comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Ledders the King - Football Manager Legend (U20121)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Kane and Able(previously Once Bale leaves..) (U12707)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 13 minutes ago
We won't raise to a higher level with Poch, we need a higher level name to do that, a top tier name for the once top tier club in English football. We need an Ancelotti or Klopp level name to do it. Now if Madrid still want Kane they can have him but why they want, or anybody wants an off form player is beyond me but pay us and he can go as now can Hugo, he's becoming a liability. Ancelotti is free so let's approach him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We need better players in some areas. We have a great manager. You are talking about City who spend £50mill on walker and who has his moments. Tripps cost £1m. Thats what we are dealing with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lower priced players can play better than expensive players if morale is good. City have Pep, top name for a top club again, that's what we need.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your reaction is way over the top, after playing a team that is going to break the PL points record. Get rid of Poch? He has done a great job with Spurs and is one of the best managers in the league. How is Pep going to do any better at Spurs when he won't have anywhere near the same funds he does at City?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That team lost three consecutive matches and our performance at Stoke wasn't the best as everybody agreed. I'm not suggesting we get Pep but I am suggesting we get a big name in to take us up which I don't think Poch will do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ancelotti is a cup manager. Look at all the teams he’s managed in the last 20 years and ask yourself how and why he’s won 1 more league title than Wenger.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's a good coach and a top name, let's go for him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is a big summer coming up for Levy, he needs to improve several players contracts and give Poch what he needs to improve the team.
My worry is, Poch probably knows that he has now taken this squad as far as he can, and may have his head turned if he does not get the squad he needs to take the final step.
Moura has nowhere near proven himself as worthy of being in starting 11 for PL or CL match, I've always thought the same about Lamela. Eriksen and in particular Son are damn well more effective players than Lamela.
comment by L_M (U4620)
posted 10 minutes ago
Moura has nowhere near proven himself as worthy of being in starting 11 for PL or CL match, I've always thought the same about Lamela. Eriksen and in particular Son are damn well more effective players than Lamela.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Moura hasn't been given enough time but the time he has had he's looked decent. Based on what we've seen of him, he should get more time or get to start a game.
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Kane and Able(previously Once Bale leaves..) (U12707)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 13 minutes ago
We won't raise to a higher level with Poch, we need a higher level name to do that, a top tier name for the once top tier club in English football. We need an Ancelotti or Klopp level name to do it. Now if Madrid still want Kane they can have him but why they want, or anybody wants an off form player is beyond me but pay us and he can go as now can Hugo, he's becoming a liability. Ancelotti is free so let's approach him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We need better players in some areas. We have a great manager. You are talking about City who spend £50mill on walker and who has his moments. Tripps cost £1m. Thats what we are dealing with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lower priced players can play better than expensive players if morale is good. City have Pep, top name for a top club again, that's what we need.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your reaction is way over the top, after playing a team that is going to break the PL points record. Get rid of Poch? He has done a great job with Spurs and is one of the best managers in the league. How is Pep going to do any better at Spurs when he won't have anywhere near the same funds he does at City?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That team lost three consecutive matches and our performance at Stoke wasn't the best as everybody agreed. I'm not suggesting we get Pep but I am suggesting we get a big name in to take us up which I don't think Poch will do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
After playing 2 tough teams, and they'll still win the league easily by a record total. You need to get some perspective.
Your suggestions are unlikely to do any better than Poch in our circumstances.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you know?
comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago
Wow Dawn/Bill wanted Kane sold the other day and now wants Poch replaced
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's right, the team played well without Harry scoring three and four, since he's come back w haven't and don't mention the goal at Stoke. There's been a lot of talk of him going to RM so why not? He's off colour at the moment.
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago
Wow Dawn/Bill wanted Kane sold the other day and now wants Poch replaced
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's right, the team played well without Harry scoring three and four, since he's come back w haven't and don't mention the goal at Stoke. There's been a lot of talk of him going to RM so why not? He's off colour at the moment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So when Bill can’t get it up, do you go elsewhere for some cocccck?
