comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by West London Express (U5874)
posted 7 minutes ago
We were the better side over 90 minutes and Kane was offside, no question.
Incompetent refereeing yet again!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Suck it up plastic fan, you wish you had Kane in your side
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Daley would come cheaper!
comment by West London Express (U5874)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by West London Express (U5874)
posted 7 minutes ago
We were the better side over 90 minutes and Kane was offside, no question.
Incompetent refereeing yet again!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Suck it up plastic fan, you wish you had Kane in your side
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Daley would come cheaper!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can`t see Pool selling him
comment by West London Express (U5874)
posted 53 minutes ago
We were the better side over 90 minutes and Kane was offside, no question.
Incompetent refereeing yet again!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well its only 1-0 and if you are the better side you'll certainly make that up in the next game.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by NPE IV (U22020)
posted 6 hours, 58 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 5 hours, 42 minutes ago
comment by Hod idol the x factor - Mo's posh tin set! (U5117)
posted 11 minutes ago
It's only half time in the a 2 leg semi final. It's as if Chelsea have already been knocked out by this decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea have more than their fair share of decisions go for them against Spurs over the years. So not sure why they are moaning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also amazed Spurs kept 11 men on the field, the cyclical way they were scything down Hazard. Ref was very lenient, almost as bad as Clattenburg two years ago when Spurs should have had 8 men by the end.
Not overly fussed about VAR it was marginal call either way
----------------------------------------------------------------------
WTF, there was hardly a bad Spurs tackle all night. Compared to some of the stuff Chelsea were getting away with first half. Spurs were playing against 12 men for the first 45 minutes.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
My issue is it was a pen and he dived...
Could he have hurdled the keeper and stayed up? yes but why should he as the ref then would not give the pen.
Was there enough contact for both his legs to end up in the position? No he exaggerated it but if he didn't he wouldn't have got the pen that to be fair he deserved.
Im hopeful that the use of VAR will mean this sort of argument will cease to exist.
However onside or offside still seems to be a matter for debate which will always happen but surely its got to make the officials at least more effective.
comment by Scouse-Heart (U3234)
posted 15 minutes ago
My issue is it was a pen and he dived...
Could he have hurdled the keeper and stayed up? yes but why should he as the ref then would not give the pen.
Was there enough contact for both his legs to end up in the position? No he exaggerated it but if he didn't he wouldn't have got the pen that to be fair he deserved.
Im hopeful that the use of VAR will mean this sort of argument will cease to exist.
However onside or offside still seems to be a matter for debate which will always happen but surely its got to make the officials at least more effective.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was not a dive, 100 per cent. You were happy that Salah got a penalty last week, despite the oppo player barely touching him at all, a feather would have been a harder touch, yet the goalie wiping Kane completely out is not a penalty but a dive in your opinion.
Kane did hang his leg out a little, but like the Salah one, it was a penalty for me.
Put it this way, if Kane really wanted to stay on his feet then he could, but why would he when the keeper rushes out and give him an opportunity to go down?
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Scouse-Heart (U3234)
posted 15 minutes ago
My issue is it was a pen and he dived...
Could he have hurdled the keeper and stayed up? yes but why should he as the ref then would not give the pen.
Was there enough contact for both his legs to end up in the position? No he exaggerated it but if he didn't he wouldn't have got the pen that to be fair he deserved.
Im hopeful that the use of VAR will mean this sort of argument will cease to exist.
However onside or offside still seems to be a matter for debate which will always happen but surely its got to make the officials at least more effective.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was not a dive, 100 per cent. You were happy that Salah got a penalty last week, despite the oppo player barely touching him at all, a feather would have been a harder touch, yet the goalie wiping Kane completely out is not a penalty but a dive in your opinion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should really read what I have written...literally in the first line of my post I state it WAS a pen!!??
So the last line of your reply is completely false...
https://i.postimg.cc/ZqC0Ft2D/E388-BC6-F-CF5-B-45-E6-B016-D9-B453-D6-D128.jpg
Gk clearly has hit both his legs and full speed.
That picture does not show the whole story tbh, MK.
