Isco won't be too expensive????
Ok good luck with that one
Isco has achieved more than Morata had when Chelsea bought him. He isn't goiwto be cheap. None of those are. Fekir is the only one who would be around the £55m Mark which would be a standard price in this market.
Isco would be 70-80 million pounds and Hazard might be 140-160 million pounds worth.So we can buy Fekir and Isco and still have money left to spend in the transfer market.
comment by ZahraIhsanphile (U20361)
posted 1 minute ago
Isco would be 70-80 million pounds and Hazard might be 140-160 million pounds worth.So we can buy Fekir and Isco and still have money left to spend in the transfer market.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really think Isco would be between 70-80m????
Deluded
Because he is out of favour at Real Madrid at present,that is why I think that and you can knock off 20-30 million pounds of his real price due to Real yearning for Eden Hazard from Chelsea.
Have you not already replaced him with that very slow Brazilian Italian?
None of the players you haven't mentioned are replacements for Cesc Fabregas. It'll have to be someone young who can play that regista role.
Apparently a 30 million deal for Wilson in January, I think this could be very good business in this current market if it was to go ahead
comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
comment by ZahraIhsanphile (U20361)
posted 1 minute ago
Isco would be 70-80 million pounds and Hazard might be 140-160 million pounds worth.So we can buy Fekir and Isco and still have money left to spend in the transfer market.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really think Isco would be between 70-80m????
Deluded
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Situation is not good with Isco. He's been in stinking form and is yet to start a league game under Solari, and to make matters worse has clashed both with the manager and the fans.
Great news from Madrid !,lets put a cheeky bid in for him in January ,RM are a shambles this season ,and Cesc is on his way to Milan anyway.
Hi harl. January would be a bit too soon, imo, unless we brought in a replacement for him. Maybe if Chelsea were willing to entertain a player+cash swap deal for Hazard...
I would not be averse to that IOAG ,but maybe not until the summer as you say. Providing of course Hazard doesnt have a look at Madrid and has a change of mind !
Ethan Apmadu - job sorted!
What you mean the goalscoring Ampadu Brummie
That's him - he's proved midweek that he can double up as a replacement for Morata as well as replace Fabregas!
comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 3 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by ZahraIhsanphile (U20361)
posted 1 minute ago
Isco would be 70-80 million pounds and Hazard might be 140-160 million pounds worth.So we can buy Fekir and Isco and still have money left to spend in the transfer market.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really think Isco would be between 70-80m????
Deluded
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This article is a bit delusional but his valuations are probably right. You don’t seem to know what you are talking about.
comment by 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 (U18355)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 3 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by ZahraIhsanphile (U20361)
posted 1 minute ago
Isco would be 70-80 million pounds and Hazard might be 140-160 million pounds worth.So we can buy Fekir and Isco and still have money left to spend in the transfer market.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really think Isco would be between 70-80m????
Deluded
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This article is a bit delusional but his valuations are probably right. You don’t seem to know what you are talking about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't know what I am talking about? Work for Madrid do you? I believe its delusional tk believe they would sell Isco for anything below 100m regardless of form. Pretty much all their players are in poor form and lets be fair he wouldn't be the first player to fall out with the fans. Both Ronaldos were booed by the awful Madrid fans
Isco isn’t THAT good where you can go out and spend £100M and know you aren’t gonna get a bad deal. And he’s nearly 27, not like he has a high ceiling to improve. Also Madrid would be happy to swap him and a lot of cash for Hazard I’d imagine
No idea who we could replace Fabregas with
comment by 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 (U18355)
posted 12 minutes ago
Isco isn’t THAT good where you can go out and spend £100M and know you aren’t gonna get a bad deal. And he’s nearly 27, not like he has a high ceiling to improve. Also Madrid would be happy to swap him and a lot of cash for Hazard I’d imagine
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isco is an excellent player. Look at the prices these says. Sigurdsson 50m
Richarlison 50m
Fred 50m
Mahrez 60m
Keita 63m
Are you telling me if sn English club was buying you could get him fir around 70m????
comment by Kunta Kante (U1641)
posted 35 seconds ago
No idea who we could replace Fabregas with
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's only a backup for Jorginho nowadays- Ampadu would be fine!
Prefer Ampadu at CB Brummie, his passing is not as good as Fab/Jorgi
I think if Brummie had his own way Chelsea would be fielding the under 18s every week
And we would be playing championship football
comment by Kunta Kante (U1641)
posted 1 hour, 28 minutes ago
Prefer Ampadu at CB Brummie, his passing is not as good as Fab/Jorgi
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Looked good playing there for Wales!
comment by Ronny Van Banterous - It's only me!! (U5996)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
I think if Brummie had his own way Chelsea would be fielding the under 18s every week
And we would be playing championship football
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the big myth about me though Van Ban.
Yes I do want to see the young lads bought through but I wouldn't play more than a couple of 18 year olds at one time and I'd only start by giving them time from the bench to start and up their exposure if they exceed expectations - what do you think my name is Brummie Wenger!
Our kids have proved beyond doubt that they are better than kids from City, Liverpool, Yoonited, Le Ar$e over the last five years, yet theirs prosper with trust whilst ours stagnate getting farmed out all the time!
Sign in if you want to comment
Replacement for Cesc Fabregas?
Page 1 of 2
posted on 15/12/18
Isco won't be too expensive????
