comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 minutes ago
Ready bought cheeseboards are up there in the dullard “you’ve been swindled” stakes alongside tins of assorted biscuits for cheese and Quality Street and la piece de resistance; “the Christmas Hamper”.
You throw most of it away.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well, well, well,
what do we have here.
a cheese snob.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 minutes ago
Ready bought cheeseboards are up there in the dullard “you’ve been swindled” stakes alongside tins of assorted biscuits for cheese and Quality Street and la piece de resistance; “the Christmas Hamper”.
You throw most of it away.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hovis digestive type cheese biscuits and ham primula is all you ever need.
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 minutes ago
Ready bought cheeseboards are up there in the dullard “you’ve been swindled” stakes alongside tins of assorted biscuits for cheese and Quality Street and la piece de resistance; “the Christmas Hamper”.
You throw most of it away.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hovis digestive type cheese biscuits and ham primula is all you ever need.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plain primula. One of my naughty foods.
Been yonks since I ate those. Digestive biscuits with primula. Christ I even used to butter the digestives first 😳
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 minutes ago
Ready bought cheeseboards are up there in the dullard “you’ve been swindled” stakes alongside tins of assorted biscuits for cheese and Quality Street and la piece de resistance; “the Christmas Hamper”.
You throw most of it away.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hovis digestive type cheese biscuits and ham primula is all you ever need.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plain primula. One of my naughty foods.
Been yonks since I ate those. Digestive biscuits with primula. Christ I even used to butter the digestives first 😳
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Butter is also a good shout
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 minutes ago
Ready bought cheeseboards are up there in the dullard “you’ve been swindled” stakes alongside tins of assorted biscuits for cheese and Quality Street and la piece de resistance; “the Christmas Hamper”.
You throw most of it away.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hovis digestive type cheese biscuits and ham primula is all you ever need.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or Ivan's for3skin in your case.
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 minutes ago
Ready bought cheeseboards are up there in the dullard “you’ve been swindled” stakes alongside tins of assorted biscuits for cheese and Quality Street and la piece de resistance; “the Christmas Hamper”.
You throw most of it away.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hovis digestive type cheese biscuits and ham primula is all you ever need.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or Ivan's for3skin in your case.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or his cheesey feet...but I'm lick toes intolerant
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 minutes ago
Ready bought cheeseboards are up there in the dullard “you’ve been swindled” stakes alongside tins of assorted biscuits for cheese and Quality Street and la piece de resistance; “the Christmas Hamper”.
You throw most of it away.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hovis digestive type cheese biscuits and ham primula is all you ever need.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or Ivan's for3skin in your case.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or his cheesey feet...but I'm lick toes intolerant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nailed it.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 19 minutes ago
his finishing is woeful tho.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
17 goals this season scored 1 less than edouard and Griffiths combined this season! yup cant find the pokey at all
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you’re missing the point.
What we’re saying is that with a bit more composure and experience he’s have scored even more. That’s not a bad thing is it? 🤔
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ayer because I read 'his finishing is woeful' and I understand it as 'with a bit more composure and experience he’s have scored even more'
If you say his finishing is 'woeful' you are writing him off.
If he had said 'his finishing could be better' or 'it could improve in time' then you might have had a point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye very good.
All except from the main part which is where I never said his finishing was woeful.
Ne need. In advance 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you said we were missing the point.
The point being discussed was the comment 'his finishing is woeful tho.'. The one that is included at the top of the thread in your post.
I know you never said it.
But you certainly seemed to be directly defending it.
If you don't agree with it just directly refute it as others have. Instead of telling us we are 'missing the point'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I stated you were missing the point because you’re purely concentrating on one remark over the whole discussion about Morelos.
I think every single Tim on here has stated quite unequivocally that he is by far and away your best player with perhaps McGregor being the only other contender.
We’ve also stated quite clearly that a bit more composure (which he’ll likely get) would make him far better again; but if it suits you then you hang onto JFK’s quote as being your saving grace.