Lol it shows the gk hit both his legs (at full speed). It’s shouldn’t even be up for a debate.
Clear as day and if people say any different then they are clueless
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
If that’s the reason then they are more stupid than I thought
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Greatteamswinit4times- a terrible enemy (U6008)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by MKspur (U9129)
posted 9 minutes ago
If that’s the reason then they are more stupid than I thought
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I felt the same when people were questioning our penalty against Arsenal. Whining because Salah could have stayed on his feet, ignoring that the Arsenal defender literally kicked him 3 times not touching the ball once.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spot on.
If a player ( in our case kepa) is stupid enough to come flying out miss the ball and hit into a player why on earth would he stay on his feet.
Do people Moan when players get tugged back on halfway line and end up on the deck, doubt it.
comment by MKspur (U9129)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Greatteamswinit4times- a terrible enemy (U6008)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by MKspur (U9129)
posted 9 minutes ago
If that’s the reason then they are more stupid than I thought
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I felt the same when people were questioning our penalty against Arsenal. Whining because Salah could have stayed on his feet, ignoring that the Arsenal defender literally kicked him 3 times not touching the ball once.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spot on.
If a player ( in our case kepa) is stupid enough to come flying out miss the ball and hit into a player why on earth would he stay on his feet.
Do people Moan when players get tugged back on halfway line and end up on the deck, doubt it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly my point there is no reason he should stay on his feet (either kane or salah) if its a foul anywhere else on the pitch then its a pen. However if nither go down niether get it as the ref will bottle it in the area.
Both exaggerate the fall but both are pens
As an ex referee, it was a clear penalty in my opinion.
Goal keeper never got anywhere near the ball and made contact with Kane.
Whilst the offside is slightly more contentious, if there is any doubt then my advice to my linesmen was NOT to flag
Sign in if you want to comment
Spurs won last night 1-0, yet all
Page 3 of 3
posted on 9/1/19
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by West London Express (U5874)
posted 7 minutes ago
We were the better side over 90 minutes and Kane was offside, no question.
Incompetent refereeing yet again!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Suck it up plastic fan, you wish you had Kane in your side
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Daley would come cheaper!
posted on 9/1/19
comment by West London Express (U5874)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by West London Express (U5874)
posted 7 minutes ago
We were the better side over 90 minutes and Kane was offside, no question.
Incompetent refereeing yet again!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Suck it up plastic fan, you wish you had Kane in your side
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Daley would come cheaper!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can`t see Pool selling him
posted on 9/1/19
comment by West London Express (U5874)
posted 53 minutes ago
We were the better side over 90 minutes and Kane was offside, no question.
Incompetent refereeing yet again!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well its only 1-0 and if you are the better side you'll certainly make that up in the next game.
posted on 9/1/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/1/19
comment by NPE IV (U22020)
posted 6 hours, 58 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 5 hours, 42 minutes ago
comment by Hod idol the x factor - Mo's posh tin set! (U5117)
posted 11 minutes ago
It's only half time in the a 2 leg semi final. It's as if Chelsea have already been knocked out by this decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea have more than their fair share of decisions go for them against Spurs over the years. So not sure why they are moaning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also amazed Spurs kept 11 men on the field, the cyclical way they were scything down Hazard. Ref was very lenient, almost as bad as Clattenburg two years ago when Spurs should have had 8 men by the end.
Not overly fussed about VAR it was marginal call either way
----------------------------------------------------------------------
WTF, there was hardly a bad Spurs tackle all night. Compared to some of the stuff Chelsea were getting away with first half. Spurs were playing against 12 men for the first 45 minutes.
posted on 10/1/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/1/19
My issue is it was a pen and he dived...
Could he have hurdled the keeper and stayed up? yes but why should he as the ref then would not give the pen.
Was there enough contact for both his legs to end up in the position? No he exaggerated it but if he didn't he wouldn't have got the pen that to be fair he deserved.
Im hopeful that the use of VAR will mean this sort of argument will cease to exist.
However onside or offside still seems to be a matter for debate which will always happen but surely its got to make the officials at least more effective.
posted on 10/1/19
It was not a dive at all
posted on 10/1/19
comment by Scouse-Heart (U3234)
posted 15 minutes ago
My issue is it was a pen and he dived...
