comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 57 seconds ago
"thinking he's better and smarter than others"



Who the feck are you?

Sorry I seem to have affected you so badly without even addressing you, and sorry to burst your bubble, but you have no idea what I think.

Pick up your toys and calm down.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You ruin every thread with your semantic drivel
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It's not semantics. Buy a dictionary maybe?

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
_Viva_Vida (U6044)

What's odd is making a point to me that literally has nothing to do with what I said.

And now you can't admit it because... well... because no one ever does on this forum, do they?

Ridiculous.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You raised the subject of Goalkeepers coming off their line for penalties in reference to Subasic. I said that all goalkeepers do it.

I stayed on the topic you raised.

_Viva_Vida (U6044)

But you also asked me why a keeper would stop doing it if he's not being pulled up on it.

Why ask me that?

It had absolutely nothing to do with my point.

It amuses me what an OCD retaard you are, can't even help yourself

comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 7 seconds ago
It amuses me what an OCD retaard you are, can't even help yourself
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Okay you've had your little tantrum. That's enough for one day, I think.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
_Viva_Vida (U6044)

But you also asked me why a keeper would stop doing it if he's not being pulled up on it.

Why ask me that?

It had absolutely nothing to do with my point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It was a rhetorical question.

If you weren't interested in the point raised you could have chosen to ignore it in order to focus on the previous point. Instead you chose to label a relevant point as irrelevant. which I think is incorrect and has resulted in childish bickering.

I was hoping for a good discussion on this.

_Viva_Vida (U6044)

It was irrelevant. I had no idea why you felt the need to make it, so I said so.

You want to talk about childishness?

Your reply.

Rather than just accept that okay, it was irrelevant, you replied with 'I didn't say you did say that' or whatever.

Now that was childish and it was entirely your fault.

Read back the comments - this is entirely your fault.

Now that was childish and it was entirely your fault.

Read back the comments - this is entirely your fault.
-----------------
And thats not childish?

Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)

What is childish about pointing out whose fault it was?

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 10 minutes ago
_Viva_Vida (U6044)

Rather than just accept that okay, it was irrelevant, you replied with 'I didn't say you did say that' or whatever.

Now that was childish and it was entirely your fault.

Read back the comments - this is entirely your fault.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You only labelled my point as 'irrelevant' after I my comment saying that 'I never said you said that etc".

I made that statement because you mistakenly thought I was being argumentative, I wasn't. That wasn't being childish, it was making clear of my position.

I am not interested in discussing the relevance of my point further, as we will never agree.

If you want to discuss my first point properly then I am happy to do so.

https://themindsjournal.com/the-narcissist-blames-you/

_Viva_Vida (U6044)

I came back and said 'I never said otherwise', which is basically the same thing.

"I made that statement because you mistakenly thought I was being argumentative"

Wrong. You have assumed my thinking.

I was merely bemused at why you'd made a point, to me, that had no relevance to what I'd said.

I didn't think you were being argumentative and I was entitled to make the point that I'd never said otherwise.

You then responded with a childish remark, and here we are.

Why would I want to discuss a point that had no relevant to my point and isn't something I disagree with, particularly with someone who can't accept when they have made a mistake?

Narcissists are notorious for placing blame on other people and not on themselves.

Even when they clearly and definitely did something wrong, they can not- and will not- accept responsibility. They almost always deflect the blame elsewhere. Narcissists either ignore their contribution to the situation or insist that the other person (spouse, child, co-worker or etc.) made them do it. Narcissists know right from wrong, they just cannot allow something bad to be their fault. It is another manifestation of their supreme self-centeredness as well as a protection for their fragile ego. It is also a primitive method of avoiding external repercussions.

Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)

"Even when they clearly and definitely did something wrong"

Rules me out then - unless you can show me what I did wrong?

Good luck with that.

Interesting how you want to focus on me though, given your behaviour on this thread.

I assume that's my fault as well though, yes?

You have assumed my thinking.

----------------------------

I will stop assuming what you think then because there is a clear contradiction in what you say and what you think.

_Viva_Vida (U6044)

No there's not.

There was no implication that I thought you had been argumentative.

Nothing whatsoever.

I simply replied with 'I never said otherwise'.

You claim that you can deduce, from those four words, what I thought?



Give it a rest ffs.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 52 minutes ago
_Viva_Vida (U6044)

It's irrelevant to reply to me asking why, if he's not being punished, he would stop doing it.

Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Feck me you must be some craic at a party, bet you get invited to loads

kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)

Yeh, because these sorts of conversations happen all the time at parties, speaking face to face.



It makes me laugh when people say this. If you lot behave offline as you do on here then god help you.

There was no implication that I thought you had been argumentative.

Nothing whatsoever.

I simply replied with 'I never said otherwise'.

---------------------------------------------

The fact you replied to the comment with that gave an implication that you thought I was being argumentative, as you made a defensive remark. So I thought I would make clear to you that I wasn't being argumentative. That is why I will never assume what you think anymore, as it contradicts what you say.

...........................................

Give it a rest ffs.

---------------------------------

I have already offered to in my previous comment, are you?

Well defo take your own advice there skip, you'd pick an argument at a party, spend the whole time thinking you're really smart and people find you interesting while the reality is everyone's gone to the kitchen to get away from you and are asking what idiot brought this sap here

_Viva_Vida (U6044)

So merely replying to it gave an implication I thought your were being argumentative?

What utter crap.

" So I thought I would make clear to you that I wasn't being argumentative."

But you didn't, did you.

You just replied with a childish 'I didn't say you did say that', rather than just acknowledging that it was an irrelevant point and/or explaining why you'd said it.

There is no contradiction between what I say and what I think.

You're just inventing this because you can't admit that you made a mistake and caused this whole shiitshow.

If you lot behave offline as you do on here then god help you.


You don't have to have different personalities on or off line, you can be sound in both, well you can't but people can.

I mean all you do is get uptight about what you said, what someone replied etc. so like I said, I bet you're great craic at a session

comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 1 minute ago
Well defo take your own advice there skip, you'd pick an argument at a party, spend the whole time thinking you're really smart and people find you interesting while the reality is everyone's gone to the kitchen to get away from you and are asking what idiot brought this sap here
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh dear, the point flew over your head, didn't it?

I don't behave 'at parties' as I do on here. That was my point, you muppet.

To the OP, good luck tonight I hope England win on pens that are full of drama.