In other words the “point” you refer to isn’t about one single remark. The whole point of the discussion is to how good Morelos is.
If you can’t see that then we give up and there’s not any further point in discussing further with you. If that’s the case then it’s just symptomatic of the unbelievable pedantry that ruins threads.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This.
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 4 hours, 16 minutes ago
comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 17 minutes ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're quite right btw Hamish.
It was Oranges Herbert who brought up Timmy education.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So?! I said tims were thick .... aww naww !! dry yer eyes sweet cheeks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Totally unneccesary.
No place for that sort of sectarian nonsense on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what is sectarian about saying tims are thick ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't try to turn this into a pointless, pedantic argument about the meaning of Tims. It's clear what you meant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In your wee warped heid maybe... All i said was tims were thick deal with. You have already admitted to going out your way to get rid of other posters.
go run to admin get me banned for my awful attack.
Tim logic, tim education is banter been used on here many a time by many why have you deceided that when I use it its sectarian and means anything different to every other use?
What is different from saying that all tims smell? all gers fans are fat?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well as you won't explain your comment I will have to interpret it.
You say that your comment is not sectarian.
I will assume that your argument is that Tims are Celtic fans, rather than Catholics? (correct me if I'm wrong).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have explained it tim = celtic fans lack of education = thick... All your doing is backing up my point !!
As far as im aware tim has alwasy and always mean celtic? ie jock stein was a tim !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So where are all these Celtic schools that you are referring to!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Magnum - why don’t you pull up say zach or lauders for example when they make a I blame the schools joke?
Or any Celtic fan when they’ve made them? Why pick this particular comment to get upset over?
Genuine question
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Genuine answer.
He's a returning poster who has refused to disclose his precious user name although several have asked/guessed.
My assumption from that is that he's been drummed out previously or left under a cloud. My experience of here is that these guys eventually return to type. We've all seen that.
I wouldn't pull Zach up about it as I've met him...he's one of the best posters on the site and a genuinely good guy. He's mainly on here for a laugh.
You can start your cliquey patter if you like...but it's not a clique. Everyone and anyone can go to the nights out...,those who chose not to can't complain about it.,it's their choice IMO.
Also.,in the past few weeks I've been accused of all sorts on here..including by you.
So I'm starting to think that maybe we should be more careful about such matters.
Curly was also a top poster on here and as good a guy as you could meet. I'll also settle for his view that I'm a fair poster who calls it as he sees it and is not influenced by scarf colour.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn't pull zach up because he's a good guy.
Didn't mention lauders when asked.
That's probably fair, fteepee
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by *Zico* (U21900)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 19 minutes ago
his finishing is woeful tho.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
17 goals this season scored 1 less than edouard and Griffiths combined this season! yup cant find the pokey at all
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you’re missing the point.
What we’re saying is that with a bit more composure and experience he’s have scored even more. That’s not a bad thing is it? 🤔
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ayer because I read 'his finishing is woeful' and I understand it as 'with a bit more composure and experience he’s have scored even more'
If you say his finishing is 'woeful' you are writing him off.
If he had said 'his finishing could be better' or 'it could improve in time' then you might have had a point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye very good.
All except from the main part which is where I never said his finishing was woeful.
Ne need. In advance 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you said we were missing the point.
The point being discussed was the comment 'his finishing is woeful tho.'. The one that is included at the top of the thread in your post.
I know you never said it.
But you certainly seemed to be directly defending it.
If you don't agree with it just directly refute it as others have. Instead of telling us we are 'missing the point'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I stated you were missing the point because you’re purely concentrating on one remark over the whole discussion about Morelos.
I think every single Tim on here has stated quite unequivocally that he is by far and away your best player with perhaps McGregor being the only other contender.
We’ve also stated quite clearly that a bit more composure (which he’ll likely get) would make him far better again; but if it suits you then you hang onto JFK’s quote as being your saving grace.
