our girls, great comeback.

Bear, strap-on, care to comment?

Ewe Rams !

As our victories over Forest are becoming so common I am only mildly pleased by this. Let the scarlet clad filth cream their jeans over a win for their 1st team over our U23s. They need something to cheer up their otherwise sad existence.

by lastapostleofvidal (U1491)
13 November 2017
Comment on this Article

Forest 2 up

Derby score 3

Forest miss last minute penalty
________________________________________________________

Did Forest get Tom Cleverley in on loan (and in a frock) to take the penno?

Sorry to change the subject, but how did he ever get to play for England and HTF is Joe Hart still getting picked?

Bravo Derby Ladies 🍾🍾😎

'Fraud RFB is still \/\/ an King off to their 1st Xl win against our kids.....

Apparently Forest Ladies fans who weren't at the game thought they were the better team though, which must be some consolation.

In these gender free times, only one way to do this. The Brian Clough Trophy, played over two legs, with mixed teams of ladies, U23's and seniors.

Two legs sounds a bit able-bodied-centric . One leg or no legs should also be acceptable.

I would also have suggested that mental handicap should similarly be no bar to participation, but I fear they might overwhelm us through sheer weight of numbers.

You forgot to mention which team had the best legs vidal, tut tut.

It could be complicated.......

4 x U23's - of which any 2 can be ladies.

2 x Ladies - of which one must be a lady.

4 x Seniors - of which any 2 can be ladies.

1 x Scottish International. gender neutral.

A start to fully inclusive footy

Heb, I assume your choice of the Scottish International being the gender neutral member of the squad is that skirt wearing for men is already firmly rooted in their culture whereas the rest of us are a bit behind the times.

Indeed. And the only way to get a Scot onto the team......

Good thinking.

Anya take note.

Is there a passage for any of these players into the senior team?
Maybe Derby should champion this as, recently proven when we outplayed you and outscored you, there is no talent coming through.
It would be very progressive too

There are two reasons why clubs give their young players a run in the first team. Either the young players are very talented or the first team players aren't much good. Wonder which of these applies to Forest? Forest the team with a softer centre than a Fry's Turkish Delight.

Strett, In January do you want any of our central defenders as we have a surfeit and you have none.

I think we would accept £6 million for Shackell and £2 million for Rawson with Bent for £1 million.

comment by VC10Ram (U18980)
posted 19 hours, 28 minutes ago
I think we would accept £6 million for Shackell and £2 million for Rawson with Bent for £1 million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This statement typifies why you lot are in La La Land.

Failures don't sell for big bucks, only in sheep dreams.

comment by I'm not Spartacus, dernt bulleh meh (U4603)
posted 21 hours, 10 minutes ago
There are two reasons why clubs give their young players a run in the first team. Either the young players are very talented or the first team players aren't much good. Wonder which of these applies to Forest? Forest the team with a softer centre than a Fry's Turkish Delight.

Strett, In January do you want any of our central defenders as we have a surfeit and you have none.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So when your First Team is sh!te and your U23's still don't get 20 minutes, that means.................al your teams are cr@p?

Too good for you though, eh Bear? That means......?