Could he have hurdled the keeper and stayed up? yes but why should he as the ref then would not give the pen.
Was there enough contact for both his legs to end up in the position? No he exaggerated it but if he didn't he wouldn't have got the pen that to be fair he deserved.
Im hopeful that the use of VAR will mean this sort of argument will cease to exist.
However onside or offside still seems to be a matter for debate which will always happen but surely its got to make the officials at least more effective.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was not a dive, 100 per cent. You were happy that Salah got a penalty last week, despite the oppo player barely touching him at all, a feather would have been a harder touch, yet the goalie wiping Kane completely out is not a penalty but a dive in your opinion.
posted on 10/1/19
Kane did hang his leg out a little, but like the Salah one, it was a penalty for me.
Put it this way, if Kane really wanted to stay on his feet then he could, but why would he when the keeper rushes out and give him an opportunity to go down?
posted on 10/1/19
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Scouse-Heart (U3234)
posted 15 minutes ago
My issue is it was a pen and he dived...
Could he have hurdled the keeper and stayed up? yes but why should he as the ref then would not give the pen.
Was there enough contact for both his legs to end up in the position? No he exaggerated it but if he didn't he wouldn't have got the pen that to be fair he deserved.
Im hopeful that the use of VAR will mean this sort of argument will cease to exist.
However onside or offside still seems to be a matter for debate which will always happen but surely its got to make the officials at least more effective.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was not a dive, 100 per cent. You were happy that Salah got a penalty last week, despite the oppo player barely touching him at all, a feather would have been a harder touch, yet the goalie wiping Kane completely out is not a penalty but a dive in your opinion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should really read what I have written...literally in the first line of my post I state it WAS a pen!!??
So the last line of your reply is completely false...
posted on 10/1/19
https://i.postimg.cc/ZqC0Ft2D/E388-BC6-F-CF5-B-45-E6-B016-D9-B453-D6-D128.jpg
Gk clearly has hit both his legs and full speed.
posted on 10/1/19
That picture does not show the whole story tbh, MK.
posted on 10/1/19
Lol it shows the gk hit both his legs (at full speed). It’s shouldn’t even be up for a debate.
Clear as day and if people say any different then they are clueless
posted on 10/1/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/1/19
If that’s the reason then they are more stupid than I thought
posted on 10/1/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/1/19
comment by Greatteamswinit4times- a terrible enemy (U6008)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by MKspur (U9129)
posted 9 minutes ago
If that’s the reason then they are more stupid than I thought
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I felt the same when people were questioning our penalty against Arsenal. Whining because Salah could have stayed on his feet, ignoring that the Arsenal defender literally kicked him 3 times not touching the ball once.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spot on.
If a player ( in our case kepa) is stupid enough to come flying out miss the ball and hit into a player why on earth would he stay on his feet.
Do people Moan when players get tugged back on halfway line and end up on the deck, doubt it.
posted on 10/1/19
comment by MKspur (U9129)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Greatteamswinit4times- a terrible enemy (U6008)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by MKspur (U9129)
posted 9 minutes ago
If that’s the reason then they are more stupid than I thought
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I felt the same when people were questioning our penalty against Arsenal. Whining because Salah could have stayed on his feet, ignoring that the Arsenal defender literally kicked him 3 times not touching the ball once.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spot on.
If a player ( in our case kepa) is stupid enough to come flying out miss the ball and hit into a player why on earth would he stay on his feet.
Do people Moan when players get tugged back on halfway line and end up on the deck, doubt it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly my point there is no reason he should stay on his feet (either kane or salah) if its a foul anywhere else on the pitch then its a pen. However if nither go down niether get it as the ref will bottle it in the area.
Both exaggerate the fall but both are pens
posted on 10/1/19
As an ex referee, it was a clear penalty in my opinion.
Goal keeper never got anywhere near the ball and made contact with Kane.
Whilst the offside is slightly more contentious, if there is any doubt then my advice to my linesmen was NOT to flag
Page 3 of 3