocked by work. Most things don't work, people keep putting up twitter links on here - most of time, if people don't include a summary or opinion on the link, I have to guess what they're on about.

comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 19 minutes ago
Blocked by work. Most things don't work, people keep putting up twitter links on here - most of time, if people don't include a summary or opinion on the link, I have to guess what they're on about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

That must be so annoying

Anyway guys, look at this. No comment necessary

https://x.com/fasc1nate/status/1769790398912954612?s=46&t=_inLKQLdQd8BiVPSqxRmkA

Copy the link and paste it into archive.ph?

Can't help you beyond that.

comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 3 hours, 6 minutes ago
Instead of running the insane conspiracy theory she used to be a man, you think they'd just focus on the fact she was 40 and he was 15 when they first met.

He's literally 2 years younger than her oldest child
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And who would care if she was a man married to a woman that much younger?

comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 3 hours, 6 minutes ago
Instead of running the insane conspiracy theory she used to be a man, you think they'd just focus on the fact she was 40 and he was 15 when they first met.

He's literally 2 years younger than her oldest child
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And who would care if she was a man married to a woman that much younger?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If one is 15 and the other is 40, the story isn't really about the actual age difference - just the actual ages.

comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 3 hours, 6 minutes ago
Instead of running the insane conspiracy theory she used to be a man, you think they'd just focus on the fact she was 40 and he was 15 when they first met.

He's literally 2 years younger than her oldest child
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And who would care if she was a man married to a woman that much younger?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If one is 15 and the other is 40, the story isn't really about the actual age difference - just the actual ages.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Were the shegging when they first met?

To be fair I don't know loads about it, but I just meant if there's anything to pick up on in that relationship then the grooming angle is surely the most obvious.

Whether it's true or not is different, but truth has never stopped our Russian friends before.

I think they are trying to play to the right wing, anti-trans movement. There is the same conspiracy theory about Michelle Obama.

Jeremy Hunt suggests that the general election will be held in October

'This particular spending review has to be completed before next April. If the general election is in October that will mean it's very very tight'

He says that if there's another fiscal event before the election he would like to freeze fuel duty again

When have the French ever cared about the bedroom habits of their presidents? Wasn't Chirac Mr 5mins +shower and Mitterand had a secret family.
Of all the things to try and rile the French.

Haiti, Dr Barbecue, Biden & Trudeau

👇🏻

https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1769846246926115030

Yanis 👇🏻

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3_I18eEABU

Peks that’s all 💩

Tucker Carlson

At ease my Right wing hysterics, the new James Bond is not gonna be black.

One good thing about Trump winning the election (as I fear he will) is seeing who the likes of Tucker Carlson and his idiotic viewers will blame for all the world's (and America's problems).

I don't think I'd even heard of Carlson when Trump was president, so I don't know what he was whining and lying about then, or who he was whining and lying to.

Trump won't win and if he does we won't have anyone to blame because we will all be DEAD 🤬