How much have Everton paid?
Everton have signed Brazilian winger Richarlison from fellow Premier League side Watford in a potential £50m deal on a five-year deal.
Everton are believed to have paid an initial £35m for the 21-year-old, with further clauses taking it to £50m.
Be interesting to know what the add ons are.
Question
Alisson. £56m up front, £9m add ons.
Why do you keep saying he cost £65m?
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 17 minutes ago
£35m on Richarlison or the same on Ox?
Well I’m sure one will outscore the other.....in either league or career goals in next two seasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Apart from the fact that they play in different positions!
£50m
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 11 minutes ago
Question
Alisson. £56m up front, £9m add ons.
Why do you keep saying he cost £65m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Alasnomoresmithandjones (long live Israel) (U15157)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 4 minutes ago
OFFICIAL: Everton have signed Brazilian winger Richarlison from fellow Premier League side Watford in a potential £50m deal on a five-year deal.
More: bbc.in/2LiVe0Z
£50m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmmmm
Everton are believed to have paid an initial £35m for the 21-year-old
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/44946473
Mug
----------------------------------------------------------------------
With add ons taking the deal up to £50m.
Hence it says “Everton sign £50m Richarlison” on their homepage.
Always rely on the BBC for the most accurate transfer fees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So they have paid £50m today?
How is your hand feeling frim clutching at straws.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did I say they paid £50m today?
The value of a transfer deal includes the add ons. This is widely recognised, hence why it says “Everton sign £50m Richarlison” on the BBC home page
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Echo is the most reliable news outlet when it comes to Merseyside teams. I've seen many a RS fan say I won't believe it until I see it in the Echo, but of course you've decided to go with the BBC today because it suits.
Why the feck do you care anyway?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, not gone with it just today, I was four days ago as well when the first details came out, as was Annie Road. See below for proof.
https://www.ja606.co.uk/comments/viewAllComments/393300/3
£50m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've gone with the BBC because it suits, if the Echo had gone with £50m and the BBC had quoted £40m you would have gone with the Echo. Now stop telling lies a feck off. You and KLS are a pair of weirdo's, your club have spent a kings ransom on some good players and you're still on here obsessing about us.
Who’s obsessing?
Taking the p!ss, yes!
Obsessing, no!
comment by Alasnomoresmithandjones (long live Israel) (U15157)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Alasnomoresmithandjones (long live Israel) (U15157)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 4 minutes ago
OFFICIAL: Everton have signed Brazilian winger Richarlison from fellow Premier League side Watford in a potential £50m deal on a five-year deal.
More: bbc.in/2LiVe0Z
£50m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmmmm
Everton are believed to have paid an initial £35m for the 21-year-old
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/44946473
Mug
----------------------------------------------------------------------
With add ons taking the deal up to £50m.
Hence it says “Everton sign £50m Richarlison” on their homepage.
Always rely on the BBC for the most accurate transfer fees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So they have paid £50m today?
How is your hand feeling frim clutching at straws.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did I say they paid £50m today?
The value of a transfer deal includes the add ons. This is widely recognised, hence why it says “Everton sign £50m Richarlison” on the BBC home page
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Echo is the most reliable news outlet when it comes to Merseyside teams. I've seen many a RS fan say I won't believe it until I see it in the Echo, but of course you've decided to go with the BBC today because it suits.
Why the feck do you care anyway?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, not gone with it just today, I was four days ago as well when the first details came out, as was Annie Road. See below for proof.
https://www.ja606.co.uk/comments/viewAllComments/393300/3
£50m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've gone with the BBC because it suits, if the Echo had gone with £50m and the BBC had quoted £40m you would have gone with the Echo. Now stop telling lies a feck off. You and KLS are a pair of weirdo's, your club have spent a kings ransom on some good players and you're still on here obsessing about us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
None of the sort Alas, that's your paranoia kicking in again
For example, BBC said the Alisson deal was £66.8m. Echo reported it as £65m (more favourable for the club reported by the Echo, surprise surprise).
I go with BBC's £66.8m, so Richarlison is £50m for consistency
Very consistent is our Neo, very consistent!
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Alasnomoresmithandjones (long live Israel) (U15157)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Alasnomoresmithandjones (long live Israel) (U15157)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 4 minutes ago
OFFICIAL: Everton have signed Brazilian winger Richarlison from fellow Premier League side Watford in a potential £50m deal on a five-year deal.
More: bbc.in/2LiVe0Z
£50m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmmmm
Everton are believed to have paid an initial £35m for the 21-year-old
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/44946473
Mug
----------------------------------------------------------------------
With add ons taking the deal up to £50m.
Hence it says “Everton sign £50m Richarlison” on their homepage.
Always rely on the BBC for the most accurate transfer fees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So they have paid £50m today?
How is your hand feeling frim clutching at straws.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did I say they paid £50m today?
