Spurs have the lowest % attendance in the premier league. A whopping 75%. The next lowest in 91.1%
You been on your calculator all morning
Best supported club in the land 🤙🏽
You lot are jokers, your lodging in a temporary home, biggest capacity football ground in England, if you didn't get these figures, something would be very wrong.
A few people upset with the facts in your article Sandy.
Why is it that every time something positive is to be posted about Spurs, you get Liverpool supporters on here, trying to do it down. They really do have a complex.
mousers all over it......shock
comment by eriksensensen (U17512)
posted 12 seconds ago
Sandy gone fishing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This wasn`t in anyway posted as a WUM article. Thought it would be interesting to show that Spurs really do have very, very good support.
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by eriksensensen (U17512)
posted 12 seconds ago
Sandy gone fishing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This wasn`t in anyway posted as a WUM article. Thought it would be interesting to show that Spurs really do have very, very good support.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who's ever said otherwise?
Desperation from the trophy dodgers.
You can’t squeese 90k people in 42k capacity stadiums tbf. So has it occurred to you that all clubs listed above have bigger ground capacity hence bigger attendances.
The correct way to do this is if club is able to fill the ground week in week out . A percentage of attendance/ground capacity would be a better indication of best supported club
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why is it that every time something positive is to be posted about Spurs, you get Liverpool supporters on here, trying to do it down. They really do have a complex.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was just complimenting your use of a calculator
Tottenham
Although I can’t wait to get into our new home
Nice to have my suspicions confirmed.
Anybody better supported than Tottenham outside of Europe, Sandy? Or are we the biggest club in the world?
Can't wait to get into the new WHL but I've always said it should be at least 70k. I think a few of our rivals have been shocked and begrudgingly impressed by our Wembley crowds.
Wait for this CFC bloke to show up. He is normally good with attendance figures
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 2 minutes ago
Can't wait to get into the new WHL but I've always said it should be at least 70k. I think a few of our rivals have been shocked and begrudgingly impressed by our Wembley crowds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It couldn’t been 70k+. The transport links couldn’t cope plus the site wasn’t big enough
comment by Conte'nt = eism (U20893)
posted 18 seconds ago
You can’t squeese 90k people in 42k capacity stadiums tbf. So has it occurred to you that all clubs listed above have bigger ground capacity hence bigger attendances.
The correct way to do this is if club is able to fill the ground week in week out . A percentage of attendance/ground capacity would be a better indication of best supported club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bit sily that really. Are you saying then that a club that has a ground that only holds 1,000, and they fill it every week with 900 people, making it 90 per cent full are a better supported club than one that say has a ground that has a capacity of 100,000, and fills it every week with 80,000, making it only 80 per cent full, thus by your analogy making it a worse supported club. That would be total nonsense.
comment by Flashy flibble (U10324)
posted 8 minutes ago
Nice to have my suspicions confirmed.
Anybody better supported than Tottenham outside of Europe, Sandy? Or are we the biggest club in the world?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suspect we are the best supported in the world, although I suspect somebody will come up with a fact that a Nigerian 3rd division side is pulling in more supporters.
comment by ツ Hєиgу+ (U9129)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 2 minutes ago
Can't wait to get into the new WHL but I've always said it should be at least 70k. I think a few of our rivals have been shocked and begrudgingly impressed by our Wembley crowds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It couldn’t been 70k+. The transport links couldn’t cope plus the site wasn’t big enough
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh transport links would have to be vastly improved really to have more than 62,000 into the new stadium, which is slap bang in the middle of a very busy public road, Tottenham High Road, and a heavily built up area. Although getting in and out of Wembley is hardly a picnic.
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 7 minutes ago
Can't wait to get into the new WHL but I've always said it should be at least 70k. I think a few of our rivals have been shocked and begrudgingly impressed by our Wembley crowds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
agree with the 70k tbh.. we have capacity to do it too tbh.. those gaps in the single tier stand in the top corners look nice, but could be used for seats.....
im worried that in 10 years we will look back and wonder if we made it too small !
comment by ツ Hєиgу+ (U9129)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 2 minutes ago
Can't wait to get into the new WHL but I've always said it should be at least 70k. I think a few of our rivals have been shocked and begrudgingly impressed by our Wembley crowds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It couldn’t been 70k+. The transport links couldn’t cope plus the site wasn’t big enough
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You say that Hengy but we've cleverly increased it from 56k to 62k so if we'd had a higher starting position we might of got closer to 70k.
