4th article really? Fan makes wrong prediction on 606 horror
comment by United_kaz (U9943)
posted 2 minutes ago
4th article really? Fan makes wrong prediction on 606 horror
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ask yourself why this only happens to a select few
He's no pensioner btw.
Filtering isn't the OAP way....
comment by United_kaz (U9943)
posted 14 minutes ago
4th article really? Fan makes wrong prediction on 606 horror
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You gotta read his guff. The character is a joke.
‘Liverpool beat a woeful West Ham 4-0 first game of the season, and have since struggled, even though they have been winning. Spurs though are a different kettle of a pitch, just better all over the pitch than Liverpool. Expect something like 2-0, 3-0 to Spurs. Be a bit of a reality check to those that think Liverpool are equipped to win a title, they are not.’
-------
Sandy isn't so bad, you can atleast have some form of debate with him. GB however is so far up Liverpool's backside he thinks the midfield 3 that played for Liverpool yesterday would get the better of ours
comment by No-name (U21614)
Sandy isn't so bad, you can atleast have some form of debate with him. GB however is so far up Liverpool's backside he thinks the midfield 3 that played for Liverpool yesterday would get the better of ours
=======
Naah, both of them are as thick as the other. You're just biased yourself.
comment by Naby W@n Kenabiyoko - Soon moving to Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch (U1282)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by No-name (U21614)
Sandy isn't so bad, you can atleast have some form of debate with him. GB however is so far up Liverpool's backside he thinks the midfield 3 that played for Liverpool yesterday would get the better of ours
=======
Naah, both of them are as thick as the other. You're just biased yourself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How? You don't have to be a Chelsea fan to see we have the better midfield, its not like im saying our strikeforce is better than yours is it?
I see we have a new wise guy on the Chelsea board.
So you got jokes, right?
Wait, you actually believe you have the better midfield?
“Sandy isn't so bad, you can atleast have some form of debate with him.”
Until you post something that proves him wrong and he filters you
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 14 hours, 49 minutes ago
“Sandy isn't so bad, you can atleast have some form of debate with him.”
Until you post something that proves him wrong and he filters you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. This is true. Does GB filter?
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Sandy the jinx
Page 1 of 1
posted on 2/9/18
4th article really? Fan makes wrong prediction on 606 horror
posted on 2/9/18
comment by United_kaz (U9943)
posted 2 minutes ago
4th article really? Fan makes wrong prediction on 606 horror
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ask yourself why this only happens to a select few
posted on 2/9/18
He's no pensioner btw.
Filtering isn't the OAP way....
posted on 2/9/18
comment by United_kaz (U9943)
posted 14 minutes ago
4th article really? Fan makes wrong prediction on 606 horror
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You gotta read his guff. The character is a joke.
posted on 2/9/18
‘Liverpool beat a woeful West Ham 4-0 first game of the season, and have since struggled, even though they have been winning. Spurs though are a different kettle of a pitch, just better all over the pitch than Liverpool. Expect something like 2-0, 3-0 to Spurs. Be a bit of a reality check to those that think Liverpool are equipped to win a title, they are not.’
-------
posted on 2/9/18
Sandy isn't so bad, you can atleast have some form of debate with him. GB however is so far up Liverpool's backside he thinks the midfield 3 that played for Liverpool yesterday would get the better of ours
posted on 2/9/18
comment by No-name (U21614)
Sandy isn't so bad, you can atleast have some form of debate with him. GB however is so far up Liverpool's backside he thinks the midfield 3 that played for Liverpool yesterday would get the better of ours
=======
Naah, both of them are as thick as the other. You're just biased yourself.
posted on 2/9/18
comment by Naby W@n Kenabiyoko - Soon moving to Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch (U1282)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by No-name (U21614)
Sandy isn't so bad, you can atleast have some form of debate with him. GB however is so far up Liverpool's backside he thinks the midfield 3 that played for Liverpool yesterday would get the better of ours
=======
Naah, both of them are as thick as the other. You're just biased yourself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How? You don't have to be a Chelsea fan to see we have the better midfield, its not like im saying our strikeforce is better than yours is it?
posted on 2/9/18
posted on 2/9/18
I see we have a new wise guy on the Chelsea board.
So you got jokes, right?
posted on 2/9/18
Wait, you actually believe you have the better midfield?
posted on 2/9/18
“Sandy isn't so bad, you can atleast have some form of debate with him.”
Until you post something that proves him wrong and he filters you
posted on 3/9/18
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 14 hours, 49 minutes ago
“Sandy isn't so bad, you can atleast have some form of debate with him.”
Until you post something that proves him wrong and he filters you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. This is true. Does GB filter?
Page 1 of 1