In other words the “point” you refer to isn’t about one single remark. The whole point of the discussion is to how good Morelos is.
If you can’t see that then we give up and there’s not any further point in discussing further with you. If that’s the case then it’s just symptomatic of the unbelievable pedantry that ruins threads.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well not really....I think he's rubbish.
McGregor is rangers best player by a country mile.
Tavs is next.
Morales is probably the best of the rest but not much cop.
He runs about a lot..so what.
Even at his tender young age, his showreel of comedy misses must be on its second dvd already.
So include me out of the 'wee think he's good' brigade.
Had the exact same argument with many over Myles beerman and the boy mccrorie.
I'm rarely wrong about a player...although I did think Saidy Janko was better than tierney at one point.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by *Zico* (U21900)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 19 minutes ago
his finishing is woeful tho.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
17 goals this season scored 1 less than edouard and Griffiths combined this season! yup cant find the pokey at all
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you’re missing the point.
What we’re saying is that with a bit more composure and experience he’s have scored even more. That’s not a bad thing is it? 🤔
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ayer because I read 'his finishing is woeful' and I understand it as 'with a bit more composure and experience he’s have scored even more'
If you say his finishing is 'woeful' you are writing him off.
If he had said 'his finishing could be better' or 'it could improve in time' then you might have had a point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye very good.
All except from the main part which is where I never said his finishing was woeful.
Ne need. In advance 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you said we were missing the point.
The point being discussed was the comment 'his finishing is woeful tho.'. The one that is included at the top of the thread in your post.
I know you never said it.
But you certainly seemed to be directly defending it.
If you don't agree with it just directly refute it as others have. Instead of telling us we are 'missing the point'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I stated you were missing the point because you’re purely concentrating on one remark over the whole discussion about Morelos.
I think every single Tim on here has stated quite unequivocally that he is by far and away your best player with perhaps McGregor being the only other contender.
We’ve also stated quite clearly that a bit more composure (which he’ll likely get) would make him far better again; but if it suits you then you hang onto JFK’s quote as being your saving grace.
In other words the “point” you refer to isn’t about one single remark. The whole point of the discussion is to how good Morelos is.
If you can’t see that then we give up and there’s not any further point in discussing further with you. If that’s the case then it’s just symptomatic of the unbelievable pedantry that ruins threads.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well not really....I think he's rubbish.
McGregor is rangers best player by a country mile.
Tavs is next.
Morales is probably the best of the rest but not much cop.
He runs about a lot..so what.
Even at his tender young age, his showreel of comedy misses must be on its second dvd already.
So include me out of the 'wee think he's good' brigade.
Had the exact same argument with many over Myles beerman and the boy mccrorie.
I'm rarely wrong about a player...although I did think Saidy Janko was better than tierney at one point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
" you can’t see that then we give up and there’s not any further point in discussing further with you. If that’s the case then it’s just symptomatic of the unbelievable pedantry that ruins threads."
This, is the "This" I was applauding.
The constant circular argument from the usual suspect with a new username.
This, is the "This" I was applauding.
The constant circular argument from the usual suspect with a new username.
—————————————-
And which usual suspect am I supposed to be exactly.
Just to warn you - whoever you think it is - I have never been one of the ‘usuals’ so you are wrong.
Only on here could your posts be judged against the ‘crimes’ of previous posters who have nowt to do with yoy😂😂😩
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 4 minutes ago
This, is the "This" I was applauding.
The constant circular argument from the usual suspect with a new username.
—————————————-
And which usual suspect am I supposed to be exactly.
Just to warn you - whoever you think it is - I have never been one of the ‘usuals’ so you are wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? You've never been one of the 'usuals'..?
We'll you're the CLONE of a previous user.
Loves attention.
Loves pedantic arguments.
Loves arguing in any form.
Avoids answering when shown to be wrong.