Sign in if you want to comment
Spurs seem to be the best supported
Page 1 of 4
posted on 13/2/18
Spurs have the lowest % attendance in the premier league. A whopping 75%. The next lowest in 91.1%
posted on 13/2/18
You been on your calculator all morning
posted on 13/2/18
Liverpool 10th
posted on 13/2/18
Best supported club in the land 🤙🏽
posted on 13/2/18
You lot are jokers, your lodging in a temporary home, biggest capacity football ground in England, if you didn't get these figures, something would be very wrong.
posted on 13/2/18
Sandy gone fishing
posted on 13/2/18
A few people upset with the facts in your article Sandy.
posted on 13/2/18
Why is it that every time something positive is to be posted about Spurs, you get Liverpool supporters on here, trying to do it down. They really do have a complex.
posted on 13/2/18
mousers all over it......shock
posted on 13/2/18
comment by eriksensensen (U17512)
posted 12 seconds ago
Sandy gone fishing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This wasn`t in anyway posted as a WUM article. Thought it would be interesting to show that Spurs really do have very, very good support.
posted on 13/2/18
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by eriksensensen (U17512)
posted 12 seconds ago
Sandy gone fishing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This wasn`t in anyway posted as a WUM article. Thought it would be interesting to show that Spurs really do have very, very good support.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who's ever said otherwise?
posted on 13/2/18
Desperation from the trophy dodgers.
posted on 13/2/18
You can’t squeese 90k people in 42k capacity stadiums tbf. So has it occurred to you that all clubs listed above have bigger ground capacity hence bigger attendances.
The correct way to do this is if club is able to fill the ground week in week out . A percentage of attendance/ground capacity would be a better indication of best supported club
posted on 13/2/18
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why is it that every time something positive is to be posted about Spurs, you get Liverpool supporters on here, trying to do it down. They really do have a complex.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was just complimenting your use of a calculator
posted on 13/2/18
Tottenham
Although I can’t wait to get into our new home
posted on 13/2/18
Nice to have my suspicions confirmed.
Anybody better supported than Tottenham outside of Europe, Sandy? Or are we the biggest club in the world?
posted on 13/2/18
reel em in sandy
posted on 13/2/18
Can't wait to get into the new WHL but I've always said it should be at least 70k. I think a few of our rivals have been shocked and begrudgingly impressed by our Wembley crowds.
posted on 13/2/18
Wait for this CFC bloke to show up. He is normally good with attendance figures
posted on 13/2/18
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 2 minutes ago
Can't wait to get into the new WHL but I've always said it should be at least 70k. I think a few of our rivals have been shocked and begrudgingly impressed by our Wembley crowds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It couldn’t been 70k+. The transport links couldn’t cope plus the site wasn’t big enough
posted on 13/2/18
comment by Conte'nt = eism (U20893)
posted 18 seconds ago
You can’t squeese 90k people in 42k capacity stadiums tbf. So has it occurred to you that all clubs listed above have bigger ground capacity hence bigger attendances.
The correct way to do this is if club is able to fill the ground week in week out . A percentage of attendance/ground capacity would be a better indication of best supported club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bit sily that really. Are you saying then that a club that has a ground that only holds 1,000, and they fill it every week with 900 people, making it 90 per cent full are a better supported club than one that say has a ground that has a capacity of 100,000, and fills it every week with 80,000, making it only 80 per cent full, thus by your analogy making it a worse supported club. That would be total nonsense.
posted on 13/2/18
comment by Flashy flibble (U10324)
posted 8 minutes ago
Nice to have my suspicions confirmed.
Anybody better supported than Tottenham outside of Europe, Sandy? Or are we the biggest club in the world?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suspect we are the best supported in the world, although I suspect somebody will come up with a fact that a Nigerian 3rd division side is pulling in more supporters.
posted on 13/2/18
comment by ツ Hєиgу+ (U9129)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 2 minutes ago
Can't wait to get into the new WHL but I've always said it should be at least 70k. I think a few of our rivals have been shocked and begrudgingly impressed by our Wembley crowds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It couldn’t been 70k+. The transport links couldn’t cope plus the site wasn’t big enough
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh transport links would have to be vastly improved really to have more than 62,000 into the new stadium, which is slap bang in the middle of a very busy public road, Tottenham High Road, and a heavily built up area. Although getting in and out of Wembley is hardly a picnic.
posted on 13/2/18
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 7 minutes ago
Can't wait to get into the new WHL but I've always said it should be at least 70k. I think a few of our rivals have been shocked and begrudgingly impressed by our Wembley crowds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
agree with the 70k tbh.. we have capacity to do it too tbh.. those gaps in the single tier stand in the top corners look nice, but could be used for seats.....
im worried that in 10 years we will look back and wonder if we made it too small !
posted on 13/2/18
comment by ツ Hєиgу+ (U9129)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 2 minutes ago
Can't wait to get into the new WHL but I've always said it should be at least 70k. I think a few of our rivals have been shocked and begrudgingly impressed by our Wembley crowds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It couldn’t been 70k+. The transport links couldn’t cope plus the site wasn’t big enough
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You say that Hengy but we've cleverly increased it from 56k to 62k so if we'd had a higher starting position we might of got closer to 70k.
Page 1 of 4