comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/sep/16/ireland-apple-13-billion-tax-forced-against-will

Pesky EU forcing companies to pay tax.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Even more staggering is the notion that injecting life into a broken economy is to lower taxation on international and private corporate investment only to find to everyone’s shock and horror that the economy booms.

Amazing stuff really

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about a minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/sep/16/ireland-apple-13-billion-tax-forced-against-will

Pesky EU forcing companies to pay tax.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Even more staggering is the notion that injecting life into a broken economy is to lower taxation on international and private corporate investment only to find to everyone’s shock and horror that the economy booms.

Amazing stuff really
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should share it out among us

comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about a minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/sep/16/ireland-apple-13-billion-tax-forced-against-will

Pesky EU forcing companies to pay tax.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Even more staggering is the notion that injecting life into a broken economy is to lower taxation on international and private corporate investment only to find to everyone’s shock and horror that the economy booms.

Amazing stuff really
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should share it out among us
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Indeed. Get it sent over

Huw Edwards is given six months' imprisonment suspended for two years with a requirement to complete a seeex offender programme.

Can’t believe he’s not inside for a long time

The company has no staff and appears to have taken on debt to fund Jenrick

Edwards got away with it there.

You can’t control the images people send you but you do have the power to delete them

comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 25 minutes ago
Huw Edwards is given six months' imprisonment suspended for two years with a requirement to complete a seeex offender programme.

Can’t believe he’s not inside for a long time
----------------------------------------------------------------------


not sure that receiving dodgy images on whatsapp is illegal

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 minutes ago
Edwards got away with it there.

You can’t control the images people send you but you do have the power to delete them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How you know he got away with it?

comment by RB&W - He kicked lumps out of them (U21434)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 25 minutes ago
Huw Edwards is given six months' imprisonment suspended for two years with a requirement to complete a seeex offender programme.

Can’t believe he’s not inside for a long time
----------------------------------------------------------------------


not sure that receiving dodgy images on whatsapp is illegal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It isn’t, it’s the fact he kept them rather than deleting them.

I mean he paid for the images, which is why he’s been prosecuted.

I’m not sure what purpose sending him to jail would serve tbh.

comment by Mamba - You hit us, We hit you. (U1282)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 minutes ago
Edwards got away with it there.

You can’t control the images people send you but you do have the power to delete them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How you know he got away with it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m pretty sure most people with Cat A indecent images of children under 10 on their phones would have got sent down

comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted about a minute ago
I mean he paid for the images, which is why he’s been prosecuted.

I’m not sure what purpose sending him to jail would serve tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Might deter him from doing it again

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - He kicked lumps out of them (U21434)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 25 minutes ago
Huw Edwards is given six months' imprisonment suspended for two years with a requirement to complete a seeex offender programme.

Can’t believe he’s not inside for a long time
----------------------------------------------------------------------


not sure that receiving dodgy images on whatsapp is illegal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It isn’t, it’s the fact he kept them rather than deleting them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think is more that he vvanked over them rather than not deleting them that irks most people.

We’re not going to see the images but by all accounts they’re pretty repulsive. A long way down from just pictures of young lads bums.

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 minutes ago
We’re not going to see the images but by all accounts they’re pretty repulsive. A long way down from just pictures of young lads bums.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pictures of feet?

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - You hit us, We hit you. (U1282)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 minutes ago
Edwards got away with it there.

You can’t control the images people send you but you do have the power to delete them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How you know he got away with it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m pretty sure most people with Cat A indecent images of children under 10 on their phones would have got sent down
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A lot get suspended sentences

Especially Celebrity Nonces

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - You hit us, We hit you. (U1282)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 minutes ago
Edwards got away with it there.

You can’t control the images people send you but you do have the power to delete them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How you know he got away with it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m pretty sure most people with Cat A indecent images of children under 10 on their phones would have got sent down
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you read that law, there are a lot of factors that are looked at, including the conduct of the accused. For instance, I read somewhere he asked not to be sent any illegal stuff. I still think he should have done some jail time, just saying we don't know all the details.

A federal judge in Manhattan ruled Mr Trump breached Mr Grant's copyright for his 1983 hit, and is now liable for damages as well as paying for the singer's legal fees.

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 9 minutes ago
Especially Celebrity Nonces
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Should celebrities receive harsher sentences than us average bods?

Mosed dangerus italian cities per guvmint n data:
1. Milan
2. Rome
3. Florence
4. Rimini
5. Turin
6. Bologna
7. Prato
8. Imperia
9. Venice
10. Livorno

comment by #4zA (U22472)
posted 28 minutes ago
Mosed dangerus italian cities per guvmint n data:
1. Milan
2. Rome
3. Florence
4. Rimini
5. Turin
6. Bologna
7. Prato
8. Imperia
9. Venice
10. Livorno
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In what way dangerous? Crime?

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by #4zA (U22472)
posted 28 minutes ago
Mosed dangerus italian cities per guvmint n data:
1. Milan
2. Rome
3. Florence
4. Rimini
5. Turin
6. Bologna
7. Prato
8. Imperia
9. Venice
10. Livorno
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In what way dangerous? Crime?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yup

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 50 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 9 minutes ago
Especially Celebrity Nonces
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Should celebrities receive harsher sentences than us average bods?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Should they receive lighter sentences?
Oh sorry. They already do.

Which of them would be a nice holiday, Rome aside as I’ve already been