Me, I could be wrong about you, and me being me I will apologise, as I am an adult.
comment by *Zico* (U21900)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 4 minutes ago
This, is the "This" I was applauding.
The constant circular argument from the usual suspect with a new username.
—————————————-
And which usual suspect am I supposed to be exactly.
Just to warn you - whoever you think it is - I have never been one of the ‘usuals’ so you are wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? You've never been one of the 'usuals'..?
We'll you're the CLONE of a previous user.
Loves attention.
Loves pedantic arguments.
Loves arguing in any form.
Avoids answering when shown to be wrong.
Me, I could be wrong about you, and me being me I will apologise, as I am an adult.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? So who am I supposed to be?
Put your money where your mouth is 👍
comment by Zachsda(FFS Da, put it back) (U1850)
posted 12 minutes ago
Ffs is this still going
Just finished work
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sooo, let me get this straight, an article about Celtics top 20 billion striker attracts just 18 comments, and one about Rangers star apparently not worth a penny is knocking on 500 Confusing
Sorry ^^^^^^ Did not mean to hit on "reply"
But I've done it now .....
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by *Zico* (U21900)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 4 minutes ago
This, is the "This" I was applauding.
The constant circular argument from the usual suspect with a new username.
—————————————-
And which usual suspect am I supposed to be exactly.
Just to warn you - whoever you think it is - I have never been one of the ‘usuals’ so you are wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? You've never been one of the 'usuals'..?
We'll you're the CLONE of a previous user.
Loves attention.
Loves pedantic arguments.
Loves arguing in any form.
Avoids answering when shown to be wrong.
Me, I could be wrong about you, and me being me I will apologise, as I am an adult.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? So who am I supposed to be?
Put your money where your mouth is 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How will we know you’re telling the truth as to who you used to be?!
Sign in if you want to comment
Alfredo
Page 20 of 32
21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 minutes ago
Ready bought cheeseboards are up there in the dullard “you’ve been swindled” stakes alongside tins of assorted biscuits for cheese and Quality Street and la piece de resistance; “the Christmas Hamper”.
You throw most of it away.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well, well, well,
what do we have here.
a cheese snob.
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 minutes ago
Ready bought cheeseboards are up there in the dullard “you’ve been swindled” stakes alongside tins of assorted biscuits for cheese and Quality Street and la piece de resistance; “the Christmas Hamper”.
You throw most of it away.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hovis digestive type cheese biscuits and ham primula is all you ever need.
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 minutes ago
Ready bought cheeseboards are up there in the dullard “you’ve been swindled” stakes alongside tins of assorted biscuits for cheese and Quality Street and la piece de resistance; “the Christmas Hamper”.
You throw most of it away.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hovis digestive type cheese biscuits and ham primula is all you ever need.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plain primula. One of my naughty foods.
Been yonks since I ate those. Digestive biscuits with primula. Christ I even used to butter the digestives first 😳
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 minutes ago
Ready bought cheeseboards are up there in the dullard “you’ve been swindled” stakes alongside tins of assorted biscuits for cheese and Quality Street and la piece de resistance; “the Christmas Hamper”.
You throw most of it away.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hovis digestive type cheese biscuits and ham primula is all you ever need.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plain primula. One of my naughty foods.
Been yonks since I ate those. Digestive biscuits with primula. Christ I even used to butter the digestives first 😳
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Butter is also a good shout
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 minutes ago
Ready bought cheeseboards are up there in the dullard “you’ve been swindled” stakes alongside tins of assorted biscuits for cheese and Quality Street and la piece de resistance; “the Christmas Hamper”.
You throw most of it away.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hovis digestive type cheese biscuits and ham primula is all you ever need.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or Ivan's for3skin in your case.
posted on 3/12/18
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 minutes ago
Ready bought cheeseboards are up there in the dullard “you’ve been swindled” stakes alongside tins of assorted biscuits for cheese and Quality Street and la piece de resistance; “the Christmas Hamper”.
