Rhonda Rousey has also worked hard for many years to become what she is now.
She's not making a mockery, she just had a different path to the WWE and she has given and taken real beatings in her life unlike the WWE actors.
She's arguably worked harder than them all to reach where she is.
You know its not real though, don't you?
Yes I know that No Love but Ronda has injured many women during her matches in WWE for the present year.
Also, the WWE and the other girls are benefitting greatly from the publicity she brings.
WWE obv loves MMA stars as WC, hence her and Br-rr-rock, Lesnar.
Must be great publicity n marketing.
I don't personally like Ronda Rousey and feel as if she makes a mockery of other women wrestling in WWE nowadays who have worked for years to become a WWE woman superstar.
-----------------------------------------------------------
I only saw her at Mania, in WWE, and she was arguably the best thing on the entire show (and I was very skeptical going in). Adapted to the choreographed style seamlessly.
The argument that she'd hold the rest of the women's division back I saw coming and it's utter bollox. She isn't Lesnar, she's been a hardcore wrestling fan all her life and if anything she's done more for WWE by getting over in UFC (for a window of time) than any of the other women in that company. WWE crave legitimacy today, I'd argue to their detriment, she's legit.
Long as her matches don't look bad, and her match at Mania was MOTN imo, she's a tremendous asset to them.
Also important to note that WWE can parade 'women's revolution' all they like but at the end of the day both the men and women need to look the part, it's the entertainment part of sports-entertainment, and I'd legitimately argue besides Stephanie, Nia and maybe Bliss, she's the only woman they have who looks like what she's meant to be - she's meant to be a no nonsense fighter and she actually looks like one.
It's part of the whole legitimacy thing. Most of WWE's women look and dress like disney characters in an environment where we're told to take them seriously, it's a contradiction that Rousey isn't affected by.
I liked Ronda Rousey initially but I wanted him to be like Chyna was in the past in WWE but I don't think she has been as good as her so far in WWE.I do know and feel that Rousey and Angle v Stephanie and Triple H was the best match of Wrestlemania this year.
OK, I can't speak for her work since Mania, I just remember she surprised me enormously. Bit of work needed on the mic for sure, but fantastic in the ring.
Yes,she is good in the ring.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Evolution was first all women pay-per-view
Page 1 of 1
posted on 8/12/18
Rhonda Rousey has also worked hard for many years to become what she is now.
She's not making a mockery, she just had a different path to the WWE and she has given and taken real beatings in her life unlike the WWE actors.
She's arguably worked harder than them all to reach where she is.
You know its not real though, don't you?
posted on 8/12/18
Yes I know that No Love but Ronda has injured many women during her matches in WWE for the present year.
posted on 8/12/18
She'll learn.
posted on 8/12/18
Also, the WWE and the other girls are benefitting greatly from the publicity she brings.
posted on 10/12/18
WWE obv loves MMA stars as WC, hence her and Br-rr-rock, Lesnar.
Must be great publicity n marketing.
posted on 10/12/18
Liv Morgan though
posted on 13/12/18
I don't personally like Ronda Rousey and feel as if she makes a mockery of other women wrestling in WWE nowadays who have worked for years to become a WWE woman superstar.
-----------------------------------------------------------
I only saw her at Mania, in WWE, and she was arguably the best thing on the entire show (and I was very skeptical going in). Adapted to the choreographed style seamlessly.
The argument that she'd hold the rest of the women's division back I saw coming and it's utter bollox. She isn't Lesnar, she's been a hardcore wrestling fan all her life and if anything she's done more for WWE by getting over in UFC (for a window of time) than any of the other women in that company. WWE crave legitimacy today, I'd argue to their detriment, she's legit.
Long as her matches don't look bad, and her match at Mania was MOTN imo, she's a tremendous asset to them.
posted on 13/12/18
Also important to note that WWE can parade 'women's revolution' all they like but at the end of the day both the men and women need to look the part, it's the entertainment part of sports-entertainment, and I'd legitimately argue besides Stephanie, Nia and maybe Bliss, she's the only woman they have who looks like what she's meant to be - she's meant to be a no nonsense fighter and she actually looks like one.
It's part of the whole legitimacy thing. Most of WWE's women look and dress like disney characters in an environment where we're told to take them seriously, it's a contradiction that Rousey isn't affected by.
posted on 14/12/18
I liked Ronda Rousey initially but I wanted him to be like Chyna was in the past in WWE but I don't think she has been as good as her so far in WWE.I do know and feel that Rousey and Angle v Stephanie and Triple H was the best match of Wrestlemania this year.
posted on 14/12/18
OK, I can't speak for her work since Mania, I just remember she surprised me enormously. Bit of work needed on the mic for sure, but fantastic in the ring.
posted on 15/12/18
Yes,she is good in the ring.
Page 1 of 1