Wahl come up to the bridge and we can discuss properly
Wouldn’t have been as much of an issue if Mourinho could coach attackers into playing better.
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 2 minutes ago
So if they were terrible they were not better options, Demba Ba wasn’t henry but he was a solid player who scored goals and had a good pl record. Criminal that he wasn’t played more.
Now your just chatting rubbish. Salah was given 6 league starts in 2 seasonsplenty of chances my ass
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many sub appearances?
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 2 minutes ago
Wahl come up to the bridge and we can discuss properly
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't want to meet you.
comment by Ed The King Woodward (U10026)
posted 11 seconds ago
Wouldn’t have been as much of an issue if Mourinho could coach attackers into playing better.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can’t blame mourinho for Torres but his dismissive comments of Eto’o were not needed, his lack of playing ba was poor management and as u say his lack of coaching (oscar, salah, schurrle) was equally as frustrating
comment by Ed The King Woodward (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
Wouldn’t have been as much of an issue if Mourinho could coach attackers into playing better.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like Robben, Hazard, Drogba, Costa, Milito, Eto'o, Di Maria etc.?
Why sub appearances? I doubt if he got over 10. Sub appearances don’t mean much, can be 1 or 2 minutes
Because the point is that Salah was given game time but didn't make the most of it. Why would Mourinho drop willian who is playing well for Salah if Salah isn't giving him any reason to?
Your saying he got chances, I’m saying he did not. 6 starts is nothing. If your now saying it’s because of Willian, then u agree that he didn’t get chances
In total over TWO YEARS, salah (last years player of the year) was given 15 matches(subs and starts) which equalled 608 minutes. Meaning when he played he got an average of 40 minutes lol. He played 7/8 halves of football for us and 4 full games. In TWO YEARS.
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Ed The King Woodward (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
Wouldn’t have been as much of an issue if Mourinho could coach attackers into playing better.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like Robben, Hazard, Drogba, Costa, Milito, Eto'o, Di Maria etc.?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hazard, Costa, eto, Robben, di Maria we’re all considered top players and talents before mourinho got there
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 13 minutes ago
Wahl come up to the bridge and we can discuss properly
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He doesn't know where Stamford Bridge is, he'd end up at Charlton
Willian in 13/14 scored 4 goals in 35 games
The irony of Eva saying Nick is trying to rewrite history when it claimed we were 3rf favorites in 05/06
All played better under other managers.
Look at the difference Solskjaer is making because he can coach attacking players.
Mourinho was the reason Chelsea were in the position to win the league that year. But he was also the reason they didn’t.
comment by DD11 (U21614)
posted 9 minutes ago
The irony of Eva saying Nick is trying to rewrite history when it claimed we were 3rf favorites in 05/06
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Looool true.
I think that settles it. Another debate wahl/eva has lost and another day in the office
This is just lying. What can I say when everyone is delusional?
We signed Salah mid season to add to the squad. He played occasionally as a sub when needed and he never showed any promise to suggest he deserved a starting role. Hazard and Willian were better performers, as was Schurrle. Eventually it was clear Salah wasn't adding quality to the squad, so we got rid of him. It's not fair to criticise Mourinho for that. No one cared when Salah left. That's the reality of what happened.
comment by Ed The King Woodward (U10026)
posted 2 hours, 13 minutes ago
All played better under other managers.
Look at the difference Solskjaer is making because he can coach attacking players.
Mourinho was the reason Chelsea were in the position to win the league that year. But he was also the reason they didn’t.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK listen, when/if Solskjaer achieves 1/10 of what Mourinho has achieved as a manager, then please, come back to me and compare the two.
https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/mohamed-salah-liverpool-credit-leaving-chelsea-frank-lampard-a8079826.html
“There shouldn’t be too much finger pointing [at Chelsea],” Lampard told BTSport.
“I was there with Salah, he was young.
“It was probably an early stage in his career, it didn’t work for him, he went away and did well.
https://www.ja606.co.uk/comments/viewAllComments/381248
"With Salah in particular, I don’t think any of our fans mourned his loss when was sold. Too busy crediting the club for the fee we got for him."
"In fact quite a few of our fans on other social media platforms were mocking the Scousers for paying £40m for him."
"Was more gutted when we sold Schurrle, shows what I know"
"Wasnt really sold on Salah or De Bruyne.
Salah was garbage for us"
"I didn't mind about Salah."
"Same with Salah. Seemed like another pace merchant for us, the goalscoring touch he's developed since leaving I simply didn't see"
"Losing Salah never troubled me, and still doesn't."
Stop rewriting history you liars
I've PROPERLY mugged you off here
Nick hasn't even commented on that article and none of those quotes you have put up are on that article
Just when you think Eva/Erik can't raise the bar and make itself look more of a plank
can you read? They're all there.
And the point i'm making is that chelsea fans didn't care when Salah was sold so you can't blame Mourinho since no one saw anything with Salah.
Sign in if you want to comment
Just watched this again today
Page 7 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9
posted on 4/1/19
Wahl come up to the bridge and we can discuss properly
posted on 4/1/19
Wouldn’t have been as much of an issue if Mourinho could coach attackers into playing better.
posted on 4/1/19
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 2 minutes ago
So if they were terrible they were not better options, Demba Ba wasn’t henry but he was a solid player who scored goals and had a good pl record. Criminal that he wasn’t played more.