You throw most of it away.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hovis digestive type cheese biscuits and ham primula is all you ever need.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or Ivan's for3skin in your case.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or his cheesey feet...but I'm lick toes intolerant
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 minutes ago
Ready bought cheeseboards are up there in the dullard “you’ve been swindled” stakes alongside tins of assorted biscuits for cheese and Quality Street and la piece de resistance; “the Christmas Hamper”.
You throw most of it away.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hovis digestive type cheese biscuits and ham primula is all you ever need.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or Ivan's for3skin in your case.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or his cheesey feet...but I'm lick toes intolerant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nailed it.
posted on 3/12/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 19 minutes ago
his finishing is woeful tho.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
17 goals this season scored 1 less than edouard and Griffiths combined this season! yup cant find the pokey at all
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you’re missing the point.
What we’re saying is that with a bit more composure and experience he’s have scored even more. That’s not a bad thing is it? 🤔
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ayer because I read 'his finishing is woeful' and I understand it as 'with a bit more composure and experience he’s have scored even more'
If you say his finishing is 'woeful' you are writing him off.
If he had said 'his finishing could be better' or 'it could improve in time' then you might have had a point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye very good.
All except from the main part which is where I never said his finishing was woeful.
Ne need. In advance 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you said we were missing the point.
The point being discussed was the comment 'his finishing is woeful tho.'. The one that is included at the top of the thread in your post.
I know you never said it.
But you certainly seemed to be directly defending it.
If you don't agree with it just directly refute it as others have. Instead of telling us we are 'missing the point'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I stated you were missing the point because you’re purely concentrating on one remark over the whole discussion about Morelos.
I think every single Tim on here has stated quite unequivocally that he is by far and away your best player with perhaps McGregor being the only other contender.
We’ve also stated quite clearly that a bit more composure (which he’ll likely get) would make him far better again; but if it suits you then you hang onto JFK’s quote as being your saving grace.
In other words the “point” you refer to isn’t about one single remark. The whole point of the discussion is to how good Morelos is.
If you can’t see that then we give up and there’s not any further point in discussing further with you. If that’s the case then it’s just symptomatic of the unbelievable pedantry that ruins threads.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This.
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 4 hours, 16 minutes ago
comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 17 minutes ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're quite right btw Hamish.
It was Oranges Herbert who brought up Timmy education.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So?! I said tims were thick .... aww naww !! dry yer eyes sweet cheeks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Totally unneccesary.
No place for that sort of sectarian nonsense on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what is sectarian about saying tims are thick ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't try to turn this into a pointless, pedantic argument about the meaning of Tims. It's clear what you meant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In your wee warped heid maybe... All i said was tims were thick deal with. You have already admitted to going out your way to get rid of other posters.
go run to admin get me banned for my awful attack.
Tim logic, tim education is banter been used on here many a time by many why have you deceided that when I use it its sectarian and means anything different to every other use?
What is different from saying that all tims smell? all gers fans are fat?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well as you won't explain your comment I will have to interpret it.
You say that your comment is not sectarian.
I will assume that your argument is that Tims are Celtic fans, rather than Catholics? (correct me if I'm wrong).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have explained it tim = celtic fans lack of education = thick... All your doing is backing up my point !!
As far as im aware tim has alwasy and always mean celtic? ie jock stein was a tim !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So where are all these Celtic schools that you are referring to!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Magnum - why don’t you pull up say zach or lauders for example when they make a I blame the schools joke?
Or any Celtic fan when they’ve made them? Why pick this particular comment to get upset over?
Genuine question
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Genuine answer.
He's a returning poster who has refused to disclose his precious user name although several have asked/guessed.
My assumption from that is that he's been drummed out previously or left under a cloud. My experience of here is that these guys eventually return to type. We've all seen that.
I wouldn't pull Zach up about it as I've met him...he's one of the best posters on the site and a genuinely good guy. He's mainly on here for a laugh.
