Comment deleted by Site Moderator

No way we deserved to lose 3-1 and if you take into acount the rules of the game we should've won. As you said Torres was brilliant, goal was class. I just hope the miss doesn't affect him and the Chelsea lads are all congratualting him tonight on his personal performance.

na torres was great and made rooneys pen look decent

Vidic and Rio will be back hopefully

They shouldn't be as good, but they have key men making a diff and chelsea can't deal with that. the midfield was appalling 1st half but the second half was goo except from the defence.
Jury's out on ivanovic and terry is gone. really worried about our defence.

Ivanovic

What part of 3-1 dont you understand ?

omment by Up The Chels (U9714)
posted 3 minutes ago
No way we deserved to lose 3-1 and if you take into acount the rules of the game we should've won. As you said Torres was brilliant, goal was class. I just hope the miss doesn't affect him and the Chelsea lads are all congratualting him tonight on his personal performance

------------------------------------------------------

Really, Chelsea deserved to win huh, well the laws of the game states that if you score more goals than the other team in a match, you win. So actually, Manchester United deserved to win

Bubbly, I said if you take into account the laws of the game. You had two offside goals, so taking into account the laws of the game you should've only have scored one.

Chelsea were getting torn apart at times - we missed a pen, should have had another pen, hit the crossbar, had a shot cleared off the line.

Whereas all Chelsea had was a shocking Torres miss, other than that it was all pretty comfortable for United really.

United definitely deserved the win.

Shame United were missing Welbeck, Ferdinand, Vidic, Rafael and Cleverley

mousebugger i guess ramires miss and torres shot over the bar don't count due to united law.

A comfortable result for United? Ridiculous...

Two offside goals, a penalty you should never have had; which was a great bit of comedy though, seeing the "best player in the world" fall on his backside.

Chelsea had so many great chances, and had they put away even a fraction of them they'd be taking back three points back to SB.

A defeat, but the performance make it feel like a draw, which if there were decent linesman today it would have been.

Two offside goals, a penalty you should never have had; which was a great bit of comedy though, seeing the "best player in the world" fall on his backside.

_____________________________________________________

Just said this elsewhere, but here we go:

United had 1 penalty disallowed, missed another penalty, hit the woodwork twice, missed an open net and missed two other sitters.

Game could have been a cricket score but United were good value for the win

"a penalty you should never have had"

What? It was clear as day!

mousebugger i guess ramires miss and torres shot over the bar don't count due to united law.
----------------

Blazing shots over count for nothing otherwise you may as well say yuou could have scored from a corner. Ramires shot was saved, so it was a good save.

United were overrunning you, yes you had a couple of chances, but you only really breached united a couple of times. United were breaching the Chelsea defence almost at will.

You are all clinging to the thought that the offside goals meant you were hard done by, but in reality you have to admit the best team won.

Nothing to do with who the best team was, although I think chelsea have the better players, man u just have the best manager.

Clear as day, to a United supporter perhaps. As clear as your first two goals were on-side too right?

Look at it again, his foot clearly connected with the ball first, but hey, what do you expect it's OT.

Look at it again, his foot clearly connected with the ball first, but hey, what do you expect it's OT.
_____________________

Perhaps you should watch again. Gets the man before the ball. Penalty all day long.