Correction, haven't scored against us in 3 of the last 4 games.

comment by I'm not Spartacus, resilience and character (U4603)
posted 9 seconds ago
Correction, haven't scored against us in 3 of the last 4 games.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not nobody talking to himself!

I have no idea Vidal. Rowett has the coaching badges but doesn’t have the imagination or the bottle to take risks. We play with 6 defenders even against bottom of the league. I’d have popped Ledley in at DM a started with both Vydra and Palmer. Also Luke Thomas ahead of either Jerome or Nugent.
We don’t see any kind of imagination from Rowett. I was hoping Cardiff didn’t get called off because the injuries would have forced a change and perhaps enlightened him.
Pearson was a good option. It could have worked out if Mel hadn’t bottled it and backed him rather that the team. The squad needed tough love but cried to Mel rather than nuckle under.

comment by I'm not Spartacus, resilience and character (U4603)
posted 2 minutes ago
Correction, haven't scored against us in 3 of the last 4 games.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I pay little credence to most you say as it’s generally drivel.

comment by Rameses (U7190)
posted 4 minutes ago
I have no idea Vidal. Rowett has the coaching badges but doesn’t have the imagination or the bottle to take risks. We play with 6 defenders even against bottom of the league. I’d have popped Ledley in at DM a started with both Vydra and Palmer. Also Luke Thomas ahead of either Jerome or Nugent.
We don’t see any kind of imagination from Rowett. I was hoping Cardiff didn’t get called off because the injuries would have forced a change and perhaps enlightened him.
Pearson was a good option. It could have worked out if Mel hadn’t bottled it and backed him rather that the team. The squad needed tough love but cried to Mel rather than nuckle under.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great point.

comment by Red Forest Bear ( Bear Knows) (U6288)
posted 4 minutes ago

comment by I'm not Spartacus, resilience and character (U4603)
posted 9 seconds ago
Correction, haven't scored against us in 3 of the last 4 games.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not nobody talking to himself

-----------------------------------------------------------------

English not your strong suit then RFB?

comment by I'm not Spartacus, resilience and character (U4603)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Red Forest Bear ( Bear Knows) (U6288)
posted 4 minutes ago

comment by I'm not Spartacus, resilience and character (U4603)
posted 9 seconds ago
Correction, haven't scored against us in 3 of the last 4 games.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not nobody talking to himself

-----------------------------------------------------------------

English not your strong suit then RFB?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Suit, only time was when he was in court.

comment by Strett (U1462)
posted 5 minutes ago

comment by I'm not Spartacus, resilience and character (U4603)
posted 2 minutes ago
Correction, haven't scored against us in 3 of the last 4 games.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I pay little credence to most you say as it’s generally drivel.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Drivel? So you have beaten us in the last 4 games then and I imagined the results?
So you have scored in more than 3 of the last four games then and I imagined you hadn't.
So you are above us in the Championship and not near the bottom, the people who publish the tables have made a mistake.

In denial so much about how crap Forest are you can't accept indisputable facts. By the way 1 + 1 = 2, I know you struggle with that one.

I don't fit in it any longer Igor and no I didn't wear it in front of the beak.

This wont resolve the vexatious question of who will be your next manager though will it?

Mick McCarthy I'd say.

'Pearson was a good option. It could have worked out if 'Mel hadn’t bottled it and backed him rather that the team. The squad needed tough love but cried to Mel rather than nuckle under.'

Dear me, I didn't think that things had got so bad that we'd be calling for the return of Pearson

comment by I'm not Spartacus, resilience and character (U4603)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Strett (U1462)
posted 5 minutes ago

comment by I'm not Spartacus, resilience and character (U4603)
posted 2 minutes ago
Correction, haven't scored against us in 3 of the last 4 games.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I pay little credence to most you say as it’s generally drivel.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Drivel? So you have beaten us in the last 4 games then and I imagined the results?
So you have scored in more than 3 of the last four games then and I imagined you hadn't.
So you are above us in the Championship and not near the bottom, the people who publish the tables have made a mistake.

In denial so much about how crap Forest are you can't accept indisputable facts. By the way 1 + 1 = 2, I know you struggle with that one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fish finger production was a notable classic.

comment by I'm not Spartacus and I talk drivel (U4603)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by Strett (U1462)
posted 5 minutes ago

comment by I'm not Spartacus and I talk drivel (U4603)
posted 2 minutes ago
Correction, haven't scored against us in 3 of the last 4 games.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I pay little credence to most you say as it’s generally drivel.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Drivel? So you have beaten us in the last 4 games then and I imagined the results?
So you have scored in more than 3 of the last four games then and I imagined you hadn't.
So you are above us in the Championship and not near the bottom, the people who publish the tables have made a mistake.

In denial so much about how crap Forest are you can't accept indisputable facts. By the way 1 + 1 = 2, I know you struggle with that one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suspect that your recent form is no better than ours spurt!

spurt smile mate, it could always be worse you might have lost 1-5 after added time.

He’s like Mr Logic from viz, Bear.

comment by Strett (U1462)
posted 3 minutes ago
He’s like Mr Logic from viz, Bear.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's not confuse the bear even more.

Spurt!

I'm glad that you can count to two, because that will enable you to total the number of points, your failing team has managed to accrue through out March!


Six mate before you look it up.


Perhaps you should consider a name change?

comment by Red Forest Bear ( Bear Knows) (U6288)
posted 47 seconds ago
Spurt!

I'm glad that you can count to two, because that will enable you to total the number of points, your failing team has managed to accrue through out March!


Six mate before you look it up.


Perhaps you should consider a name change?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh the irony.

comment by Red Forest Bear ( Bear Knows) (U6288)
posted 14 minutes ago

Spurt!

I'm glad that you can count to two, because that will enable you to total the number of points, your failing team has managed to accrue through out March!


Six mate before you look it up.


Perhaps you should consider a name change?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

There was I thinking that it was the number of points in a season that counted. Now I know it's just the number accrued in just one month that is important.

I will give you a tip RFB. When you post on another board to gloat make sure you have something to gloat about. It's a bit like Forest fans gloating over our 11 point season when Forest were two divisions below us and haven't been in the Premier League since the last millennium.

This is a bit like two guys in the clap clinic, both with festering knobrot, and each one pointing and laughing at the other one.

Which two?

Derby and Forest!

comment by lastapostleofvidal (U1491)
posted 14 seconds ago
Derby and Forest!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah, thought it was Strett and blackstarr.

They’re a pair of jobbies arguing about which one is the stinkiest.