You can start your cliquey patter if you like...but it's not a clique. Everyone and anyone can go to the nights out...,those who chose not to can't complain about it.,it's their choice IMO.
Also.,in the past few weeks I've been accused of all sorts on here..including by you.
So I'm starting to think that maybe we should be more careful about such matters.
Curly was also a top poster on here and as good a guy as you could meet. I'll also settle for his view that I'm a fair poster who calls it as he sees it and is not influenced by scarf colour.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn't pull zach up because he's a good guy.
Didn't mention lauders when asked.
That's probably fair, fteepee
posted on 3/12/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/12/18
comment by *Zico* (U21900)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 19 minutes ago
his finishing is woeful tho.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
17 goals this season scored 1 less than edouard and Griffiths combined this season! yup cant find the pokey at all
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you’re missing the point.
What we’re saying is that with a bit more composure and experience he’s have scored even more. That’s not a bad thing is it? 🤔
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ayer because I read 'his finishing is woeful' and I understand it as 'with a bit more composure and experience he’s have scored even more'
If you say his finishing is 'woeful' you are writing him off.
If he had said 'his finishing could be better' or 'it could improve in time' then you might have had a point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye very good.
All except from the main part which is where I never said his finishing was woeful.
Ne need. In advance 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you said we were missing the point.
The point being discussed was the comment 'his finishing is woeful tho.'. The one that is included at the top of the thread in your post.
I know you never said it.
But you certainly seemed to be directly defending it.
If you don't agree with it just directly refute it as others have. Instead of telling us we are 'missing the point'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I stated you were missing the point because you’re purely concentrating on one remark over the whole discussion about Morelos.
I think every single Tim on here has stated quite unequivocally that he is by far and away your best player with perhaps McGregor being the only other contender.
We’ve also stated quite clearly that a bit more composure (which he’ll likely get) would make him far better again; but if it suits you then you hang onto JFK’s quote as being your saving grace.
In other words the “point” you refer to isn’t about one single remark. The whole point of the discussion is to how good Morelos is.
If you can’t see that then we give up and there’s not any further point in discussing further with you. If that’s the case then it’s just symptomatic of the unbelievable pedantry that ruins threads.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well not really....I think he's rubbish.
McGregor is rangers best player by a country mile.
Tavs is next.
Morales is probably the best of the rest but not much cop.
He runs about a lot..so what.
Even at his tender young age, his showreel of comedy misses must be on its second dvd already.
So include me out of the 'wee think he's good' brigade.
Had the exact same argument with many over Myles beerman and the boy mccrorie.
I'm rarely wrong about a player...although I did think Saidy Janko was better than tierney at one point.
posted on 3/12/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/12/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/12/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by *Zico* (U21900)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 19 minutes ago
his finishing is woeful tho.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
17 goals this season scored 1 less than edouard and Griffiths combined this season! yup cant find the pokey at all
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you’re missing the point.
What we’re saying is that with a bit more composure and experience he’s have scored even more. That’s not a bad thing is it? 🤔
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ayer because I read 'his finishing is woeful' and I understand it as 'with a bit more composure and experience he’s have scored even more'
If you say his finishing is 'woeful' you are writing him off.
If he had said 'his finishing could be better' or 'it could improve in time' then you might have had a point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye very good.
All except from the main part which is where I never said his finishing was woeful.
Ne need. In advance 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you said we were missing the point.
The point being discussed was the comment 'his finishing is woeful tho.'. The one that is included at the top of the thread in your post.
I know you never said it.
But you certainly seemed to be directly defending it.
If you don't agree with it just directly refute it as others have. Instead of telling us we are 'missing the point'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I stated you were missing the point because you’re purely concentrating on one remark over the whole discussion about Morelos.
I think every single Tim on here has stated quite unequivocally that he is by far and away your best player with perhaps McGregor being the only other contender.