The value of a transfer deal includes the add ons. This is widely recognised, hence why it says “Everton sign £50m Richarlison” on the BBC home page
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Echo is the most reliable news outlet when it comes to Merseyside teams. I've seen many a RS fan say I won't believe it until I see it in the Echo, but of course you've decided to go with the BBC today because it suits.
Why the feck do you care anyway?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, not gone with it just today, I was four days ago as well when the first details came out, as was Annie Road. See below for proof.
https://www.ja606.co.uk/comments/viewAllComments/393300/3
£50m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've gone with the BBC because it suits, if the Echo had gone with £50m and the BBC had quoted £40m you would have gone with the Echo. Now stop telling lies a feck off. You and KLS are a pair of weirdo's, your club have spent a kings ransom on some good players and you're still on here obsessing about us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
None of the sort Alas, that's your paranoia kicking in again
For example, BBC said the Alisson deal was £66.8m. Echo reported it as £65m (more favourable for the club reported by the Echo, surprise surprise).
I go with BBC's £66.8m, so Richarlison is £50m for consistency
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you were wrong twice, never mind. Now trot along, surely you've got better things to discuss.
Alas
But you were spot on yeah?
“I don't know why Liverpool fans are mocking us, you paid £67m for a keeper who was crap in the WC and the CL.”
Alisson £67m including add ons
Richarlison £35m
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 55 minutes ago
Question
Alisson. £56m up front, £9m add ons.
Why do you keep saying he cost £65m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said that?
But, but "The Echo is the most reliable news outlet when it comes to Merseyside teams" according to Alas, and they reported it as £65m.
So why does say he cost £67m ?
So £35m it is and he has half the PL goals of that other £35m man Ox.
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 4 minutes ago
So £35m it is and he has half the PL goals of that other £35m man Ox.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because they both play the same positions don’t they?
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 55 minutes ago
Question
Alisson. £56m up front, £9m add ons.
Why do you keep saying he cost £65m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You refer to £65m here three times on this page:
https://www.ja606.co.uk/comments/viewAllComments/393337/3
Care to comment?
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 4 minutes ago
So £35m it is and he has half the PL goals of that other £35m man Ox.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because they both play the same positions don’t they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t they?
Winger/midfielder.
Ah well.
Still half as many goals in 100less games.
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 55 minutes ago
Question
Alisson. £56m up front, £9m add ons.
Why do you keep saying he cost £65m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You refer to £65m here three times on this page:
https://www.ja606.co.uk/comments/viewAllComments/393337/3
Care to comment?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s what the Echo said 😂
However I don’t mind being corrected once the scale of the Brazilian Butland transfer was confirmed.
You keep clutching the draws and searching for an out
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 4 minutes ago
So £35m it is and he has half the PL goals of that other £35m man Ox.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because they both play the same positions don’t they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No!
Ox played a lot of football for Arsenal at wingback.
He plays as a central midfielder for Liverpool, Richarlison is a winger/wide forward like Salah, well like a really overpriced sh!t Salah.
See the difference?
So with Alisson, you included the add ons when talking about how much he cost, i.e £65m.
Makes sense for you to therefore include add ons when talking about Richarlison, so £50m
Consistency right.
Glad we cleared that up
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 4 minutes ago
So £35m it is and he has half the PL goals of that other £35m man Ox.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because they both play the same positions don’t they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No!
Ox played a lot of football for Arsenal at wingback.
He plays as a central midfielder for Liverpool, Richarlison is a winger/wide forward like Salah, well like a really overpriced sh!t Salah.
See the difference?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many games as WB did he play? Now as the defensive linchpin he can only average 1 in 15ish.
And he cost £35m!
FFS
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 2 minutes ago
So with Alisson, you included the add ons when talking about how much he cost, i.e £65m.
Makes sense for you to therefore include add ons when talking about Richarlison, so £50m
Consistency right.
Glad we cleared that up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, I’m happy with the revised transfer fee for Brazilian Butland. I just posted what the Echo said.
Now the BBC say it’s less.....😂
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 4 minutes ago
So £35m it is and he has half the PL goals of that other £35m man Ox.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because they both play the same positions don’t they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No!
Ox played a lot of football for Arsenal at wingback.
He plays as a central midfielder for Liverpool, Richarlison is a winger/wide forward like Salah, well like a really overpriced sh!t Salah.
See the difference?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can, no surprise Arouna can’t though. He knows as much about the game as GB.
Sign in if you want to comment
Richarlison medical...
Page 4 of 6
6
posted on 24/7/18
How much have Everton paid?
posted on 24/7/18
Everton have signed Brazilian winger Richarlison from fellow Premier League side Watford in a potential £50m deal on a five-year deal.
