You act like a bastion of 606 attempting to pull apart peoples posts, as you have above, but the reality you address very little because youre simply not very bright tbh. Youre well out of your depth here as per.
Classic vidic.
That is completely incorrect. Most genuine witness statements contain some inaccuraciesare vague. That is the way our brain works. The police are actually more suspect of witness statements that are very precise and where all the details are presented as fact.
======
You've got it in reverse.
Most genuine witnesses have no doubts whatsoever about the subject matter itself.
Its info in the periphery that should be sketchy, not how many times you were called the N word.
The police and courts are immediately suspicious of any would be victim who is inconsistent with the subject matter itself, unless they took a hit to the head.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
The moment Evra can't say how many times he was abused then the case is thrown out.
..............
He only has to be abused once. Six or eight times make it worse, not better.
========
Completely missing the point.
Your stupid.
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
That is completely incorrect. Most genuine witness statements contain some inaccuraciesare vague. That is the way our brain works. The police are actually more suspect of witness statements that are very precise and where all the details are presented as fact.
======
You've got it in reverse.
Most genuine witnesses have no doubts whatsoever about the subject matter itself.
Its info in the periphery that should be sketchy, not how many times you were called the N word.
The police and courts are immediately suspicious of any would be victim who is inconsistent with the subject matter itself, unless they took a hit to the head.
---------------------------
He was clear about the subject matter - Suarez had referred to his skin colour (as he admitted).
The number if times is the finer details. Which the police would expect might be inaccurate.
Completely missing the point.
.............
Not missing it at all. The point does not stand.
The number if times is the finer details. Which the police would expect might be inaccurate.
.............
And it only needed to happen once, something Mamba and his cohorts keep ignoring.
Its like if you have been involved in a fight and the police ask you how many times you were hit. In most cases, unless it was only a couple of punches, you are't going to know exactly. Same applies here VC.
The bottom line is, the FA's rules say that you if reference another players skin/race when abusing them, that is classed as racist abuse. Suarez admitted using a word that referenced his skin colour and they were both certainly abusing each other - Suarez admitted to nipping Evra. So he was guilty.
He was clear about the subject matter - Suarez had referred to his skin colour (as he admitted).
=======
That's it? He doesn't have to explain the why, how, where and when? Its when they explain this that you know if they're telling porkies or not. Don't be ridiculous.
The number if times is the finer details. Which the police would expect might be inaccurate.
----------
Its hard to have a discussion when you just state inaccuracies as fact.
How can the number of times an offence occurred by 'the finer details?' Its a major detail and instrumental in determining many things including the accuracy as well as truthfulness of a statement.
Get the fack outta town.
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
The moment Evra can't say how many times he was abused then the case is thrown out.
..............
He only has to be abused once. Six or eight times make it worse, not better.
========
Completely missing the point.
Your stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're *
How can the number of times an offence occurred by 'the finer details?'
................
Because it only needed to have happened once.
What part of this don't you understand?
And it only needed to happen once, something Mamba and his cohorts keep ignoring.
=======
Nobody has disagreed with this or even come close to doing so. You're thick.
Evra saying one thing about the number of times he was abused and then changing it at a later date is not something that can be an error. That's the crux of the discussion pal.
Just take a deep breathe and try reading it again. I'm keeping my fingers crossed for you.
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
And it only needed to happen once, something Mamba and his cohorts keep ignoring.
=======
Nobody has disagreed with this or even come close to doing so. You're thick.
Evra saying one thing about the number of times he was abused and then changing it at a later date is not something that can be an error. That's the crux of the discussion pal.
Just take a deep breathe and try reading it again. I'm keeping my fingers crossed for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
breath*
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
How can the number of times an offence occurred by 'the finer details?'
................
Because it only needed to have happened once.
What part of this don't you understand?
=========
Not when the cops are taking your statement you nincompoop.
If the cops are taking you statement, its wise to know where, when and how many times you were called the N word. You live in the States. You should know this.
The moment you say '10 times'
Come back the next day and say 'actually it was one time only.'
Not saying you're lying but your case is out.
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
How can the number of times an offence occurred by 'the finer details?'
................
Because it only needed to have happened once.
What part of this don't you understand?
=========
Not when the cops are taking your statement you nincompoop.
If the cops are taking you statement, its wise to know where, when and how many times you were called the N word. You live in the States. You should know this.
The moment you say '10 times'
Come back the next day and say 'actually it was one time only.'
Not saying you're lying but your case is out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your statement
Not when the cops are taking your statement you nincompoop.
................
Don't be ridiculous.
Mamba
Can you sort your grammar and spelling out please. It is like dealing with an infant.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
Mamba
Can you sort your grammar and spelling out please. It is like dealing with an infant.
=========
Its dawned on you how stupid you are, hasn't it?
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
Mamba
Can you sort your grammar and spelling out please. It is like dealing with an infant.