We’ve also stated quite clearly that a bit more composure (which he’ll likely get) would make him far better again; but if it suits you then you hang onto JFK’s quote as being your saving grace.
In other words the “point” you refer to isn’t about one single remark. The whole point of the discussion is to how good Morelos is.
If you can’t see that then we give up and there’s not any further point in discussing further with you. If that’s the case then it’s just symptomatic of the unbelievable pedantry that ruins threads.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well not really....I think he's rubbish.
McGregor is rangers best player by a country mile.
Tavs is next.
Morales is probably the best of the rest but not much cop.
He runs about a lot..so what.
Even at his tender young age, his showreel of comedy misses must be on its second dvd already.
So include me out of the 'wee think he's good' brigade.
Had the exact same argument with many over Myles beerman and the boy mccrorie.
I'm rarely wrong about a player...although I did think Saidy Janko was better than tierney at one point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
" you can’t see that then we give up and there’s not any further point in discussing further with you. If that’s the case then it’s just symptomatic of the unbelievable pedantry that ruins threads."
This, is the "This" I was applauding.
The constant circular argument from the usual suspect with a new username.
posted on 3/12/18
This, is the "This" I was applauding.
The constant circular argument from the usual suspect with a new username.
—————————————-
And which usual suspect am I supposed to be exactly.
Just to warn you - whoever you think it is - I have never been one of the ‘usuals’ so you are wrong.
Only on here could your posts be judged against the ‘crimes’ of previous posters who have nowt to do with yoy😂😂😩
posted on 3/12/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 4 minutes ago
This, is the "This" I was applauding.
The constant circular argument from the usual suspect with a new username.
—————————————-
And which usual suspect am I supposed to be exactly.
Just to warn you - whoever you think it is - I have never been one of the ‘usuals’ so you are wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? You've never been one of the 'usuals'..?
We'll you're the CLONE of a previous user.
Loves attention.
Loves pedantic arguments.
Loves arguing in any form.
Avoids answering when shown to be wrong.
Me, I could be wrong about you, and me being me I will apologise, as I am an adult.
posted on 3/12/18
495
posted on 3/12/18
comment by *Zico* (U21900)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 4 minutes ago
This, is the "This" I was applauding.
The constant circular argument from the usual suspect with a new username.
—————————————-
And which usual suspect am I supposed to be exactly.
Just to warn you - whoever you think it is - I have never been one of the ‘usuals’ so you are wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? You've never been one of the 'usuals'..?
We'll you're the CLONE of a previous user.
Loves attention.
Loves pedantic arguments.
Loves arguing in any form.
Avoids answering when shown to be wrong.
Me, I could be wrong about you, and me being me I will apologise, as I am an adult.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? So who am I supposed to be?
Put your money where your mouth is 👍
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Zachsda(FFS Da, put it back) (U1850)
posted 12 minutes ago
Ffs is this still going
Just finished work
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sooo, let me get this straight, an article about Celtics top 20 billion striker attracts just 18 comments, and one about Rangers star apparently not worth a penny is knocking on 500 Confusing
posted on 3/12/18
Sorry ^^^^^^ Did not mean to hit on "reply"
posted on 3/12/18
But I've done it now .....
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by *Zico* (U21900)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 4 minutes ago
This, is the "This" I was applauding.
The constant circular argument from the usual suspect with a new username.
—————————————-
And which usual suspect am I supposed to be exactly.
Just to warn you - whoever you think it is - I have never been one of the ‘usuals’ so you are wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? You've never been one of the 'usuals'..?
We'll you're the CLONE of a previous user.
Loves attention.
Loves pedantic arguments.
Loves arguing in any form.
Avoids answering when shown to be wrong.
Me, I could be wrong about you, and me being me I will apologise, as I am an adult.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? So who am I supposed to be?
Put your money where your mouth is 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How will we know you’re telling the truth as to who you used to be?!
Page 20 of 32
21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25