Everton are believed to have paid an initial £35m for the 21-year-old, with further clauses taking it to £50m.
posted on 24/7/18
Be interesting to know what the add ons are.
posted on 24/7/18
Question
Alisson. £56m up front, £9m add ons.
Why do you keep saying he cost £65m?
posted on 24/7/18
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 17 minutes ago
£35m on Richarlison or the same on Ox?
Well I’m sure one will outscore the other.....in either league or career goals in next two seasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Apart from the fact that they play in different positions!
£50m
posted on 24/7/18
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 11 minutes ago
Question
Alisson. £56m up front, £9m add ons.
Why do you keep saying he cost £65m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly
posted on 24/7/18
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Alasnomoresmithandjones (long live Israel) (U15157)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 4 minutes ago
OFFICIAL: Everton have signed Brazilian winger Richarlison from fellow Premier League side Watford in a potential £50m deal on a five-year deal.
More: bbc.in/2LiVe0Z
£50m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmmmm
Everton are believed to have paid an initial £35m for the 21-year-old
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/44946473
Mug
----------------------------------------------------------------------
With add ons taking the deal up to £50m.
Hence it says “Everton sign £50m Richarlison” on their homepage.
Always rely on the BBC for the most accurate transfer fees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So they have paid £50m today?
How is your hand feeling frim clutching at straws.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did I say they paid £50m today?
The value of a transfer deal includes the add ons. This is widely recognised, hence why it says “Everton sign £50m Richarlison” on the BBC home page
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Echo is the most reliable news outlet when it comes to Merseyside teams. I've seen many a RS fan say I won't believe it until I see it in the Echo, but of course you've decided to go with the BBC today because it suits.
Why the feck do you care anyway?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, not gone with it just today, I was four days ago as well when the first details came out, as was Annie Road. See below for proof.
https://www.ja606.co.uk/comments/viewAllComments/393300/3
£50m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've gone with the BBC because it suits, if the Echo had gone with £50m and the BBC had quoted £40m you would have gone with the Echo. Now stop telling lies a feck off. You and KLS are a pair of weirdo's, your club have spent a kings ransom on some good players and you're still on here obsessing about us.
posted on 24/7/18
Who’s obsessing?
Taking the p!ss, yes!
Obsessing, no!
posted on 24/7/18
comment by Alasnomoresmithandjones (long live Israel) (U15157)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Alasnomoresmithandjones (long live Israel) (U15157)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 4 minutes ago
OFFICIAL: Everton have signed Brazilian winger Richarlison from fellow Premier League side Watford in a potential £50m deal on a five-year deal.
More: bbc.in/2LiVe0Z
£50m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmmmm
Everton are believed to have paid an initial £35m for the 21-year-old
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/44946473
Mug
----------------------------------------------------------------------
With add ons taking the deal up to £50m.
Hence it says “Everton sign £50m Richarlison” on their homepage.
Always rely on the BBC for the most accurate transfer fees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So they have paid £50m today?
How is your hand feeling frim clutching at straws.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did I say they paid £50m today?
The value of a transfer deal includes the add ons. This is widely recognised, hence why it says “Everton sign £50m Richarlison” on the BBC home page
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Echo is the most reliable news outlet when it comes to Merseyside teams. I've seen many a RS fan say I won't believe it until I see it in the Echo, but of course you've decided to go with the BBC today because it suits.
Why the feck do you care anyway?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, not gone with it just today, I was four days ago as well when the first details came out, as was Annie Road. See below for proof.
https://www.ja606.co.uk/comments/viewAllComments/393300/3
£50m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've gone with the BBC because it suits, if the Echo had gone with £50m and the BBC had quoted £40m you would have gone with the Echo. Now stop telling lies a feck off. You and KLS are a pair of weirdo's, your club have spent a kings ransom on some good players and you're still on here obsessing about us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
None of the sort Alas, that's your paranoia kicking in again
For example, BBC said the Alisson deal was £66.8m. Echo reported it as £65m (more favourable for the club reported by the Echo, surprise surprise).
I go with BBC's £66.8m, so Richarlison is £50m for consistency
posted on 24/7/18
Very consistent is our Neo, very consistent!
posted on 24/7/18
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Alasnomoresmithandjones (long live Israel) (U15157)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Alasnomoresmithandjones (long live Israel) (U15157)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 4 minutes ago
OFFICIAL: Everton have signed Brazilian winger Richarlison from fellow Premier League side Watford in a potential £50m deal on a five-year deal.
More: bbc.in/2LiVe0Z
£50m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmmmm
Everton are believed to have paid an initial £35m for the 21-year-old
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/44946473
Mug
----------------------------------------------------------------------
With add ons taking the deal up to £50m.
Hence it says “Everton sign £50m Richarlison” on their homepage.
Always rely on the BBC for the most accurate transfer fees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So they have paid £50m today?
How is your hand feeling frim clutching at straws.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did I say they paid £50m today?