Now your just chatting rubbish. Salah was given 6 league starts in 2 seasonsplenty of chances my ass
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many sub appearances?
posted on 4/1/19
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 2 minutes ago
Wahl come up to the bridge and we can discuss properly
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't want to meet you.
posted on 4/1/19
comment by Ed The King Woodward (U10026)
posted 11 seconds ago
Wouldn’t have been as much of an issue if Mourinho could coach attackers into playing better.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can’t blame mourinho for Torres but his dismissive comments of Eto’o were not needed, his lack of playing ba was poor management and as u say his lack of coaching (oscar, salah, schurrle) was equally as frustrating
posted on 4/1/19
comment by Ed The King Woodward (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
Wouldn’t have been as much of an issue if Mourinho could coach attackers into playing better.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like Robben, Hazard, Drogba, Costa, Milito, Eto'o, Di Maria etc.?
posted on 4/1/19
Why sub appearances? I doubt if he got over 10. Sub appearances don’t mean much, can be 1 or 2 minutes
posted on 4/1/19
Because the point is that Salah was given game time but didn't make the most of it. Why would Mourinho drop willian who is playing well for Salah if Salah isn't giving him any reason to?
posted on 4/1/19
Your saying he got chances, I’m saying he did not. 6 starts is nothing. If your now saying it’s because of Willian, then u agree that he didn’t get chances
posted on 4/1/19
In total over TWO YEARS, salah (last years player of the year) was given 15 matches(subs and starts) which equalled 608 minutes. Meaning when he played he got an average of 40 minutes lol. He played 7/8 halves of football for us and 4 full games. In TWO YEARS.
posted on 4/1/19
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Ed The King Woodward (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
Wouldn’t have been as much of an issue if Mourinho could coach attackers into playing better.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like Robben, Hazard, Drogba, Costa, Milito, Eto'o, Di Maria etc.?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hazard, Costa, eto, Robben, di Maria we’re all considered top players and talents before mourinho got there
posted on 4/1/19
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 13 minutes ago
Wahl come up to the bridge and we can discuss properly
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He doesn't know where Stamford Bridge is, he'd end up at Charlton
posted on 4/1/19
Willian in 13/14 scored 4 goals in 35 games
posted on 4/1/19
The irony of Eva saying Nick is trying to rewrite history when it claimed we were 3rf favorites in 05/06
posted on 4/1/19
All played better under other managers.
Look at the difference Solskjaer is making because he can coach attacking players.
Mourinho was the reason Chelsea were in the position to win the league that year. But he was also the reason they didn’t.
posted on 4/1/19
3rd
posted on 4/1/19
comment by DD11 (U21614)
posted 9 minutes ago
The irony of Eva saying Nick is trying to rewrite history when it claimed we were 3rf favorites in 05/06
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Looool true.
posted on 4/1/19
I think that settles it. Another debate wahl/eva has lost and another day in the office
posted on 4/1/19
This is just lying. What can I say when everyone is delusional?
We signed Salah mid season to add to the squad. He played occasionally as a sub when needed and he never showed any promise to suggest he deserved a starting role. Hazard and Willian were better performers, as was Schurrle. Eventually it was clear Salah wasn't adding quality to the squad, so we got rid of him. It's not fair to criticise Mourinho for that. No one cared when Salah left. That's the reality of what happened.
posted on 4/1/19
comment by Ed The King Woodward (U10026)
posted 2 hours, 13 minutes ago
All played better under other managers.
Look at the difference Solskjaer is making because he can coach attacking players.
Mourinho was the reason Chelsea were in the position to win the league that year. But he was also the reason they didn’t.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK listen, when/if Solskjaer achieves 1/10 of what Mourinho has achieved as a manager, then please, come back to me and compare the two.
posted on 4/1/19
https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/mohamed-salah-liverpool-credit-leaving-chelsea-frank-lampard-a8079826.html
“There shouldn’t be too much finger pointing [at Chelsea],” Lampard told BTSport.
“I was there with Salah, he was young.
“It was probably an early stage in his career, it didn’t work for him, he went away and did well.
posted on 4/1/19
https://www.ja606.co.uk/comments/viewAllComments/381248
"With Salah in particular, I don’t think any of our fans mourned his loss when was sold. Too busy crediting the club for the fee we got for him."
"In fact quite a few of our fans on other social media platforms were mocking the Scousers for paying £40m for him."
"Was more gutted when we sold Schurrle, shows what I know"
"Wasnt really sold on Salah or De Bruyne.
Salah was garbage for us"
"I didn't mind about Salah."
"Same with Salah. Seemed like another pace merchant for us, the goalscoring touch he's developed since leaving I simply didn't see"
"Losing Salah never troubled me, and still doesn't."
Stop rewriting history you liars
I've PROPERLY mugged you off here
posted on 4/1/19
Nick hasn't even commented on that article and none of those quotes you have put up are on that article
Just when you think Eva/Erik can't raise the bar and make itself look more of a plank
posted on 4/1/19
can you read? They're all there.
posted on 4/1/19
And the point i'm making is that chelsea fans didn't care when Salah was sold so you can't blame Mourinho since no one saw anything with Salah.
Page 7 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9