Actually don’t answer that
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago
Wow Dawn/Bill wanted Kane sold the other day and now wants Poch replaced
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's right, the team played well without Harry scoring three and four, since he's come back w haven't and don't mention the goal at Stoke. There's been a lot of talk of him going to RM so why not? He's off colour at the moment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So we are going to sell someone who is arguably the best striker in the world because he’s off colour
classic wum material that
comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago
Wow Dawn/Bill wanted Kane sold the other day and now wants Poch replaced
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's right, the team played well without Harry scoring three and four, since he's come back w haven't and don't mention the goal at Stoke. There's been a lot of talk of him going to RM so why not? He's off colour at the moment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So we are going to sell someone who is arguably the best striker in the world because he’s off colour
classic wum material that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends how long he stays off colour. I noticed some criticism of him from some of you boys in the live match thread yesterday, that's unusual but it's started, after me as usual because some of you are a little slow on the uptake I've noticed.
Didn’t see you on the match thread?
Sell Harry Kane. Oh ffs mate. And replace him with who ? I couldn't give a s*** wether we scored a bucket load of goals without him. Most those goals come against s*** opposition like Swansea and Bournemouth during his period out. The Chelsea result was very impressive, but no way in any shape or form are we a better side with Kane not in the team. Unbelievable people want rid of Toby because we are supposedly so good without him and now you got people piping up about Kane
comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)
posted 15 minutes ago
Didn’t see you on the match thread?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wasn't on it, I prefer to read it now and laugh when you're wrong. Kane had 18 touches yesterday and posed little threat.
Now to answer you Don, well Stoke was sh*t opposition too and Kane wasn't so good against them either was he? "His" goal was very dubious and you should are that we score more without him. I'd prefer to score more without him and win than score few with him and lose. We were a better side without him for certain.
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 7 minutes ago
Sell Harry Kane. Oh ffs mate. And replace him with who ? I couldn't give a s*** wether we scored a bucket load of goals without him. Most those goals come against s*** opposition like Swansea and Bournemouth during his period out. The Chelsea result was very impressive, but no way in any shape or form are we a better side with Kane not in the team. Unbelievablepeople want rid of Toby because we are supposedly so good without him and now you got people piping up about Kane
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t forget replace poch too
comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 7 minutes ago
Sell Harry Kane. Oh ffs mate. And replace him with who ? I couldn't give a s*** wether we scored a bucket load of goals without him. Most those goals come against s*** opposition like Swansea and Bournemouth during his period out. The Chelsea result was very impressive, but no way in any shape or form are we a better side with Kane not in the team. Unbelievablepeople want rid of Toby because we are supposedly so good without him and now you got people piping up about Kane
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t forget replace poch too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If we only finish 4th and don't win the FA Cup do you think Daniel will be satisfied with that? I still maintain that Poch is not the man to take us up a level.
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 7 minutes ago
Sell Harry Kane. Oh ffs mate. And replace him with who ? I couldn't give a s*** wether we scored a bucket load of goals without him. Most those goals come against s*** opposition like Swansea and Bournemouth during his period out. The Chelsea result was very impressive, but no way in any shape or form are we a better side with Kane not in the team. Unbelievablepeople want rid of Toby because we are supposedly so good without him and now you got people piping up about Kane
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t forget replace poch too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If we only finish 4th and don't win the FA Cup do you think Daniel will be satisfied with that? I still maintain that Poch is not the man to take us up a level.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yea but you’re a wum
comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 7 minutes ago
Sell Harry Kane. Oh ffs mate. And replace him with who ? I couldn't give a s*** wether we scored a bucket load of goals without him. Most those goals come against s*** opposition like Swansea and Bournemouth during his period out. The Chelsea result was very impressive, but no way in any shape or form are we a better side with Kane not in the team. Unbelievablepeople want rid of Toby because we are supposedly so good without him and now you got people piping up about Kane
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t forget replace poch too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If we only finish 4th and don't win the FA Cup do you think Daniel will be satisfied with that? I still maintain that Poch is not the man to take us up a level.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yea but you’re a wum
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, not at all, I'm posting as I see things and things aren't looking too rosy at the moment. Eriksen's goal was lucky and against Stoke it was a cross that went in, we're being a bit lucky at the moment and we need a good win straight away.
Now do you think Daniel will be satisfied with only 4th and nothing more?
I think he would be satisfied, taking into account the difference in financial muscle the other clubs around you have.
comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 14 minutes ago
I think he would be satisfied, taking into account the difference in financial muscle the other clubs around you have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We finished second with the same disadvantage last season didn't we?