The value of a transfer deal includes the add ons. This is widely recognised, hence why it says “Everton sign £50m Richarlison” on the BBC home page
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Echo is the most reliable news outlet when it comes to Merseyside teams. I've seen many a RS fan say I won't believe it until I see it in the Echo, but of course you've decided to go with the BBC today because it suits.
Why the feck do you care anyway?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, not gone with it just today, I was four days ago as well when the first details came out, as was Annie Road. See below for proof.
https://www.ja606.co.uk/comments/viewAllComments/393300/3
£50m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've gone with the BBC because it suits, if the Echo had gone with £50m and the BBC had quoted £40m you would have gone with the Echo. Now stop telling lies a feck off. You and KLS are a pair of weirdo's, your club have spent a kings ransom on some good players and you're still on here obsessing about us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
None of the sort Alas, that's your paranoia kicking in again
For example, BBC said the Alisson deal was £66.8m. Echo reported it as £65m (more favourable for the club reported by the Echo, surprise surprise).
I go with BBC's £66.8m, so Richarlison is £50m for consistency
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you were wrong twice, never mind. Now trot along, surely you've got better things to discuss.
posted on 24/7/18
Alas
But you were spot on yeah?
“I don't know why Liverpool fans are mocking us, you paid £67m for a keeper who was crap in the WC and the CL.”
Alisson £67m including add ons
Richarlison £35m
posted on 24/7/18
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 55 minutes ago
Question
Alisson. £56m up front, £9m add ons.
Why do you keep saying he cost £65m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said that?
posted on 24/7/18
But, but "The Echo is the most reliable news outlet when it comes to Merseyside teams" according to Alas, and they reported it as £65m.
So why does say he cost £67m ?
posted on 24/7/18
So £35m it is and he has half the PL goals of that other £35m man Ox.
posted on 24/7/18
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 4 minutes ago
So £35m it is and he has half the PL goals of that other £35m man Ox.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because they both play the same positions don’t they?
posted on 24/7/18
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 55 minutes ago
Question
Alisson. £56m up front, £9m add ons.
Why do you keep saying he cost £65m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You refer to £65m here three times on this page:
https://www.ja606.co.uk/comments/viewAllComments/393337/3
Care to comment?
posted on 24/7/18
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 4 minutes ago
So £35m it is and he has half the PL goals of that other £35m man Ox.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because they both play the same positions don’t they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t they?
posted on 24/7/18
Winger/midfielder.
Ah well.
Still half as many goals in 100less games.
posted on 24/7/18
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 55 minutes ago
Question
Alisson. £56m up front, £9m add ons.
Why do you keep saying he cost £65m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You refer to £65m here three times on this page:
https://www.ja606.co.uk/comments/viewAllComments/393337/3
Care to comment?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s what the Echo said 😂
However I don’t mind being corrected once the scale of the Brazilian Butland transfer was confirmed.
You keep clutching the draws and searching for an out
posted on 24/7/18
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 4 minutes ago
So £35m it is and he has half the PL goals of that other £35m man Ox.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because they both play the same positions don’t they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No!
Ox played a lot of football for Arsenal at wingback.
He plays as a central midfielder for Liverpool, Richarlison is a winger/wide forward like Salah, well like a really overpriced sh!t Salah.
See the difference?
posted on 24/7/18
So with Alisson, you included the add ons when talking about how much he cost, i.e £65m.
Makes sense for you to therefore include add ons when talking about Richarlison, so £50m
Consistency right.
Glad we cleared that up
posted on 24/7/18
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 4 minutes ago
So £35m it is and he has half the PL goals of that other £35m man Ox.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because they both play the same positions don’t they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No!
Ox played a lot of football for Arsenal at wingback.
He plays as a central midfielder for Liverpool, Richarlison is a winger/wide forward like Salah, well like a really overpriced sh!t Salah.
See the difference?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many games as WB did he play? Now as the defensive linchpin he can only average 1 in 15ish.
And he cost £35m!
FFS
posted on 24/7/18
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 2 minutes ago
So with Alisson, you included the add ons when talking about how much he cost, i.e £65m.
Makes sense for you to therefore include add ons when talking about Richarlison, so £50m
Consistency right.
Glad we cleared that up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, I’m happy with the revised transfer fee for Brazilian Butland. I just posted what the Echo said.
Now the BBC say it’s less.....😂
posted on 24/7/18
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 4 minutes ago
So £35m it is and he has half the PL goals of that other £35m man Ox.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah because they both play the same positions don’t they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No!
Ox played a lot of football for Arsenal at wingback.
He plays as a central midfielder for Liverpool, Richarlison is a winger/wide forward like Salah, well like a really overpriced sh!t Salah.
See the difference?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can, no surprise Arouna can’t though. He knows as much about the game as GB.
Page 4 of 6
6