=========
Its dawned on you how stupid you are, hasn't it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's *
Yeah, thanks Fatty Dazzler for the corrections
Good looking out mate.
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeah, thanks Fatty Dazzler for the corrections
Good looking out mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No worries thickhead
The FA dont need sh!t to prosecute after a charge. In fact they have about a 99% conviction rate or something daft so all the stuff of Evra changing his story multiple times, the FA letting him watch the video three times before his statement whilst taking Suarez's on the spot, the language experts opinion, the complete lack of witnesses and so on is moot.
Its not the law, it's the FA and they do what they want.
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeah, thanks Fatty Dazzler for the corrections
Good looking out mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No worries thickhead
===========
Reet ard
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
The FA dont need sh!t to prosecute after a charge. In fact they have about a 99% conviction rate
========
The 1% they didn't nail is Manchester United cases.
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 12 minutes ago
He was clear about the subject matter - Suarez had referred to his skin colour (as he admitted).
=======
That's it? He doesn't have to explain the why, how, where and when? Its when they explain this that you know if they're telling porkies or not. Don't be ridiculous.
The number if times is the finer details. Which the police would expect might be inaccurate.
----------
Its hard to have a discussion when you just state inaccuracies as fact.
How can the number of times an offence occurred by 'the finer details?' Its a major detail and instrumental in determining many things including the accuracy as well as truthfulness of a statement.
Get the fack outta town.
----------------------
As I said, this isn't that different from an assault case. In the heat of the moment, you aren't taking notes on how times you are hit or abused. So yes, the authorities would expect that these details may not be entirely clear. I think that the FA's report even mention this didn't it?
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
The FA dont need sh!t to prosecute after a charge. In fact they have about a 99% conviction rate
========
The 1% they didn't nail is Manchester United cases.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well tbf they cited Henderson in defence in a smack irony.
Who cares anyway? Ive seen Evra shouting the N word multiple times at the top of his voice, the guy is a wrong un and has a litany of trouble making incidents throughout his career.
Sign in if you want to comment
Klopp and Fergie
Page 11 of 12
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12
posted on 6/11/18
You act like a bastion of 606 attempting to pull apart peoples posts, as you have above, but the reality you address very little because youre simply not very bright tbh. Youre well out of your depth here as per.
Classic vidic.
posted on 6/11/18
That is completely incorrect. Most genuine witness statements contain some inaccuraciesare vague. That is the way our brain works. The police are actually more suspect of witness statements that are very precise and where all the details are presented as fact.
======
You've got it in reverse.
Most genuine witnesses have no doubts whatsoever about the subject matter itself.
Its info in the periphery that should be sketchy, not how many times you were called the N word.
The police and courts are immediately suspicious of any would be victim who is inconsistent with the subject matter itself, unless they took a hit to the head.
posted on 6/11/18
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
The moment Evra can't say how many times he was abused then the case is thrown out.
..............
He only has to be abused once. Six or eight times make it worse, not better.
========
Completely missing the point.
Your stupid.
posted on 6/11/18
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
That is completely incorrect. Most genuine witness statements contain some inaccuraciesare vague. That is the way our brain works. The police are actually more suspect of witness statements that are very precise and where all the details are presented as fact.
======
You've got it in reverse.
Most genuine witnesses have no doubts whatsoever about the subject matter itself.
Its info in the periphery that should be sketchy, not how many times you were called the N word.
The police and courts are immediately suspicious of any would be victim who is inconsistent with the subject matter itself, unless they took a hit to the head.
---------------------------
He was clear about the subject matter - Suarez had referred to his skin colour (as he admitted).
The number if times is the finer details. Which the police would expect might be inaccurate.
posted on 6/11/18
Completely missing the point.
.............
Not missing it at all. The point does not stand.
posted on 6/11/18
The number if times is the finer details. Which the police would expect might be inaccurate.
.............
And it only needed to happen once, something Mamba and his cohorts keep ignoring.
posted on 6/11/18
Its like if you have been involved in a fight and the police ask you how many times you were hit. In most cases, unless it was only a couple of punches, you are't going to know exactly. Same applies here VC.
The bottom line is, the FA's rules say that you if reference another players skin/race when abusing them, that is classed as racist abuse. Suarez admitted using a word that referenced his skin colour and they were both certainly abusing each other - Suarez admitted to nipping Evra. So he was guilty.
posted on 6/11/18
He was clear about the subject matter - Suarez had referred to his skin colour (as he admitted).
=======
That's it? He doesn't have to explain the why, how, where and when? Its when they explain this that you know if they're telling porkies or not. Don't be ridiculous.
The number if times is the finer details. Which the police would expect might be inaccurate.
----------
Its hard to have a discussion when you just state inaccuracies as fact.