The only thing I can agree with you is we have to win the fa Cup this year. In my opinion and I'm sure a lot of the players will feel the same that it will put a negative on what has been a good season if we don't win it. This is our best chance in a long time to get a trophy with Poch and would feel somewhat "here we go again" if we don't win it. Poch and Kane out though? Sorry mate ridiculous
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 14 minutes ago
I think he would be satisfied, taking into account the difference in financial muscle the other clubs around you have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We finished second with the same disadvantage last season didn't we?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But did you spend anything like Utd (150m) and City (250m).
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 14 minutes ago
I think he would be satisfied, taking into account the difference in financial muscle the other clubs around you have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We finished second with the same disadvantage last season didn't we?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But did you spend anything like Utd (150m) and City (250m).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No which is what I'm saying. Why would he be satisfied with 4th when we finished 2nd last season and without the muscle the others have?
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 34 minutes ago
The only thing I can agree with you is we have to win the fa Cup this year. In my opinion and I'm sure a lot of the players will feel the same that it will put a negative on what has been a good season if we don't win it. This is our best chance in a long time to get a trophy with Poch and would feel somewhat "here we go again" if we don't win it. Poch and Kane out though? Sorry mate ridiculous
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok, look we scored well without Kane in the FA Cup didn't we so I'd choose the same team which beat Swansea, if we can do it without Kane then there's no problem is there? You're just going on his past and I'm not sure that his present and future is and will be as good.
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 14 hours, 40 minutes ago
Sandy , I don't think people are saying we are rubbish. But I been banging on for months about the Toby situation and have said for ages that we are nowhere near good defensively without him. We need to pay him what he deserves otherwise we run the risk of losing top players every single season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree with all of Don's comments on this thread. Alderweireld is at the top of his game right now. Sanchez's time will come. Aurier looks to be a failure, so snail-pace Trippier plays. And Davies is frankly just not as good as Rose was.
So we have a back line in which Vertonghen is the only master player.
I'm hoping that even in this situation we can win the Funny Adams tin pot, but I'm not putting any money onit
Sign in if you want to comment
Enough with the blind favouritism...
Page 3 of 3
posted on 15/4/18
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Ledders the King - Football Manager Legend (U20121)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Kane and Able(previously Once Bale leaves..) (U12707)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 13 minutes ago
We won't raise to a higher level with Poch, we need a higher level name to do that, a top tier name for the once top tier club in English football. We need an Ancelotti or Klopp level name to do it. Now if Madrid still want Kane they can have him but why they want, or anybody wants an off form player is beyond me but pay us and he can go as now can Hugo, he's becoming a liability. Ancelotti is free so let's approach him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We need better players in some areas. We have a great manager. You are talking about City who spend £50mill on walker and who has his moments. Tripps cost £1m. Thats what we are dealing with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lower priced players can play better than expensive players if morale is good. City have Pep, top name for a top club again, that's what we need.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your reaction is way over the top, after playing a team that is going to break the PL points record. Get rid of Poch? He has done a great job with Spurs and is one of the best managers in the league. How is Pep going to do any better at Spurs when he won't have anywhere near the same funds he does at City?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That team lost three consecutive matches and our performance at Stoke wasn't the best as everybody agreed. I'm not suggesting we get Pep but I am suggesting we get a big name in to take us up which I don't think Poch will do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ancelotti is a cup manager. Look at all the teams he’s managed in the last 20 years and ask yourself how and why he’s won 1 more league title than Wenger.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's a good coach and a top name, let's go for him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 15/4/18
There is a big summer coming up for Levy, he needs to improve several players contracts and give Poch what he needs to improve the team.
My worry is, Poch probably knows that he has now taken this squad as far as he can, and may have his head turned if he does not get the squad he needs to take the final step.
posted on 15/4/18
Moura has nowhere near proven himself as worthy of being in starting 11 for PL or CL match, I've always thought the same about Lamela. Eriksen and in particular Son are damn well more effective players than Lamela.
posted on 15/4/18
comment by L_M (U4620)
posted 10 minutes ago
Moura has nowhere near proven himself as worthy of being in starting 11 for PL or CL match, I've always thought the same about Lamela. Eriksen and in particular Son are damn well more effective players than Lamela.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Moura hasn't been given enough time but the time he has had he's looked decent. Based on what we've seen of him, he should get more time or get to start a game.
