Morata is a classy player.
Reminds me a little of Torres in his Liverpool days.

Morata. Said it all summer long

Morata was clumsy today I thought. Hardly breath taking performance. Lukaku was abysmal.

I think pretty much everyone on the Utd board has now called Lukaku a flat track bully now.

Neither.

But lukaku is a better striker. That doesn’t say much for morata. He’s not that good.

Morataaaaaaa

Morata but if Lukaku scores next game and Morata doesn't then Lukaku.

Lukaku got little service all game, I actually think he would have scored more today than Morata with the chances Morata got.

comment by Kunta Kinte Kante Conte (U1641)
posted 18 seconds ago
Lukaku got little service all game, I actually think he would have scored more today than Morata with the chances Morata got.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Agreed. Chelsea were wasteful and nobody more than Morata. Should have had about 3 or 4.

morata apart from his goal was pretty anonymous

but i'd take him over lukaku, definetely

still think lukaku will score more goals over the season but morata will score more important goals

Morata is easily the better footballer. Easily.

But with decent service lukaku is very effective. Harsh to judge him based on the boring ones negative tactics.

comment by Eric_the_king (SE85) (U21241)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Kunta Kinte Kante Conte (U1641)
posted 18 seconds ago
Lukaku got little service all game, I actually think he would have scored more today than Morata with the chances Morata got.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Agreed. Chelsea were wasteful and nobody more than Morata. Should have had about 3 or 4.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

yeah pretty much, this is just an article for chelsea fans who were bitter over lukaku in the summer to circlejerk over

comment by Stretty - mr mourinho (U3123)
posted 5 minutes ago
Neither.

But lukaku is a better striker. That doesn’t say much for morata. He’s not that good.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Only Aguero has more goals than Lukaku in last 5 seasons. So he knows where the goal is.

He's a limited footballer though.

FFS I should really check the article already live first

Big performance by your guys. Gonna cause some consternation at United.

Salah is better than both and he plays wide, two average Joe's

Morata choked a couple of times, but I'll take that in exchange for his workrate and general feistiness. As I hadn't seen much of him before, I sure wish Jose landed him early on, I could see him doing a good job for our squad. Lukaku looked a bit shiftless today, to put it nicely. Going to SB always is a nightmare, maybe we should have played a cup squad to see if they might just steal a result today, our first selection hasn't fared well since the well before SAF retired.

We all know Morata is the better footballer, however you can't argue with Lukaku's scoring record.

Yeah, his first touch isn't great and he can't trap a bag of cement but at the end of the day what do you want your striker to do? Hit the bag of the net, that's what and he's shown he can do that!

Lukaku

United don’t get the best these days

comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 42 seconds ago
United don’t get the best these days
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats a good point.
You look at the cost of their squad, and the lack of quality in it, especially midfield, and you would have to assume they have been made to pay well over the odds for their players based on the name of their club, rather than the inherent value of those players.

comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 42 seconds ago
United don’t get the best these days
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats a good point.
You look at the cost of their squad, and the lack of quality in it, especially midfield, and you would have to assume they have been made to pay well over the odds for their players based on the name of their club, rather than the inherent value of those players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Is there a worst team pound for pound in sports history?

comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by jlou1978 (U15376)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 42 seconds ago
United don’t get the best these days
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats a good point.
You look at the cost of their squad, and the lack of quality in it, especially midfield, and you would have to assume they have been made to pay well over the odds for their players based on the name of their club, rather than the inherent value of those players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Is there a worst team pound for pound in sports history?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably not, no.

No there are worse teams in history as compared to current Man U team.