How can the number of times an offence occurred by 'the finer details?' Its a major detail and instrumental in determining many things including the accuracy as well as truthfulness of a statement.
Get the fack outta town.
posted on 6/11/18
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
The moment Evra can't say how many times he was abused then the case is thrown out.
..............
He only has to be abused once. Six or eight times make it worse, not better.
========
Completely missing the point.
Your stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're *
posted on 6/11/18
How can the number of times an offence occurred by 'the finer details?'
................
Because it only needed to have happened once.
What part of this don't you understand?
posted on 6/11/18
And it only needed to happen once, something Mamba and his cohorts keep ignoring.
=======
Nobody has disagreed with this or even come close to doing so. You're thick.
Evra saying one thing about the number of times he was abused and then changing it at a later date is not something that can be an error. That's the crux of the discussion pal.
Just take a deep breathe and try reading it again. I'm keeping my fingers crossed for you.
posted on 6/11/18
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
And it only needed to happen once, something Mamba and his cohorts keep ignoring.
=======
Nobody has disagreed with this or even come close to doing so. You're thick.
Evra saying one thing about the number of times he was abused and then changing it at a later date is not something that can be an error. That's the crux of the discussion pal.
Just take a deep breathe and try reading it again. I'm keeping my fingers crossed for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
breath*
posted on 6/11/18
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
How can the number of times an offence occurred by 'the finer details?'
................
Because it only needed to have happened once.
What part of this don't you understand?
=========
Not when the cops are taking your statement you nincompoop.
If the cops are taking you statement, its wise to know where, when and how many times you were called the N word. You live in the States. You should know this.
The moment you say '10 times'
Come back the next day and say 'actually it was one time only.'
Not saying you're lying but your case is out.
posted on 6/11/18
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
How can the number of times an offence occurred by 'the finer details?'
................
Because it only needed to have happened once.
What part of this don't you understand?
=========
Not when the cops are taking your statement you nincompoop.
If the cops are taking you statement, its wise to know where, when and how many times you were called the N word. You live in the States. You should know this.
The moment you say '10 times'
Come back the next day and say 'actually it was one time only.'
Not saying you're lying but your case is out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your statement
posted on 6/11/18
Not when the cops are taking your statement you nincompoop.
................
Don't be ridiculous.
posted on 6/11/18
Mamba
Can you sort your grammar and spelling out please. It is like dealing with an infant.
posted on 6/11/18
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
Mamba
Can you sort your grammar and spelling out please. It is like dealing with an infant.
=========
Its dawned on you how stupid you are, hasn't it?
posted on 6/11/18
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
Mamba
Can you sort your grammar and spelling out please. It is like dealing with an infant.
=========
Its dawned on you how stupid you are, hasn't it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's *
posted on 6/11/18
Yeah, thanks Fatty Dazzler for the corrections
Good looking out mate.
posted on 6/11/18
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeah, thanks Fatty Dazzler for the corrections
Good looking out mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No worries thickhead
posted on 6/11/18
The FA dont need sh!t to prosecute after a charge. In fact they have about a 99% conviction rate or something daft so all the stuff of Evra changing his story multiple times, the FA letting him watch the video three times before his statement whilst taking Suarez's on the spot, the language experts opinion, the complete lack of witnesses and so on is moot.
Its not the law, it's the FA and they do what they want.
posted on 6/11/18
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeah, thanks Fatty Dazzler for the corrections
Good looking out mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No worries thickhead
===========
Reet ard
posted on 6/11/18
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
The FA dont need sh!t to prosecute after a charge. In fact they have about a 99% conviction rate
========
The 1% they didn't nail is Manchester United cases.
posted on 6/11/18
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 12 minutes ago
He was clear about the subject matter - Suarez had referred to his skin colour (as he admitted).
=======
That's it? He doesn't have to explain the why, how, where and when? Its when they explain this that you know if they're telling porkies or not. Don't be ridiculous.
The number if times is the finer details. Which the police would expect might be inaccurate.
----------
Its hard to have a discussion when you just state inaccuracies as fact.
How can the number of times an offence occurred by 'the finer details?' Its a major detail and instrumental in determining many things including the accuracy as well as truthfulness of a statement.
Get the fack outta town.
----------------------
As I said, this isn't that different from an assault case. In the heat of the moment, you aren't taking notes on how times you are hit or abused. So yes, the authorities would expect that these details may not be entirely clear. I think that the FA's report even mention this didn't it?
posted on 6/11/18
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope. (U1282)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
The FA dont need sh!t to prosecute after a charge. In fact they have about a 99% conviction rate
========
The 1% they didn't nail is Manchester United cases.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well tbf they cited Henderson in defence in a smack irony.
Who cares anyway? Ive seen Evra shouting the N word multiple times at the top of his voice, the guy is a wrong un and has a litany of trouble making incidents throughout his career.
Page 11 of 12
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12