or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 56 comments are related to an article called:

Maracas

Page 2 of 3

posted on 24/3/18

Nonsense. The dormant article directive only applies to articles on the Derby County pages. Also, it was an entirely different article, with the focus of it comparing the current owner to the previous one and illustrating the dangers of discarding somebody in favour of another in a grass-is-always-greener scenario. While Marco’s is merely sensationalist, mine is full of pathos and deeper meaning, intensely thought-provoking and Proustian in its depth. La recherche du temps perdu indeed.

Plus, Marco was too thick to know how to put it on the Forest side so I was only helping the poor sap out. So far today it has had 91 views but as yet no comments. I guess they are formulating their best “He hasn’t yet been convicted” excuses.

You’re welcome.

posted on 24/3/18

He walked from the match fixing charge Vidal even though he was probably guilty. You only have to look at him to know he's a villain. As he gets away with match fixing I wonder if there were any unusual betting patterns when Forest won at Wolves.

posted on 24/3/18

They didnt pursue the bakery bombing charge either as they didn’t think it could be proved that he was behind it. They seem pretty confident they have him this time though and there are money-laundering and other charges still to come.

I quite liked “Forever and Ever” though, on the plus side.

posted on 24/3/18

He's Teflon Spart!

posted on 24/3/18

Most uber wealthy seem to be Jorvik. Look at all the accusations against the flatulently named one in the US. Despite that he is as guilty as puppy next to a pile of poo, not one charge yet.

Just wondering how someone tried for match fixing and accused of blowing up a bakery can be considered a "fit and proper" person by the EFL.

comment by Rameses (U7190)

posted on 24/3/18

You’re walking a fine line Vidal.

Before quoting the directive you really should read it in its entirety.
3R made provision in Annex 6 to Chapter 3 referring to dormant articles and the forest board.
Para 6 states “In instances where an article is reposted on the forest board, in part or in it’s entirety (including links) it can be assumed that forest posters where aware of the original as they live on our board anyway.”

Clearly placing your article in contravention of the directive.

We await the EFL ruling.

comment by Maяcо (U1329)

posted on 24/3/18

comment by Rameses (U7190)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
Vidal.
This definitely is in contravention of the dormant article directive currently in operation.
Marco’s original article on the Derby board was still gleaming comments at the time Vidal pasted it on the Forest board.
Any notion that Vidal intended the article to reach a more interested audience is flawed as his target audience read our board before their own.

Forest and Marco are asked for their views and the EFL will aducate shortly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My view is perfectly clear, plagiarists MUST be punished, otherwise where will it all end?

posted on 24/3/18

comment by JorvikRammer, if you listen to fools the mob ... (U1369)
posted 26 minutes ago
He's Teflon Spart!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Polytetrafluorethylene coated. Hets proof and very slippery.

posted on 24/3/18

Hets = heat

comment by Rameses (U7190)

posted on 24/3/18

Noted Marco.

comment by Scouse (U9675)

posted on 24/3/18

comment by thriceramdini12 (U21438)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by JorvikRammer, if you listen to fools the mob ... (U1369)
posted 26 minutes ago
He's Teflon Spart!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Polytetrafluorethylene coated. Hets proof and very slippery.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, not slippery, (wet fish are slippery) it has a low coefficient of friction.

posted on 24/3/18

Plagiarists must be punished, otherwise where will it all end?

posted on 24/3/18

posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
Vidal.
This definitely is in contravention of the dormant article directive currently in operation.
Marco’s original article on the Derby board was still gleaming comments at the time Vidal pasted it on the Forest board.
Any notion that Vidal intended the article to reach a more interested audience is flawed as his target audience read our board before their own.

Forest and Marco are asked for their views and the EFL will aducate shortly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My view is perfectly clear, plagiarists MUST be punished, otherwise where will it all end?

comment by Rameses (U7190)

posted on 24/3/18

Good one Spart

posted on 24/3/18

Also, Marco’s link didn’t even work when published. His article, to sum up, was a brief quote from a song (plagiarised) and a link to nowhere at all. I know that still makes it his most meaningful contribution on here since he bared his anguished soul about Paul Green’s departure all those years ago, but to say I plagiarised it is completely incorrect. In fact, it was only after my polished effort that he amended his own to include the same functional link present in mine, the effing plagiarist. He needs investigating. Probgably a five-year van would be appropriate, but then again who would notice or care?

posted on 24/3/18

Scouse, if something has a low coefficient of friction it is slippery, by definition. I could give you a lecture on why PTFE (now known as polytetrafluoroethene, ethylene has been discarded in the IUPAC nomenclature) has such properties if you wished. All to do with the high electronegativity of fluorine.

posted on 24/3/18

Do it, Spart. Write an article. The world has been waiting for this one. Now is your time.

posted on 24/3/18

comment by GRouseR (U9675)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by thriceramdini12 (U21438)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by JorvikRammer, if you listen to fools the mob ... (U1369)
posted 26 minutes ago
He's Teflon Spart!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Polytetrafluorethylene coated. Hets proof and very slippery.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, not slippery, (wet fish are slippery) it has a low coefficient of friction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I believe for a thing to be slippery means it has a low coefficient of friction. ie they are one and the same thing.thing.

posted on 24/3/18

Hard though it is to drag myself away from what promises to be a riveting afternoon of debate, I am off on Max Lowe Watch for the afternoon.

posted on 24/3/18

If he gets a game Vidal.

posted on 24/3/18

The Opium Den, West Bridgford.

Should have put 2 and 2 together when they employed Karanka, opium is the only thing that would make it bearable to watch. Clever move from Maracas. Create the demand and the supply.

Genius.

comment by Maяcо (U1329)

posted on 24/3/18

comment by lastapostleofvidal (U1491)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago

Probgably a five-year van would be appropriate, but then again who would notice or care?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Rameses:

I'm prepared to accept Vidal's compensation offer of a new van, even if it is for just 5 years.

I just need clarification about his use of the word "Probgably" before I officially accept.

comment by Rameses (U7190)

posted on 24/3/18

More than reasonable Milf. He’d be getting off lightly at that. Perhaps a compulsory 3 hour grammar, spelling and comprehension workshop with Spart could be thrown in.

posted on 24/3/18

Notts Forrist needs to be looked into as well.

comment by Maяcо (U1329)

posted on 24/3/18

comment by Igør Ewe-Reka. (U1993)
posted 23 minutes ago
Notts Forrist needs to be looked into as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 2 of 3

Sign in if you want to comment