Ok good luck with that one
posted on 15/12/18
Isco has achieved more than Morata had when Chelsea bought him. He isn't goiwto be cheap. None of those are. Fekir is the only one who would be around the £55m Mark which would be a standard price in this market.
posted on 15/12/18
Isco would be 70-80 million pounds and Hazard might be 140-160 million pounds worth.So we can buy Fekir and Isco and still have money left to spend in the transfer market.
posted on 15/12/18
comment by ZahraIhsanphile (U20361)
posted 1 minute ago
Isco would be 70-80 million pounds and Hazard might be 140-160 million pounds worth.So we can buy Fekir and Isco and still have money left to spend in the transfer market.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really think Isco would be between 70-80m????
Deluded
posted on 15/12/18
Because he is out of favour at Real Madrid at present,that is why I think that and you can knock off 20-30 million pounds of his real price due to Real yearning for Eden Hazard from Chelsea.
posted on 15/12/18
Have you not already replaced him with that very slow Brazilian Italian?
posted on 15/12/18
None of the players you haven't mentioned are replacements for Cesc Fabregas. It'll have to be someone young who can play that regista role.
Apparently a 30 million deal for Wilson in January, I think this could be very good business in this current market if it was to go ahead
posted on 15/12/18
comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
comment by ZahraIhsanphile (U20361)
posted 1 minute ago
Isco would be 70-80 million pounds and Hazard might be 140-160 million pounds worth.So we can buy Fekir and Isco and still have money left to spend in the transfer market.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really think Isco would be between 70-80m????
Deluded
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Situation is not good with Isco. He's been in stinking form and is yet to start a league game under Solari, and to make matters worse has clashed both with the manager and the fans.
posted on 15/12/18
Great news from Madrid !,lets put a cheeky bid in for him in January ,RM are a shambles this season ,and Cesc is on his way to Milan anyway.
posted on 15/12/18
Hi harl. January would be a bit too soon, imo, unless we brought in a replacement for him. Maybe if Chelsea were willing to entertain a player+cash swap deal for Hazard...
posted on 15/12/18
I would not be averse to that IOAG ,but maybe not until the summer as you say. Providing of course Hazard doesnt have a look at Madrid and has a change of mind !
posted on 15/12/18
Ethan Apmadu - job sorted!
posted on 15/12/18
What you mean the goalscoring Ampadu Brummie
posted on 15/12/18
That's him - he's proved midweek that he can double up as a replacement for Morata as well as replace Fabregas!
posted on 15/12/18
comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 3 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by ZahraIhsanphile (U20361)
posted 1 minute ago
Isco would be 70-80 million pounds and Hazard might be 140-160 million pounds worth.So we can buy Fekir and Isco and still have money left to spend in the transfer market.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really think Isco would be between 70-80m????
Deluded
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This article is a bit delusional but his valuations are probably right. You don’t seem to know what you are talking about.
posted on 15/12/18
comment by 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 (U18355)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 3 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by ZahraIhsanphile (U20361)
posted 1 minute ago
Isco would be 70-80 million pounds and Hazard might be 140-160 million pounds worth.So we can buy Fekir and Isco and still have money left to spend in the transfer market.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really think Isco would be between 70-80m????
Deluded
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This article is a bit delusional but his valuations are probably right. You don’t seem to know what you are talking about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't know what I am talking about? Work for Madrid do you? I believe its delusional tk believe they would sell Isco for anything below 100m regardless of form. Pretty much all their players are in poor form and lets be fair he wouldn't be the first player to fall out with the fans. Both Ronaldos were booed by the awful Madrid fans
posted on 15/12/18
Isco isn’t THAT good where you can go out and spend £100M and know you aren’t gonna get a bad deal. And he’s nearly 27, not like he has a high ceiling to improve. Also Madrid would be happy to swap him and a lot of cash for Hazard I’d imagine
posted on 15/12/18
No idea who we could replace Fabregas with
posted on 15/12/18
comment by 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 (U18355)
posted 12 minutes ago
Isco isn’t THAT good where you can go out and spend £100M and know you aren’t gonna get a bad deal. And he’s nearly 27, not like he has a high ceiling to improve. Also Madrid would be happy to swap him and a lot of cash for Hazard I’d imagine
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isco is an excellent player. Look at the prices these says. Sigurdsson 50m
Richarlison 50m
Fred 50m
Mahrez 60m
Keita 63m
Are you telling me if sn English club was buying you could get him fir around 70m????
posted on 15/12/18
comment by Kunta Kante (U1641)
posted 35 seconds ago
No idea who we could replace Fabregas with
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's only a backup for Jorginho nowadays- Ampadu would be fine!
posted on 15/12/18
Prefer Ampadu at CB Brummie, his passing is not as good as Fab/Jorgi
posted on 15/12/18
I think if Brummie had his own way Chelsea would be fielding the under 18s every week
And we would be playing championship football
posted on 15/12/18
comment by Kunta Kante (U1641)
posted 1 hour, 28 minutes ago
Prefer Ampadu at CB Brummie, his passing is not as good as Fab/Jorgi
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Looked good playing there for Wales!
posted on 15/12/18
comment by Ronny Van Banterous - It's only me!! (U5996)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
I think if Brummie had his own way Chelsea would be fielding the under 18s every week
And we would be playing championship football
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the big myth about me though Van Ban.
Yes I do want to see the young lads bought through but I wouldn't play more than a couple of 18 year olds at one time and I'd only start by giving them time from the bench to start and up their exposure if they exceed expectations - what do you think my name is Brummie Wenger!
Our kids have proved beyond doubt that they are better than kids from City, Liverpool, Yoonited, Le Ar$e over the last five years, yet theirs prosper with trust whilst ours stagnate getting farmed out all the time!
posted on 15/12/18
lol Manc Python
Page 1 of 2