posted on 15/4/18
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Kane and Able(previously Once Bale leaves..) (U12707)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 13 minutes ago
We won't raise to a higher level with Poch, we need a higher level name to do that, a top tier name for the once top tier club in English football. We need an Ancelotti or Klopp level name to do it. Now if Madrid still want Kane they can have him but why they want, or anybody wants an off form player is beyond me but pay us and he can go as now can Hugo, he's becoming a liability. Ancelotti is free so let's approach him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We need better players in some areas. We have a great manager. You are talking about City who spend £50mill on walker and who has his moments. Tripps cost £1m. Thats what we are dealing with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lower priced players can play better than expensive players if morale is good. City have Pep, top name for a top club again, that's what we need.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your reaction is way over the top, after playing a team that is going to break the PL points record. Get rid of Poch? He has done a great job with Spurs and is one of the best managers in the league. How is Pep going to do any better at Spurs when he won't have anywhere near the same funds he does at City?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That team lost three consecutive matches and our performance at Stoke wasn't the best as everybody agreed. I'm not suggesting we get Pep but I am suggesting we get a big name in to take us up which I don't think Poch will do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
After playing 2 tough teams, and they'll still win the league easily by a record total. You need to get some perspective.
Your suggestions are unlikely to do any better than Poch in our circumstances.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you know?
posted on 15/4/18
comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago
Wow Dawn/Bill wanted Kane sold the other day and now wants Poch replaced
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's right, the team played well without Harry scoring three and four, since he's come back w haven't and don't mention the goal at Stoke. There's been a lot of talk of him going to RM so why not? He's off colour at the moment.
posted on 15/4/18
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago
Wow Dawn/Bill wanted Kane sold the other day and now wants Poch replaced
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's right, the team played well without Harry scoring three and four, since he's come back w haven't and don't mention the goal at Stoke. There's been a lot of talk of him going to RM so why not? He's off colour at the moment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So when Bill can’t get it up, do you go elsewhere for some cocccck?
Actually don’t answer that
posted on 15/4/18
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago
Wow Dawn/Bill wanted Kane sold the other day and now wants Poch replaced
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's right, the team played well without Harry scoring three and four, since he's come back w haven't and don't mention the goal at Stoke. There's been a lot of talk of him going to RM so why not? He's off colour at the moment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So we are going to sell someone who is arguably the best striker in the world because he’s off colour
classic wum material that
posted on 15/4/18
comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago
Wow Dawn/Bill wanted Kane sold the other day and now wants Poch replaced
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's right, the team played well without Harry scoring three and four, since he's come back w haven't and don't mention the goal at Stoke. There's been a lot of talk of him going to RM so why not? He's off colour at the moment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So we are going to sell someone who is arguably the best striker in the world because he’s off colour
classic wum material that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends how long he stays off colour. I noticed some criticism of him from some of you boys in the live match thread yesterday, that's unusual but it's started, after me as usual because some of you are a little slow on the uptake I've noticed.
posted on 15/4/18
Didn’t see you on the match thread?
posted on 15/4/18
Sell Harry Kane. Oh ffs mate. And replace him with who ? I couldn't give a s*** wether we scored a bucket load of goals without him. Most those goals come against s*** opposition like Swansea and Bournemouth during his period out. The Chelsea result was very impressive, but no way in any shape or form are we a better side with Kane not in the team. Unbelievable people want rid of Toby because we are supposedly so good without him and now you got people piping up about Kane
posted on 15/4/18
comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)
posted 15 minutes ago
Didn’t see you on the match thread?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wasn't on it, I prefer to read it now and laugh when you're wrong. Kane had 18 touches yesterday and posed little threat.
Now to answer you Don, well Stoke was sh*t opposition too and Kane wasn't so good against them either was he? "His" goal was very dubious and you should are that we score more without him. I'd prefer to score more without him and win than score few with him and lose. We were a better side without him for certain.
posted on 15/4/18
Care not are.
posted on 15/4/18
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 7 minutes ago
Sell Harry Kane. Oh ffs mate. And replace him with who ? I couldn't give a s*** wether we scored a bucket load of goals without him. Most those goals come against s*** opposition like Swansea and Bournemouth during his period out. The Chelsea result was very impressive, but no way in any shape or form are we a better side with Kane not in the team. Unbelievablepeople want rid of Toby because we are supposedly so good without him and now you got people piping up about Kane
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t forget replace poch too
posted on 15/4/18
comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 7 minutes ago
Sell Harry Kane. Oh ffs mate. And replace him with who ? I couldn't give a s*** wether we scored a bucket load of goals without him. Most those goals come against s*** opposition like Swansea and Bournemouth during his period out. The Chelsea result was very impressive, but no way in any shape or form are we a better side with Kane not in the team. Unbelievablepeople want rid of Toby because we are supposedly so good without him and now you got people piping up about Kane
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t forget replace poch too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If we only finish 4th and don't win the FA Cup do you think Daniel will be satisfied with that? I still maintain that Poch is not the man to take us up a level.
