Did you miss the bit in the report where to experts said that Suarez's interview showed that he used the version that Evra reported. Makes yourong winded post invalid. Thanks for your input though.
=======
It clearly says they used a transcription.

You clearly read the whole thing with blinkers on which is why you missed and are still missing that facet.

It's cleverly written so that it pays no importance to the transcription and lesser minds will miss this fact and jump straight to 'an interview with the experts"

You posted it. Read it again.

Did you miss the bit in the report where to experts said that Suarez's interview showed that he used the version that Evra reported
=======
How is this even possible? How did the interview show he used the version Evra reported? It's impossible. Can't happen.

If this wasn't about football things wouldn't get this Kangarooey.

Unless you have witnesses or an admission, how can this assumption be made to the detriment of an accused person?

If I use street A to work everyday doesn't mean I used street A to work on the 17th of November 2013, does it?

The moment you assume I used street A on the said date in the absence of corresponding evidence then you lose all legitimacy because I could have easily made a detour to collect my wife's dry cleaning or buy her a new thong.

Ever been to Law class, even for one semester perhaps?

This is not rocket science.

I’m still wondering how a spurs v Liverpool thread turned into a Suarez v Evra thread with over 800 comments.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Edbo then filtered me the following day for saying VAR got the call right when the Spurs attacker pulled the defender back, before they scored. I mean everybody with eyes can see him doing it. You'd have to be the most biased person in the world to not believe the correct decision was made. I got filtered for it

I'm currently filtered by about 10 Spudlings over nothing at all.

comment by No love - Salah=The Matrix. Everyone else moves in slow motion. (U1282)
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago

Did you miss the bit in the report where to experts said that Suarez's interview showed that he used the version that Evra reported. Makes yourong winded post invalid. Thanks for your input though.
=======
It clearly says they used a transcription.

You clearly read the whole thing with blinkers on which is why you missed and are still missing that facet.

It's cleverly written so that it pays no importance to the transcription and lesser minds will miss this fact and jump straight to 'an interview with the experts"

You posted it. Read it again.
----------------------------

I understand exactly what I have read. The language experts read a transcription of Suarez's interview with the FA, which shows that he uses the 'tu' form of the verb. I have been quite clear about that throughout and at no point have I suggested that the language experts interviewed Suarez. It is you that needs to learn to read properly.

"I understand exactly what I have read"

Clearly you do not.

Suarez decided, see this thing they're accusing me off, I'm gonna say I said it, then claim a defence.

This is what Elvis thinks. He's not the sharpest.

comment by No love - Salah=The Matrix. Everyone else moves in slow motion. (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago

Did you miss the bit in the report where to experts said that Suarez's interview showed that he used the version that Evra reported
=======
How is this even possible? How did the interview show he used the version Evra reported?
--------------------------

No-one is saying that the interview proves that Suarez used the 'tu' form of the verb in his discussion with Evra. What it does prove according to the experts is that he does use the 'tu' verb as part of his language, in addition to the 'vos' version. So Evra's account of what was said to him could have been accurate, despite what the pro-Suarez 'expert' that TOOR keeps quoting says

You seem to lack the intelligence to understand the nuances of this discussion. Perhaps best to leave it to the grownups?

comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago

Suarez decided, see this thing they're accusing me off, I'm gonna say I said it, then claim a defence.

This is what Elvis thinks. He's not the sharpest.
---------------------------

TOOR, you don't understand what the report says my friend.

I am not claiming that Suarez admitted in his interview that he said those words to Evra. I am claiming that Suarez's interview with the FA demonstrated to to the language experts that he does use the 'tu' form of the verb as part of his language. Therefore he COULD have used the words that Evra reported. It is all there in black and white in the report. I have provided the relevant sections several times. I think you need to go back and read it slowly and try to process it, as is makes the opinion from the expert you keep quoting completely irrelevant.

Didn't Evra change his story from saying that Suarez said it repeatedly and then changed that to saying he said it once. In a real court of law it would of been thrown out for lying.

But it wasn't a real court of law it was an independent panel that had Utd people involved which means it was not an independent panel so the whole thing should of not gone ahead.

It was a total farce

" I am claiming that Suarez's interview with the FA demonstrated to to the language experts that he does use the 'tu' form of the verb as part of his language"

Which is incorrect. You can claim it all you like but it doesn't make it true.

The language expert from the same country as Sanchez?

It is you that needs to learn to read properly.

..............

You have to remember that you are dealing with Mamba here. Reading and understanding do not matter to him. He is just on the WUM and not worth debating with.

TOOR on the other hand is a thick

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 36 minutes ago
It is you that needs to learn to read properly.

..............

You have to remember that you are dealing with Mamba here. Reading and understanding do not matter to him. He is just on the WUM and not worth debating with.

TOOR on the other hand is a thick


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah?

Wanna try 2+2*2 again?

Remember when you said 8?

Remember when you couldn't understand if Liverpool finish about United this season they'd have finished about them in three of the last five seasons?

You're calling people thick?

comment by T Bone Steak Roysters (U3947)
posted 1 hour, 35 minutes ago

Didn't Evra change his story from saying that Suarez said it repeatedly and then changed that to saying he said it once. In a real court of law it would of been thrown out for lying.
-------------------

Off the top of my head, I think he said Suarez used the word on 5 occasions. But in an interview with TV he told them it had happened 10 times, but that we more a turn of phrase to emphasise that it was multiple times. He didn't literally mean 10 times.

TOOR on the other hand is a thick


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah?

...................

To have an opinion where you say Spurs have no chance of winning the FA Cup is quite possibly the most stupid thing you have ever said on here.

And considering people think you are the Liverpool version of Stretty, that isn't a compliment.

comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 1 hour, 25 minutes ago

" I am claiming that Suarez's interview with the FA demonstrated to to the language experts that he does use the 'tu' form of the verb as part of his language"

Which is incorrect. You can claim it all you like but it doesn't make it true.
-------------------------------

So the report is wrong then?

Remember when you couldn't understand if Liverpool finish about United this season they'd have finished about them in three of the last five seasons?

..............

What are you blabbering on about you buffoon?

comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 1 hour, 25 minutes ago

The language expert from the same country as Sanchez?
-------------------------

What has Sanchez got to do with anything?

comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
The language expert from the same country as Sanchez?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

By the same token, is Manchester Uni the only place with experts in Latin American dialects?

That's true about the five seasons actually

Forgot about that. He ain't bright tbf.

That's true about the five seasons actually

...................

It isn't actually.

Yes it is!

You idiot.