It was a handball (made himself bigger and it struck his arm), correct decision but not sure about the yellow

comment by Scruttocks (U19684)
posted 5 hours, 8 minutes ago
It was a handball (made himself bigger and it struck his arm), correct decision but not sure about the yellow
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You need to find another sport mate

Never a handball. He tried to move his arm away from the ball, therefore the opposite of intentional.

The other was offside. How can you say the attacker didn't effect the goalkeeper?

We do seem to get quite a lot of these decisions against us.

The point of the aqrticle is not if it was a deliberate handball or not.

The VAR rules state that the ultimate decison lies with the referee, not with some other mystery offical hidden in a studio miles away.

If the monitor's not working then the law says you have to go with the refs original decision which was a corner.

And the new rule that you can be offside and get a penalty is certainly going to shake things up in matches.

Both stonewall penalties,City get away with it in England but the referee had a good game last night.

comment by harlequinHebdo (U16981)
posted 2 minutes ago
Both stonewall penalties,City get away with it in England but the referee had a good game last night.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Time to pick another sport mate

I thought you were supposed to be a better poster in 2019 ? ......you ain't

comment by harlequinHebdo (U16981)
posted 7 minutes ago
I thought you were supposed to be a better poster in 2019 ? ......you ain't
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They werent stone wall penalties. It took the ref 4 mintues to decide and change his opinion. Even most pundits think the handball wasnt a penalty. never stonewall, so either dont understand the sport or you are wumming. And i called you out for that. So yes, a better poster.

Both were pens, City got the win they deserved.

Well done the ref and well done City.

comment by harlequinHebdo (U16981)
posted 1 hour ago
Both stonewall penalties
-----------------------------------------------------------------
You’re better than Joe Pasquale. Hilarious.

Just be grateful you flukily won that match due to dire goalkeeping from shalke. Fair result would have been 2-1

City were the better team,and I'm glad they won, but naivete and stupidity is no excuse, both were stonewall penalties.

The Fernandinho one is odd though. Surely the player is interfering with play from an offside position. It was silly from Fernandinho but he wouldn’t have been so desperate to get goal side of him if he had known he was offside.

Both very soft penalties, but their only chances, glad we turned it around.

Schalke didn't look like scoring unless it was from the spot ,the handball shot would of ended up in Edersons midriff

Jenas who isn't a City fan said the second one was like 15 incidents that happen in every game ,so you have to ask what was going on
I think back to the Sterling non pen v another German team Hoffenhiem and maybe some retribution had been put in the officials mind, used as an excuse to try and put them out in the knockout stage

Will Shalke get 3 or more penalties in the return leg?

UEFA and their broken monitors ?
it was okay a minute ago, now its faaked !
sure

Both penalties for me