posted on 15/4/18
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 7 minutes ago
Sell Harry Kane. Oh ffs mate. And replace him with who ? I couldn't give a s*** wether we scored a bucket load of goals without him. Most those goals come against s*** opposition like Swansea and Bournemouth during his period out. The Chelsea result was very impressive, but no way in any shape or form are we a better side with Kane not in the team. Unbelievablepeople want rid of Toby because we are supposedly so good without him and now you got people piping up about Kane
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t forget replace poch too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If we only finish 4th and don't win the FA Cup do you think Daniel will be satisfied with that? I still maintain that Poch is not the man to take us up a level.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yea but you’re a wum
posted on 15/4/18
comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 7 minutes ago
Sell Harry Kane. Oh ffs mate. And replace him with who ? I couldn't give a s*** wether we scored a bucket load of goals without him. Most those goals come against s*** opposition like Swansea and Bournemouth during his period out. The Chelsea result was very impressive, but no way in any shape or form are we a better side with Kane not in the team. Unbelievablepeople want rid of Toby because we are supposedly so good without him and now you got people piping up about Kane
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t forget replace poch too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If we only finish 4th and don't win the FA Cup do you think Daniel will be satisfied with that? I still maintain that Poch is not the man to take us up a level.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yea but you’re a wum
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, not at all, I'm posting as I see things and things aren't looking too rosy at the moment. Eriksen's goal was lucky and against Stoke it was a cross that went in, we're being a bit lucky at the moment and we need a good win straight away.
Now do you think Daniel will be satisfied with only 4th and nothing more?
posted on 15/4/18
I think he would be satisfied, taking into account the difference in financial muscle the other clubs around you have.
posted on 15/4/18
comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 14 minutes ago
I think he would be satisfied, taking into account the difference in financial muscle the other clubs around you have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We finished second with the same disadvantage last season didn't we?
posted on 15/4/18
The only thing I can agree with you is we have to win the fa Cup this year. In my opinion and I'm sure a lot of the players will feel the same that it will put a negative on what has been a good season if we don't win it. This is our best chance in a long time to get a trophy with Poch and would feel somewhat "here we go again" if we don't win it. Poch and Kane out though? Sorry mate ridiculous
posted on 15/4/18
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 14 minutes ago
I think he would be satisfied, taking into account the difference in financial muscle the other clubs around you have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We finished second with the same disadvantage last season didn't we?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But did you spend anything like Utd (150m) and City (250m).
posted on 15/4/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 15/4/18
comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by D.J.C. (U20811)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 14 minutes ago
I think he would be satisfied, taking into account the difference in financial muscle the other clubs around you have.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We finished second with the same disadvantage last season didn't we?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But did you spend anything like Utd (150m) and City (250m).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No which is what I'm saying. Why would he be satisfied with 4th when we finished 2nd last season and without the muscle the others have?
posted on 15/4/18
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 34 minutes ago
The only thing I can agree with you is we have to win the fa Cup this year. In my opinion and I'm sure a lot of the players will feel the same that it will put a negative on what has been a good season if we don't win it. This is our best chance in a long time to get a trophy with Poch and would feel somewhat "here we go again" if we don't win it. Poch and Kane out though? Sorry mate ridiculous
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok, look we scored well without Kane in the FA Cup didn't we so I'd choose the same team which beat Swansea, if we can do it without Kane then there's no problem is there? You're just going on his past and I'm not sure that his present and future is and will be as good.
posted on 15/4/18
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 14 hours, 40 minutes ago
Sandy , I don't think people are saying we are rubbish. But I been banging on for months about the Toby situation and have said for ages that we are nowhere near good defensively without him. We need to pay him what he deserves otherwise we run the risk of losing top players every single season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree with all of Don's comments on this thread. Alderweireld is at the top of his game right now. Sanchez's time will come. Aurier looks to be a failure, so snail-pace Trippier plays. And Davies is frankly just not as good as Rose was.
So we have a back line in which Vertonghen is the only master player.
I'm hoping that even in this situation we can win the Funny Adams tin pot, but I'm not putting any money onit
Page 3 of 3